DNA Confirms Orcas Prey Upon One of Australia's Deadliest Marine Predators
It's not just the white sharks off the South African coast of Gansbaai that feel the deep, primal fear known only to prey.
For years now, a single pair of orcas (Orcinus orca) has been recorded off the coast of Gansbaai, harrying and hunting the white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) that make the area one of their homes, slurping out the sharks' nutrient-rich livers, leaving the rest of the carcasses to wash ashore.
It now appears that the behavior is more widespread than we knew. In 2023, off the southeastern coast of Australia, half a world away from Gansbaai, the remains of a 4.7-meter (15.4-foot) white shark washed ashore, a gaping hole in its abdomen ringed by ragged tooth marks, and a marked absence of a liver.
DNA sequencing has now confirmed that the culprit was none other than an orca.
"There were four distinctive bite wounds, one of which was characteristic of liver extraction by killer whale, similar to what has been observed in South Africa," says biologist Isabella Reeves, of Flinders University in Australia.
The researchers took swabs from the white shark's bite wounds and sequenced for any genetic material that the predator may have left behind. This confirmed the presence of orca DNA in the main bite, while three other wounds carried traces of DNA from scavenging broadnose sevengill sharks.
As we are discovering, the predation by orcas on cartilaginous fish such as sharks and rays isn't uncommon. Orcas are highly adaptable and highly intelligent, and around the world, different groups of orcas have developed their own strategies for hunting and feeding.
The strategy developed by the pair named Port and Starboard off the coast of South Africa is fascinating because it involves two such efficient species of marine predator, but a growing body of evidence suggests that it is not unique. Orcas in the Gulf of Mexico prey on whale sharks, for instance. And orcas off the coast of Australia have been recorded preying on multiple species of shark, including porbeagles, makos, blue sharks, tiger sharks, and ground sharks.
But the discovery of the white shark carcass in 2023 was the first known instance of orca predation of the species in Australian waters.
"These findings provide compelling evidence of killer whale predation on white sharks in Australian waters, with a strong indication of selective liver consumption," Reeves says. "This suggests that such predation events may be more widespread and prevalent across the globe than previously believed."
Two days before the carcass washed ashore, near Portland in the Australian state of Victoria, two locally known orcas named Bent Tip and Ripple were seen hunting, and catching, large prey in nearby Bridgewater Bay. This may have been the hunt in question, although confirmation would be difficult to obtain.
All we know for now is that the culprit was orcas – but that's quite mind-blowing. Orcas have their own habitats, hunting grounds, and specialties. Different groups in different locations don't intermingle, communicate, or breed with each other. It raises some interesting questions about how similar hunting behavior could have emerged in two very different locations.
It's possible that orca predation of white sharks is just a more widespread, normal behavior than we knew about. If this is the case, we need to learn more about it and how it affects the rest of the ecosystem.
The displacement of a top predator can have grave effects: in South Africa, for instance, reduced shark presence means a drop in shark predation on elephant seals, which could increase food competition for the seals later.
If orcas in Australian waters have started preying on white sharks, that could have implications for populations of the animals sharks normally eat.
"Evidence suggests that the white sharks being displaced or directly killed as a result of the killer whale predation in South Africa has led to cascading shifts in the wider marine ecosystem," says ecological geneticist Adam Miller of Flinders University.
"We know that white sharks are key regulators of ecosystem structure and functions, so it's very important we preserve these top predators. Therefore, it is important that we keep a tab on these types of interactions in Australian waters where possible."
The research has been published in Ecology & Evolution.
'Beyond Doubt': Proteins in Fossil From Actual Dinosaur, Claim Scientists
'Lost City' Deep Under The Ocean Is Unlike Anything We've Ever Seen Before on Earth
Octopuses May Have The Oldest Sex Chromosomes in The Animal Kingdom
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
24 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Sleep apnea is on the rise — new study finds climate change might be to blame
As summer sets in you might notice the impact hot temperatures have on your sleep, with many of us struggling to drift off when stuffy or overheated. But rising temperatures might impact our sleep in ways we don't immediately realize, with a new study drawing a link between climate change-induced global warming and increased levels of sleep apnea. Sleep apnea, characterized by disrupted breathing at night, is already among the most common sleep disorders, with an estimated 936 million people worldwide thought to experience OSA (obstructive sleep apnea.) And this study indicates that this prevalence could continue to rise alongside global temperatures, increasing the burden of OSA on both our sleep and the healthcare system. Recently published in leading journal Nature Communications, the study from Flinders University investigates the impact of higher temperatures on sleep apnea episodes in 116,620 participants over the course of three years. Using under the mattress sleep trackers, the study found that on a given night, higher temperatures were associated with a 45% increase in the probability of experiencing symptoms of sleep apnea. 'This study helps us to understand how environmental factors like climate might affect health by investigating whether ambient temperatures influence the severity of OSA,' explains Dr. Bastien Lechat, lead author. 'Overall, we were surprised by the magnitude of the association between ambient temperature and OSA severity." Based on these findings, researchers predict that in the next 75 years the societal burden of OSA, including associated healthcare costs, might double. The study notes that the impact was most frequently observed in European countries, compared to Australia and the US. Dr. Lechat theorizes the difference might be due to air conditioning, more prevalent in the latter areas. Dr. Danny Eckert, senior researcher, further points out that as the study is skewed towards higher economic areas — where air conditioning is more readily available — the estimated health and financial impact might actually be an underestimate. Sleep apnea is characterized by breathing disruptions as you sleep. There is currently no cure for sleep apnea, although the symptoms can be managed. Untreated sleep apnea carries severe risks, including fatigue, a reduced quality of life and a higher danger of being involved in traffic accidents. Untreated and severe sleep apnea has also been linked to an increased risk of dementia and cardiovascular disease, as well as anxiety and depression. If higher global temperature cause cases of sleep apnea to rise, we might also see an increase in these comorbidities. 'The increase in OSA prevalence in 2023 due to global warming was associated with a loss of approximately 800,000 healthy life years across the 29 countries studied.," explains Dr. Lechat. The research team hopes this study will be the first step in developing strategies to reduce the impact of ambient temperature on sleep apnea. Sleep apnea symptoms can be hard to spot, as the most obvious signs of apnea occur when you're asleep. However, the symptoms listed below offer an indicator of sleep apnea that can help you seek a diagnosis. If you suspect you're experiencing sleep apnea, we recommend speaking to a healthcare professional. They can help you find a diagnosis and develop an effective sleep apnea treatment plan.
New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
Inside the battle to control the world's supply of rare earths
Back in 2009, Jim Kennedy, a consultant and entrepreneur of rare earths — a group of 17 metallic elements, including 15 lanthanides, crucial for modern technology — met with a top official at the Pentagon to discuss the future of these precious minerals. 'He was almost indifferent to the issue,' Kennedy tells The Post. 'His dispassion was staggering. It was one of the most disappointing meetings in my life.' Sixteen years later, that indifference has widely disappeared. Rare earths — used for everything from smartphones, electric cars and airplane engines to medical equipment, wind turbines and military applications like missiles and fighter jets — have become one of the most in-demand and politically contested industries in the world. 10 A miner carrying a heavy bag of rare earth-filled mud in China, which controls many of the most crucial rare earth elements now required for the sophisticated technology that powers everything from cellphones to fighter jets. REUTERS Rare earths 'enjoy an unusual level of bipartisan political support because they are vital both to economic development and national security,' says Melissa Sanderson, a former president and current board director at American Rare Earths, an Australian company focused on developing rare earth projects, including one in Wyoming. Rare earths aren't just a big part of modern technology; they're in many ways the most critical components. They're used as heat-absorbing agents in wind turbine motors, as strengthening and anti-glare agents in iPhones and fighter jets and as clarifying agents in MRIs. They're also almost completely controlled by China. Between 2020 and 2023, 70% of our rare earth imports came from China, according to Statista. That number jumped to 80% last year. And the US is 100% reliant on China imports of Yttrium, a rare earth metal used in everything from cellphones to TVs to radiation therapy used to treat liver cancer. 10 Rare earths 'enjoy an unusual level of bipartisan political support because they are vital both to economic development and national security,' says Melissa Sanderson, a former president and current board director at American Rare Earths. China has been fickle about granting export licenses for rare earths, although their grip has shown recent signs of weakening. President Trump had a lengthy (and rare) phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping on June 5 and in a social media post after the call, Trump wrote 'there should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products.' The next day, China granted temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers of the top three US automakers. The irony is that for much of the mid-20th century, the US was a global leader of rare earth elements. But 'demand was exponentially lower at the time,' says Sanderson. 'Therefore, the output from our sole producer — Mountain Pass Materials, known as MP Materials now — was sufficient to satisfy a large percentage of then-existing demand.' The Las Vegas-Nevada-based company still operates the only rare earth mine and processing facility in the United States. 10 President Trump and President Zelensky meet in the Oval Office in February. Soon after this meeting a deal was made for Ukraine to supply vital rare earths to the United States. AFP via Getty Images America's rare earths lead came to an end in 1980, brought on by changes to US regulations. Because processing rare earth minerals involves the separation and removal of uranium and thorium, it can lead to radioactive waste and other contaminants. 'The US was concerned about the environmental impact, since particularly with the technology of the time, there were significant impacts to air, water and even ground quality that would not have met US standards,' says Sanderson. It wasn't the same story in China, who were more willing to accept the dangerous pollutants 'as a price for achieving its market dominance,' she says. China's monopoly of rare earths doesn't just give them an economic advantage. 'China has been 'weaponizing' its market hegemony for many years, in increasingly sophisticated and legal ways,' says Sanderson. 10 Pres. Trump with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Having conceded its lead on rare earth mining, the US is playing a serious game of catch-up with the Chinese. REUTERS The country first flexed their power in 2010, blocking rare earth exports to Japan, a major producer of permanent metal magnets. 'That decision was overturned by the World Trade Organization, so China does not exert its control as overtly now,' says Sanderson. But in the current trade tussle with the US, 'China has identified seven crucial elements under its export control regime which it will not sell to the US,' says Sanderson. 'Due to concerns that while suitable for civilian economic use, they could also be used for military purposes.' While President Trump's tariffs are often blamed for exacerbating the tensions, Kennedy, who serves as president of ThREE Consulting, a rare earths consultancy, says the tariffs are actually 'forcing China to reveal the magnitude of this threat. Absent Trump's tariffs, China would never have shown its hand until it was too late.' 10 The US is 100% reliant on China imports of Yttrium, a rare earth metal used in everything from cellphones to TVs to radiation therapy used to treat liver cancer. REUTERS Just how bad could it get? Kennedy believes that if left unchecked, and China was allowed to continue their embargo without consequences, 'the non-Chinese world would need to shut down and re-engineer most everything that comes off an assembly line,' says Kennedy. 'This is not an overstatement.' The stand-off with China may be at the forefront, but it's not the only way Trump is maneuvering to protect the nation from rare earth depletion. Greenland contains (by some estimates) about a quarter of the world's rare earth minerals, and Trump has suggested that the US could annex the autonomous territory in Denmark. 10 A chunk of Ytrium, once of the most important rare earth elements. Phil Degginger/imageBROKER/Shutterstock The US also recently inked a landmark deal with Ukraine, which has approximately 5% of the total global mineral reserves. Although Trump declared in February that Ukraine would be providing 'the equivalent of like $500 billion worth of rare earth [minerals],' the exact amount wasn't specified in the deal, other than that the US and Ukraine would be splitting profits 50/50. There have also been efforts to mine rare earths from an entirely new source — the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. 10 Consultant Jim Kennedy was one of the first industry insiders to raise the alarm around the rarity — and potential global conflict — surrounding rare earths. It's called the 'Clarion Clipperton Zone,' a remote area of the Pacific between Hawaii and Mexico, roughly half the size of the contiguous US. This seabed region is rich in polymetallic nodules, the rock-like formations that contain some of the most sought-after rare earths in the world. It's a veritable goldmine waiting to be unearthed. In fact, the US Geological Survey recently estimated that the Clarion Clipperton Zone contains more nickel, cobalt and manganese than all terrestrial reserves combined. The Metals Company, a Canadian firm with US investment ties, is already making strides to become the first to mine commercially in the region. They conducted a field test back in 2022, and the company is currently applying for 'exploration licenses and commercial recovery permits' from the US. There are legal hurdles that could slow down their ambitions. Despite a 1980 law passed by Congress to regulate seabed mining, the Clarion Clipperton Zone technically falls under the jurisdiction of the International Seabed Authority, which operates under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Whether the ISA has exclusive authority over the region remains open to debate. 10 Gerard Barron, CEO of The Metals Company, has dismissed some of the concerns about potential environmental damage surrounding rare earth mining efforts. AFP via Getty Images There are also environmental concerns. Arlo Hemphill, a Senior Oceans Campaigner at Greenpeace, warns that any move to mine the Pacific 'would be an ecological disaster. Scientists have not even had a chance to fully explore and understand the wonders of the deep, but a greedy corporation wants to tear up this ecosystem and cause immense ecological damage.' Gerard Barron, CEO of The Metals Company, dismisses these concerns, pointing out during a recent interview that Indonesia regularly mines in biodiverse rainforest regions. 'For some reason,' he said during the interview, 'people think it's okay to go digging up rainforests to get the metals underneath them, yet we're debating whether we should be going to pick up these rocks that sit on the abyssal plain?' (Barron did not respond to the Post's request for comment.) There are other options, but many are just as controversial. Sanderson believes the key will come down to strengthening our relationship with allies like Canada and Australia. 'They have significant natural resources and experienced and large mining companies,' she says. 'Cooperation with these countries is vital for filling the knowledge gap. The US doesn't have nearly enough experienced chemical and process engineers, as just one example.' 10 Rare earths are also crucial components of military fighter jets. Soonthorn – It took half a century for China to achieve its market position, she says, and the US needs an integrated supply chain from mine to magnet, but we're essentially starting from scratch. The US also needs to reform its mining regulatory system, which has a dysfunctional permitting process and some of the longest lead times for new mine production in the world. 'On average, companies wait anywhere from eight to fifteen years from when a deposit is initially determined to be economically interesting to when production can start,' says Sanderson, 'and some have waited significantly longer than that.' New mining projects are also frequently litigated, 'multiple times from multiple angles,' says Sanderson, which can add even more years to the wait time. With the return on investment horizon so long and the prospects so uncertain, many companies 'have difficulty attracting the investment necessary to support the high costs of building a mine,' she says. 10 Miners of rare earths such as these in China are increasingly at the forefront of the global race to control many of the elements that will determine our technological future. REUTERS Kennedy, however, is hopeful for the future. His company, Caldera Holding LLC, is collaborating with federal labs to refashion a former iron ore mine in Missouri to focus on rare earth minerals. He believes his mine is the only one that can provide 'geopolitically significant quantities' of rare earths.' But the ball, says Kennedy, is very much in Trump's court. His trade war has caused uncertainty, but the president's actions 'strongly suggest that delinking from China is real. This can be helpful, but follow-through is critical.' It's now up to the Trump administration to provide low-cost loans, grants and production tax credits to US-based mining companies that have (at least until now) faced almost insurmountable obstacles. 'Failure to support integrated projects,' says Kennedy, 'will result in many slow-motion train wrecks.'
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
How far you walk may be more important than speed to fix chronic back pain
While walking is beneficial for reducing the risk of lingering chronic low back pain, experts say that it is how you walk that really matters. Walking more is a bigger factor than how fast you walk, Norwegian researchers said on Friday. 'Our findings suggest that daily walking volume is more important than mean walking intensity in reducing the risk of chronic lower back pain,' they wrote in a study published in the journal JAMA Network Open. The authors also found that walking for more than 100 minutes a day -- or an hour and forty minutes -- was associated with a 23 percent lower risk of chronic low back pain compared with walking fewer than 78 minutes a day. Walking 125 minutes or more daily also lowered the risk by 24 percent. The study included data from more than 11,000 patients aged 20 years and older, who were a part of the Trøndelag Health Study. Their health was first assessed during the years from 2017 to 2019. The authors later followed up from 2021 to 2023. Participants did not have chronic low back pain at the start of the study. To measure their walking, they wore accelerometers. Following just over four years, 1,659 participants reported experiencing chronic low back pain. They noted that participants with a higher walking volume tended to exercise more often and that the reduction in risk of chronic low back pain leveled off beyond walking for 100 minutes a day. Still, they urged that these findings could inform policy related to the costly condition going forward. The findings come after previous research that also identified being active as a way to alleviate chronic low back pain. Back pain affects more than a quarter of Americans. Another study last year found that people with chronic low back pain who walked 30 minutes a day for five days a week went twice as long without a recurrence as those who did not walk, according to UCLA Health. Approximately 70 percent of individuals experience a recurrence of low back pain within 12 months following recovery from an episode, Australian researchers found. Walking can help to strengthen the muscles that support the spine, and increase circulation and joint mobilization, according to Healthline. It is the sixth-most costly condition in the U.S. and can be incredibly debilitating, making even standing up or sitting at work a struggle. 'If confirmed by future research, these results could inform public health strategies aimed at preventing chronic low back pain, as well as complementing current guidelines that solely report on physical activity as a secondary prevention tool,' they said.
