Government Initiatives Propel Growth of Sustainable Portland Cement - Innovative and Eco-friendly Cement Products on the Rise
Portland cement market set to grow from 2.4 billion tons in 2024 to 3.2 billion tons by 2033, with a 3.05% CAGR. Driven by rising construction activities, urbanization, and sustainable development, Asia Pacific leads the market. Major players like Mitsubishi, Lafarge, and Holcim innovate for greener solutions.
Portland Cement Market
Dublin, June 02, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Portland Cement Market Report by Type (Type 1, Type 2, Type 3, Type 4, Type 5), Application Sector (Residential, Commercial, Industrial), Packing Type (10 KG, 15 KG, 25 KG, and Others), Trade Data (Import Trends, Export Trends), and Region 2025-2033" has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.
The global Portland cement market, valued at 2.4 Billion Tons in 2024, is projected to expand to 3.2 Billion Tons by 2033, with a CAGR of 3.05% between 2025 and 2033.
Key growth drivers include increased demand for housing and commercial spaces, ongoing construction and infrastructure projects, and government initiatives promoting industrialization and sustainable development.
As a crucial construction material, Portland cement's role in building infrastructures is paramount, driving its global demand. It comprises clinker, gypsum, and essential additives. Current trends show a shift towards sustainable construction materials, influencing market growth alongside the adoption of low-maintenance, durable building materials. The push for green buildings to curb carbon emissions further bolsters this market.
Technological advancements enhancing energy efficiency and sustainability present lucrative opportunities for investors. Additionally, the demand for competitively priced Portland cement and infrastructure for sports facilities contributes to market growth.
Market Trends/Drivers:
Construction and Infrastructure Development
Ongoing global construction and infrastructure projects significantly drive the market. The trend towards residential area renovations enhances aesthetics and utility, coupled with the demand for high-quality cement for aging infrastructure. Portland cement's superior binding properties make it ideal for robust structures.
Rising Demand for Housing and Commercial Spaces
Population growth and urbanization escalate the need for housing and commercial spaces, promoting the cement industry's expansion. Portland cement is pivotal in constructing various infrastructures-buildings, roads, bridges-offering unmatched versatility and durability. The rise of mass transit systems globally further supports market growth.
Government Initiatives
Governments worldwide foster market growth through investments in smart city projects and incentives for green building construction. Increasing demand for cement in manufacturing, logistics, energy, and transportation sectors aligns with these developmental agendas. Rapid industrialization and urban migration accentuate this trend.
Report Segmentation
Industry Segmentation: By Type:
Type 1 (largest segment)
Type 2
Type 3
Type 4
Type 5
By Application Sector:
Residential (largest segment)
Commercial
Industrial
By Packing Type:
10 KG
15 KG
25 KG (largest segment)
Others
By Trade Data:
Import Trends
Export Trends
By Region:
Asia Pacific (dominant region)
North America
Europe
Middle East and Africa
Latin America
Asia Pacific leads the market due to rapid urbanization and a surge in residential developments. Favorable policies for smart city projects and the growing demand for high-grade cement also drive regional growth.
Competitive Landscape:
Key players focus on R&D for innovative products, including eco-friendly cements and high-performance materials. Efforts in sustainability are evident through reduced energy consumption and carbon capture technologies. Companies like Mitsubishi Cement Corporation, Lafarge, Heidelberg Cement, and others dominate the landscape, with enhancements in digital technologies improving efficiency.
Key Attributes:
Report Attribute
Details
No. of Pages
134
Forecast Period
2024 - 2033
Estimated Market Value in 2024
2.4 Billion Tons
Forecasted Market Value by 2033
3.2 Billion Tons
Compound Annual Growth Rate
3.2%
Regions Covered
Global
Key Topics Covered:
Scope and Methodology
Executive Summary
Introduction
Overview
Key Industry Trends
Global Portland Cement Market
Market Overview
Market Performance
Market Breakup by Type
Market Breakup by Application Sector
Market Breakup by Packing Type
Market Breakup by Imports and Exports
Market Breakup by Region
Market Forecast
Market Breakup by Type
Market Breakup by Application Sector
Market Breakup by Packing Type
Trade Data
Market Breakup by Region
SWOT Analysis
Value Chain Analysis
Porter's Five Forces Analysis
Price Analysis
Competitive Landscape
Companies Featured
Mitsubishi Cement Corporation
Alamo Cement Company
Lafarge
Martin Marietta
Heidelberg Cement
National Cement Company
American Cement Company
Holcim
Argos
Essroc
China National Building Material
Salt River Materials Group
Italcementi
Anhui Conch Cement
Ash Grove Cement Company
Tanzania Portland Cement Company
Quikrete
CalPortland Company
Capitol Aggregates
CEMEX
GCC of America
Lehigh Hanson
NationalCement Company of Alabama
Ultratech Cement
BuzziUnicem USA
For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/qnj996
About ResearchAndMarkets.comResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.
Attachment
Portland Cement Market
CONTACT: CONTACT: ResearchAndMarkets.com Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@researchandmarkets.com For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Motor 1
an hour ago
- Motor 1
The Silverado EV Is Big, Dumb, and Fun: Review
Quick Specs 2025 Chevrolet Silverado EV LT Extended Range Battery 170.0 Kilowatt-Hours Output 645 Horsepower / 765 Pound-Feet Range 390 Miles Charge Type 350-Kilowatt DC Base Price / As Tested $75,195 / $83,485 Pros: Insane Power, Insane Range, Sublime Ride, Comfortable Cabin Cons: Massive, No CarPlay, Super Cruise Is Optional Chevrolet Silverado EV Overview: All-Electric, All Truck Photo by: Jeff Perez / Motor1 If you want an electric pickup, the pickings are pretty slim. Ford offers the F-150 Lightning, and Rivian produces the R1T. General Motors, meanwhile, has two EV pickups on the market (or three if you count the barely usable Hummer): The Chevrolet Silverado EV and the GMC Sierra EV. The Chevrolet Silverado EV is the Bowtie brand's first electric pickup. It has a massive battery pack with two electric motors, and on paper, at least, it's insanely capable; over 600 horsepower and more than 400 miles of range on the base model, and a towing capacity that stacks up to many gas trucks. The question is: Why would you buy the electric Silverado over the tried-and-true gas version? Well, if you want a pickup that's as quick as a sports car and rides like an Escalade, you won't do much better than this one. Just prepare to pay up. Battery & Motors: Huge Power Photo by: Jeff Perez / Motor1 Chevrolet offers a few different battery packs for the Silverado EV, depending on which trim you choose. Options range from a standard 119.0-kilowatt-hour pack to a massive 205.0-kilowatt-hour pack. This particular model, an LT Extended Range, sits smack dab in the middle of the two, with a 170.0-kWh pack. This Silverado LT EV's two electric motors give it 645 horsepower and 765 pound-feet of torque, with 390 miles of driving range. The RST with the larger pack has slightly more torque (785 lb-ft) and a bit more range (460 miles), but the LT does the job nearly as well. It's powerful—really powerful. Activate the 'Wide Open Watts (WOW)' mode to unlock launch control and uncork the Silverado EV's full output. It takes less than 5.0 seconds for the supersized truck to reach 60 miles per hour on its way to an electronically limited top speed of 114. Technology & Infotainment: No CarPlay Photo by: Jeff Perez / Motor1 Here's where the Silverado EV gets its first ding: There is no Apple CarPlay or Android Auto connectivity. As with all modern Chevy EVs, the Silverado has ditched smartphone mirroring in place of its built-in setup. That said, the system still looks good and is easy to use. The Silverado has a 17.7-inch central touchscreen and an 11.0-inch digital instrument cluster that both look crystal clear. The native Google Maps navigation is easy to use (just like on your smartphone), and it offers specific waypoints for things like charging stations, so you'll never run out of juice. Chevy's hands-free Super Cruise safety system, unfortunately, does not come standard on the Silverado EV. It costs an extra $9,800 at a minimum when adding the LT Premium package, which includes other tech add-ons like a rearview mirror camera, a trailer camera, a bed-view camera, blind spot monitoring, and a bit more. But if you plan on doing lots of highway driving, Super Cruise is almost always worth the splurge. Driving Impressions: A Pickup Truck On Steroids Photo by: Jeff Perez / Motor1 Most modern pickups are already too massive as it is. The Silverado EV is even bigger still. It takes up a concerning amount of space in its lane, especially when driving on narrower roads around town. It's difficult to navigate through tight obstacles—like smaller parking lots or shopping centers—and impossible to park without the many different camera angles Chevy offers. That said, the four-wheel steering system makes navigating tight areas slightly less impossible; it actually has a better turning radius than you might think. And if you're in a really tricky spot, the Silverado EV does have a 'Sidewinder' mode that moves all four wheels in the same direction laterally. It's mostly for off-road use. Photo by: Jeff Perez / Motor1 Photo by: Jeff Perez / Motor1 If you're cruising on the highway, though, the Silverado EV is a perfectly pleasant road-trip companion. Even for something that weighs around 8,500 pounds as tested, it doesn't feel all that lumbering; the suspension is soft, the cabin is whisper quiet, and the entire experience is supremely comforting. Add hands-free Super Cruise onto that (which this particular tester did have), and the Silverado EV eats up highway miles as well as a luxury vehicle. And did I already mention that this thing is quick as hell? With Wide Open Watts activated, the Silverado EV races off the line with an absurd amount of ferocity. It'll shove you and all four passengers firmly into their seats backs before you run out of pavement. Range: Miles For Days Photo by: Jeff Perez / Motor1 Chevrolet's EVs offer some of the best range on the market today. The Silverado is no exception. The Silverado delivers 390 miles of range on this LT Extended Range model, 460 miles on the RST, and up to 492 miles with the Work Truck. For most buyers, even 390 miles of range should be plenty for their weekly commutes. Plugging into a DC Fast Charging station yields up to 350 kilowatt-hours, which means you should be able to add 100 miles of range in as little as 10 minutes. Charging at home on a 19.2-kilowatt Level 2 charger should yield around 34 miles of range per hour. The only other electric pickup that comes close is from Rivian. The R1T offers an estimated 420 miles of range with the dual-motor Max Pack. Payload & Towing: Best In Class Electric pickups aren't exactly the go-to options for buyers looking to tow, but on paper, at least, the Silverado EV certainly has what it takes. The LT has a maximum towing capacity of 12,500 pounds—the most of any Silverado EV, matching the Work Truck. Even the sporty RST trim has a modest 10,000-pound capacity. The Ford F-150 Lightning has a max 10,000-pound towing capacity by comparison, and the Rivian R1T comes closer to the Silverado, with an 11,000-pound towing capacity. Pricing & Verdict: You Get What You Pay For At $75,195 to start for the base LT Extended Range, the Silverado EV certainly isn't the thriftiest pickup on the market—even among its EV counterparts. The Ford F-150 Lightning is still cheaper out of the box for the base XLT model, which starts at $65,540. And the Rivian R1T starts at $71,900. Add on things like the $9,800 Premium package (Super Cruise, 22-inch wheels, and more), $395 Riptide Blue paint, and a few dealer accessories—as equipped here—and the final as-tested price comes out to $83,485. Not exactly a bargain. That said, the Silverado beats both of those trucks with the best standard range of the class and the most horsepower. For the amount of money that Chevrolet is asking, you definitely get a lot of truck. 31 Source: Jeff Perez / Motor1 Competitors Ford F-150 Lightning GMC Sierra EV Rivian R1T More Silverado EV Reviews The Silverado EV Might Just Save America 2024 Chevrolet Silverado EV Work Truck First Drive: Powering Productivity 2025 Chevrolet Silverado EV LT Extended Range Motor Dual Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Battery 170.0 Kilowatt-Hours Output 645 Horsepower / 765 Pound-Feet Drive Type All-Wheel Drive Speed 0-60 MPH 5.0 Seconds (est.) Maximum speed 114 Miles Per Hour Weight 8,500 Pounds (est.) Efficiency 74 City / 61 Highway / 68 Combined MPGe EV Range 390 Miles Charge Time 10-80% In 38 Minutes Charge Type 350 Kilowatts DC Fast Charging Seating Capacity 5 Towing 12,500 Pounds Payload 1,800 Pounds Base Price $75,195 As-Tested Price $83,485 On Sale Now Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
SXSW London Debates: Is The Green Transition Financially Viable?
Rhian-Mari Thomas argues that the green transition is financially viable at SXSW London, referencing ... More the record amount of investment in the sector in 2024 Thought leaders across green finance and economics gathered to debate the financial viability of climate progress on day four of SXSW London. Held at the innovation and ideas festival's Climate & Nature House, a space hosted by Bellwethers to have meaningful environmental conversations, the session followed a traditional debate format encouraging a jovial air of competition. Sophie Lambin, founder and CEO of Kite Insights, and Stephen Dunbar-Johnson, president, international at the New York Times Company moderated the conversation. Lambin clarified that the debaters were tasked with addressing whether we can realistically and successfully invest our way to a green future, considering our current economic system and the state of the climate emergency, or whether we need new financial tools and a financial system. Arguing for the notion that 'the green transition is financially viable' were Rhian-Mari Thomas, CEO Green Finance Institute, Marisa Drew, chief sustainability officer, Standard Chartered Bank, and Fiona Howarth, CEO of Octopus Electric Vehicles. Arguing against the notion were Kathy Boughman McLeod, CEO Climate Resilience for All, Chaitanya Kumar, head of economy & environment at New Economics Foundation and Erinch Sahan, business and enterprise lead at Doughnut Economics Action Lab. Each debater was given three minutes to make their case. The debaters prepare their arguments on stage at SXSW London In support of the motion, Thomas started the conversation by saying that the green transition is 'economically strategic, it is socially imperative, and it is already underway.' She highlighted that a record $2.1 trillion was invested in green energy technology in 2024 according to BloombergNEF. Thomas sees this as evidence that the financial markets view green investments as smart economic strategy that not only provides financial opportunity, but protects us from the social and economic damage of the climate crisis. Howarth drew on the enormous success of her employer, Octopus Energy Group, as evidence that current investment is working. Started nine years ago, the company now employs 10,000 people and is valued at $9 billion while making green energy a viable option for consumers. She says this is thanks to 'smart innovators', and 'clever policy mechanisms'. Drew, instead, highlighted that emerging markets such as India, China, Indonesia and Middle Eastern countries have some of the fastest growing economies and are doubling down on green energy transition. 'What is Saudi Arabia doing? It is spending billions, if not trillions, on diversifying its economy. What does that tell you? The energy transition is viable, and the old way is no longer going to be the case in the not-too-distant future,' she argued. The first rebuttal came from Sahan, who highlighted that while $2.1 trillion was invested in green energy last year, the Climate Policy Initiative estimates that $6 trillion per year is needed to fund a green transition. He also argued that financial viability of a movement currently means that it is still satisfying the ROI needs of the financial market. 'These parameters are holding us back,' he said, taking off his belt to use as a symbol that financial markets are placing a straightjacket on businesses and governments to make progress on climate. He then pulled out an apple to make the point that the current green transition focuses on low hanging fruit, undermining the need for larger systemic change that picks the fruit at the top of the tree too. Chaitanya Kumar argued that the current financial system is too heavily influenced by fossil fuel ... More companies to be a fully viable solution to the green transition Kumar's speech made the point that large investment funds have interests in many of the biggest companies in the world as well as oil and gas companies, intrinsically tying them together, and creating strong lobbying power. 'Incumbent power and the political economy of the transition is still very much held by fossil fuel interests around the world,' he said. He drew on examples of the lobbying by fossil fuel companies which saw the EU label natural gas as a 'green energy' in 2022 and Microsoft's pivot on its sustainability strategy to adjust for escalating AI emissions. Finally, McLeod, highlighted the social costs, as well as the environmental costs of the current system. 'The market we have, not necessarily the market we wish to have, incentivizes pollution, devalues people and overlooks protection,' she told the audience. Addressing the plight of informal women workers who are on the frontline of the climate crisis, she said: 'This economy is chaos. We cannot maintain these expectations of return and believe that there is a green future. That is a fantasy.' The debate was declared a tie after the audience were invited to applaud the team they felt debated the best. Summarising the conversation, Dunbar-Johnson emphasised the importance of debate on these issues: 'What you did is encapsulate the complexity of the arguments in these subjects. This is a subject that we must grapple with. If the money is there, do we have the political solutions to drive that? We do have instruments to drive it, but the reality is, too much of the narrative is about the cost of the transition, not about the cost of not transitioning and the opportunities.'
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Should AI And Robots Be Taxed To Protect Workers?
HAI'AN, CHINA - JUNE 29, 2020 - Tax officials in the robot industrial park to understand the ... More production status of enterprises. Hai'an City, Jiangsu Province, China, June 29, 2020.- (Photo credit should read Costfoto/Future Publishing via Getty Images) Detroit used to be the richest city in America, some said it was the wealthiest in the world (in the early 1950's). Within a period of fifty years, it became the USA's poorest city, ignominiously falling victim to the largest municipal bond default in 2013. I visited the city some eight years ago, to witness the kick-off of an ambitious plan to revive the city, led by Mayor Mike Duggan, with the support of local business leaders. For instance, Dan Gilbert, an insurance firm owner bought and then gave away inner-city apartments to encourage people to move back into the city. Having spent a couple of days in Detroit last week I am pleased to report that the renewal of the city centre is bearing fruit – it is a hive of construction activity, iconic buildings have been impressively scrubbed up and there are plenty of stylish restaurants and shops. My initial visit to Detroit sticks in my mind for two reasons. The first is that I did a speech there alongside JD Vance – my topic was how small European countries managed to achieve high growth rates and social cohesion (as an example to Detroit), and his emphasis was on the need to focus resources and policy on 'forgotten' parts of America like Michigan. Our double act was good enough that we were invited to do another event in the new World Trade Centre in New York. At the time, I recall he was anti-Trump, pro-innovation and very much an advocate of third level education. A lot has changed since, but his book 'Hillbilly Elegy' is still worth a read. My second memorable Detroit experience was a visit to the Ford factory in Dearborn, to witness the full power of a robot-based manufacturing line, which at times was quite intimidating. I am tempted to say that in the next ten years, robots will have a bigger impact on America's society and economy than JD. The rise and fall of Detroit, and its wide hinterland out to Michigan towns like Flint has been undercut by many factors – immigration, the exit of the wealthy to other America cities, a failure to renew skill sets and an industrial base, and the economic side-effect of the rise of China as a manufacturing zone. The issue worrying people in states like Michigan is whether AI and robotics will have the same effect on the local economy, as the model of globalization was perceived to do (by the likes of JD Vance) in recent years. Indeed, there has been a flurry of articles in the US press in recent days warning that AI will wipe out swathes of jobs (for example a pwc report on Agentic AI promises cost cuts of up to 40% in the software and legal sectors). My instinct is that new technologies do not necessarily 'kill' jobs but shift them to other sectors and value chains, a process that is usually contingent on the quality of education systems and government policy. Much of the research on the potential impact of AI on work (from McKinsey for instance and most notably David Autor at MIT and Carl Benedikt-Frey at Oxford) points to a nuanced view that sees AI and robotics helping less able workers participate in the workforce, and emphasises reskilling. The risk to this enlightened outlook is that AI is unique in the sense that its take-up is rapid, especially so within large services firms, and this may give corporations greater power over labour (and downward pressure on wages). Equally there is not enough commentary on the fact that the critical AI projects are owned by a small, connected set of investors. In the emerging world, AI will likely have the greatest positive impact on public administration and on healthcare (through better and broader diagnoses), though employment in service sectors (especially where those services are exported) may take a hit. With professional and specialised workers in mind, I would also like to re-state my 'One Man and His Dog' hypothesis as a model for how professionals can use AI. 'One Man and His Dog' was a cult British tv show based on sheepdog trials. In this context the sheepdog is an intelligent, non-human actor helping the human to solve a complex problem – which is what AI does. Like a dog, if mistreated or provoked, AI can bite back but in general the idea is that like the sheepdog, AI can make the professional (doctor, commando or researcher) do their job in a more effective way. Those who worry about the labour market should instead focus on debt, and the perilous finances of the developed world. The global financial crisis demonstrated that debt can kill millions of jobs when it provokes a deep recession. To that end, the Trump budget will prove increasingly controversial, and arguably what America needs is a very different fiscal approach. The lesson from Hillbilly Elegy is that the spoils of globalization went to the few – bankers in New York, scientists in Boston and tech firms in California. Arguably they should have paid much higher taxes and this then used to bolster education, training and infrastructure across America. The same logic is true with AI – its commercial benefits will accrue to a very small number of people, but millions will need help readjusting to the side-effects it has on labour markets. The debt outlook makes this doubly the case and the Trump budget, which will add USD 2.4 trillion to the national debt by 20234 (according to the Congressional Budget Office) will not only break the bank but break the labour market.
