Washington lawmakers consider expanding free food for students
The Brief
Access to free breakfast and lunch would be expanded to all students across Washington under Senate Bill 5352.
Supporters believe the free food would boost student outcomes, though the state's budget shortfall could shadow the proposal.
The state would also provide more reimbursement to public schools to offset the costs.
OLYMPIA, Wash. - Washington lawmakers are considering providing free breakfast and lunch to all K-12 students, an expansion of current practice that could be challenged by the state's budget woes.
Under current state law, public, charter and state-tribal education compact schools must provide free meals to any Kindergarten through fourth grade student if at least 40% of the school is eligible for free or reduced lunch under federal guidelines.
Senate Bill 5352 would expand that benefit to all students, regardless of grade or school population, enabling any student to request a free breakfast or lunch. The state would also provide more reimbursement to public schools to offset the costs.
What they're saying
Prime sponsor State Senator Marcus Riccelli (D-Spokane), said students can thrive in school when they have access to quality nutrition.
"They can learn, grow and play, and they'll do it in a healthy way," he told the Senate Early Learning and K-12 Education Committee on Tuesday. "We talk a lot about academic success, test scores here. We know none of that is attainable if a kid's got issues with being hungry in school."
A representative on behalf of Governor Bob Ferguson (D) testified in support of the bill. The governor previously highlighted the proposal during his inaugural address last month.
"Right now, if you're a single parent working 40 hours a week making $19 an hour, your child doesn't qualify for free meals," he said on January 15. "That's unacceptable. That needs to change."
One student from Kirkland testified that expanding free meals would provide a great help to families economically struggling, but not enough to qualify for free and reduced food.
"It's not that my family can't afford to add money to mine and my siblings' account, I personally just want to take that burden off my family," said Lake Washington High School student Eleanor Lenihan. "Having the assurance that I can get lunch anytime would relieve that stress for me, too."
However, the state's projected budget shortfall of $12 billion dollars over the next four years is casting a shadow on the proposal.
Committee chair State Senator Lisa Wellman (D-Mercer Island) said crucial funding increases for materials and operating costs, special education and student transportation are already slated to cost the state an additional $1 billion. She also raised questions about providing free meals to students whose families can comfortably afford the food.
"I don't believe we'll be able to fund all of these items, plus meals on top of that, as much as we would like to be providing everything we possibly can to students," she said.
Wellman pressed supporters on what priority would need to take a back seat. Some said the free meal expansion could be phased in over time, while others said new taxes could support all of the priorities and boost student outcomes.
"I believe that Washington, still having the second-most regressive tax code in the country, creates an opportunity for you to pass progressive new revenue measures that would not only fully fund the big three, but would also add meals to that equation," said Aaron Czyzewski, Advocacy and Policy Director for Food Lifeline.
Companion legislation was heard in the House Appropriations Committee on February 3. As of Tuesday, both bills have yet to be scheduled for a committee vote.
The Source
Information in this story is from Albert James, a television reporter covering state government as part of the Murrow News Fellowship program – a collaborative effort between news outlets statewide and Washington State University.
3 arrested, charged in connection to Renton, WA beauty store thefts
First electric fire truck in WA unveiled in Redmond
King County Metro purchase of 120 Teslas faces scrutiny
Trump names Washington's Joe Kent to lead counterterrorism agency
Armed suspect arrested after barricading in Thurston County, WA home
Rare, endangered Malayan tapir calf born at Point Defiance Zoo in WA
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national coverage, plus 24/7 streaming coverage from across the nation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Fulbright board members, accusing Trump of politicizing the program, announce resignation
Board members of the Fulbright Scholarship Program announced their resignation Wednesday, protesting what they call the Trump administration's politicization of the program, as the White House continues to find itself locked in a battle with universities around the nation. In a memo released on Wednesday, board members said they voted 'overwhelmingly' to resign in light of the actions of political appointees at the State Department, which manages the program. The 12-person board was appointed by former President Joe Biden. The program awards nearly 8,000 scholarships to academics each year, according to its website. The board said the administration usurped the program's authority when the State Department denied some of those awards for a 'substantial number of individuals' for the 2025-2026 academic year, overriding the board's decision to admit academics studying subjects including biology, engineering, medical sciences, music and history. 'Our resignation is not a decision we take lightly,' the memo read. 'But to continue to serve after the Administration has consistently ignored the Board's request that they follow the law would risk legitimizing actions we believe are unlawful and damage the integrity of this storied program and America's credibility abroad.' The Fulbright Program directed a request for comment to the State Department, which did not immediately respond. However, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) — the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee — confirmed the board members' resignation. 'While I understand and respect the bipartisan Fulbright Board for resigning en masse rather than grant credibility to a politicized and unlawful process, I'm painfully aware that today's move will change the quality of Fulbright programming and the independent research that has made our country a leader in so many fields,' Shaheen said. The Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board's page on the State Department's website — which earlier Wednesday listed a dozen members — only has one member on Wednesday afternoon: Carmen Estrada-Schaye, the president of Historic Homes Restoration, who was appointed to the board in 2022. Members on the board included several alumnis of Joe Biden's White House, including former deputy chief of staff Jen O'Malley Dillon, former head of speechwriting Vinay Reddy and Louisa Terrell, former director of the Office of Legislative Affairs. Congress established the Fulbright Program nearly 80 years ago and, according to the board, specified that the board has final approval authority of applicants. The program was established to 'increase mutual understanding and support friendly and peaceful relations between the people of the United States and the people of other countries,' according to the Fulbright website. Forty-four Fulbright alumni have served as heads of state or government, according to the State Department, while 62 Fulbright alumni from 15 countries have been awarded the Nobel Prize. Ninety Fulbright alumni have received Pulitzer Prizes. 'This proud legacy has depended on one thing above all: the integrity of the program's selection process based on merit, not ideology, and its insulation from political interference,' the board's memo said. 'That integrity is now undermined.' The board said it has repeatedly raised legal issues and strong objections with senior administration officials, including in writing, but officials have refused to acknowledge or respond to the board. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Since President Donald Trump began his second term, the White House has clashed with universities for programs and policies the administration has labeled divisive. Recently, the administration tried to stop foreign students and scholars from attending Harvard University. A court has temporarily blocked the administration from enforcing the order.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oregon legislature passes bill to combat ‘politicized' book bans
PORTLAND, Ore. () – The Oregon legislature passed a bill on Monday in an effort to combat 'politicized' book bans across the state, the Democratic House Majority Office announced. Senate Bill 1098, the Freedom to Read bill, prevents books from being banned based on protected topics such as race, sex and religion, or bans based on the author's identity. The bill also ensures that people who are directly connected to a school – including parents, guardians and school staff – can file complaints about textbooks or library materials rather than allowing complaints from politicians, campaigns or people outside of Oregon. Under the bill, local review committees will make the final call if the material is allowed. DON'T MISS: Oregon representative counters bill against book bans by reading explicit excerpt 'This legislation is a clear statement of our values as Oregonians and a society', said Representative Travis Nelson (D-N & NE Portland), a chief sponsor of the bill. 'It embodies our commitment to creating an educational environment where every student can learn, grow, and see themselves reflected in the stories and histories that shape our world.' The bill comes as 127 books were challenged in Oregon schools and libraries in 2024, marking the highest number since the State Library started tracking challenged titles, according to the House Majority Office. 'SB 1098 creates a process to make sure such decisions are made with community input, and to protect librarians from being targeted by activist groups. Under this bill, a book challenge must come from a parent, guardian or school employee, not from an outside person or organization,' said Rep. Zach Hudson (D -East Multnomah County). Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now 'As an elementary teacher, I observed daily the importance of students having access to a broad range of cultures, histories, and experiences,' added, Rep. Lisa Fragala (D – Eugene). 'All students deserve to see themselves, their families, and their communities represented in the books they read at school. Book bans erase the voice and experiences of too many children, and we need learning environments that affirm students' identities, so they feel empowered to learn.' In a press release issued Monday, however, Rep. Boomer Wright (R-Reedsport), a member of the House Education Committee, argued that the bill limits school districts' ability to choose age-appropriate books for school libraries. 'I voted against SB 1098 because there were no sideboards on age appropriateness. I do not support banning books. I support age appropriateness when choosing instructional materials,' Rep. Wright explained. Wright noted that Rep. Emily McIntire (R-Eagle Point) introduced an amendment, which would affirm a school's ability to consider age and grade-level appropriateness when reviewing books, Wright said, adding, 'The amendment supporting age appropriateness was not adopted. If it had, I could have voted in support of SB 1098.' Cars damaged near Portland school after teen suspect rammed cars outside, police say After passing the Oregon Senate and House of Representatives, the bill now heads to Governor Tina Kotek's desk. The bill comes after written testimony was submitted by State Librarian Wendy Cornelisen, noting the State Library is neutral in its support of the bill. According to Cornelisen, Oregon is seeing a 'clear pattern' in recent reports of book challenges. 'Incidents and challenged materials are disproportionately about, by, or center the stories of individuals who belong to an underrepresented protected class under ORS 659.850. In 2023-24, 87% of the items challenged told the stories of one or more underrepresented groups. Sixty-six percent of challenged materials focused on 2SLGBTQIA+ people, while 22% centered Black, Indigenous, or people of color,' Cornelisen said. 'The data shared here were gathered through reports of challenges at schools and libraries, media stories, and our staff's experience working on challenge incidents. However, we have reason to believe that incidents in Oregon are underreported. Many school and library staff are not aware of the option to report such incidents. Despite the anonymity of the reporting process, staff also may decline to report for fear of political blowback, job repercussions, or media attention on their organization,' Cornelisen continued. 'We anticipate the numbers we have shared here would be significantly higher if all intellectual freedom incidents in Oregon were reported.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


American Military News
6 hours ago
- American Military News
Democrat congresswoman indicted after breaching ICE facility in New Jersey
Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) was indicted on Tuesday for 'forcibly impeding and interfering with federal officers' after breaching U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Delaney Hall Federal Immigration Facility in Newark, New Jersey, on May 9. In a Tuesday press release, U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey Alina Habba announced that McIver had been charged in a three-count indictment for 'forcibly impeding and interfering with federal officers.' 'According to the allegations in the indictment, McIver forcibly impeded and interfered with federal officers as they attempted to arrest an individual outside the Delaney Hall Federal Immigration Facility in Newark, New Jersey on May 9, 2025,' the press release stated. According to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey, McIver and two other members of Congress went to the Delaney Hall Federal Immigration Facility on May 9 for a congressional oversight inspection while an immigration protest rally was being held in Newark. The attorney's office noted that the members of Congress entered a secured area at the facility and that the mayor of Newark was also given access to the secured area. READ MORE: Video: Democrat congresswoman charged for breaching ICE facility Tuesday's press release explained that McIver and the other members of Congress challenged a federal officer after the officer notified the Newark mayor that he was not authorized to be in the secured area of the facility and that he would be arrested if he did not leave the secured area. The attorney's office said that when officials later attempted to arrest the mayor, 'McIver and others surrounded the Mayor and prevented the officers from handcuffing him.' 'After the Mayor was escorted outside the secured area, law enforcement officers made a second attempt to arrest him. At this time, someone in the crowd yelled 'circle the mayor.' McIver then faced the Mayor and placed her arms around him in an effort to prevent HSI from completing the arrest,' the press release added. 'During her continued attempts to thwart the arrest, McIver slammed her forearm into the body of one law enforcement officer and also reached out and tried to restrain that officer by forcibly grabbing him. McIver also used each of her forearms to forcibly strike a second officer.' McIver currently faces up to eight years in prison for each of the first two counts and up to one year in prison for the third count brought against her by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey. In a statement obtained by Fox News, Paul Fishman, McIver's attorney, responded to the congresswoman's indictment, saying, 'This prosecution is political retaliation against a dedicated public servant… We fully expect the Congresswoman's exoneration.'