
Oldest surviving victim of the Post Office scandal savages Keir Starmer for 'continuing this little game' as she reveals she STILL hasn't been compensated
The oldest surviving victim of the Post Office Horizon scandal has hit out at the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer after revealing she is still waiting for her full compensation.
Betty Brown, 92, from Stanley, Durham, appeared on ITV 's Good Morning Britain on Tuesday and revealed she is convinced she will never see compensation in her lifetime.
More than 900 sub-postmasters were prosecuted between 1999 and 2015 after faulty Horizon accounting software made it look as though money was missing from their accounts.
Hundreds are still awaiting compensation despite the previous government announcing that those who have had convictions quashed are eligible for £600,000 payouts. The Post Office has paid out roughly £438 million to 3,100 claimants.
But Mrs Brown says she is not one of those claimants.
The Durham native ran her Post Office in the small town of Stanley with her husband Oswald for more than 70 years.
During her decades-long service to the community, the postmistress said her world was turned upside down with the introduction of the Horizon system which regularly reported that there were shortfalls in her till of up to £1,500 a day.
Despite contacting the Post office helpline for support, Mrs Brown took the drastic step of using her life savings, more than £100,000 to plug the gap.
Speaking on the ITV breakfast show, the widow added that the stress of it led her husband to an early grave.
And she has now hit out at the Prime Minister and accused him of playing games instead of supporting those who were wrongly accused of stealing.
Mrs Brown told Richard Madeley and Susanna Reid that she feels she has been treated poorly but is determined not to give up and even at 92 will keep fighting for her money back.
'The determination I have will keep me going, and the anger even after 25 years, they stole my money after serving them for 76 years serving, my husband and I together.'
Mrs Brown also explained that and that she believes Sir Keir has been dragging his feet when it comes to ensuring victims are paid their full compensation.
'I can't understand why people like me are still yet to get justice and that's what we want. It's absolutely disgusting the way we've been treated. Diabolical.'
Mrs Brown added that she believes the Labour leader has all the necessary information to ensure the process is concluded as quickly as possible.
'He wants to do the deed, why is he carrying on, why is he continuing this little game he has?' she said.
Mrs Brown told Richard Madeley and Susanna Reid (pictured left) that she is determined not to give up and even at 92 will keep fighting for her money back
The widower also explained that and that she believes Sir Keir has been dragging his feet when it comes to ensuring victims are paid their full compensation
'He has all the information, all the experts who have investigated. Everything is there; accountants, medical professionals, all he has to do - it's all been analysed - he just has to put it together and get it finished.'
The widower called on Sir Keir to honour the repayments, and told the ITV hosts: 'Whenever these experts decide on a figure, 100 per cent must be paid and the PM must recognise it must all be paid'.
The Durham native went on to explain that she had been desperate to prove her innocence and regularly called in to the Post Office helpline to update them on the reported shortfall but was told it was her fault.
She said: 'I had a standing arrangement with my area manager. Every Thursday morning I had to phone the Post Office phone line, I had to tell them the balance from the night before.
'They knew but there was no support and I was told I was the only one it was happening to.'
Mrs Brown also revealed that the Post Office encouraged her to retire early because of the issues around her Horizon system and their decision crushed her husband who was suffering from cancer at the time and became fixated on the correspondence from the Post Office head office.
The widower called on Sir Keir to honour the repayments and said: 'Whenever these experts decide on a figure, 100 per cent must be paid and the PM must recognise it must all be paid'
'Every time you walked in to the room he was sitting on the settee reading this [letter] and I'd go away and when I'd go in he'd be reading again and I had to hide it to stop him reading it.
'The last words he ever said when the took ill, he had cancer like the king and he had dealt with this for 15 years, the experts in Newcastle that treated him couldn't believe it, they successfully treated him for 15 years but when [the letter] came he went gradually downhill.
'I used to go on the bus and he'd be sitting up in the bed and the first thing he always said was "any word from the Post Office?" and the next day "any word form the Post Office?" and this went on all the time and one day I went in and he said "they don't intent to do anything, how could they do anything like that to us?"'
'They were all his friends over the years and he trusted them 200 per cent but how could they do that to us?'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Moment 'feral' Brit tries to provoke another passenger on chaotic flight to Ibiza
A 'feral' Brit has been captured attempting to provoke another passenger on a chaotic 'flight from hell' to Ibiza. The altercation reportedly occurred on Jet2 flight LS1181 from Birmingham on Friday after the pilot delayed takeoff by around two-and-a-half hours. Originally scheduled to depart at 6.15pm, holidaymakers were not allowed on board until around 7pm only to be told that there would be further delays. One passenger who witnessed the incident unfold says it was at this point that the flight began to go 'feral'. CJ Edwards posted on TikTok to explain that the passenger, who can be seen in footage wearing a green outfit, decided to drink a bottle of vodka in '10 seconds', resulting in him later screaming in the faces of flight attendants. He was also seen throwing items of clothing at another passenger in the video, which raised tensions before others on board stepped in. Mr Edwards said: 'People were drinking and doing all sorts, and what I want to say is that it wasn't just him. 'There were a lot of things going on. There was a fight on the plane, someone got slapped, someone was sick in the aisles. My friend had sick on his shoe. People were passing drinks over each other. CJ Edwards posted on TikTok to explain that the passenger, who can be seen in footage wearing a green outfit, decided to drink a bottle of vodka in 'ten seconds', resulting in him later screaming in the faces of flight attendants 'There was a lot going on. So when we got on the flight and told we can't move, the guy took his bottle of Ciroc out that he'd got from duty free and, I'm not lying, he's guzzled it down in about 10 seconds.' Mr Edwards said it was at that point he knew he didn't want to be 'anywhere near' the man and moved to the back of the plane to sit with a friend. Despite the pre-flight chaos, Mr Edwards said the plane eventually took off - which flight records say was at 8.44pm - but that that there was a strong amount of turbulence. 'And when it's doing all of this in the air the man is standing up,' he continued. 'He's doing the most. He was coming to the back of the plane where I was, trying to get some drink off people and talk to some guys. 'When the air hostess told him to sit down he's looked in her face and said 'But who are you? Who are you to tell me to sit down?'. 'After all that when we're trying to land he's standing up again. He's in the aisles, moving through. People are trying to get him to sit down and he's not doing it. 'The pilot is on the microphone saying 'to the guy standing up, please sit down'. 'I think the person he was with as well that he ended up slapping them but I'm not too sure. It was the flight from hell.' When returning home after spending 24 hours in Ibiza, Mr Edwards said he saw the man who apologised and blamed his behaviour on frustration at the flight being delayed. He added: 'When I was getting my flight back today I saw him and he was like 'bro I'm so sorry, I was frustrated because I was trying to do 24 hours and my time was delayed'. 'I was just thinking 'your time was delayed like everyone else's, big man'.'


The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
More jets does not mean UK ‘at war' says Reeves, amid Israel-Iran conflict
Sending more jets to the Middle East 'does not mean' that the UK is at war, Rachel Reeves has said, as she warned of rising oil and gas prices amid the conflict between Israel and Iran. The Chancellor also indicated that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel, but declined to comment on 'what might happen in the future'. The two nations continued to exchange fire overnight, as the region braced for a protracted conflict. Sir Keir Starmer confirmed on Saturday that more RAF planes are being deployed, amid the escalating hostilities between Israel and Iran. Additional refuelling aircraft have been deployed from UK bases and more fast Typhoon jets will be sent over, it is understood. Asked whether the announcement from the Prime Minister means the UK is at war, Ms Reeves told Sky News: 'No, it does not mean that we are at war. 'And we have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict, but we do have important assets in the region and it is right that we send jets to protect them and that's what we've done. 'It's a precautionary move.' Oil prices surged surged on Friday after Israel's initial strikes against Iran's nuclear programme, sparking fears of increasing prices in the UK. The Chancellor told the BBC that there is 'no complacency' from the Treasury on the issue and 'we're obviously, monitoring this very closely as a government'. Sir Keir has declined to rule out the possibility of intervening in the conflict entirely, and the Chancellor indicated on Sunday that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel in the future. Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the Government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. Asked whether the UK would come to Israel's aid if asked, the Chancellor told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: 'We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. 'I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Pushed again on whether the UK would deploy assets in support of Israel if asked, she said: 'What we've done in the past (…) is help protect Israel from incoming strikes. 'So a defensive activity.' She added: 'I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage (…) it's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation.' It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride has backed the Government's decision to send further RAF jets to the region, telling the BBC it is the 'right thing' to do. He told the BBC: 'We've got assets out there in the UAE, Oman, Cyprus, they need to be protected given that Iran has suggested they may be under threat.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Drug-addled migrant can stay in UK after judge rules he would ‘struggle mentally'
A drug-addled migrant who has racked up 42 convictions in Britain cannot be deported to Uganda after a judge ruled he 'struggles mentally'. The 44-year-old man, named as MW, would also struggle to deal with his diabetes and opioid addiction, the judge said. The man was initially granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK, having lived here since the age of six. But he grew up to have a prolific criminal career, which saw him serve two years and three months in a Young Offenders Institute for robbery and possessing a blade in March 1999. In December 2001 he was jailed for two months for fraud, and in December 2008 he was sentenced to three years and six months for actual bodily harm and robbery. He also served an 18-month term in May 2017 for supply of cocaine and heroin. As a result, the Home Office decided to deport him. In response he launched a human rights claim, saying that he was gay and would be persecuted in Uganda. Second protection claim That was refused on May 7 2019, prompting an appeal to the First-tier Immigration Tribunal. While that appeal was pending, he submitted a second protection claim which was also refused on June 28 2023. His appeal was expanded to include a challenge to this second refusal. Even while these appeals were ongoing the man, who has fathered four children here, was convicted again and awaiting sentence for another burglary. The First-tier Tribunal heard the case on Nov 28 2024 and issued its decision on Jan 8 2025. The judge found that MW could not claim refugee status and humanitarian protection because he was a 'danger to the community' and that he had not shown he would be at risk in Uganda. However, the judge allowed his human rights appeal, finding that he met the exception to the public interest in deportation under UK law, which applies to foreign criminals sentenced to less than four years. The judgment said: 'The main concern with regard to the appellant relocating to Uganda is the length of time which he has been away from the country coupled with his vulnerability as an individual suffering from PTSD with a history of drug and alcohol abuse and the lack of support in Uganda. 'I find that it is more likely than not that the appellant would struggle mentally on his return to Uganda, that he would have a real lack of emotional support to assist him in reintegrating and that his mental health will impact on his ability to find employment, accommodation and forge links in Uganda.' The Home Office was granted permission to appeal this decision but another judge finally dismissed this appeal, meaning the man can stay.