Tehran has ‘no desire' for nuclear bomb, ambassador insists
Iran's ambassador to the UK insisted his country had no intention of building a nuclear weapon as he clashed with MPs on Tuesday.
Seyed Ali Mousavi told the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee that Iran's nuclear programme was 'only peaceful', insisting: 'There is no desire, not any intention, to produce a nuclear bomb.'
His comments come less than a week after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) censured Iran for failing to comply with nonproliferation obligations intended to stop it developing a nuclear weapon.
Tehran is reported to have enriched uranium up to 60%, requiring only a short technical step to reach the weapons-grade level of 90%.
Earlier, Donald Trump had declared on his Truth Social platform that Iran 'can not have a nuclear weapon' and urged people to 'immediately evacuate Tehran'.
But Sir Keir Starmer has played down the possibility of a US strike on Iran, saying a statement by leaders of the G7, including Mr Trump, was 'about de-escalation'.
During Tuesday's hearing, Mr Mousavi condemned Israeli air strikes on Iran, accusing Tel Aviv of 'terrorist and criminal aggression' and deliberately targeting civilians.
But he also clashed with MPs on the committee over Iran's support for Russia's war in Ukraine and plots to assassinate people in the UK.
In a heated exchange with Labour MP Blair McDougall, Mr Mousavi complained about the use of the word 'regime' to describe the government in Tehran, insisting it was 'a very lawful and legally responsible state'.
Referring to Russia's use of Iranian-supplied drones to strike civilian targets in Ukraine, Mr McDougall asked: 'What's the legal basis for (Vladimir) Putin's war in Ukraine, if you're a fan of international law?'
But Mr Mousavi insisted Iran had 'declared to the Russian side not to use our cooperation against a third party', adding the committee would have to 'ask this question to the Russian Federation'.
He also asked for 'evidence' of plots to attack Iranian journalists in the UK, offering to provide members of Iran's security services to 'remove these kinds of misunderstandings'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
Will new school rules help cut violence in the classroom?
The best time to teach a child not to throw a chair in a classroom is not as it is being projected across the what an educational psychologist told me last week as we discussed how teachers should respond to disruptive behaviour in people in education agree building positive relationships is the key to preventing violence in schools but teachers say they also need to be able to use "consequences" as the past few months I've spoken to dozens of teachers who say the balance between "nurture" and consequences has been no-one wants to have a chair thrown at them. In response to concerns from teachers, the Scottish government has now published guidance for schools on how to deal with violent and aggressive behaviour from the Conservatives dismissed it as "waffle", saying it gives no clear instructions on when and how to exclude violent or disruptive pupils. What's the problem? Karen Simpson taught in a primary school in Inverness for 14 years but in 2018 she quit to become a said she loved the job but there was a "gradual" erosion of a teacher's ability to use boundaries that made it impossible to maintain story chimes with the stories of so many leaving the profession because the classroom behaviour has become too difficult, too overwhelming. Parents too have told me their children are too nervous to go to school. They say their kids are traumatised by the disruptive behaviour of other pupils who have repeatedly got away with swearing or violence and faced no boundaries. Some call for a return to the days of corporal punishment in schools, when unruly children were disciplined by "the tawse".It was outlawed in the 1980s in Scotland, for very good reasons, but some think the pendulum has swung too far with many councils focusing on the principles of "nurture". What does the new guidance say? For low-level disruptive behaviour the guidance suggests a range of include offering children "an alternative activity to the rest of the class that allows the child to regulate their emotions or behaviour" or asking the pupil to "take a break for a short time". The guidance also suggests access to learning support for pupils struggling to regulate their behaviour. But teachers have told me there is already not enough learning support in different levels of difficult behaviour the appendix to the guidelines suggests different staged children who are being violent one consequence is to give them a laminated piece of paper with bullet points reminding them how to behave and step away. Other inventions include keeping the child in school but taking them to a different area to allow them to calm down. What about exclusions from school? For years there has been a presumption against removing kids from at Edinburgh University found that being expelled from school massively impacts young people's life chances in all the worst dramatically cut its exclusions as did many other local in recent times teachers have been expressing growing concerns about some local authorities and schools misinterpreting the nurture principles by removing all or any her foreword to the guidance, Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth said exclusion should only be used as a "last resort".The guidance says exclusion can be used in response to violence or anti-social behaviour, saying this measure can "allow matters to calm, time for planning, meeting with parents etc". What was the reaction to the guidelines? Teachers' unions have broadly welcomed the new guidelines but the EIS said they won't solve the behavioural problems in schools without significantly more resources and staff to support Secretary Jenny Gilruth said they will empower teachers in the face of rising levels of disruption and emotional dysregulation. However, Tory education spokesman Miles Briggs said they were a pathetic response to the epidemic of violence in Scottish said: "Teachers are still being given no clear rules on when and how they can exclude violent or disruptive pupils."Jenny Gilruth only mentions it as a last resort. Instead teachers are being fed waffle about eye-contact, hand signals and merits."These are utterly insufficient for dealing with the extreme behaviour that we've seen recently in classrooms up and down the country."Rather than clear rules, this document is full of Holyrood blob buzzwords about multi-agency processes, positivity and inclusion."
NBC News
36 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump set to grant another extension to avoid TikTok disruption
President Donald Trump will extend a deadline for the owner of social media platform TikTok to find a U.S. buyer so that it can remain operating in the country, the White House said Tuesday. Trump plans to sign an executive order this week that will keep the platform, which has about 170 million U.S. users, running despite a bipartisan law banning it over national security concerns. The law requires the app's Beijing-based parent company, ByteDance, to sell it to a non-Chinese buyer or face a nationwide prohibition. In April, the president extended an earlier deadline by 75 days to avoid disruption for the app. "As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement Tuesday. The order will give ByteDance an additional 90 days to comply with the law, which was upheld early this year by the Supreme Court. "This extension will last 90 days, which the Administration will spend working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure," Leavitt said. Earlier Tuesday, the president said that any divestiture deal would "probably have to get China approval, but I think we'll get it. I think President Xi will ultimately approve it."
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Australian gay rights organisation defends Iran even though the country's regime executes homosexuals
An Australian gay rights group has endorsed Iran 's military campaign against Israel - even though the fundamentalist Muslim theocracy executes homosexual men. LGBTI Rights Australia divided opinion on Facebook with a post which said: 'Iran has a right to defend itself.' The group - billing itself as 'Australia's largest online community advocating and campaigning for LGBTI rights' - has a series of social media posts condemning Israel, one of the few nations in the Middle East that holds gay pride rallies. The latest post was made on Monday afternoon, three days after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu authorised a bombing campaign on Iran's nuclear facilities that has so far killed 224 people, including 14 nuclear scientists. Iran responded by firing rockets to Israel, killing 24 people, after Netanyahu accused the Muslim theocracy of having enough enriched uranium to develop a nuclear bomb to eradicate Israel, the world's only Jewish state. Amnesty International estimates more than 5,000 gay men and lesbians have been executed since the Ayatollah came to power in 1979. Same-sex attracted men in Iran are also pressured to undergo gender reassignment surgery even if they don't suffer from gender dysphoria. Women are also imprisoned and tortured in Iran for refusing to wear a hijab in public. A Kurdish-Iranian woman Mahsa Amini died in custody in 2022 after being detained by the morality police for refusing for not wearing her headscarf properly. Iran, led by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, has also been known to fund terrorist groups including Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen. LGBTI Rights Australia is far from the only gay rights group endorsing Israel's enemies, with the University of Sydney home to a 'Queers for Palestine' group despite Hamas torturing gay men. Many Aussies unleashed about the LGBTI Rights Group supporting Iran. 'The Islamic Republic does not represent the Iranian people and have been brutally suppressing them and the LGTBQI+ community for decades. The women of Iran have been begging for your attention'. 'I am horrified by the war, but defending the Islamic Republic and their incredible cruelty and devastation across the region isn't going to help,' she said. Another said: 'A huge number of Iranian's are very supportive of a West/Israeli action to overthrow the current regime. They want help getting out from under the rule of oppressive religious extremists that currently hold all the power.' 'The current Iranian regime is no friend of the LGBTI cause, let alone women's rights and patriarchy. 'You don't have to love Israeli policy to admit this: if you're queer, Iran is a regime that wants you erased. Israel is not.'
