
Dublin's Temple blasted for 'ridiculous' prices after customer shares eye-watering receipt for TWO drinks
A pub-goer has been left gobsmacked by the price of just two drinks after visiting Dublin's notoriously steep Temple bar.
A photograph of a receipt shared to social media revealed that one patron had paid an eye-watering €15.40 (12.99) for just one pint of Guinness and a shot of Baby Guinness.
The Irish pub, which is located in Dublin's city centre and highly popular among tourists, is renowned for it's premium prices, with customers having long lamented the cost of it's drinks.
The expensive tab was shared to X from an account called @PintsO_Guinness, which shares posts relating to Ireland's iconic stout. The account's description reads: 'Capturing the perfect pints & sharing the magic.'
It revealed that the unknown customer had visited on 29 May at 9:46pm and paid a whopping €10.45 (8.82) for one pint of Guinness, and €4.95 (£4.18) for 'mixer/ baby', believed to be a Baby Guinness.
Captioning the post, the Guinness fan page simply wrote 'Christ'.
The post has since gone viral, gathering nearly 50,000 views and dozens of commenters from frustrated boozers complaining about the extortionate price tags.
Writing on X, one said '£8.50 for a pint, ouch', while multiple called out the venue for creating 'outrageous' prices.
One Dublin local described the prices as 'bare faced robbery' and griped that the venue was often 'absolutely rammed'.
They wrote: 'I live five minute walk away from Temple Bar, born and reared in the area and in my 40 years of being of drinking age I can count on one hand how many times I've had a session in Temple Bar, you just can't do it, it's bare face robbery and it's going on years too.
'Also the place is absolutely rammed full of tourists so much so they have to drink out on the streets as the pubs are so full.'
A second asked: 'Why do people still enter this establishment?'
'Dublin isn't cheap but that's mental. The average in the city centre would be around €7 now,' remarked another.
'They should replace 'Thank you for your custom' with 'You have been ripped off', a commenter joked.
However, some were more keen to blame the continuous stream of customers for the cost, telling people to 'stay away' if they want to see the price reduced.
'This business operates on what people will pay.. they depend on a revolving customer base, people get shafted, they leave. Somebody else walks in, next day repeat. Best to stay away and advise others to do the same,' they wrote.
The post has since gone viral, gathering nearly 50,000 views and dozens of commenters from frustrated boozers complaining about the extortionate price tags
The Temple Bar is famous for its 10am-2am live music sessions, flower-covered façade, 450-strong whiskey selection.
It's not the first time that the pub, widely considered Dublin's most famous pub, has come under fire for it's drinks prices .
A tourist revealed that they had been left shocked by the price he paid for a single round.
Ryan had been enjoying a holiday in the Irish capital but was left stunned after forking out €107.20 (£91.16) at the bar in Dublin's tourist hot spot.
The eye-watering tab at The Temple Bar in the centre of the city covered one beer, one Coke, two rums and six Baby Guinness shots.
He paid a staggering €11.45 (£9.74) for a pint of Heineken, €4.95 (£4.21) for a Coke, six Baby Guinness shots costing at €11.35 each (totalling €68.10 (£57.91)), and two shots of Malibu, costing €11.35 each and coming to €22.70 (£19.30).
The surprised customer shared the receipt, dated Friday, April 4 at 2.52pm, on X and it quickly went viral with many jumping to his defence to question the prices.
On his X profile @Ryan_AVFCC, Ryan simply wrote in the caption: 'Suicidal' and shared his shock with other users who flocked to the comments.
One person wrote underneath: 'Nearly £70 for 6 baby Guinness I'd never check my bank app again' while another said: 'Got scammed bro'.
One shocked X user commented: 'WTF is a 'baby' Guinness and how the hell is it worth $10?'.
In March, customers were appalled at the pub's prices during St Patrick's Day.
Punters who wanted to enjoy a Guinness at the historic pub, had to fork out a whopping €10.45 (£8.79) for a pint.
Shockingly, a Guinness wasn't the most expensive pint on offer during the celebration - a Heineken, Carlsberg, Smithwick's Pale Ale or Bulmer's Cider will set pub goers back €11.45 (£9.63).
According to the Irish Pub Guide, the average price of a pint of Guinness 'or any stout' in May 2024 in Ireland was €5.77 (£4.84).
One man called the pricing 'obscene' while another likened the price list to 'robbery without violence'.
'They might as well serve you while wearing a striped jumper a eye mask,' one woman replied. 'That's why I stay away from the city centre,' a Dubliner said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
17 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Leaving Cert: Teacher says many students found today's English exam 'challenging'
A teacher has said many students found the questions challenging in the latest Leaving Cert exam. Students completed English paper two on Thursday afternoon. Advertisement Sue O'Sullivan Casey, from Pobalscoil Inbhear Scèine, Kenmare, Co Kerry, said the Higher Level questions on Shakespeare's King Lear challenged students to consider a variety of elements of the play. 'The questions on Shakespeare's King Lear were manageable for those who were familiar not just with the King Lear character but minor characters also,' she said. 'The first question allowed students to write about the complex villains of the play. They could have also reflected on King Lear's actions, too, and those of his daughter Cordelia. The alternative question centred on the staple themes of the play: justice and order. 'Other popular Single Text questions on Anthony Doerr's 'All the Light We Cannot See', Arthur Miller's 'The Crucible' and Mary Shelley's 'Frankenstein' allowed students to explore both character and theme in their chosen texts with plenty of opportunity to offer critical analysis and argument. Advertisement 'The General Vision and Viewpoint focused on aspects of human nature and the complexities within it. Students would have seen a similar style question in recent papers and should have managed this fine. The Cultural Context question, meanwhile, explored control and power and students would have been pleased to see such a question. However, the question asked students to identify the subtle ways in which divisions were explored. This may have thrown some. 'Whilst inclusion and exclusion were analysed for those students who had studied Theme or Issue. This may have proven difficult for some students if they had not explored this aspect of the texts. However, issues of power and identity would have lent themselves to this idea of inclusion/ exclusion. The Comparative questions once again only required students to base their answer on two texts for the 70-mark question. However, a great many students still answer this question based on three texts to allow for lots of opportunities to contrast and compare. Overall, those students who took their time to stop and carefully consider the keywords of the question and plan their answers would have managed well. 'Lastly, the prescribed poets that appeared on this year's paper were not overly surprising. As many predicted, the contemporary female American poet Tracy K. Smith appeared much to the relief of a great many students. The shock of the day for many students was the absence of Hopkins. Students would have been frustrated by this, as it eliminated an option that many of them would have had worked hard on. 'Another surprise was the inclusion of not one but three Irish poets; Boland, Kavanagh and Mahon. The unseen poem featured As Far as Turn Back by Pat Boran and was succinct and easy to navigate with the questions that followed testing students' ability to interpret the poet's message through their use of language. Advertisement 'Overall, the paper was fair and balanced with nothing too out of the ordinary. The student who had put in the work over the course of two years would have felt prepared and capable to meet each question diligently.' Ordinary paper Ms O'Sullivan Casey said the Ordinary Level questions were accessible and many students would have managed well. 'For students who would have studied Sive by John B. Keane, the questions asked students to consider the text's key moments, characters and relationships. It also offered some clear, manageable functional writing tasks including the text for a podcast and a debate. Quiz Quiz: Could you pass Junior Certificate Maths? Read More 'Other questions on Arthur Miller's 'The Crucible' and Colson Whitehead's 'The Underground Railroad' were challenging but not unfamiliar. Advertisement 'The Comparative Study saw students study their texts in relation to either Themes, Social Setting or Relationships and the questions today allowed those who knew their texts well to write about key moments that highlighted these modes at work. 'The Studied Poetry saw poems from Boland, Eliot, and Dickinson appear from the traditional poetry course and poems by Sinead Morrissey, Liz Lockhead and Jessica Traynor appear from the alternative poetry course. The Unseen Poetry question featured First Day by Theo Dorgan and the questions gave students an opportunity to demonstrate their ability to identify and comment on the poet's use of language. 'The paper was fair and straightforward. A student who had prepared consistently over two years would have been ready to handle the questions well.'


BreakingNews.ie
17 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Supreme Court decision on compensation over power lines could affect thousands of landowners
A Supreme Court decision that compensation can be awarded for depreciation of the value of lands due to having electricity power lines installed across them could potentially affect thousands of landowners. The five judge court rejected arguments by the Electricity Supply Board (ESB) that a property arbitrator was not entitled to include compensation for land depreciation – referred to in the relevant 19th century law as 'injurious affection' – in an award of €39,500 statutory compensation to a couple over power lines installed across their farm. Advertisement Arbitrator Peter Good, since deceased, had made the award to Peter and Rose O'Reilly concerning lands owned by them at Crubany, Co Cavan. Compensation for 'injurious affection' formed a substantial part of the award, and its inclusion was successfully appealed by the ESB to the High Court. The couple appealed the High Court to the Court of Appeal, which decided the matter raised issues of public importance requiring determination by the Supreme Court. On Friday, Mr Justice Brian Murray, giving the court's main judgment, upheld arguments by Peter Bland SC, with barrister Michael O'Donnell, instructed by solicitor Gabriel Toolan, that the entitlement to compensation includes for 'injurious affection'. Advertisement The case arose after the couple entered landowner agreements with the ESB in 2011. In return for unobstructed access to their lands to construct electric lines, they were entitled to compensation under the Electricity Supply Act 1927. The main issue in the Supreme Court appeal concerned the extent of the right to compensation. Mr Good decided that, as well as compensation for the loss of value of house sites on the land holding across which the lines travel, they were entitled to compensation for injurious affection, or general loss of value of their entire holding. Among his findings, Mr Justice Murray said none of the legal authorities demand a 'perfect equation' between the compensation mandated by the Constitution for interference with property interests, and the compensation enabled either by developments of the common law or by early Victorian legislation governing the compulsory acquisition of property. The ESB was correct in saying the exercise of powers conferred by section 53 of the 1927 Act did not give rise to the transfer or creation of interests 'in land', he said. There was therefore no basis on which it could be said that the 'injurious affection' provisions of the 1845 Land Clauses Consolidation Act were automatically incorporated into the procedure for deciding compensation under the 1927 Act. Advertisement No significance could be attached to the fact that the 1927 Act did not expressly include or exclude those provisions, he said. Ireland 'Author' of property fraud scheme faces prison ter... Read More He said the High Court had erred if it found the Acquisition of Land (Assessment of Compensation) Act 1919 operated in any way to preclude a claimant seeking compensation for injurious affection or depreciation of the value of their holding caused by the presence of the electric lines, poles and pylons, he said. In other findings, he held Mr Good erred when he fixed compensation for the anticipated exercise of the power of re-entry onto the lands. He upheld the High Court decision that there was no breach by Mr Good, in his handling of the matter, of the ESB's right to fair procedures. The precise amount of compensation was referred for decision, in line with the court's findings, by a new arbitrator. In a separate concurring judgment, Mr Justice Seamus Woulfe agreed with his colleague on all issues other than the constitutional issue and said he was reserving his position on that issue to an appropriate case.


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Nicola Peltz insists she's 'grateful to have beautiful people around her' as Brooklyn Beckham's family feud intensifies
Nicola Peltz insisted she's 'grateful to have beautiful people around her' in a gushing Instagram post on Thursday. The actress, 30, appeared in high-spirits in the snap as she was surrounded by her 'team' amid the ongoing drama with husband Brooklyn Beckham's family. She wrote: 'I love my team so much. I'm so grateful to have such beautiful people around me'. David Beckham, 50, and wife Victoria, 51, have become estranged from eldest child Brooklyn, 26, whose heiress wife has been blamed for the rift in the once tight-knit family. The Beckhams have largely remained silent in public about the rift, but they are said to fear that Brooklyn is falling increasingly under the control of Nicola. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the Brooklyn recently said he is excited to build his own family with wife Nicola, as tensions continue to simmer between him and his parents. During a PDA-packed video shared released by Glamour Magazine, the eldest son of Victoria and David gushes multiple times that he can see kids in his future, and that Nicola will be an 'amazing' mother. Taking on the magazine's Friend Test, the pair are tasked with looking into each other's eyes for two minutes and revealing what they see. Romantic Brooklyn immediately gushes: 'I see us when we have our kids,' as Nicola adds: 'I see the future father of my kids.' 'The most important thing someone can do in their life is find that person for life because they'll really change everything and they'll make everything better,' Brooklyn later adds. And revealing what he has learned from his four year relationship with Nicola, Brooklyn honed in on his wife's nurturing nature. 'We have four dogs and the way she treats them, I feel like you're gonna be the most amazing mum with our kids,' he told her. As for Nicola she was keen to highlight her husband's 'pure, good intentions.' 'I like when you say be happy and follow your heart or go with your gut because sometimes I feel like your head is overthinking and your heart is super emotional but I feel like your gut is just that intuition that you just go with,' the US actress mused. In the magazine interview with Glamour Germany, conducted in April, the couple opened up about outside interference in their marriage and hinted at worsening relations with the Beckham clan, as they instead focused on the advice they'd received from Nicola's billionaire parents, Nelson and Claudia Peltz. While Brooklyn appeared to be deliberately omitting mention of his family, as he shared a different meaning behind the name of his hot sauce, Cloud 23. The aspiring chef's representative told last week how the number 23 was a 'warm nod' to David, who wore number 23 while playing for Real Madrid and LA Galaxy, inspired by NBA legend Michael Jordan, in a touching move that appeared to be an olive branch to his father. However, in the new interview, Brooklyn failed to mention his father, simply stating: 'The 23 stands for our engagement date and my age back then.' Elsewhere in the interview, he and Nicola also seemed to hint at interference in their relationship and the ongoing reports of the family feud. When asked how they 'protect' their relationship in the spotlight, Brooklyn stated: 'Ignore the noise. Keep your head down, work hard, be kind. People are always going to talk. What matters is that we're happy together.' While Brooklyn was present at the Victoria's 50th, both he and his wife failed to make an appearance at her 51st. And while his younger brothers Romeo and Cruz took to social media to pay their birthday tributes to their parents, on both occasions Brooklyn stayed silent. Brooklyn appeared to nail his loyalties to the mast when he posted an image on Instagram of himself and Nicola riding a motorbike, writing: 'My whole world x I will love you forever x I always choose you baby x you're the most amazing person I know xx me and you forever baby.'