logo
ຣັດເຊຍໃຊ້ທໍ່ສົ່ງແກັສ ເພື່ອໂຈມຕີກອງກຳລັງຢູເຄຣນຈາກດ້ານຫຼັງ ໃນເມືອງເຄີສກ

ຣັດເຊຍໃຊ້ທໍ່ສົ່ງແກັສ ເພື່ອໂຈມຕີກອງກຳລັງຢູເຄຣນຈາກດ້ານຫຼັງ ໃນເມືອງເຄີສກ

ກອງກຳລັງພິເສດຂອງຣັດເຊຍ ຍ່າງເປັນລະຍາທາງຫຼາຍກິໂລແມັດພາຍໃນທໍ່ສົ່ງແກັສເພື່ອໂຈມຕີກອງກຳລັງຢູເຄຣນຈາກດ້ານຫຼັງໃນພາກພື້ນເຄີີຣກ (Kursk) ທັງພວກນັກບລອກເກີ້ກ່ຽວກັບສົງຄາມຂອງກອງທັບຢູເຄຣນ ແລະ ຂອງຊາວຣັດເຊຍຕ່າງກໍ່ໄດ້ລາຍງານ, ຂະນະທີ່ມົສກູ ເຄື່ອນໄຫວເພື່ອຍຶດຄືນບາງສ່ວນຂອງແຂວງຢູ່ຊາຍແດນທີ່ກີຢິບຍຶດໄປ ໃນການໂຈມຕີແບບທີ່ບໍ່ຮູ້ເມື່ອ ອີງຕາມອົງການຂ່າເອພີລາຍງານ.
ຢູເຄຣນເປີດສາກການຮຸກຮານຂ້າມພົມແດນທີ່ກ້າສ່ຽງ ໃນພາກພື້ນ ເຄີສກ ເມື່ອເດືອນສິງຫາ ຊຶ່ງຖືວ່າ ເປັນການໂຈມຕີດິນແດນຂອງຣັດເຊຍ ຄັ້ງໃຫຍ່ທີ່ສຸດນັບຕັ້ງແຕ່ສົງຄາມໂລກຄັ້ງທີ 2. ພາຍໃນບໍ່ພໍເທົ່າໃດວັນ ກອງກຳລັງຂອງຢູເຄຣນ ຫຼາຍໜ່ວຍສາມາດຍຶດຄອງພື້ນທີ່ໄດ້ 1,000 ຕາລາງກິໂລແມັດ ລວມເຖິງເມືອງຊາຍແດນທີ່ເປັນຍຸດທະສາດ ຄື ຊຸດຈາ ( Sudzha) ແລະ ຈັບຕົວນັກໂທດສົງຄາມຊາວຣັດເຊຍໄປຫຼາຍຮ້ອຍຄົນ. ອີງຕາມການລາຍງານຂອງກີຢິບ ປະຕິບັດການດັ່ງກ່າວ ມີຈຸດໝາຍເພື່ອຂໍ້ຕໍ່ລອງໃນການເຈລະຈາສັນຕິພາບໃນອະນາຄົດ ແລະບັງຄັບໃຫ້ຣັດເຊຍ ຫັນທະຫານອອກໄປຈາກການບຸກໂຈມຕີທີ່ມີຢູ່ພາກຕາເວນອອກຂອງຢູເຄຣນ.
ແຕ່ຫຼາຍເດືອນຫຼັງຈາກທີ່ຢູເຄຣນໂຈມຕີິໜັກແບບສາຟ້າແລບ ທະຫານໃນ ເຄີສກຂອງຕົນ ກໍ່ອິດເມື່ອຍ ແລະ ເປື້ອນເລືອດຈາກການໂຈມຕີຢ່າງບໍ່ຢຸດຢັ້ງຂອງທະຫານ 50,000 ຄົນ ລວມເຖິງບາງສ່ວນຈາກເກົາຫຼີເໜືອ ຊຶ່ງເປັນພັນທະມິດຂອງຣັດເຊຍນຳດ້ວຍ ແຜນທີ່ທີ່ເປີດເຜີຍຂອງສະໜາມລົບສະແດງໃຫ້ເຫັນທະຫານຢູເຄຣນຫຼາຍໝື່ນຄົນສ່ຽງທີ່ຈະຖືກປິດລ້ອມ.
ຕາມໂພສຂອງ ເທເລແກຣມ ໂດຍ ພວກບລອກເກີ້ ທີ່ສະໜັບສະໜູນ ວັງເຄຣມລິນ ຊຶ່ງເກີດໃນຢູເຄຣນ ເຈົ້າໜ້າທີ່ຣັດເຊຍຍ່າງເຂົ້າໄປປະມານ 15 ກິໂລແມັດພາຍໃນທໍ່ສົ່ງແກັສ ຊຶ່ງຈົນກະທັ້ງບໍ່ດົນມານີ້ ມົສກູ ເຄີຍໃຊ້ສົ່ງແກັສໄປຍັງຢູໂຣບ. ບລອກເກີ້ ຢູຣີ ໂພໂດລຢາກາ (Yuri Podolyaka) ອ້າງວ່າທະຫານຣັດເຊຍ ບາງສ່ວນໃຊ້ເວລາຫຼາຍວັນລໍຖ້າຢູ່ໃນທໍ່ສົ່ງແກັສ ກ່ອນທີ່ຈະໂຈມຕີິກອງກຳລັງຢູເຄຣນຈາກດ້ານຫຼັງໃກ້ເມືອງຊຸດຈາ.
ເມືອງນີ້ ມີຜູ້ຢູ່ອາໄສປະມານ 5,000 ຄົນ ກ່ອນທີ່ຣັດເຊຍ ຈະຮຸກຮານຢູເຄຣນໃນເດືອນກຸມພາ 2022 ແລະ ມີສະຖານີຖ່າຍໂອນ ແລະວັດແທກແກັສຫຼັກຕະຫຼອດແນວທໍ່ສົ່ງແກັສ ຊຶ່ງຄັ້ງນຶ່ງເຄີຍໃຊ້ເປັນຊ່ອງທາງຫຼັກ ສຳລັບການສົ່ງອອກແກັສທຳມະຊາດຂອງຣັດເຊຍ ຜ່ານດິນແດນຢູເຄຣນ.
ບລອກເກີ້ ສົງຄາມອີກຄົນນຶ່ງ ທີ່ໃຊ້ຊື່ຫຼີ້ນວ່າ Two Major ກ່າວວ່າ ກຳລັງເກີດການສູ້ລົບຢ່າງດຸເດືອນທີ່ເມືອງ ຊຸດຈາ ແລະ ກອງກຳລັງຣັດເຊຍສາມາດເຂົ້າສູ່ເມືອງໄດ້ຜ່ານທໍ່ສົ່ງແກັສ ສຳນັກຂ່າວ ເທເລແກຣມ ຂອງ ຣັດເຊຍ ໄດ້ເຜີຍແຜ່ ພາບຖ່າຍຂອງເຈົ້າໜ້າທີ່ໜ່ວຍລົບພິເສດ ຊຶ່ງໃສ່ໜ້າກາກປ້ອງກັນແກັສແລະຍ່າງໄປຕາມສິ່ງທີ່ເບິ່ງຄືວ່າ ພາຍໃນທໍ່ຂະໜາດໃຫຍ່.
ເມື່ອຕອນແລງວັນເສົາຜ່ານມາ ກອງບັນຊາການຂອງຢູເຄຣນ ໄດ້ຢືນຢັນແລ້ວວ່າ ' ກຸ່ມກໍ່ການຮ້າຍແລະບຸກໂຈມຕີ' ຂອງຣັດເຊຍ ໃຊ້ທໍ່ສົ່ງແກັສດັ່ງກ່າວເພື່ອພະຍາຍາມຍຶດພື້ນທີ່ນອກເມືອງ ຊຸດຈາ ໃນໂພສ ເທເລແກຣມ ລະບຸວ່າ ກອງກຳລັງຣັດເຊຍ ' ຖືກກວດພົບໃນເວລາທີ່ເໝາະສົມ' ແລະ ຢູເຄຣນຕອບໂຕ້ດ້ວຍການຍິງຈະຫຼວດແລະປືນໃຫຍ່.
' ຂະນະນີ້ກອງກຳລັງພິເສດຂອງຣັດເຊຍ ຖືກກວດພົບແລ້ວປິດກັ້ນ ແລະຖືກທຳລາຍລ້າງ. ການສູນເສຍຂອງສັດຕູໃນເມືອງ ຊຸດຈາ ນັ້ນສູງຫຼາຍ' ກອງບັນຊາການທະຫານ ໄດ້ລາຍງານ.
ອ່ານຂ່າວເປັນພາສາອັງກິດ
Russian special forces walked kilometers inside of a gas pipeline to strike Ukrainian units from the rear in the Kursk region, Ukraine's military and Russian war bloggers reported, as Moscow moves to recapture parts of its border province that Kyiv seized in a shock offensive.
Ukraine launched a daring cross-border incursion into Kursk in August, in what marked the largest attack on Russian territory since World War II. Within days, Ukrainian units had captured 1,000 square kilometers of territory, including the strategic border town of Sudzha, and taken hundreds of Russian prisoners of war. According to Kyiv, the operation aimed to gain a bargaining chip in future peace talks, and force Russia to divert troops away from its grinding offensive in eastern Ukraine.
But months after Ukraine's thunder run, its soldiers in Kursk are weary and bloodied by relentless assaults of more than 50,000 troops, including some from Russia's ally North Korea. Tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers run the risk of being encircled, open source maps of the battlefield show.
According to Telegram posts by a Ukrainian-born, pro-Kremlin blogger, Russian operatives walked about 15 kilometers inside the pipeline, which Moscow had until recently used to send gas to Europe. Some Russian troops had spent several days in the pipe before striking Ukrainian units from the rear near the town of Sudzha, blogger Yuri Podolyaka claimed.
The town had some 5,000 residents before the February 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, and houses major gas transfer and measuring stations along the pipeline, once a major outlet for Russian natural gas exports through Ukrainian territory.
Another war blogger, who uses the alias Two Majors, said fierce fighting was underway for Sudzha, and that Russian forces managed to enter the town through a gas pipeline. Russian Telegram channels showed photos of what they said were special forces operatives, wearing gas masks and moving along what looked like the inside of a large pipe.
Ukraine's General Staff confirmed on Saturday evening that Russian 'sabotage and assault groups' used the pipeline in a bid to gain a foothold outside Sudzha. In a Telegram post, it said the Russian troops were 'detected in a timely manner' and that Ukraine responded with rockets and artillery.
'At present, Russian special forces are being detected, blocked and destroyed. The enemy's losses in Sudzha are very high,' the General Staff reported.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer: ‘Sooner or later' Russia must yield to peace
Starmer: ‘Sooner or later' Russia must yield to peace

Voice of America

time15-03-2025

  • Voice of America

Starmer: ‘Sooner or later' Russia must yield to peace

Britain's leader encouraged his global counterparts to continue pushing for a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine at the start of a virtual meeting Saturday intended to end the fighting between the two countries. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer told a virtual meeting of mostly European leaders that 'sooner or later' Russia would have to engage in talks on reaching a ceasefire in the three-year conflict. He addressed the group, described as a 'coalition of the willing,' of mostly European leaders as well as those from Australia, New Zealand and Canada but not the United States. 'Sooner or later, he's going to have to come to the table,' Starmer said of Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose country invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. Earlier, U.S. President Donald Trump urged Moscow to accept a ceasefire deal agreed to by U.S. and Ukrainian delegations in Saudi Arabia, and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had said 'the ball is in Russia's court.' Putin has said he agrees with a ceasefire in theory, but Russia still has certain conditions and questions that must be addressed before accepting any agreement. In his nightly video address, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy suggested that Putin is stalling and has demanded so many preconditions 'that nothing will work out at all.' Meanwhile, the U.S. has expanded sanctions on Russian oil and gas as well as its financial sectors. Saturday's discussion among world leaders could address future military and financial support for Ukraine and Zelenskyy's security concerns if a peace deal is reached. Zelenskyy attended Saturday's online video session.

Russian foreign minister exaggerates Russia-China relations, ignores nuances
Russian foreign minister exaggerates Russia-China relations, ignores nuances

Voice of America

time15-03-2025

  • Voice of America

Russian foreign minister exaggerates Russia-China relations, ignores nuances

On March 12, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov spoke with American bloggers Mario Nawfal, Larry C. Johnson and Andrew Napolitano in Moscow. When asked whether the U.S. administration's efforts to normalize relations with Moscow are just to use Russia "cynically against the Chinese," Lavrov rejected such possibility. He described Russia-China relations as long-term, stronger and more confidential, based in deep trust and mutual understanding, and he emphasized widespread public support in both countries. That is misleading. The claim overlooks the underlying complexities and skepticism in the Russia-China relationship. Underlying tensions: Despite the appearance of a strong partnership, ongoing tensions underlie the relationship. This includes skepticism on both sides, especially about economic stability, military strength and the extent of mutual trust. Economic imbalance: China has become a dominant economic partner for Russia, but many Russians are concerned about China's increasing influence and the lack of substantial Chinese investment in Russia. Military relations: Unlike the strong military alignment seen in the Sino-Soviet alliance of 1950, today's cooperation is not as deeply integrated, particularly in military terms. China has not provided direct military aid to Russia in the Ukraine conflict, which would have been expected in a deeply allied relationship. Public sentiment: There is skepticism about the partnership in both Russia and China. Russian citizens are not entirely supportive of Chinese products or investments, and many Chinese question the long-term economic and military viability of Russia. Historical context Sino-Soviet Alliance (1950s): This period marked a high point of cooperation, with the Soviet Union providing substantial economic, technological and military support to China. Yet, the alliance ended with the Sino-Soviet split by the late 1950s. This contradicts Lavrov's characterization that current relations are unprecedented in their depth. Strategic Partnership (1996-2014): The strategic partnership strengthened after the Cold War, especially under Vladimir Putin and Jiang Zemin. However, China still balanced its relations with the West, highlighting that the partnership was pragmatic, not based purely on mutual trust. Anti-Western Alignment (2014-2025): The relations have become closer since Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the Ukraine invasion. China has been providing crucial economic support. Beijing, however, avoids direct military aid to evade Western sanctions and maintains neutrality. This signals that the cooperation is based on shared opposition to the West, not genuine trust or an alliance akin to that of the 1950s. Current economic dependence Moscow is now heavily dependent on Beijing: China has become Russia's largest trading partner, and Russia plays a key role in supplying China with oil and gas. The economic relationship has its imbalances, however. China's total investments in Russia remain relatively low compared with its global investments. China still prioritizes its global economic ties, while Russia has become increasingly dependent on Beijing. Vedomosti, Russia's leading business daily, reported that China rarely invests directly in Russia, noting that while Russia seeks high-tech investments, China prioritizes mining, real estate, and banking. Since 2023, China has been Russia's largest trading partner, whereas Russia ranks only sixth among China's top trade partners. Skepticism in both countries Russians question Chinese investment and the long-term benefits, while many Chinese doubt Russia's economic resilience and military strength. In February 2025, FilterLabs released the results of research that used its Talisman data tool to analyze Chinese and Russian news and social media. Talisman's analysis reveals deep skepticism about Russia among Chinese social media users, many of whom question whether Russia's economy is truly as resilient as Moscow claims, whether its military strength matches its rhetoric, and what its long-term intentions are. These doubts suggest that despite official narratives of strong ties, public confidence in Russia within China is far from unanimous. The research also shows that online sentiments in Russia toward economic cooperation with China are more negative than official narratives suggest. International sanctions have pushed many Western products out of Russia, allowing Chinese goods to fill the gap in sectors such as automobiles and technology. While their market share grows due to affordability and geopolitical shifts, many Russians remain skeptical and dissatisfied with Chinese products, FilterLabs reported. In both countries, social media discussions are consistently less positive than mainstream press coverage, which itself was not uniformly supportive, revealing underlying skepticism about the partnership. "Their partnership is vulnerable," FilterLabs founder Jonathan Teubner told VOA. Conclusion While Lavrov's statement reflects an official narrative of a strong and enduring partnership, the truth is more nuanced. Relations are indeed closer than at any point since the 1950s, but they are shaped more by pragmatism, economic necessity and shared opposition to Western influence than by deep trust or historical affinity. In both countries, public opinion reveals skepticism, and the economic and military cooperation, while growing, is not without concerns.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store