
More migrants arrive in UK after blundering Labour minister claimed majority on small boats were women and children - but now says he was only talking about ONE vessel
More people have been spotted arriving in the UK via small boats after making the dangerous crossing of the English Channel from France after a Labour Minister had to issue a clarification after claiming the majority of migrants are women and children.
Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, made the claim during Thursday's Question Time programme before hastily 'clarifying' he was referring to one specific boat after the figure was widely debunked online.
The row came as Reform's Zia Yusuf, who revealed an inner chaos to the party when he abruptly quit as chairman last week before returning two days later in a new role, also made false claims when he said 'more than 90 percent' are men.
Mr Jones provoked fury when he said that 'the majority of the people in these boats are children, babies and women'.
Following cries of disbelief from members of the public, Mr Yusuf - who prevoiously said getting Reform elected was 'not a good use of my time' - interjected to say that 'more than 90 per cent of them are adult men', which is also incorrect.
Home Office figures show 73 percent percent of small boat arrivals in 2024 - or 26,999 out of all 36,816 arrivals - were adult males.
On Friday, another 919 people arrived in 14 small boats after making the dangerous crossing from France.
That takes the 2025 total to 16,183 - 42 per cent up on the same date last year, and 79 per cent up on 2023.
The figure makes yesterday's arrivals the second highest number so far this year.
On Saturday more refugees and migrants arrived in Dover after being picked up in the Channel by a Border Force vessel.
One man was seen being helped into a wheelchair after the toll of the crossing in the world's busiest shipping lane.
On Question Time on Thursday following Mr Yusuf's intervention, host Fiona Bruce turned to Mr Jones and asked: 'You're saying that's not true?'
He replied: 'I'm saying it's not true. I'm saying this is controversial for a reason and you're told you're not supposed to challenge the audience on Question Time, but I'm going to.
'When there are babies and children put into that position by human trafficking gangs, who are coming across the Channel with skin burns from the oil from those boats mixing with the salt sea water, I would ask any of you to look at those babies and children and say 'go back'.
Mr Yusuf hit back: 'In my previous answer, I made the case that this Government prioritises foreign citizens over citizens of the United Kingdom. After that testimony, I can rest my case.
'The vast, vast majority of people making the journey from France by small boat are fighting age, military age, males, not women and children.
'We're talking about asylum hotels, and Rachel Reeves saying we're going to shut down asylum hotels.
'I spent many weeks in the constituency of Runcorn and Helsby. Runcorn is a very deprived area. And do you know the issue that exercised people so much? The reason is primarily because of HMOs – houses of multiple occupancies.
'In an unholy alliance of Serco and Yvette Cooper, illegal migrants are being deposited into communities and there's no say for the local people.'
Taking to X (formerly Twitter) this evening, Mr Jones clarified his position but maintained the percentage of migrants that are adult males is 'not north of 90 percent'.
He wrote: 'Of course the overall majority of people arriving illegally on small boats are men - but not 'north of 90 percent' as Reform claimed.
'On @bbcquestiontime I shared a story from my visit to the Border Security Command about a dinghy that arrived mostly carrying women, children and babies who had suffered horrific burns.
'I'm happy to clarify this given how this is now being misrepresented.
'Labour committed new funding this week to secure our borders while Reform have voted against giving our police the powers needed to smash the gangs fuelling this vile trade.'
At her spending review on Wednesday, Rachel Reeves pledged that migrants would be moved out of hotel accommodation by the time of the next general election, due in 2029.
Ms Reeves also promised £1 billion of savings by speeding up the asylum system, along with £280 million investment in future years for the new Border Security Command.
Latest figures show £3.1 billion was spent on housing asylum seekers in hotels in 2023-24, out of a total asylum support bill of £4.7 billion.
More than 30,000 asylum seekers are housed in about 200 hotels across Britain, many of whom arrived illegally in dinghies, and ministers are looking at moving them into derelict tower blocks and student digs.
But despite Ms Reeves' pledge to end the use of hotels, the Tories pointed out that the small print of her Spending Review documents revealed that £2.5 billion will still be spent each year on asylum support by the end of the decade.
It comes as dramatic pictures emerged of French police using tear gas and pepper spray to disperse hundreds of migrants trying to board boats headed for Britain.
Some officers were seen entering the water and dragging them back to shore.
A major point of contention between Britain and France has been the French authorities' refusal to turn back migrants who are already in the water.
Despite officers' efforts, a significant number of migrants were able to successfully cross this morning - with pictures showing them at Dover.
A record five months of the year has brought the provisional arrivals today so far to 14,812 arrivals.
This has also surpassed the highest total recorded for the first six months of the year, which was previously 13,489 on June 30 last year.
In 2024, the number of arrivals did not reach more than 14,000 until July 9 (14,058).
The Government has vowed to crack down on people-smuggling and Channel crossings since coming to power in July last year.
This includes funding elite officers to increase patrols along the northern French coastline and launching a specialist intelligence unit in Dunkirk to track down people smugglers.
It has also established a Border Security Command to lead strategy and its Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, currently going through Parliament, seeks to introduce new criminal offences and hand counter terror-style powers to law enforcement agencies to target smuggling gangs.
However, critics have repeatedly warned the 'smash the gangs' strategy will not work unless there is a deterrent strong enough to prevent migrants from wanting to make the crossing in the first place.
Yesterday, a spokesman for the PM repeatedly refused to engaged with questions about whether Mr Jones was right.
'The Government is absolutely focused on tackling these vile smuggling gangs… ' they said.
Asked again about Home Office figures suggesting he is wrong, the spokesman said: 'The focus of the government is tackling these vile gangs that deal in misery.'
Pressed if the PM had confidence in Mr Jones, the spokesman said: 'Yes.'
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'Darren Jones is completely out of touch with reality.
'Since 2018, 73 percent of small boat arrivals have been single adult men. Yet Labour MPs like Jones still push the fairytale that these boats are full of women and babies. It's a dangerous distortion of the truth.
'No wonder this is shaping up to be the worst year on record for small boat crossings. If this is what passes for reality inside the Labour Government, Britain is in serious trouble.'
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We all want to end dangerous small boat crossings, which threaten lives and undermine our border security.
'The people-smuggling gangs do not care if the vulnerable people they exploit live or die as long as they pay, and we will stop at nothing to dismantle their business models and bring them to justice.
'That is why this Government has put together a serious plan to take down these networks at every stage, and why we are investing up to an additional £280 million per year by 2028-29 in the Border Security Command.
'Through international intelligence-sharing under our Border Security Command, enhanced enforcement operations in northern France and tougher legislation in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, we are strengthening international partnerships and boosting our ability to identify, disrupt and dismantle criminal gangs whilst strengthening the security of our borders.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
More jets does not mean UK ‘at war' says Reeves, amid Israel-Iran conflict
Sending more jets to the Middle East 'does not mean' that the UK is at war, Rachel Reeves has said, as she warned of rising oil and gas prices amid the conflict between Israel and Iran. The Chancellor also indicated that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel, but declined to comment on 'what might happen in the future'. The two nations continued to exchange fire overnight, as the region braced for a protracted conflict. Sir Keir Starmer confirmed on Saturday that more RAF planes are being deployed, amid the escalating hostilities between Israel and Iran. Additional refuelling aircraft have been deployed from UK bases and more fast Typhoon jets will be sent over, it is understood. Asked whether the announcement from the Prime Minister means the UK is at war, Ms Reeves told Sky News: 'No, it does not mean that we are at war. 'And we have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict, but we do have important assets in the region and it is right that we send jets to protect them and that's what we've done. 'It's a precautionary move.' Oil prices surged surged on Friday after Israel's initial strikes against Iran's nuclear programme, sparking fears of increasing prices in the UK. The Chancellor told the BBC that there is 'no complacency' from the Treasury on the issue and 'we're obviously, monitoring this very closely as a government'. Sir Keir has declined to rule out the possibility of intervening in the conflict entirely, and the Chancellor indicated on Sunday that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel in the future. Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the Government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. Asked whether the UK would come to Israel's aid if asked, the Chancellor told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: 'We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. 'I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Pushed again on whether the UK would deploy assets in support of Israel if asked, she said: 'What we've done in the past (…) is help protect Israel from incoming strikes. 'So a defensive activity.' She added: 'I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage (…) it's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation.' It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride has backed the Government's decision to send further RAF jets to the region, telling the BBC it is the 'right thing' to do. He told the BBC: 'We've got assets out there in the UAE, Oman, Cyprus, they need to be protected given that Iran has suggested they may be under threat.'


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
B3191 Cleeve Hill closure U-turn demanded by residents
More than 1,000 people have signed a letter demanding a council reverses its decision to permanently close a coastal B3191 in Watchet, Somerset, was hit with a permanent traffic regulation order in May, after it was found to be too unstable to allow vehicles through due to coastal James Wright said the closure was "hurting people" and coastal communities needed to be listened cliff-side road, known locally as Cleeve Hill, remains accessible to pedestrians and cyclists and Somerset Council said it was committed to finding new ways of funding a solution. The road had been temporarily closed to traffic since January Wright said 1,152 residents had signed his letter opposing the road being shut permanently. He added: "Blue Anchor and Watchet are both difficult to reach places... and local connectivity is so important."The permanent closure meant the council lost the responsibility to keep that road open. They wouldn't have had to find an alternative. "We're hoping the council keep the temporary closure... so they have a duty to review it. We hope they listen to the people and keep the road as it is."The council said the permanent order could be reversed if needed, adding it was "committed to exploring all potential sources of funding and is continuing to lobby for transport investment in the area". A spokesperson said: "Detailed inspections following January 2023 revealed further movement was inevitable and it will be impossible to safely reopen the road to vehicles without major intervention such as creation of an alternative alignment for the road and cliff protection and stabilisation measures at Cleeve Hill. "The council has completed cliff protection works at nearby Blue Anchor in order to ensure that an alternative route remains available for traffic to access businesses and destinations along the B3191."


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The City should ditch Pride celebrations and focus on its real job
The multi-coloured flags are not flying as prominently as they once did. The LinkedIn pages are no longer festooned with symbols and the company's X page no longer reminds everyone of its solidarity with the cause, while at the same time corporate donations to parades and fairs are collapsing. We are already halfway through Pride month, designed to promote the LGBTQ+ community, and it is already clear that the City and the wider corporate world is dialling down the celebrations. In reality, it is about time. Sure, we all agree that everyone should be treated equally regardless of their sexuality. But the City is in steep decline – and it should get back to deal-making before it is too late. The Pride celebrations are definitely quieter than usual among businesses this year. Law firms such as DLA Piper and Linklaters have all abandoned Pride logos on their LinkedIn pages, although in the past they were prominently displayed over the course of the month. Likewise, PwC has chosen not to update its logo and so have EY and Deloitte, while KPMG only did so after being contacted by this newspaper. Meanwhile, corporate funding for the events planned around the country is in free-fall, with corporate sponsorship of Pride events down by 50pc this year according to the UK Pride Organisers Network. There are reports of local events being cancelled after the contributions from companies dried up. Indeed, Bloomberg reported earlier this month that 75pc of organisers had seen a fall in corporate backing and that Pride in London, the largest event in the UK, was at risk as businesses politely backed away. One reason for that, of course, is US president Donald Trump. In the US, his administration has clamped down on diversity, equality and inclusion (DEI) spending –in many cases forcing companies to abandon their support for liberal causes or face exclusion from government contracts and applying moral and financial pressure on others to scale back their commitments. The tactics might be rough but it is working. It is noticeable, for example, that many of the law firms that are no longer visibly backing the Pride celebrations have significant operations in the US. And since the internet does not respect national boundaries, they may well have decided that it is prudent – and law firms are always cautious – to scale back their commitments on this side of the Atlantic just in case. Trump may well have gone too far, as so often. And yet, it is surely right for the City to drop the high-profile support for Pride. Sure, we can all agree that staff should be treated with respect, and treated equally, regardless of their sexuality or gender. But the high-profile 'rainbow-washing' of Pride month – which even many gay people now feel has been hijacked by extreme activists – had also become a distraction from the real work of the Square Mile. In reality, the City is in a very perilous position right now. The initial public offering (IPO) market has collapsed and listings are moving elsewhere. We saw that confirmed earlier this month when Wise, one of the most consistently successful technology companies in Europe, decided to move its primary listing from London to New York, And the Chinese fast-fashion giant Shein – which may be controversial but is still a major company – decided to list its shares in Hong Kong instead of London. The number of companies listed in the UK's capital has fallen from 2,400 a decade ago to 1,600 now. There are virtually no new listings to replace them, with 18 listings last year raising a mere £770m, an 18pc fall on a year earlier, and plenty of companies are still giving up and accepting takeover offers. On current trends, the London market will go the way of the Liverpool and Manchester stock exchanges. It will be absorbed into New York in the same way that regional markets were absorbed into the City a hundred years ago. Meanwhile, the non-doms are all leaving following the ending of tax breaks in the UK. And much of the hedge fund and wealth management industries will go with them. The foreign exchange markets are still under threat from the European Union's determination to move trading and settlement within its own borders. Even pension funds may not be safe for much longer as Chancellor Rachel Reeves eyes them up as one of the few remaining pools of money she can raid, as she desperately searches around for more money to feed into a government machine with an insatiable appetite for more cash. Indeed, it is getting to the point where the City's only remaining major business is financing and rolling over the Government's vast and growing debts. Everything else is facing an accelerating decline. Those are the real challenges and a rainbow flag, no matter how well intentioned, does not do anything to fix any of them. In reality, the City has always been a place that tolerated just about anything except losing money, You could be gay, bi or straight, wear what you liked, dress anyway that made you feel comfortable, get up to anything you felt like at the weekend and spend your bonus money any way you chose to so long as the profit and loss account was in good shape at the end of the week. But the City no longer has the luxury of indulging fashionable causes or allowing resources to be wasted on issues that, while they may be important socially and some of the staff may personally feel very strongly about them, don't make any significant contribution to the growth of the business. In reality, Pride month was just a distraction from the real challenges of doing more deals, creating new products and opening up new markets. There won't be nearly so many high profile rainbow celebrations this month – and if we are being honest it is unlikely that anyone will miss them.