logo
Heidi Reichinnek: the young, tattooed hard-Left German leader seeing a late election surge

Heidi Reichinnek: the young, tattooed hard-Left German leader seeing a late election surge

Yahoo19-02-2025

Heidi Reichinnek is causing a stir in German politics. The 36-year-old tattoo-sleeved 'Queen of TikTok' is the leader of the country's hard-Left Die Linke – which is experiencing a polling surge ahead of Sunday's election.
Down and out on 3 per cent at the end of January – below the threshold of 5 per cent needed to gain entry to the parliament – the party's obituaries had already been written.
However, a tumultuous three weeks in German politics has catapulted Die Linke up to 9 per cent in a recent poll, meaning that it is breathing down the necks of the Greens and Olaf Scholz's Social Democrats.
The Left-wing party, successors to East Germany's communist SED, has found a niche by talking about the cost of living crisis while other parties compete over who has the best plan to revive Germany's flailing economy.
More significantly though, it has been able to mobilise young voters in a polarising debate over whether it is correct to 'normalise' the AfD, a hard-Right party that some believe is seeking a return to the darkest chapter in German history.
The figurehead of this movement is Ms Reichinnek, a no-nonsense newcomer with a reputation for fiery speeches and catchy social media content.
When the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) passed a resolution against illegal migration in late January by relying on votes from the AfD – a watershed moment in a country where the populist Right has previously been completely ostracised – Ms Reichinnek gave a thundering speech accusing the conservatives opening the door to a return to fascism.
The CDU was giving a 'leg up' to a party who 'carry forth the ideology of Auschwitz', she said during a debate that took place two days after the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi death camp.
'I can only tell the people out there, don't give up, resist the rise of fascism, man the barricades,' she said.
The two-minute speech immediately went viral, launching the previously unknown Ms Reichinnek to nationwide fame. Her social media accounts have since gathered a million followers, leading party colleagues to label her 'the Queen of TikTok'.
The tattoos that decorate her left arm, still something of a rarity in Germany's straight-laced debating chamber, soon became the talk of the Bundestag – and of the wider electorate.
One piece of ink work depicts Rosa Luxemburg, the socialist leader who was murdered shortly after the First World War.
Another is an image of Egyptian queen Nefertiti wearing a gas mask, a nod to Ms Reichinnek's time spent as a student in Egypt during the Arab Spring.
Since her Bundestag speech in late January, Die Linke says that it has been inundated with membership applications, while young voters have turned out in droves to watch her stump speeches.
In a country in which the rise of Right-wing populism has a unique ability to get pulses racing, the CDU's decision to pass a bill with AfD votes has turned this into the most heated election in living memory.
Thousands of people have taken to the streets to reject the AfD, while CDU offices have been vandalised, while one Right-wing politician narrowly avoided injury after someone loosened the nuts on a wheel of his campaign bus.
However, Die Linke has also been able to position itself as the only party talking about the impact high that inflation has had on poorer households
While the larger Left-wing parties, the Greens and the Social Democrats, are seeking to burnishing their economic credentials during a historic lull in Germany's industrial output, Die Linke has campaigned on lowering rents and cutting food prices.
The party could also be profiting from factional infighting that initially threatened its existence.
Die Linke's manifesto is full of hard-line demands including the expropriation of housing stock from private investors without offering financial compensation, the legalisation of all drugs, the doubling of dole payments, and a ban on all weapons exports.
It also advocates access to artificial insemination for everyone 'regardless of gender' and the establishment of 'queer trade unions'.
Last year, party grandee Sahra Wagenknecht left Die Linke to form a new 'anti-woke' Left-wing faction.
Staunchly anti-American, Ms Wagenknecht blamed Nato for the war in Ukraine and made it her mission to stop weapons supplies to Kyiv.
She also railed against 'gender sensitive language' and adopted migration policies similar to those of the AfD.
But, after surging in polling last summer, Ms Wagenknecht's star has waned and her party now looks set to fall short of the bar for entry into the next parliament.
In her absence, Die Linke has been able to focus more on young voters.
Ms Reichinnek meticulously 'genders' her language – a linguistic novelty popular in university towns – and unabashedly stands for the open-border migration policies that many blame for a spate of terror attacks that Germany has suffered in recent months.
This week, the former leader of the Green party's youth movement came out in support of Die Linke, lamenting a 'slide to the Right' in her former party.
Meanwhile, a study of 150,000 under 18s put Die Linke top among those still too young to vote.
The party's surge in polling has led to speculation about the possibility of a 'Left-wing front' akin to the coalition formed in France last year to keep out the hard-Right there.
However, with the Greens on about 13 per cent and Olaf Scholz's Social Democrats struggling to make it above 16 per cent, the Left-wing parties are still well below the level needed to build a stable majority.
Instead, the rise of Die Linke makes it more likely that the CDU will need to forge a coalition with two Left-wing parties, a scenario that the campaign team in the CDU headquarters desperately wanted to avoid.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump Accused Of Inciting Violence With Chilling New Rhyme
Donald Trump Accused Of Inciting Violence With Chilling New Rhyme

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Donald Trump Accused Of Inciting Violence With Chilling New Rhyme

President Donald Trump drew accusations of inciting violence after he recited a rhyme to reporters on Sunday. Trump claimed that people who are protesting the federal immigration raids that are being carried out by his administration are now spitting on agents. Spitting 'and worse' is 'their new thing,' the president claimed, offering no evidence to back up the assertion. Then he said, 'They spit, we hit.' 'And I told them, nobody's going to spit on our police officers, nobody's going to spit on our military, which they do, it's a common thing,' he added. If they spit in the face, 'they get hit very hard,' Trump warned. Trump: When they spit at people— they spit, that's their new thing—when that happens, I have a little statement: they spit, we hit.., if that happens, they get hit very hard — Acyn (@Acyn) June 8, 2025 Critics on social media suggested Trump's remark gave the go-ahead for police brutality and the excessive use of force. Others recalled the pardons that Trump dished out to hundreds of his supporters who had been convicted for their involvement in the deadly and violent U.S. Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, during which law enforcement officers were attacked. Trump drew similar ire in 2020 when, amid the protests of the police killing of George Floyd, he warned, 'When the looting starts, the shooting starts.' @POTUS They did far worse than spitting on Jan. 6. — ModerateRepublican (@Modr8_1104) June 8, 2025 Sounds like an excessive use of force. One that will surely be taken up with the courts via lawsuits. — Vince Wilson (@VinceWilsonShow) June 8, 2025 'Unless you attacked police on Jan 6 then you get to go free and we'll pay you millions in taxpayer dollars' — Jhoff10 (@Jhoff10) June 8, 2025 If you spit on a police officer that does not give the police officer the right to beat the crap out of you. It does, however, give the officer the right to arrest you. — Denison Barb (@DenisonBarbs) June 8, 2025 Cruelty isn't a policy, it's a warning sign. 'They spit, we hit' isn't leadership, it's incitement. Brutality, dehumanization, and escalation are the ethos of authoritarian regimes. This is far from law and order. It's about power through fear. And we must resist this evil. — Evaristus Odinikaeze (@odinikaeze) June 8, 2025 Karoline Leavitt Squirms Over Maria Bartiromo's Blunt Question About Elon Musk Marjorie Taylor Greene's 'Lesson For Us All' Leaves Seth Meyers Absolutely Floored German Leader Politely Shuts Down Trump's Hot Take On D-Day

Under Patel, FBI heightens focus on violent crime, illegal immigration. Other threats abound, too
Under Patel, FBI heightens focus on violent crime, illegal immigration. Other threats abound, too

Hamilton Spectator

time4 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Under Patel, FBI heightens focus on violent crime, illegal immigration. Other threats abound, too

WASHINGTON (AP) — FOR MOVEMENT AT 12:01 A.M. ON MONDAY JUNE 9TH When the FBI arrested an accused leader of the MS-13 gang, Kash Patel was there to announce the case, trumpeting it as a step toward returning 'our communities to safety.' Weeks later, when the Justice Department announced the seizure of $510 million in illegal narcotics bound for the U.S, the FBI director joined other law enforcement leaders in front of a Coast Guard ship in Florida and stacks of intercepted drugs to highlight the haul. His presence was meant to signal the premium the FBI is placing on combating violent crime, drug trafficking and illegal immigration, concerns that have leapfrogged up the agenda in what current and former law enforcement officials say amounts to a rethinking of priorities and mission at a time when the country is also confronting increasingly sophisticated national security threats from abroad. A revised FBI priority list on its website places 'Crush Violent Crime' at the top, bringing the bureau into alignment with the vision of President Donald Trump, who has made a crackdown on illegal immigration, cartels and transnational gangs a cornerstone of his administration. Patel has said he wants to 'get back to the basics.' His deputy, Dan Bongino, says the FBI is returning to 'its roots.' Patel says the FBI remains focused on some of the same concerns, including China, that have dominated headlines in recent years, and the bureau said in a statement that its commitment to investigating international and domestic terrorism has not changed. That intensifying threat was laid bare over the past month by a spate of violent acts, most recently a Molotov cocktail attack on a Colorado crowd by an Egyptian man who authorities say overstayed his visa and yelled 'Free Palestine.' 'The FBI continuously analyzes the threat landscape and allocates resources and personnel in alignment with that analysis and the investigative needs of the Bureau,' the FBI said in a statement. 'We make adjustments and changes based on many factors and remain flexible as various needs arise.' Signs of restructuring abound. The Justice Department has disbanded an FBI-led task force on foreign influence and the bureau has moved to dissolve a key public corruption squad in its Washington field office, people familiar with the matter have told The Associated Press. The Trump administration, meanwhile, has proposed steep budget cuts for the FBI, and there's been significant turnover in leadership ranks as some veteran agents with years of experience have been pushed from their positions. Some former officials are concerned the stepped-up focus on violent crime and immigration — areas already core to the mission of agencies including the Drug Enforcement Administration and Immigration and Customs Enforcement — risks deflecting attention from some of the complicated criminal and national security threats for which the bureau has long borne primary if not exclusive responsibility for investigating. 'If you're looking down five feet in front of you, looking for gang members and I would say lower-level criminals, you're going to miss some of the more sophisticated strategic issues that may be already present or emerging,' said Chris Piehota, who retired from the FBI in 2020 as an executive assistant director. A greater focus on immigration Enforcement of immigration laws has long been the principal jurisdiction of immigration agents tasked with arresting people in the U.S. illegally along with border agents who police points of entry. Since Trump's inauguration, the FBI has assumed greater responsibility for that work, saying it's made over 10,000 immigration-related arrests. Patel has highlighted the arrests on social media, doubling down on the administration's promise to prioritize immigration enforcement. Agents have been dispatched to visit migrant children who crossed the U.S-Mexico border without parents in what officials say is an effort to ensure their safety. Field offices have been directed to commit manpower to immigration enforcement. The Justice Department has instructed the FBI to review files for information about those illegally in the U.S. and provide it to the Department of Homeland Security unless doing so would compromise an investigation. And photos on the FBI's Instagram account depict agents with covered faces and tactical gear alongside detained subjects, with a caption saying the FBI is 'ramping up' efforts with immigration agents to locate 'dangerous criminals.' 'We're giving you about five minutes to cooperate,' Bongino said on Fox News about illegal immigrants. 'If you're here illegally, five minutes, you're out.' That's a rhetorical shift from prior leadership. Though Patel's direct predecessor, Christopher Wray, warned about the flow of fentanyl through the southern border and the possibility migrants determined to commit terrorism could illegally cross through , he did not characterize immigration enforcement as core to the FBI's mission. A mandate to 'crush violent crime' There's precedent for the FBI to rearrange priorities to meet evolving threats, though for the past two decades countering terrorism has remained a constant atop the agenda. Then-Director Robert Mueller transformed the FBI after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks into a national security, intelligence-gathering agency. Agents were reassigned from investigations into drugs, violent crime and white-collar fraud to fight terrorism. In a top 10 priority list from 2002, protecting the U.S. from terrorism was first. Fighting violent crime was near the bottom, above only supporting law enforcement partners and technology upgrades. The FBI's new list of priorities places 'Crush Violent Crime' as a top pillar alongside 'Defend the Homeland,' though FBI leaders have also sought to stress that counterterrorism remains the bureau's principal mandate. Wray often said he was hard-pressed to think of a time when the FBI was facing so many elevated threats at once. At the time of his departure last January, the FBI was grappling with elevated terrorism concerns; Iranian assassination plots on U.S. soil; Chinese spying and hacking of Americans' cell phones; ransomware attacks against hospitals ; and Russian influence operations aimed at sowing disinformation. Testifying before lawmakers last month, Patel took care to note the surge in terrorism threats following the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and a Chinese espionage threat he said had yielded investigations in each of the bureau's offices. But the accomplishments he dwelled on first concerned efforts to 'take dangerous criminals off our streets,' including the arrests of three suspects on the 'Ten Most Wanted' list, and large drug seizures. Rounding out the priority list are two newcomers: 'Rebuild Public Trust' and 'Fierce Organizational Accountability.' Those reflect claims amplified by Patel and Bongino that the bureau had become politicized through its years of investigations of Trump, whose Mar-a-Lago home was searched by agents for classified documents in 2022. Close allies of Trump, both men have committed to disclose files from past investigations, including into Russian election interference and the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol , that have fueled grievances against the bureau. They've also pledged to examine matters that have captivated attention in conservative circles, like the leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion that overturned Roe v. Wade. Employees have spent hours poring over documents from the sex trafficking case against financier Jeffrey Epstein , a favorite subject of conspiracy theorists , to prepare them for release. Patel had forecast his interest in rejiggering priorities long before becoming director, including by saying that if he ran the bureau, he would 'let good cops be good cops' and push agents into the field. A critic as a House Republican staffer of the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation, which he calls an example of politicized law enforcement, he had said that he would support breaking off the FBI's 'intel shops' to focus on crime-fighting. James Gagliano, a retired FBI supervisor, said he would like to see more specific information about the new priorities but was heartened by an enhanced violent crime focus so long as other initiatives weren't abandoned. 'Mission priorities change,' Gagliano said. 'The threat matrix changes. You've got to constantly get out in front of that.' Terrorism threats persist The Trump administration has touted several terrorism successes, including the arrests of a suspected participant in a suicide bombing at the Kabul airport that killed 13 American servicemembers and of an ex-Michigan National Guard member on charges of plotting a military base attack on behalf of the Islamic State. But the administration is also employing a broad definition of what it believes constitutes terrorism. FBI and Justice Department officials see the fight against transnational gangs as part of their counterterrorism mandate, taking advantage of the Trump administration's designation of the violent street gangs MS-13 and Tren de Aragua as foreign terrorist organizations to bring terrorism-related charges against defendants, including a Venezuelan man suspected of being a high-ranking TdA member and a Utah father-son suspected of providing material support to a Mexican cartel — a charge typically used for cases involving groups like the Islamic State and al-Qaida. A former Justice Department terrorism prosecutor, Patel has called the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Forces — interagency units in the bureau's 55 field offices — as 'shining examples' of its mission. Those task forces spent years pursuing suspects in the Capitol riot but have now been enlisted to track down cartel members, he has said. After an Egyptian man whose work authorization in the U.S. had expired was arrested on charges of using a homemade flamethrower and Molotov cocktails to attack a group drawing attention to Israeli hostages in Gaza, administration officials held up the case as proof of their philosophy that immigration enforcement is tantamount to protecting national security. The FBI says its domestic terrorism investigations continue uninterrupted, though Patel at times has discussed the threat in different terms than Wray, who led the bureau as it investigated the Capitol riot and who cited it as evidence of the dangers of homegrown extremists. At hearings last month, Patel pointed to a string of arsons and vandalism acts at Tesla dealerships as domestic terrorism acts that commanded the FBI's resources and attention. As it reconfigures its resources, the FBI has moved to reassign some agents focused on domestic terrorism to a new task force set up to investigate the Oct. 7 Hamas attack and its aftermath, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss personnel moves. One national security concern Patel has preached continuity on in public is the threat from China, which he said in a recent Fox News interview keeps him up at night. Wray often called China the gravest long-term threat to national security, and when he stepped aside in January the FBI was contending with an espionage operation that gave officials in Beijing access to private texts and phone conversations of an unknown number of Americans. There are signs of a broader national security realignment. A task force tracking foreign influence, like Russia's attempts to interfere in American democracy, was disbanded and the Justice Department has scaled back criminal enforcement of a statute requiring registration of U.S. lobbying on behalf of foreign entities. All of that concerns retired FBI supervisor Frank Montoya, a longtime counterintelligence official who says fentanyl and drug cartels are not 'existential' threats in the same way Russia and China are. When it comes to complicated, interagency espionage work, the FBI, he said, has always 'been the glue that made it all work.' Patel makes no apologies for priorities he says come from the White House. 'President Trump has set some priorities out in a new focus for federal law enforcement,' he has said. 'The FBI has heard those directions, and we are determined to deliver on our crime-fighting and national security mission with renewed vigor.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday
Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday

USA Today

time11 hours ago

  • USA Today

Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday

Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday Show Caption Hide Caption What we know now about President Trump's new travel ban taking effect How could President Trump's travel ban or restriction of nearly 20 countries impact you? Here is what we know now. WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's order banning citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States goes into effect at 12:01 a.m. ET on June 9, a move the president promulgated to protect the country from "foreign terrorists." The countries affected by the latest travel ban are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. The entry of people from seven other countries — Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela — will be partially restricted. Trump, a Republican, said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a "large-scale presence of terrorists," fail to cooperate on visa security, have an inability to verify travelers' identities, as well as inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States. He cited the June 1 incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national tossed a gasoline bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new curbs are needed. But Egypt is not part of the travel ban. 'I caution them not to travel': Expert warns travelers from banned countries to stay home The travel ban forms part of Trump's policy to restrict immigration into the United States and is reminiscent of a similar move in his first term when he barred travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations. Officials and residents in countries whose citizens will soon be banned expressed dismay and disbelief. Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to U.S. citizens in response to Trump's action. "Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride," he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which gifted the United States a luxury airplane for Trump's use and promised to invest billions of dollars in the U.S. Afghans who worked for the United States or U.S.-funded projects and were hoping to resettle in the U.S. expressed fear that the travel ban would force them to return to their country, where they could face reprisal from the Taliban. Democratic U.S. lawmakers also voiced concern about the policies. "Trump's travel ban on citizens from over 12 countries is draconian and unconstitutional," said U.S. Representative Ro Khanna on social media on June 5. "People have a right to seek asylum." (Reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt; writing by Mary Milliken; editing by Sandra Maler)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store