Political Leaders React to Colorado 'Terror' Attack—'Horrifying'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Political leaders condemned an alleged "terror attack" in Boulder, Colorado, on Sunday, after a male suspect allegedly threw bottles of flammable liquid at people.
"My thoughts are with the victims of the horrifying terror attack that occurred this afternoon in Boulder. Hate and violence of any kind will not be tolerated in Colorado," Senator Michael Bennet, a Colorado Democrat, wrote on X, formerly Twitter. "I will remain in contact with local officials as new information becomes available."
The Context
The FBI quickly said the attack in Boulder was being investigated as terrorism on Sunday, although local police initially said they had not yet made that determination. The attack reportedly came as peaceful demonstrators protested in support of freeing Israeli hostages who continue to be held by Hamas amid the ongoing war in Gaza.
The ongoing Israel-Hamas war was sparked by an October 7, 2023, attack led by Hamas and allied Palestinian factions against Israel, resulting in the deaths of around 1,200 people and the abduction of 251. Today, around 58 people, fewer than half of whom are believed to still be alive, remain captive in Gaza. Over 54,000 people have died in Gaza, according to the Hamas-led Palestinian Health Ministry in the war-torn territory amid Israel's subsequent military campaign.
The area where Sunday's attack occurred, known as Pearl Street Mall, attracts visitors and locals with its shops and restaurants. It is also the site of many local performances and demonstrations.
What To Know
Several people are injured after the attack, according to local law enforcement. The extent of the injuries have not been confirmed, but local law enforcement said they ranged from minor to more severe, and that the suspect was injured as well.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) said Sunday that it is investigating a "targeted terror attack" in Boulder, according to FBI Director Kash Patel in a post on X.
"We are aware of and fully investigating a targeted terror attack in Boulder, Colorado. Our agents and local law enforcement are on the scene already, and we will share updates as more information becomes available," he wrote.
Deputy FBI director Dan Bongino also posted to X, saying the attack was being probed as an "act of terror."
"All of the necessary assets will be dedicated to this investigation. If you have any investigative tips please contact the FBI. And if you aided or abetted this attack, we will find you. You cannot hide," Bongino wrote.
Local law enforcement said during a Sunday afternoon press conference that the scene was contained and that a suspect was in custody. They did not release the individual's identity or share information about a motive. While they noted that they'd been in touch with the FBI, they said they had not yet determined it was a terrorism.
Images from the scene of the attack showed an Israeli flag on the ground. The organization Run for Their Lives, which demonstrates peacefully for Israeli hostages held by Hamas, was holding an event in the location when the attack occurred.
Colorado Governor Jared Polis (left) addresses a crowd at CS Wind on November 29, 2023, in Pueblo, Colorado. Senator Michael Bennet, a Colorado Democrat, leaves the U.S. Capitol on July 11, 2024, in Washington, D.C.
Colorado Governor Jared Polis (left) addresses a crowd at CS Wind on November 29, 2023, in Pueblo, Colorado. Senator Michael Bennet, a Colorado Democrat, leaves the U.S. Capitol on July 11, 2024, in Washington, D.C.
Michael Ciaglo/Tierney L. Cross/Getty Images
What Political Leaders Are Saying
Colorado Governor Jared Polis, a Democrat, wrote on X: "I am closely monitoring the situation in Boulder, and my thoughts go out to the people who have been injured and impacted by this heinous act of terror. Hate-filled acts of any kind are unacceptable. While details emerge, the state works with local and federal law enforcement to support this investigation. More information will be provided as it becomes available."
Senator John Hickenlooper, a Colorado Democrat, on X: "Hate of any kind has no home in Colorado. We're monitoring the reports of a horrific terror attack in Boulder this afternoon. Our thoughts are with the victims and their loved ones."
Representative Gabe Evans, a Colorado Republican, on X: "My team is monitoring the attack of terror just outside our district in Boulder. Hate has no home in Colorado. We are praying for all those affected. Thank you law enforcement for quickly responding to the scene. Please follow their updates as more information is released."
Representative Joe Neguse, a Colorado Democrat, on X: "We are closely monitoring, and are in contact with local law enforcement regarding the horrific attack on Pearl Street Mall. Praying hard for the victims."
Denver Mayor Mike Johnston on X: "Our hearts are with Boulder as we mourn the innocent victims of senseless violence. Denver Police Department is in contact with Boulder PD to provide any support they need. Hate has no place in Colorado."
What Happens Next
Authorities have yet to release more details about the victims and the suspect taken into custody. An alleged motive for the attack will likely be determined and announced by law enforcement later today or tomorrow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Iowa Democrat Announces Senate Run to Unseat Republican Joni Ernst
Iowa state Rep. J.D. Scholten has launched a campaign to unseat Republican U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst, citing recent comments Ernst made about Medicaid as a tipping point. Scholten, a Democrat representing parts of Sioux City, confirmed his candidacy to multiple Iowa news outlets on Monday, just days after
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Ex-Homeland Security official fights back against Trump's ‘unprecedented' investigation order
WASHINGTON — A former Homeland Security official during President Trump's first administration who authored an anonymous op-ed sharply critical of the president is calling on independent government watchdogs to investigate after Trump ordered the department to look into his government service. Miles Taylor, once chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security, warned in an interview with the Associated Press of the far-reaching implications of Trump's April 9 memorandum, 'Addressing Risks Associated with an Egregious Leaker and Disseminator of Falsehoods,' when it comes to suppressing criticism of the president. That memo accused Taylor of concocting stories to sell his book and directed the secretary of Homeland Security and other government agencies to look into Taylor and strip him of any security clearances. Taylor sent a letter via email to inspectors general at the departments of Justice and Homeland Security on Tuesday. Coming on the same April day that Trump also ordered an investigation into Chris Krebs, a former top cybersecurity official, the dual memoranda illustrated how Trump has sought to use the powers of the presidency against his adversaries. Speaking to the AP, Taylor said the order targeting him sets a 'scary precedent' and that's why he decided to call on the inspectors general to investigate. 'I didn't commit any crime, and that's what's extraordinary about this. I can't think of any case where someone knows they're being investigated but has absolutely no idea what crime they allegedly committed. And it's because I didn't,' Taylor said. He called it a 'really, really, really scary precedent to have set is that the president of the United States can now sign an order investigating any private citizen he wants, any critic, any foe, anyone.' Since taking office again in January, Trump has stripped security clearances from a number of his opponents. But Trump's order for an investigation into Taylor, as well as Krebs, marked an escalation of his campaign of retribution in his second term. Trump fired Krebs, who directed the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, in November 2020 after Krebs disputed the Republican president's unsubstantiated claims of voting fraud and vouched for the integrity of the 2020 election, which Trump lost to Democrat Joe Biden. Taylor left the first Trump administration in 2019. In the anonymous New York Times op-ed published in 2018, he described himself as part of a secret 'resistance' to counter Trump's 'misguided impulses.' The op-ed's publication touched off a leak investigation in Trump's first White House. Taylor later published a book by the same name as the op-ed and then another book under his own name called 'Blowback,' which warned about Trump's return to office. After signing the memorandum April 9, Trump said Taylor was likely 'guilty of treason.' The letter by Taylor's lawyer to the inspectors general calls Trump's actions 'unprecedented in American history.' 'The Memorandum does not identify any specific wrongdoing. Rather, it flagrantly targets Mr. Taylor for one reason alone: He dared to speak out to criticize the President,' the letter reads. Taylor's lawyer, Abbe Lowell, said the request to the inspectors general was an attempt to 'get the administration to do the right thing.' Lowell said that depending on the outcome of their complaint, they'll explore other options including a possible lawsuit. Lowell, a veteran Washington lawyer, announced earlier this year that he was opening his own legal practice and would represent targets of Trump's retribution. In the letter, Lowell calls on the inspectors general to do their jobs of 'addressing and preventing abuses of power.' The letter says Trump's April 9 memo appears to violate Taylor's First Amendment rights by going after Taylor for his criticism of the president, calling it a 'textbook definition of political retribution and vindictive prosecution.' And, according to the letter, Trump's memo also appears to violate Taylor's Fifth Amendment due process rights. The letter highlights Taylor's 'honorable and exemplary' work service including receiving the Distinguished Service Medal upon leaving the department, and it details the toll that the April 9 memorandum has taken on Taylor's personal life. His family has been threatened and harassed, and former colleagues lost their government jobs because of their connection with him, according to the letter. Taylor told the AP that since the order, there's been an 'implosion in our lives.' He said he started a fund to pay for legal fees, has had to step away from work and his wife has gone back to work to help pay the family's bills. Their home's location was published on the internet in a doxxing. Taylor said that by filing these complaints with the inspectors general, he's anticipating that the pressure on him and his family will increase. He said they spent the last few weeks debating what to do after the April 9 memorandum and decided to fight back. 'The alternative is staying silent, cowering and capitulating and sending the message that, yes, there's no consequences for this president and this administration in abusing their powers in ways that my legal team believes and a lot of legal scholars tell me is unconstitutional and illegal,' Taylor said. Santana writes for the Associated Press.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Republican push for proof of citizenship to vote proves a tough sell in the states
Advertisement 'The bill authors failed spectacularly to explain how this bill would be implemented and how it would be able to be implemented without inconveniencing a ton of voters,' said Anthony Gutierrez, director of the voting rights group Common Cause Texas. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Voting by noncitizens is rare Voting by noncitizens is already illegal and punishable as a felony, potentially leading to deportation, but Trump and his allies have pressed for a proof-of-citizenship mandate by arguing it would improve public confidence in elections. Before his win last year, Trump falsely claimed noncitizens might vote in large enough numbers to sway the outcome. Although noncitizen voting does occur, research and reviews of state cases has shown it to be rare and more often a mistake. Advertisement Voting rights groups say the various proposals seeking to require proof-of-citizenship are overly burdensome and threaten to disenfranchise millions of Americans. Many do not have easy access to their birth certificates, have not gotten a U.S. passport or have a name that no longer matches the one on their birth certificate — such as women who changed their last name when they married. Married women who changed names are a particular concern The number of states considering bills related to proof of citizenship for voting tripled from 2023 to this year, said Liz Avore, senior policy adviser with the Voting Rights Lab, an advocacy group that tracks election legislation in the states. That hasn't resulted in many new laws, at least so far. Republicans in Wyoming passed their own proof-of-citizenship legislation, but similar measures have stalled or failed in multiple GOP-led states, including Florida, Missouri, Texas and Utah. A proposal remains active in Ohio, although Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, has said he doesn't want to sign any more bills that make it harder to vote. In Texas, the legislation swiftly passed the state Senate after it was introduced in March but never made it to a floor vote in the House. It was unclear why legislation that was such a priority for Senate Republicans – every one of them co-authored the bill -- ended up faltering. 'I just think people realized, as flawed as this playbook has been in other states, Texas didn't need to make this mistake,' said Rep. John Bucy, a Democrat who serves as vice chair of the House elections committee. Bucy pointed to specific concerns about married women who changed their last name. This surfaced in local elections earlier this year in New Hampshire, which passed a proof-of-citizenship requirement last year. Advertisement Similar laws have created confusion Other states that previously sought to add such a requirement have faced lawsuits and complications when trying to implement it. In Arizona, a state audit found that problems with the way data was handled had affected the tracking and verification of residents' citizenship status. It came after officials had identified some 200,000 voters who were thought to have provided proof of their citizenship but had not. A proof-of-citizenship requirement was in effect for three years in Kansas before it was overturned by federal courts. The state's own expert estimated that almost all of the roughly 30,000 people who were prevented from registering to vote while it was in effect were U.S. citizens who otherwise had been eligible. In Missouri, legislation seeking to add a proof-of-citizenship requirement cleared a Senate committee but never came to a vote in the Republican-led chamber. Republican state Sen. Ben Brown had promoted the legislation as a follow-up to a constitutional amendment stating that only U.S. citizens can vote, which Missouri voters overwhelmingly approved last November. He said there were several factors that led to the bill not advancing this year. Due to the session's limited schedule, he chose to prioritize another elections bill banning foreign contributions in state ballot measure campaigns. 'Our legislative session ending mid-May means a lot of things die at the finish line because you simply run out of time,' Brown said, noting he also took time to research concerns raised by local election officials and plans to reintroduce the proof-of-citizenship bill next year. Complications prompt states to focus on other issues The Republican-controlled Legislature in Utah also prioritized other election changes, adding voter ID requirements and requiring people to opt in to receive their ballots in the mail. Before Gov. Spencer Cox signed the bill into law, Utah was the only Republican-controlled state that allowed all elections to be conducted by mail without a need to opt in. Advertisement Under the Florida bill that has failed to advance, voter registration applications wouldn't be considered valid until state officials had verified citizenship, either by confirming a previous voting history, checking the applicant's status in state and federal databases, or verifying documents they provided. The bill would have required voters to prove their citizenship even when updating their registration to change their address or party affiliation. Its sponsor, Republican state Rep. Jenna Persons-Mulicka, said it was meant to follow through on Trump's executive order: 'This bill fully answers the president's call,' she said. Cassidy reported from Atlanta. Associated Press writers Mead Gruver in Cheyenne, Wyoming; David A. Lieb in Jefferson City, Missouri; Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida; Hannah Schoenbaum in Salt Lake City; Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus, Ohio; and Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan, contributed to this report.
