Equalities watchdog tells trans activists personal attacks ‘have to stop'
The equalities watchdog has told trans activists that personal attacks on her and her staff have 'got to stop'.
Baroness Falkner of Margravine, the chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), appeared emotional as she revealed to MPs that she had to cancel one meeting after police warned of a ' serious risk ' of violence.
She said that while feminist campaigners had acted in a 'dignified and respectful' manner, trans rights activists had made it harder for her staff to come to work in safety.
'Personal attacks, libellous attacks, defamation'
'The level of agitation that they can cause in terms of personal attacks, libellous attacks, defamation, where our family members are affected – our intimate family members have to think about how they're going about to their place of work – has got to stop,' she said.
'I didn't come into public life to bleat on about myself and feel sorry for myself… I have chosen not to walk away, I have chosen to deliver in the public interest as has done every member of my board.
'And they don't need to do this, they do it because of a desire for public service, as do my senior staff.'
The watchdog also repeated that companies and organisations should be using EHRC guidance on access to single-sex spaces, rather than those of groups such as Stonewall.
Baroness Falkner also said guidance would be issued on how to 'respectfully' question transgender people about their biological sex.
Women's rights activists who do not believe in gender ideology, the idea that sex is a spectrum and that people can change their gender identity, have had to run the gauntlet of intimidating protests from the trans rights movement for years.
After the Supreme Court ruled in April that the word 'sex' in the Equality Act refers to biological sex, trans rights activists took to the streets, with one carrying a placard showing an illustration of a gallows alongside a slogan suggesting ' the only good Terf (trans-exclusionary radical feminist) ' is a hanged one.
In 2022, a group called Pissed Off Trannies left more than 60 bottles of urine outside the EHRC offices and poured some of the contents into the revolving doors.
The EHRC has come in for greater criticism from trans rights activists after they published guidance confirming that organisations can bar trans people from toilets and changing rooms meant for the opposite sex.
'Serious risk of violence'
Appearing before the Commons women and equalities select committee, Lady Falkner spoke of the effect such violent threats had on her and her organisation.
'Sorry, I'm trying not to be emotional about this because it goes to the heart of what public service is about, and I've been involved in public service for 21 years now,' she said.
'The personal attacks – and I refer to personal attacks as well as the attacks on my staff, because we have a duty of care to our staff and we must ensure that our staff are able to work in a respectable, safe place of work.
'We were due to go to Glasgow for our regular annual board meeting in Scotland, and we were unable to go because the police hadn't been informed and there was serious risk of violence from messages that were seen.
'What bothers me more than my own personal security is that my staff should be able to come to their place of work in safety, and that has been somewhat lacking in the last several years.'
Lady Falkner said those on the gender-critical side of the debate, 'who felt disadvantaged or felt the law was not supporting them, did so in a dignified, respectful manner, frequently using the last resort of a tribunal or a court to pursue justice for themselves or their loved ones'.
Talking about trans rights activists, she said: 'Here we have a group that I appreciate is vulnerable, but I don't think it is fair because women and girls are vulnerable as well.
'I don't think it is fair to have a balancing act of 'who is more vulnerable'. Victimhood is not the way I approach things.
'The level of agitation that they can cause in terms of personal attacks, libellous attacks, defamation, where our family members are affected – our intimate family members have to think about how they're going about to their place of work – has got to stop.'
Lady Falkner was then prevented from continuing to talk about the attacks the EHRC has faced by Sarah Owen, Labour MP and the committee chair.
She then bizarrely asked her to clarify that she was not opposed to the right to protest.
'Overly hostile'
Last night, Maya Forstater, chief executive of human rights charity Sex Matters, said she was 'shocked' by the 'overly hostile' questioning of some of the members of the committee.
'It was particularly shocking that when Lady Falkner talked about the pressures on EHRC staff of the protests and personal attacks, the chair of the committee, Sarah Owen MP, cut her off,' she said.
'The Supreme Court provided complete legal clarity on the meaning of 'sex' in the Equality Act. Today's proceedings suggest that some MPs simply refuse to accept that.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
36 minutes ago
- The Sun
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch to call for windfall taxes on oil and gas firms to be scrapped to avoid ‘killing' the industry
TORY leader Kemi Badenoch due to call for windfall taxes on oil and gas firms to be scrapped to avoid 'killing' the industry. She was also set to demand fresh drilling licences in the North Sea in a blast against Energy Secretary Ed Miliband's decision to ban them in the name of Net Zero. The Energy Profits Levy was first introduced by the Conservatives to tax companies revelling in record revenues while families struggled with soaring bills. At the last Budget Rachel Reeves increased the tax by three points to 38 per cent of profits for the next five years. But Ms Badenoch will today warn these massive profits have 'long gone' and the longer the tax remains 'the more damaging it becomes'. She will tell the Scottish Tory conference: 'Labour have extended and increased this tax. They are killing this industry. 'And frankly if it is allowed to remain in place until 2030, as is Labour's current plan, there will be no industry left to tax. 'Thousands will have been made unemployed and all while we import more gas from overseas – from the very same basin in which we are banned from drilling.' Mr Miliband is pledging £500million to invest in hydrogen, claiming it will create thousands of jobs in the transition to 'clean energy'. He says it will cushion the blow from sectors like iron, steel, glass, chemicals and ceramics whose factories are exposed to higher energy costs. The Energy Secretary said: 'By building hydrogen networks, we are securing homegrown energy that will power British industry for generations to come.' Kemi Badenoch pleads for Tories to give her more time just like Margaret Thatcher was given 2
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Crime will be the next immigration. Politicians will be punished for it
It's hard to shake off the sense that Britain is creeping towards lawlessness. Low-level crime is on its way to becoming legalised, whether officially – in the case of cannabis – or not – as with shoplifting. Public faith in the police is collapsing as many serious crimes like burglary and assault routinely fail to be solved, and sometimes even go uninvestigated, while ' speech crimes' trigger the full wrath of the law. Too many neighbourhoods are becoming hotbeds of anti-social behaviour, with begging prolific and buildings defaced by graffiti. True, Britain is cash-strapped. But it's the fusion of chronic underinvestment with liberal idealism which is so toxic. Disorder is being normalised, criminals treated as victims, the rule of law eroded. Though politicians remain convinced that crime is a second-order issue, it could eventually prove the Labour Government's undoing. My own local area in west London is disintegrating. It started with a clutch of beggars congregating outside the Tesco after Covid. Now they are joined by dishevelled women selling 'washing powder' and bare-footed addicts. For the most part, they are a nuisance rather than dangerous. Like many women in the city, when I walk the streets, I get the surreal feeling of being neither safe nor unsafe. With the crime rate in my area surging by a third since 2019, and several of my neighbours recently burgled, that may soon change. When I expressed my concerns to police and crime commissioners this week, they echoed Mark Rowley's complaint about a lack of funds. Some say they find Rachel Reeves's claim that she is hiking police spending by 2.3 per cent each year exasperating. A view prevails in Westminster that crime is a non-issue. Its proponents point to statistics that suggest it is at its lowest level on record. They think that technology is rendering crime a relic of the past, with their favourite example, carjacking, now largely a fool's errand thanks to security device innovation. They think that any ongoing problems pertain to a tiny number of chronic offenders. Meanwhile, Left-leaning criminologists insist that conservatives' fears that 'soft' policing could drive up crime are prejudiced. Crackdowns are said to be 'counterproductive', alienating 'disproportionately-targeted' minority groups. Such framing overlooks the risk that unrecorded crime is quietly climbing, as law-breaking becomes such a regular occurrence that some victims don't bother to report it. Other kinds are probably not being picked up properly by polling. Even more worrying is the Leftist view that, if there is a specific issue with chronic offenders, it's the consequence of too much law and order rather than too little. Keir Starmer's prison guru, James Timpson, thinks Britain is 'addicted' to sentencing. Sadiq Khan has backed 'partial' cannabis decriminalisation, amid claims that policing the drug harms more than the substance itself. The way in which the Left tries to romanticise these criminals is if anything becoming more strident – we are told that in the wake of austerity and Covid, certain law-breakers are, deep down, troubled souls. Shoplifters and fare dodgers who are allegedly 'struggling with the cost of living' are the latest group to which any 'compassionate' society should turn a blind eye, the Left insist. This myth threatens to shake the foundations of our society by undermining the sacred principle that we are all equal under the law. There is only so far we can fall down this rehabilitation rabbit hole before triggering a crime surge. Labour is adamant that the Michael Howard school of tough sentencing has failed. It has opted to release offenders early and ignore our rotting prison estate. This is a terrible mistake. Even if prison isn't working in the sense that it isn't preventing ex-convicts from reoffending, policymakers should not use this as an excuse to avoid punishing those who break our laws. The answer to our failure to rehabilitate is not to allow criminals to escape punishment. In the most important sense, prison almost always 'works' by preventing somebody who is locked up from stealing or assaulting other people. True, rehabilitation can sometimes work wonders. I have spoken with ex offenders who have been transformed by such programmes. One woman, Sonia, told me of how the support of one charity helped her evade the 'revolving door back to prison'. But resource-intensive, bespoke rehabilitation is tricky to scale. In austere times, the temptation to roll out rehab on the cheap could prove overwhelming, and will end in failure. As veteran probation expert Mark Leech told me: 'There are prisoners that have done the courses so many times they could deliver them better than the tutors who deliver them.' Chasing a utopian ideal, with no idea how to make it work, let alone on a tight budget, is flirting with disaster. Efforts by some criminologists to discredit the policing approach known as 'broken windows' could also end badly. This concept, which clamps down on low-level crime such as graffiti and drug-taking on the basis that tolerating 'minor' disorder leads to a culture that promotes much more serious crime, helped flatten a vicious crime wave in 1990s New York. It has been trashed in recent years, amid complaints it is racist and based on 'bogus' evidence. I disagree. Broken windows could once again be a vital weapon against certain serious crimes, such as sexual offences. Police officers on the front line certainly seem to think so: as Matthew Barber, PCC for Thames Valley, says: 'You won't find many hardened criminals who didn't start doing things at a young age before getting steadily out of control. Fix those basics and you'll prevent an awful lot more serious crime down the road.' Though Labour politicians may be in denial, a slow-burning crisis is unfolding. There is a widespread sense of malaise, that law is breaking down. In Red Wall towns, Labour's 'levelling up' projects are being undermined by anti-social behaviour. In the cities, alarm at gang violence, as well as muggings and burglary, may yet nudge professionals to the Right. Labour's inability to tackle crime could cost it dear.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Why can't ministers just tell us where they plan to house migrants once spending on hotels stops?
What trust? WHY can't ministers just tell us where they plan to house migrants once spending on hotels stops? Their only answer to the question is to repeatedly insist that the Government wants to deport those who have no right whatsoever to be here. 1 How can voters have any trust in that? In the year to March, just 6,339 people were forcibly returned. But more than 15,000 have arrived illegally by small boat already in 2025. Another 125,000 people are still waiting for decisons on their asylum claims. So in the unlikely event ministers find an immediate way of either stopping the boats entirely or sending migrants straight back to France, tens of thousands will have to be housed for years. The uncomfortable truth for the Government is that the vast majority will be shoved into rented accommodation — for several years to come. Blocks of flats filled largely with young, unemployed men. All living for free among families struggling to pay the bills. Surely even the Home Office can see this is not a recipe for community cohesion? Zero cheer PRESIDING over an economy as remorselessly sluggish as the UK's, it was perhaps unwise of the Chancellor to boast that Britain has enjoyed the fastest growth in the whole of the G7. Yesterday's GDP figures for April showing a 0.3 per cent fall mean we are now in danger of having the fastest SLOWING economy. Some of the mini-slump was caused by Donald Trump's insane tariffs. But the cost to businesses of the National Insurance rise on employers is now very real. It has cost jobs, while also squeezing wages and consumer spending. Next spring, bigger bills landing on the doorstep will include whacking great council tax. That is now set to rise at the fastest rate for 25 years. Far from fixing the foundations, the Chancellor's problems are again piling up. Awful April might just signal the start of an even worse year. Pray for them THE terrible scenes which unfolded during the Air India crash were, as the King said, desperately shocking. It is horrifying to think of so many loved ones gone in a few moments of appalling tragedy. Couples like Brits Fiongal and Jamie Greenlaw-Meek, who were just returning from a holiday of a lifetime. Yesterday was a day of overwhelming pain and grief.
