LHC affirms Rangers' authority
The Lahore High Court (LHC) has rejected the impression that Pakistan Rangers have no authority to make arrests or detain the offenders under the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 (CNSA 1997).
The development came as LHC's Justice Muhammad Amjad Rafiq dismissed the post-arrest bail of a drug peddler for allegedly having 1060 grams of heroin.
The arguments of counsel for petitioner Maqbool Ali, who is also the accused, revolved around the claim that Pakistan Rangers have no authority to arrest and detain the offenders under the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 (CNSA 1997).
He further implored the court that the petitioner, being the owner in possession of adjacent lands, had once resisted interference with his property rights by the Rangers, who then retaliated by falsely implicating him in this case. He argued that a story was concocted, claiming two accused managed to run away from the crime scene, which was not believable, given the strength and arms available to the Rangers.
Officers from Pakistan Rangers were carrying a notification dated December 1, 2010, issued by the Government of Pakistan (Revenue Department) Federal Board of Revenue. This notification entrusted officers of Pakistan Rangers and the Frontier Corps (Balochistan, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, including FATA) operating within their respective jurisdictions with the functions of Customs officers under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1969.
Such functions shall be limited to a 20-kilometre radius from the international borders. Thus, they claim the authority to inspect any suspected person within this area. A review of the notification shows that it was ordered to remain in force until June 31, 2011, and thereafter, it was to be reissued or extended subject to the satisfactory performance of the aforementioned departments. However, Rangers officers claim that it is still operative.
Justice Rafiq observed that the claim made by the counsel for the accused that the arrest by a sub-inspector of Pakistan Rangers had vitiated the entire proceedings could not be upheld for two substantive reasons. Firstly, with all just legal exceptions, officers of various categories within Pakistan Rangers are also authorized to exercise powers under the relevant provisions of the Customs Act, 1969, in light of the 2010 notification.
Secondly, after arresting, searching, and seizing narcotics, officers of Pakistan Rangers handed over the petitioner to the local police, a power that is available even to private individuals under Section 59 of the CrPC. Thus, no illegality has been observed, particularly since the case was investigated by the police.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
21 hours ago
- Business Recorder
RTI doesn't extend to any legitimate privacy interest: LHC
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) held that right to information (RTI) does not extend to any legitimate privacy interest and request for provision of information can validly be withheld which violates the privacy of an individual. The court passed this order in an Intra Court Appeal (ICA) of a citizen Shahbaz and burdened the appellant with special cost of rupees one million. The court held that the amount of special cost should be recovered as decree in favour of the respondent department. The court said that the single bench has rightly allowed the constitutional petition of the respondent department; however, the Punjab Information Commission passed the order in blatant excess of its jurisdiction, the court added. The court said the appellant made request for getting information qua disclosure of names of taxpayers and information regarding their properties but imparting of requisite information is subject to an unambiguous consent of said individuals; otherwise, the request could validly be regretted under Section 13 (1) (b) of the Act, the court added. The court observed that the privacy directly relates to an individual's personal life, such as his name, address, phone number, family details, medical history, financial status; etc., which has validly been safeguarded in almost every law, the court added. The court said that any legitimate privacy interest of an individual is protected under the Punjab Transparency and Right to Information Act and it can be withheld under Section 13 (1) (b) of the Act. The court said the right to information is primarily intended to give access to the citizen to the information gathered and maintained by public authorities to ensure that government is functioning in a transparent manner and accountable to the people it serves. The court; however, observed that the provisions of the Act gives the power to public information officer to refuse the application for access to information where such disclosure of information is likely to harm the legitimate privacy or interest of individual unless the person concerned has consented to disclosure of information. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
07-06-2025
- Business Recorder
Special attorney not liable for acts performed on behalf of principal: LHC
LAHORE: The court held that a special attorney functions as an agent and he is not personally liable for acts performed on behalf of the principal. The court restrained the respondents from recovering the decretal amount from the petitioner Abdul Razzaq, or from attaching the petitioner's immovable property, merely on account of his status as the special attorney of the principal. The court; therefore, directed the respondent authorities to initiate and conclude recovery proceedings against the judgment-debtor Abdul Khaliq within three months. LHC explains what actually constitutes power of attorney The court observed that the responsibility of the attorney and surety with the judgment-debtor is coextensive with that of the judgment-debtor. The court said the liability of a special attorney in execution proceedings must be determined with reference to the specific contents and scope of the power of attorney executed in his favour. The court observed that a power of attorney must be construed strictly, and only those acts, duties, and obligations that are expressly conferred upon the attorney may be lawfully performed by him. The court said that no implied or assumed obligation can be fastened upon an agent beyond what has been clearly and expressly delegated. It observed that in the present case, the petitioner, acting as a special attorney, neither made any substantive commitment to satisfy the decree nor exceeded the scope of authority conferred by the power of attorney; therefore, no coercive action can lawfully be directed against him, the court added. The court said doing so would amount to an excess of jurisdiction and a violation of the fundamental principle that delegated authority does not create personal liability unless expressly undertaken. The court; therefore, held that the impugned actions of the respondents in proceedings against the petitioner who is not the judgment-debtor are ultra vires, without lawful authority, and contrary to settled legal norms. The court said if the judgment-debtor is residing abroad or is otherwise avoiding execution, the proper legal recourse lies under the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, which permits the recovery of the decretal amount as arrears of land revenue. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
05-06-2025
- Express Tribune
126 inmates recaptured after mass jailbreak at Karachi's Malir jail
Listen to article The voluntary return and arrests of prisoners who escaped from the District Jail Malir continues, with the number of those back in custody now reaching 126. Officials confirmed that investigations into the jailbreak remain ongoing, while efforts to recapture the remaining 90 fugitives are being intensified through search operations across Karachi. Authorities are encouraging voluntary surrenders as part of their strategy to bring the escapees back into custody. Yesterday, 27 more inmates were re-arrested and returned to the jail, bringing the total number of recaptured prisoners to 105. However, 111 inmates remained at large. According to jail authorities, a case pertaining to the jailbreak has been registered at Shah Latif Town Police Station, where an FIR was filed by the prison's Deputy Superintendent Zulfiqar Ali Pirzada under different sections of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) and the Anti-Terrorism Act. The charges listed include attempted murder, dacoity, police encounter and terrorism, among others. The authorities have appealed to the public for assistance in locating the remaining fugitives and have ramped up coordination between law enforcement agencies to ensure their swift capture. Raids are being carried out in different parts of the city with surveillance increased at the known residences of the escaped prisoners. Furthermore, officials have announced that inmmates who return voluntarily to the jail will be granted leniency. Read: Over 200 inmates escape from Malir Jail CM orders probe Meanwhile, in an emergency meeting held at the Chief Minister's House, Sindh CM Murad Ali Shah ordered a thorough investigation into the Malir Jail escape incident. He assigned Chief Secretary Asif Hyder Shah to oversee the probe by involving Karachi Commissioner Hassan Naqvi and Karachi Police Chief Javed Alam Odho. Addressing the press after the meeting, Murad criticised the jail administration for failing to seek immediate assistance from local authorities and law enforcement agencies. 'There seems to have been a complete breakdown in communication and preparedness,' he said during the press conference. He stressed that those found negligent would face consequences, 'Those responsible will be held accountable'. The chief minister also instructed the home secretary to carry out a detailed security audit of all prisons across Sindh. A robust search operation by the district and jail police and Rangers had followed the jail break, during which 90 escapees were recaptured on Tuesday. According to the police, the jail administration evacuated the prisoners from the barracks as a precautionary measure due to the potential danger following the earthquake. Around 3,000 prisoners gathered near the Mari Gate, causing a stampede. The Home and Law Minister dubbed this jailbreak as 'one of the largest-ever in Pakistan". The prisoners took advantage of the situation, broke the locks of the Mari Gate, and started escaping by jumping over the jail walls. Read More: Inmates escape from Karachi's Malir jail after breaking wall Jail police and Frontier Corps (FC) personnel tried to stop the prisoners by firing warning shots. However, one prisoner snatched a kalashnikov from a police officer and started firing indiscriminately, injuring two FC personnel and one police officer. Other prisoners also injured officials with stones and sticks and managed to escape. The intense firing caused panic in the area, and traffic on the National Highway was suspended. The road from Quaidabad to Malir Jail was closed, resulting in long queues of vehicles between Malir Kala Board and Quaidabad. A large contingent of District Malir police, Rangers, and FC reached the scene. The IG and DIG prisons, Superintendent of Jail, SSP Malir, and other senior officials also reached the site. Sindh Home Minister Zia ul Hassan Lanjar took notice of the incident and directed SSP Malir to take immediate action and arrest the escaped prisoners. He instructed effective measures, surveillance, intelligence, and roadblocks, and ordered strict departmental action against negligent officials. The jailbreak started late night on June 2 and continued into early morning on June 3 after hundreds of inmates, unsettled by mild tremors, were brought into the prison yard as a safety measure, Sindh Home Minister Zia ul Hasan Lanjar said while speaking to reporters at the site. A door-to-door search was conducted in the surrounding areas.
