Single mother landed with 20% rent increase calls for rent controls
A single mother whose landlord has increased her rent by 20% is campaigning for a cap on how much landlords can raise rent in the UK.
Bridget Chapman, 56, from Darlington in County Durham, who has been a private renter her entire adult life, was given just a month's notice by her landlord when they increased her rent by £100.
A recent survey by campaign group Generation Rent revealed that 61% of renters said their landlord had asked them to pay a higher rent in the past 12 months with almost a quarter (24%) reporting an increase of over £100.
Ms Chapman said that while she welcomes reforms in the Renters' Rights Bill going through Parliament, they do 'nothing to stop shock rent rises' like her family is currently faced with.
The Renters' Rights Bill seeks to introduce an end to no-fault evictions, stopping bidding wars for tenancies, helping tenants challenge unreasonable rent increases and preventing landlords from demanding more than a month's rent in advance from a new tenant.
'I just got so angry that the landlord can raise the rent whenever he wants and give me a month's notice,' Ms Chapman told the PA news agency.
'I'm paying a lot more now and it's having a knock on effect on everything else.
'I'm a single parent, so even though my kids are now adults they're still young and I'm still supporting them.
'I have a very low disposable income so it's really difficult especially since everything else has gone up including gas and electricity.'
Ms Chapman, who says she feels 'let down by the system' experienced extreme dampness in her previous home which led her to being rushed to hospital with pneumonia.
'We moved into the property and I've got asthma, so the damp started to creep in,' she said.
'We didn't realise how bad until the mould was literally black.
'The landlord gave me a dehumidifier which literally did nothing.
'Luckily I was okay. I survived, but when I had to recover, I had to go back to the house, which was full of damp and mould.'
Ms Chapman hoped her new home which she has been renting for eight years would be better but she now feels she has suffered a 'huge blow' to her security.
With rents in her local area being so high, she does not feel she can move to a more affordable option.
Ms Chapman launched her petition which has gained over 45,000 signatures on Sunday, as she feels she 'can't do anything else'.
'Doing this petition is my way to make my voice heard,' she said. 'The Government firstly needs to cap rent increases. They also need to look at capping gas and electricity bills.
'Wages are not going up, so people are struggling even more, because they're on the same wage and they pay more money for everything else.
'You get people who are working hard, full-time, and they're having to go to food banks. I think that's so wrong.'
Generation Rent says its research shows the 'most common' reason landlords put up rent is not higher costs, but rather to increase their revenue as local rents rise.
Almost a third (31%) of landlords blamed higher market rents, while a further 7% stated that the increase was because of letting agent advice.
'This is indefensible. If renters are to finally feel secure in our own homes, we need protections from shock rent rises,' a Generation Rent spokesperson said.
'Private landlords should not be able to raise the rent higher than inflation or wages. The Government can and must act to change this.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'Through our Renters' Rights Bill we are taking decisive action to transform the private renting sector for the better and empower tenants to tackle unreasonable rent hikes.
'Alongside this, as part of our Plan for Change we are putting more money in people's pockets by protecting payslips from higher taxes and increasing the minimum wage to deliver pay rises of up to £1,400 a year for millions of low-income workers.'
You can read more about Ms Chapman's petition at: https://www.change.org/p/introduce-caps-on-how-much-landlords-can-raise-rent-protect-struggling-families-like-mine
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Spending Review treats London as a one-way cash cow — again
The Chancellor took us on a breezy whistle-stop tour of the entire United Kingdom in her spending review statement to Parliament. Few corners of the realm were ignored as Rachel Reeves name-checked the towns and cities that will benefit from her defence, health and infrastructure spending largesse over the coming years. Lincoln, Portsmouth, Rosyth, Glasgow, Stevenage, Barrow, Derby, Blackpool and Sheffield all got a shout out as she ran MPs through some of the greatest hits of her £1.4 trillion annual sending plans. But, as has become the pattern over recent chancellor statements, there was scant mention of London, the metropolis of nine million people and economic superpower that generates much of the tax revenues she will be busily handing out over the next four years of the Parliament. The oversight did not come as a great surprise. London Labour council leaders who visited Downing Street for briefings in the run up to the spending review came away stony-faced after being told by unsmiling Treasury ministers that they were having to make 'difficult decisions' in a very tough economic environment. But without the capital firing on all cylinders, there is no hope of the UK achieving the growth that Keir Starmer and Reeves promised the nation. London is the golden goose. The oversight did not come as a great surprise Latest ONS figures showed the public sector raised £216.4bn of revenue from London taxpayers in 2023, while public spending only totalled £172.8bn in the capital. That £43.6bn annual fiscal surplus — it will be bigger this year — helps funds the spending programmes that the Chancellor outlined in her speech. By contrast, Scottish taxpayers raised just £86.8bn but £105.4bn of public money was spent north of the border, a fiscal deficit of £18.6bn. It was the same story in the north-west where tax revenues were £95.2bn, while spending totalled £130.1bn, a deficit of £34.9bn. There is nothing wrong with that. It is only right and fair that regeneration resources should be focused on those regions that have been allowed to decline so drastically since the great de-industrialisation of the Thatcher years. But London has its own acute deprivation problems too and without investment in its own housing, policing and transport infrastructure, the city will lose its status as Europe's pre-eminent metropolis, attracting the talent and capital that the UK economy depends on. Sadiq Khan promised that the election of a Labour government would lead to a new era of peaceful coexistence between City Hall and Downing Street after the scratchy years dealing with an unsympathetic Tory chancellor. But there is no disguising the disappointment from the Mayor. A glass half full view is that it could have been worse; the £2.2bn long-term funding settlement for Transport for London was better than feared. But as the Mayor laid bare in his reaction statement, 'this spending review could result in insufficient funding for the Met and fewer police officers.' He added: 'It's also disappointing that there is no commitment today from the Treasury to invest in the new infrastructure London needs. Projects such as extending the Docklands Light Railway not only deliver economic growth across the country, but also tens of thousands of new affordable homes and jobs for Londoners. Unless the Government invests in infrastructure like this in our capital, we will not be able to build the numbers of new affordable homes Londoners need.' Those are scarcely the words of the grateful recipient of bounty from his friends at the Treasury. The spending review also detailed how the machinery of government will continue to be ripped out of London and transferred to the provinces in a huge decentralisation programme. Over the next five years ministers plan to relocate 12,000 civil service roles out of the capital and 'have 50 per cent of UK-based senior civil servants in regional offices across the UK.' Sir Humphrey may have to get used to living in Harrogate rather than Hampstead. Over the same period 11 central London offices will be closed, including 102 Petty France and 39 Victoria Street. Perhaps more significant are plans to overhaul the long-standing cost-benefit rules for investment decisions that apparently have favoured London and the south-east over the rest of the country. That sends a very clear message that public investment allocations are now likely to prioritise 'levelling up' in the regions rather than maximising returns in London — at least for the next four years. So forget Crossrail 2, and do not hold out too much hope for Hammersmith Bridge ever being fixed. The anti-London tone of today's statement may make good politics. The MP for Leeds West and Pudsey will be only too aware of the existential threat posed to Labour from the Reform party forces gathering in the Red Wall towns and cities of the Midlands and the North. She needs to give those voters reasons to back Labour again in 2029 or 2030. The country can only thrive if London keeps pumping out the tax revenues While Reform is growing in strength in the capital the Government still believes it can rely on London to deliver MPs to the Labour benches at the next general election. But does it make good economics? The country can only thrive — that spending only be made, that investment only committed — if London keeps pumping out the tax revenues that pays for it. But there are worrying signs that London is feeling pressures of its own, from the flight of young families that are emptying its schools to the exodus of tech companies from the City's stock market. The alarming reality is that the Chancellor's trip round the country handing out money also certainly means she will have to ask for more tax increases in the autumn Budget. Whether that comes in the form of a further extension of income tax thresholds, which inevitably has a bigger impact in higher earning areas such as the capital, or restoring the pension lifetime allowance, as suggested by Angela Rayner, London and Londoners will bear the brunt. London has been treated as cash cow by successive chancellors ever since the financial crash. Sooner or later there will have to be some give as well as take. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Britain morphing into ‘National Health State', says think tank
Britain is turning into a 'National Health State', a think tank has said after the Chancellor gave the NHS a major funding boost in her spending review. The health service was the big winner of Wednesday's spending review, receiving an extra £29 billion per year for day-to-day spending and more cash for capital investment. Overnight, the Resolution Foundation said Rachel Reeves's announcements had followed a recent trend that saw increases for the NHS come at the expense of other public services. Ruth Curtice, chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, said: 'Health accounted for 90% of the extra public service spending, continuing a trend that is seeing the British state morph into a National Health State, with half of public service spending set to be on health by the end of the decade.' Defence was another of Wednesday's winners, Ms Curtice said, receiving a significant increase in capital spending while other departments saw an overall £3.6 billion real-terms cut in investment. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) made similar arguments about 'substantial' investment in the NHS and defence coming at the expense of other departments, although the think tank's director Paul Johnson warned the money may not be enough. He said: 'Aiming to get back to meeting the NHS 18-week target for hospital waiting times within this Parliament is enormously ambitious – an NHS funding settlement below the long-run average might not measure up. 'And on defence, it's entirely possible that an increase in the Nato spending target will mean that maintaining defence spending at 2.6% of GDP no longer cuts the mustard.' Ms Curtice added that low and middle-income families had also done well out of the spending review 'after two rounds of painful tax rises and welfare cuts', with the poorest fifth of families benefiting from an average of £1,700 in extra spending on schools, hospitals and the police. She warned that, without economic growth, another round of tax rises was likely to come in the autumn as the Chancellor seeks to balance the books. She said: 'The extra money in this spending review has already been accounted for in the last forecast. 'But a weaker economic outlook and the unfunded changes to winter fuel payments mean the Chancellor will likely need to look again at tax rises in the autumn.' Speaking after delivering her spending review, Ms Reeves insisted she would not have to raise taxes to cover her spending review. She told GB News: 'Every penny of this is funded through the tax increases and the changes to the fiscal rules that we set out last autumn.' Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The two neighbourhoods in Greater Manchester first in line for a £20m boost
Two neighbourhoods in Greater Manchester have been named among the first in the UK to benefit from a boost of up to £20m. Unveiling her Spending Review today (June 11), Rachel Reeves announced 'additional funding' to support up to 350 communities across the country. The Chancellor said that this unspecified sum will be used to improve parks, youth facilities, swimming pools and libraries. The money, which will be spent in some of the UK's most deprived areas, will also support the 'fightback' against graffiti and fly-tipping. READ MORE: LIVE: More arrests after Salford disorder saw riot police called to street READ MORE: Four more arrests and girl, 16, charged following 'serious disorder' in Salford During her speech in Parliament, Ms Reeves revealed that Stockport would be one of the areas set to benefit from the funding. In documents published following her speech, the government has now revealed that two places in Greater Manchester are among 25 'trailblazer' neighbourhoods that will each receive up to £20m over the next decade as part of the new fund Ms Reeves announced. The two neighbourhoods in Greater Manchester that have been selected are Brinnington in Stockport and Pendleton in Salford. The Government has today announced 25 trailblazer neighbourhoods that will receive up to £20 million over the next decade as part of a new fund announced at the Spending Review. Pendleton in Salford is one of themhttps:// — Rebecca Long-Bailey (@RLong_Bailey) June 11, 2025 According to government papers, they will be among the first of up to 350 places that are set to benefit, alongside the 75 towns previously named in the Plan for Neighbourhoods which include Ashton-under-Lyne, Chadderton, Farnworth, Heywood and Leigh. In her speech to MPs, Ms Reeves said: "I know the pride that people feel in their communities. I see it everywhere I go. "But I also know that for too many people there is a sense that something has been lost. As high streets have declined, as community spaces have closed, as jobs and opportunities have gone elsewhere. The renewal of Britain must be felt everywhere." Welcoming the news, Stockport MP Navendu Mishra said: "As one of the 25 new trailblazer neighbourhoods, it is great that Brinnington is set to receive a share of £20 million to lead the way in community-led regeneration and renewal. "Following 14 years of neglect from Conservative and Liberal Democrat Coalition Governments, I am pleased that this Government is giving neighbourhoods like Brinnington the extra support they deserve. I welcome this investment into the renewal of our community in Stockport." Ahead of the spending review, the Local Trust called on the government to break the cycle of deprivation in 'doubly disadvantaged' areas around the country, with the charity arguing that 'neighbourhood-level interventions' are needed for long-lasting regeneration. Madeleine Jennings, Head of Policy and Communications at Local Trust said: 'The Chancellor has recognised the importance of pride in place and that many communities around the country have seen that pride decline. The Big Local programme has shown that a sense of pride about the community you live in essential component of good health and wellbeing, especially in deprived areas. "However, our evidence also shows that agency and a belief in collective efficacy are just as important which is why we will continue to work with the government to ensure this new programme puts communities themselves in charge of decision making and setting priorities. "At a time of difficult decisions, the Chancellor's decision to invest in social infrastructure in deprived areas is testament to the powerful evidence in favour of long-term investment in community capacity coming out of the Big Local programme. "We are proud that the learning from Big Local has been able to inform the work of the Independent Commission on Neighbourhoods who have powerfully advocated for such a fund in order to reach the communities living in neighbourhoods that are furthest from being able to achieve the government's five missions."
