
I feel sorry for the huffing hordes who believe painful exertion is necessary for health
It was during speculation around the recent illness of Pope Francis earlier this year that the penny dropped. Some had already buried the poor man before he recovered and had even elected a successor to occupy the sede vacante ('the seat being vacant'), a term used by the Vatican to describe that period between popes.
'Bless my sweet soul,' says I to myself, 'but surely that's the root of one of my favourite words – sedentary?' And, I was right. It's remarkable that it took me years to cop that.
Little gives me greater pleasure of an evening than to sit out, beverage in hand, as the world runs by, puffing and sweating in miserable pursuit of the body-perfect, some carrying as much body fat as the Famine statues on Custom House Quay in Dublin.
'This is the life,' I tell myself, raising a glass in salute to the huffing hordes hurtling past. But it's hard to admire the vanity. The ones I do feel for are those who believe such painful exertion is necessary for health reasons. It is not, as Dr Muiris Houston
made clear
in this newspaper recently.
READ MORE
Addressing those who celebrate 'the sedentary', he asks a most seductive question: 'What's the least amount of exercise you can get away with?'
He continues: 'From a starting point of virtually zero exercise, an hour or two a week of leisurely cycling or moderately paced walking might be all you need to reduce your risk of death from cardiovascular disease by as much as 20 per cent.'
Sweetest of all, he adds: 'The benefits appear to max out after four to six hours exercise a week – with no additional gains beyond this point for most people.'
He also noted how academics in Sydney had found that risk of premature death was reduced by at least 10 per cent if, on a daily basis, people slept a minimum of 15 minutes more, added an extra 1.6 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical exercise and ate another half a serving of vegetables. No bother.
There's a similar benefit to doing all the week's exercises over a weekend. And spending just 15 minutes a day outside in nature is enough to boost your mood, concentration and physical health. Sláinte!
Sedentary, from Latin sedere 'to sit, occupy an official seat'.
inaword@irishtimes.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
6 days ago
- RTÉ News
Pope Leo, in first month, makes a break in style from Francis
In his first month, Pope Leo XIV has taken a very different approach to his predecessor Francis. Leo, the former Cardinal Robert Prevost, has led some two dozen public events since he was elected as the first US pope on 8 May but not made notable appointments, nor announced plans for foreign trips, nor said where he will live at the Vatican. It's a stark contrast to when Francis, originally from Argentina, was selected as the first pope from the Americas in March 2013. Within a month, Francis had announced he would be the first pontiff in more than a century to live outside the Vatican's apostolic palace, appointed his successor as Archbishop of Buenos Aires and created a new formal advisory group of senior Catholic cardinals. Two of Leo's long-time associates said they expect the 69-year-old Pope to take a deliberative approach to the challenges facing the Catholic Church and may require months before making major decisions. "Leo is taking his time," Rev Mark Francis, a friend of the new pontiff since the 1970s, said. "While he is going to continue in the path indicated by Pope Francis, his disposition is very different." Leo was first appointed a bishop by Francis in 2015 and then chosen by the late pope to take up a senior Vatican role two years ago. He has frequently praised his predecessor in his first weeks. He has also repeated some of Francis' main themes, and has echoed the Argentine pontiff's emotional appeals for an end to the wars in Gaza and Ukraine. But the two men have different temperaments, according to Rev Francis, who attended seminary with Leo in Chicago and later knew him when they both lived in Rome in the 2000s. "Leo is much more focused and methodical and not inclined to hasty decisions," he said. Among the challenges facing the American pope is the Vatican's €83 million budget shortfall, which Reuters reported in February had stirred contention among senior cardinals under his predecessor. Other looming issues facing the 1.4 billion-member Church include declining adherence to the faith in Europe, ongoing revelations of clerical sexual abuse, and doctrinal debates over matters such as inclusion of LGBT Catholics and the possibility of women's ordination. Francis, who sought to modernise the Church, did not formally change many doctrines but garnered criticism from conservative cardinals by opening the door to communion for divorcees and blessings for same-sex couples. Rev Anthony Pizzo, who has known Leo since 1974 when they attended Villanova University outside Philadelphia together, said the pope is someone who listens carefully and seeks to hear many viewpoints before making decisions. "This is going to be his modus operandi," said Rev Pizzo, who leads the Midwest US province of the Augustinian religious order, to which Leo also belongs. "When you first come into leadership, listen well, get to know your constituency … to make a well-informed decision," he added, describing the pope's thought process. A 'shy' listener Francis and Leo came to the papacy at different ages and with different career backgrounds. Francis, elected at age 76, had been a cardinal for 12 years before ascending to the papacy. He had earlier been a leading contender in the 2005 conclave that elected his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI. Leo, seven years younger when he donned the white papal cassock, is a relative unknown on the world stage who only became a cardinal and Vatican official two years ago. He spent most of his prior career as a missionary in Peru. Early in his tenure, Francis told journalists that, due to his age, he expected to have a brief papacy of only a few years. Leo, the youngest pontiff since John Paul II was elected at age 58 in 1978, can perhaps expect a papacy of ten or more years. Among the challenges facing the new pope is the Vatican budget shortfall and the city-state also has a much larger gap in its pension fund, said to total some €631m by the Vatican's finance czar in 2022 but estimated by several insiders to have since ballooned significantly. In his first weeks, Leo has not addressed the budget issues and has made only a few new appointments to Vatican roles. But he has held formal one-on-one meetings with many senior Vatican officials, which Rev Pizzo suggested the pope could be using to try to learn quickly. Rev Jorge Martinez Vizueta, who knew Leo in Peru, said he is someone who pays close attention to what people tell him. "He listens a lot, even with a certain shyness," said Rev Martinez, an Augustinian at a monastery where Leo previously was a spiritual advisor. Although Leo has not announced where he will live, more than three informed sources said he is expected to move into the official papal apartments in the Vatican's apostolic palace overlooking St Peter's Square. Francis shunned the palace in favour of a Vatican hotel. One senior source, who asked not to be identified, said the papal apartments, which have not been lived in since 2013, will require at least two to three months of renovations. Careful with responses While Francis made some big decisions quickly in his first month, he also took time on other issues. He did not make his first trip abroad until late July 2013, four months into his papacy. Leo's first foreign trip is likely to be to Turkey, to celebrate the 1,700th anniversary of an early Church council with Patriarch Bartholomew, the spiritual leader of the Eastern Orthodox Church. The Vatican has not announced the trip, but it was previously planned for Francis. Bartholomew told an Italian television station that he and Leo discussed the possibility of the new pope travelling to Turkey in late November. Francis, who often spoke off the cuff, was known for giving freewheeling news conferences on flights home from his trips abroad and frequently responded to queries with an unexpected quip. Asked during his first flight home about a Vatican official said to be gay, Francis famously responded: "If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge him?" Rev Francis said Leo, who in his first month has largely read from prepared texts, is likely to be more careful with his responses during news conferences. "He won't be shooting from the hip like Francis did while speaking with journalists," he said.


RTÉ News
16-05-2025
- RTÉ News
How changes in height show health effects of the Great Irish Famine
Analysis: New research shows how the long‑term health impacts of the Great Irish Famine varied by region and socioeconomic conditions We set out to understand how a disaster as terrible as the Great Irish Famine (1845–1852), one of the worst famines in history, can affect the long‑term health of the people who survived it. Logically, one might think that a famine would simply leave everyone in poor health. But we found something surprising as we examined the data. In the hardest‑hit areas, the survivors did not display the expected stunting in height usually associated with malnutrition and disease. In some regions, the survivors' average adult height was comparable to—or even slightly greater than—that of individuals born before or after the Famine. This unexpected outcome led us to ask: How can a disaster that kills so many also leave behind survivors who appear physically "healthier" in one key way? Scarring vs selection When a famine strikes, two distinct processes may affect those growing up during that period. First, there is "scarring". This refers to the lasting damage that insufficient nutrition and widespread disease can cause during early childhood. With scarring, children born during a famine may not reach their full genetic potential for height because they were malnourished during a key developmental stage. In our study, this would show up as a drop in the average adult height of the Famine-born generation. From RTÉ Radio 1's Arena, Breandán Mac Suibhne talks about his book The End of Outrage: Post-Famine Adjustment in Rural Ireland The second process is "selection". In an extremely severe famine, only the strongest children survive. In other words, if the Great Irish Famine was harsh enough that many vulnerable children did not make it to adulthood, then the group of survivors would be composed largely of more physically robust individuals. In that case, even if the Famine created extreme hardship, the surviving population might not show the expected stunting because the frailest never survived long enough to be measured. Our research set out to untangle these two effects by comparing the heights of individuals born before, during, and after the Famine across Ireland. What prison registers tell us about height To get a clear picture, we turned to an unusual yet valuable source of data: prison registers from Dublin and Clonmel. These records were kept by prison administrators in the 19th century to keep track of the prison population and include detailed information on each prisoner's height, age, birthplace, occupation, religion and the nature of their crime. Importantly, the registers provide us with individual‑level data for over 14,500 subjects born in the years surrounding the Famine. In the absence of other historical sources of individual-level health data, these prison registers are a surprisingly valuable to historians, economists and epidemiologists. Adult height is widely accepted by as a measure of early‑life health. The period that human biologists have found to have most impact on adult height is what happens in utero. For our purposes, height serves as a proxy for the nutritional and health conditions during the crucial period from conception to the age of two. By comparing cohorts born before, during, and after the Famine, we can assess how early‑life conditions affected survivors in the long run. Urban Dublin versus rural Tipperary One of our most striking findings emerged from comparing different regions of Ireland. In urban areas like Dublin, where the Famine's direct death toll was much lower, the surviving children experienced what appears to be a clear scarring effect. In Dublin, those born during the Famine were, on average, about 0.7 centimetres (0.27 inches) shorter than those born before or after. This is a large number and suggests that insufficient nutrition and disease led to long‑term stunting in Dublin, where most vulnerable children survived. By contrast, in rural areas such as Tipperary, the Famine was much more severe: excess mortality there was 35 per 1,000 population. With significantly higher mortality, most of the frail or vulnerable children did not survive. In these regions, selection effects dominated: only the healthiest children survived, and as a result, there was little or no detectable drop in average population height. In fact, some of our statistical analyses even suggest that survivors from these severely affected rural regions were slightly taller than expected. In other words, the extreme nature of the Famine in Tipperary meant that the survivors were a highly selected group. The role of migration to the city Many families in rural areas attempted to escape the harsh conditions by moving to cities or emigrating abroad. This movement further "selected" the survivors in each region. In Dublin, net immigration meant that the urban population included many rural migrants—those who were forced to migrate because of malnutrition, and who were therefore less healthy than those who could remain in rural areas and who then survived into adulthood. This contributed to the overall drop in height among urban survivors. Our study shows that the long‑term health impact of the Great Irish Famine is not straightforward. In regions where the Famine was less deadly, most vulnerable children survived into adulthood but suffered lasting effects, such as stunted growth. Meanwhile, in the most severely-affected regions of Ireland, the extreme loss of life meant that only the fittest survived, masking the damage by creating a population that, on average, appears healthier in terms of height. In essence, the Famine produced both scarring and selection, with the balance between these two forces varying by region and socioeconomic conditions. From RTÉ Radio 1's The History Show, Blighted Nation explores how the Great Famine swept through Ireland in the mid 1800s and changed the country forever Stunted growth is all we can measure from our archival sources, but we know from other works in the field of human biology that stunting has severe health consequences, is correlated with reduced cognitive abilities, and is also associated with worse mental health. Economists have also shown that shorter individuals earn less than taller individuals within the same population group. These findings are important for how we understand catastrophic events today. When assessing the long‑term consequences of disasters—whether they are natural, man‑made, or climate‑related—we must account for the fact that survivors are not a random sample of the pre‑disaster population. Instead, the surviving group is "selected" in ways that can obscure underlying health deterioration. Our work uses a well-known historical context to provide a framework for disentangling these effects, which can inform future studies on the impacts of extreme events on population health and human capital.


Irish Independent
06-05-2025
- Irish Independent
Pope Francis's popemobile to be used as mobile health unit in Gaza
©Telegraph Media Group Holdings Ltd Today at 21:30 A popemobile used by Pope Francis is to be transformed into a mobile health unit and sent to the Gaza Strip. Before his death at the age of 88 on Easter Monday, Pope Francis ordered that the vehicle be modified into a clinic on wheels and sent to the war-torn territory to help wounded, sick and malnourished children. About a million Palestinian children have been displaced as a result of fighting between Hamas and Israeli forces. Register for free to read this story Register and create a profile to get access to our free stories. You'll also unlock more free stories each week.