China allows visa-free entry for 5 Latin American nations to boost ties
China will allow visa-free entry for nationals of five Latin American countries for one year to boost closer connections with the region.
Starting June 1, citizens of Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Peru and Uruguay will be allowed to enter China for up to 30 days without a visa, China's Foreign Ministry announced Thursday. The trial program will be in effect for one year.
'We welcome more foreign friends to visit China, to experience the colorful and vibrant China,' Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said at a daily briefing.
Beijing hosted the China-CELAC, or Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, Forum earlier this week, aiming at strengthening its alliances in the region as a counterweight to U.S. influence.
China has been opening up to dozens of countries including most of the European nations, Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Malaysia to boost the economy after strict pandemic travel measures. China and Uzbekistan will also begin mutual visa-free entry for up to 30 days starting June 1, according to China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
BOJ sets aside maximum provisions for bond transactions, Nikkei reports
June 2 (Reuters) - The Bank of Japan has set aside the maximum provision for losses on bond transactions, the Nikkei reported on Monday. For fiscal 2024, BOJ raised the level of provisions to 100% for the first time, signaling that the central bank expects higher interest payments to financial institutions to impact its capital base, the newspaper reported. Japan's central bank kept short-term interest rates steady at 0.5% in its May meeting, with pressures mounting to keep hiking borrowing costs. BOJ did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Sanctioned MPs ‘banned from meeting Chinese officials'
MPs have claimed they were banned from attending a meeting between Chinese officials and an arm of the Foreign Office at the request of Beijing. The Great Britain China Centre (GBCC), an arms-length body of the Foreign Office, will host Chinese officials this month, with MPs invited to attend. But those who have been sanctioned by the Chinese Communist Party for raising concerns about human rights abuses said they were told they will not be welcome because Chinese officials may not be authorised to meet with them. The Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (Ipac) said to let China decide who was allowed to attend would be 'subjugating the interests of our people to those of an authoritarian dictatorship'. The Times understands that GBCC officials contacted Ipac, which has members from parliaments across the world, to ask if any of its MPs wanted to join the discussion. It was later said that the Chinese officials may not be allowed to meet the politicians. Whether they would have been allowed to has not been tested. A letter signed by MPs and peers to Sir David Lidington, GBCC's honorary president and formerly Theresa May 's de facto deputy prime minister, said: 'Parliament has stood together against the Chinese Communist Party's attempted interference in our domestic politics. 'It is deeply disappointing to find such interference not merely accepted, but promoted by British tax-funded entities like the GBCC. 'We must be clear that as elected representatives of the British people we believe such an instruction to be incompatible with the mandate of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office to advance the interests of the British people; rather we view it as the reverse: subjugating the interests of our people to those of an authoritarian dictatorship seeking to silence parliamentarians whose only offence was to oppose Beijing's atrocity crimes.' A number of British politicians have been sanctioned by China after raising concerns about human rights abuses. GBCC said three Ipac MPs, including one who was sanctioned, had been invited. However in a later email seen by The Times a GBCC staff member said it was unclear whether the Chinese officials would be authorised to meet with them. In a statement, the GBCC said it 'actively seeks the greatest possible diversity of political opinion in its bilateral dialogues with Chinese counterparts, and therefore invited three IPAC MPs, including one who is sanctioned and all from different political parties, to the event'. It said: 'As they were either unable to attend, or did not reply to the invitation, GBCC reached out to Ipac to explore interest from other Ipac-affiliated MPs. 'The Chinese side is obviously not involved in recruiting UK delegates, so GBCC does not know whether or not they would be prepared to engage with sanctioned MPs. However, GBCC stands ready to find out.' Tom Tugendhat, the former security minister and one of those who has been sanctioned, told The Times: 'I'm sure the FCDO did not intend to reinforce China's sanctions that ministers have told us they've raised frequently in Beijing. It appears this message got lost in translation. I hope the government will seize the opportunity to reassure parliament that we will not allow ourselves to be divided according to the designs of the Chinese Communist Party.' Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former Tory leader who is also on the sanctions list, said he was 'sure [the decision] was made by the Chinese state and the Great British China Centre should have the guts to say to them we don't do meetings like that'. He added: 'We don't ban certain people. That shows a lack of courage on their part.' The letter to GBCC added: 'Please urgently reconsider your rejection of fellow parliamentarians. Your interlocutors from the People's Republic of China are welcome to discuss with members of parliament but they are not welcome to choose who those members are; that is the privilege of the British people and the British people alone.'
BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Trump's tariffs 'not going away', top adviser says
US President Donald Trump is not planning to extend the pause to his sweeping global tariffs, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick president's plan - where countries face between 11% to more than 100% tariffs on goods brought into the US - was announced in April. But the majority of the tariffs were paused by Trump for 90 days in the wake of stock market with Fox News, Lutnick said he expects the President to stand firm when that 90 day pause expires at the start of July.A key trade deal would be with China, who US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said has "not been a reliable partner" and claimed it was holding back products in the global supply chain. The president's top trade advisers presented a united front in their appearances on separate US morning television programmes on remained steadfast on the tariff agenda, which has faced ongoing challenges in the nation's court system."Tariffs are not going away," Lutnick said in response to the court added that the US "could sign lots of deals now" but the Trump administration is working to "make them better". "You're going to see over the next couple of weeks, really, first class deals for the American worker," he said.. And on the expiration of the 90 day pause, Lutnick said: "I think that's the deadline, and the President's just going to determine what rates people have if they can't get a deal done". When the pause expires, in theory it would enact sweeping tariffs on countries across the globe. Imports from about 60 trading partners that the White House has described as the "worst offenders", including the European Union, Vietnam, South Africa and more, will face higher rates. Trump has described these taxes as payback for unfair trade tariffs has Trump announced and why?US pauses higher tariffs for most countries after market havoc, but hits China harderOn Friday, Trump announced the US will double its current tariff rate on steel and aluminium imports from 25% to 50%, beginning on with most of the announced tariffs, Trump said the move would help boost local steel industry, while reducing US reliance on China. US steel manufacturing has decreased in recent years and countries like China, India and Japan have become the world's biggest producers. The steel tariffs come as many hold their breath waiting for further announcements. from the Trump administration. Trump's tariff policies have upended global trade and cracks have formed - or widened - among relationships between the US and other countries, including some of its closest partners. World watches for news of US-China trade deal The levies have worsened relations between China and the US, the two largest global economies - and launched the countries into a tit-for-tat trade a trade truce struck in May at Geneva, the US lowered tariffs imposed on goods from China from 145% to 30%. China's retaliatory tariffs on US goods dropped from 125% to 10%.But a larger trade deal between the countries has not been established. On Sunday, Treasury Secretary Bessent told CBS News, the BBC's US news partner, details of the trade will be "ironed out" once Chinese President Xi Jinping and Trump speak, but he did not say exactly when that conversation is expected. "What China is doing is they are holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe. And that is not what a reliable partner does," Bessent Treasury Secretary claimed China could be withholding some products because of a "glitch", or he said it could be "intentional" - but the administration would not know for sure until a call with both countries happened. On Friday, China urged the US to "immediately correct its erroneous actions, cease discriminatory restrictions against China and jointly uphold the consensus reached at the high-level talks in Geneva".White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett told ABC News on Sunday that Trump and Xi are expected to talk this week, and said "both sides have expressed a willingness to talk". "The bottom line is that we've got to be ready in case things don't happen the way we want," Hassett said of the expected China talks. "Because if we have cannons without cannonballs, then we can't fight a war.""We have to have a steel industry that's ready for American defence," he said.
