Nationwide 82-year-old chain to shutter final stores in weeks… but not before a huge closing down sale
Joann is closing for good after 82 years — and everything must go.
The once-popular craft retailer confirmed it will shutter all remaining stores in the coming weeks.
It will wrap up its nationwide going-out-of-business sales that offer shoppers up to 90 percent off.
Joann's demise has come fast. It filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in January in the hope of restructuring and keeping the business afloat.
But just a month later bosses said would Joann would close all its 800 stores. After shutting 255 in April, the rest will go this month.
Until 2018, it was known as Jo-Ann Stores but rebranded as 'Joann' to move beyond fabrics to embrace a wider range of crafts.
Fans of Joann were furious to learn the chain canceled gift cards on February 28.
Joann is the latest retailer to face challenges after experiencing a pandemic-era sales boom. With Americans now returning to work, the surge in home crafting has significantly declined.
Joann's closures come after a widespread 'retail apocalypse' last year saw major companies file for bankruptcy and brick-and-mortar stores close in their droves.
Up until mid-December, US retailers have shut 7,300 stores - up nearly 60 percent from 2023.
The most recent big retail bankruptcy was Container Store, which filed for Chapter 11 protection on December 22. There has been no news yet on its
The store - known for its home organizational goods, including closet organizers and storage bins - has been around for 46 years.
Despite receiving a boost from Marie Kondo's hit Netflix show 'Tidying Up' during the Covid-19 pandemic, the chain has been weighed down by mounting losses in recent years.
Joann specialized in fabrics and arts and crafts supplies, and its major competitors included Michaels and Hobby Lobby.
It first filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in March last year after pandemic-era sales growth faded, leaving the retailer with $1.2 billion in debt.
It emerged from bankruptcy the next month - with 815 stores across 49 states - after creditors agreed to cancel $505 million in debt in exchange for ownership of the company.
Unfortunately, it was not enough for the chain to make a financial comeback.
The retailer had $615.7 million in debt before its second filing and later sold all its assets to the GA Group and various lenders.
Now that Joann has bitten the dust, so will the jobs of nearly 20,000 employees.
Burlington is using Joann's unfortunate demise as an opportunity for store expansion.
The department store retailer confirmed it would begin transitioning 45 Joann locations into Burlington stores in May and June.
Some locations will be in California, Texas, and Joann's home state of Ohio.
Despite Joann's failure, Michaels is continuing its reign of being the North America's largest provider of arts and crafts and currently operates over 1,200 stores.
Hobby Lobby is thriving after opening several stores this year, one being in Arizona last week.
As of now, Michaels and Hobby Lobby have never filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Poundland rescue deal in doubt as councils seek unpaid business rates
A rescue deal for Poundland has been thrown into doubt after the struggling high street chain was hit with a series of court claims for outstanding debts. A string of local councils are pursuing the discount retailer over unpaid business rates, potentially piling further pressure on its already-stretched finances. Sources close to sale talks for Poundland fear the overdue taxes, thought to be worth millions of pounds, could scupper attempts to safeguard the company's future by scaring away potential buyers. It is understood that Poundland is hoping to write off the outstanding payments as part of a radical turnaround plan drawn up by management. The company is also proposing a freeze on future business rates payments for as long as nine months if it ends up in the hands of new owners. The plan also envisages between 150 and 200 store closures and steep rent cuts of between 10pc and 50pc on hundreds more. Poundland has more than 800 shops across the UK, employing 16,000 people. The measures, designed to put the business on a firmer financial footing, are expected to be implemented via a court-sanctioned restructuring scheme. However, there is no guarantee that a judge will approve the proposal. It comes after an auction of Poundland was whittled down to a shoot-out between the distressed investment funds Gordon Brothers and Hilco. Reports suggest Gordon Brothers, which owns Mothercare, is the frontrunner. Poundland was put on the block earlier this year by its Polish owner Pepco after becoming an increasing financial burden. Pepco crashed to a £548m loss in December after taking a £650m write-down on Poundland, as bosses blamed a 'significant decline in performance' and spiralling costs. Last month, Pepco told investors not to expect 'major proceeds' from any sale of Poundland. It also warned that the chain might not make a profit in the forthcoming financial year. The business continued to face 'highly challenging trading conditions' in the six months to the end of March, it said. Like-for-like sales were down 7.3pc and pre-tax earnings slumped three quarters to €22m (£18.6m).
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Voters reveal if Trump would have won election without Elon Musk and weigh in on his new political party idea
During their face-off last week, Elon Musk boldly claimed that he was the reason President Donald Trump won the 2024 election. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk claimed on Thursday. 'Such ingratitude,' the billionaire added. The billionaire SpaceX, X and Tesla head contributed around $277 million to Trump and Trump aligned candidates in the 2024 race and Musk personally hit the campaign trail in support of the Republican nominee. But in a Daily Mail poll conducted by JL Partners and released Friday, more registered voters sided with Trump than Musk. The polling found that 45 percent believed that Trump would have won the election without the help of Musk. Another 34 percent said Trump needed Musk to win. Finally 21 percent of respondents said they were unsure. When broken down by party, Republicans were more likely to say that Trump would have won without Musk's help. Among Republicans, 71 percent said Trump won on his own, while just 15 percent said that Trump wouldn't have won the November presidential election without the DOGE leader's help. Fifty-three percent of Democrats credit Musk for Trump's win, while just 24 percent said that Trump did it on his own. Amid their fighting, Musk suggested the idea of starting his own third-party. He floated the idea of forming the 'America Party' to represent the '80 percent' of people he said were in the political middle. When voters were asked what party they'd vote for if candidates in their area were running for office, a party created by Musk received only 4 percent backing among all the poll's respondents. Overall Democrats had an edge - with 42 percent saying the Democratic Party - while Republican candidates received 35 percent. When voters surveyed were broken down by party, Musk's third-party did the best with unaffiliated voters, with 7 percent backing that option. Just 1 percent of Democrats would vote for a Musk-party candidate, while 5 percent of Republicans said they'd make that choice. Democrats and Republicans largely stayed in their camps - with 86 percent of Democrats saying they'd support a Democrat and 84 percent of Republicans saying they'd vote Republican. On Friday, the Daily Mail and JL Partners released the first batch of numbers from the new poll - finding that Republicans overwhelmingly took Trump's side in the fight despite Musk's almost year-long association with the MAGA movement. Among GOP voters, 59 percent sided with the U.S. president, while just 12 percent chose Musk. Another 28 percent said they were unsure. Since April Trump has lost some support with GOP voters, while Musk's has grown - but Trump still has nearly five times as much support. Previous polling found that 70 percent of Republicans backed Trump, while 6 percent selected Musk. 'Republicans are clear: Donald Trump is their man. As our polling showed before, Trump voters are sticking by the person they backed in November over Elon Musk,' said J.L. Partners pollster James Johnson. The fresh poll was conducted Friday with a sample of 1,006 registered voters, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percent.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Big changes are being proposed for a US food aid program. Here's a breakdown by the numbers
President Donald Trump 's plan to cut taxes by trillions of dollars could also trim billions in spending from social safety net programs, including food aid for lower-income people. The proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program would make states pick up more of the costs, require several million more recipients to work or lose their benefits, and potentially reduce the amount of food aid people receive in the future. The legislation, which narrowly passed the U.S. House, could undergo further changes in the Senate, where it's currently being debated. Trump wants lawmakers to send the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' to his desk by July 4, when the nation marks the 249th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Here's a look at the food aid program, by the numbers: Year: 2008 The federal aid program formerly known as food stamps was renamed the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, on Oct. 1, 2008. The program provides monthly payments for food purchases to low-income residents generally earning less than $1,632 monthly for individuals, or $3,380 monthly for a household of four. The nation's first experiment with food stamps began in 1939. But the modern version of the program dates to 1979, when a change in federal law took effect eliminating a requirement that participants purchase food stamps. There currently is no cost to people participating in the program. Number: 42 million A little over 42 million people nationwide received SNAP benefits in February, the latest month for which figures are available. That's roughly one out of every eight people in the county. Participation is down from a peak average of 47.6 million people during the 2013 federal fiscal year. Often, more than one person in a household is eligible for food aid. As of February, nearly 22.5 million households were enrolled SNAP, receiving an average monthly household benefit of $353. Dollars: $295 billion Legislation passed by the House is projected to cut about $295 billion of federal spending from SNAP over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. A little more than half of those federal savings would come by shifting costs to states, which administer SNAP. Nearly one-third of those savings would come by expanding a work requirement for some SNAP participants, which the CBO assumes would force some people off the rolls. Additional money would be saved by eliminating SNAP benefits for between 120,000 and 250,000 immigrants legally in the U.S. who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents. Another provision in the legislation would cap the annual inflationary growth in food benefits. As a result, the CBO estimates that the average monthly food benefit would be about $15 lower than it otherwise would have been by 2034. Ages: 7 and 55-64 To receive SNAP benefits, current law says adults ages 18 through 54 who are physically and mentally able and don't have dependents would need to work, volunteer or participate in training programs for at least 80 hours a month. Those who don't do so are limited to just three months of benefits in a three-year period. The legislation that passed the House would expand work requirements to those ages 55 through 64. It also would extend work requirements to some parents without children younger than age 7. And it would limit the ability of states to waive work requirements in areas that lack sufficient jobs. The combined effect of those changes is projected by the CBO to reduce SNAP participation by a monthly average of 3.2 million people. Percentages: 5%-25% The federal government currently splits the administrative costs of SNAP with states but covers the full cost of food benefits. Under the legislation, states would have to cover three-fourths of the administrative costs. States also would have to pay a portion of the food benefits starting with the 2028 fiscal year. All states would be required to pay at least 5% of the food aid benefits, and could pay more depending on how often they make mistakes with people's payments. States that had payment error rates between 6-8% in the most recent federal fiscal year for which data is available would have to cover 15% of the food costs. States with error rates between 8-10% would have to cover 20% of the food benefits, and those with error rates greater than 10% would have to cover 25% of the food costs. Many states could get hit with higher costs. The national error rate stood at 11.7% in the 2023 fiscal year, and just three states — Idaho, South Dakota and Vermont — had error rates below 5%. But the 2023 figures are unlikely to serve as the base year, so the exact costs to states remains unclear. As a result of the cost shift, the CBO assumes that some states would reduce or eliminate benefits for people. Margin: 1 House Resolution 1, containing the SNAP changes and tax cuts, passed the House last month by a margin of just one vote — 215-214. A vote also could be close in the Senate, where Republicans hold 53 of the 100 seats. Democrats did not support the bill in the House and are unlikely to do so in the Senate. Some Republican senators have expressed reservations about proposed cuts to food aid and Medicaid and the potential impact of the bill on the federal deficit. GOP Senate leaders may have to make some changes to the bill to ensure enough support to pass it.
