Scarlets prepared for 'different animal' Leinster
United Rugby Championship quarter-final: Leinster v Scarlets
Venue: Aviva Stadium, Dublin Date: Saturday, 31 May Kick-off: 15:00 BST
Coverage: Watch on BBC One Wales, listen on BBC Radio Wales, follow live text on BBC Sport online.
Captain Josh Macleod says Scarlets are prepared to face a fully loaded Leinster in Saturday's United Rugby Championship (URC) quarter-final.
Scarlets stunned Leinster with a 35-22 victory at Parc y Scarlets last month, although the runaway league leaders had made 11 changes for the visit to Llanelli.
Leo Cullen rested a number of key players with one eye on the Champions Cup semi-final.
But after losing out in Europe to Northampton Saints focus, the Irish side's focus now shifts back to the URC.
"We're certainly expecting a bigger challenge this weekend with personnel," said Macleod.
"Yes, they're going to be a different animal, we're preparing for that, but we've built nicely as well."
Davies hits milestone as Scarlets stun Leinster
Northampton stun Leinster in Dublin to reach final
Scarlets are making their first appearance in the play-offs since 2018, when they were beaten 40-32 by Leinster in the final.
Leinster, meanwhile, have made it to this stage in each of the past 10 seasons.
And while Macleod recognises his side go to Dublin as underdogs, he believes they are more than capable of claiming another big scalp.
"The confidence is good, there's no complacency, boys are still willing to turn up to work, train hard every day and continue to get better. At this stage of the season you can't really ask for more," said the back-rower.
"We've got a changing room that are willing to fight for each other and when you get to the quarter-finals, who knows what can happen."
Macleod says the Leinster game is a chance for Scarlets to repay some of their fans' faith after what has been a tumultuous period on and off the pitch.
"They've had to endure some pretty tough results over the last couple of years," he said.
"To be able to give back, with the opportunity to come over to Dublin, hopefully we can put out a performance they can be proud of."
Macleod's fine form this season has seen him recalled to Wales' squad for this summer's tour of Japan.
The 28-year-old will be looking to add to the two caps he won in the 2022 autumn internationals.
"It's a massive honour and privilege to be able to get named," he said, while hoping the curtain will not fall on Scarlets' season this weekend.
He is also looking forward to working with Cardiff boss Matt Sherratt, who will once again take interim charge as Wales continue to search for a permanent head coach.
"I've only heard good words, so it's an exciting time and one that I'm really looking forward to getting stuck into," Macleod added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Springsteen's Berlin concert echoes with history and a stark warning
Updated [hour]:[minute] [AMPM] [timezone], [monthFull] [day], [year] BERLIN (AP) — Veteran rock star Bruce Springsteen, a high-profile critic of President Donald Trump, slammed the U.S. administration as 'corrupt, incompetent and treasonous' during a concert Wednesday in Berlin. He was addressing tens of thousands of fans at a stadium built for the 1936 Olympic Games that still bears the scars of World War II and contains relics from the country's dark Nazi past. 'Tonight, we ask all who believe in democracy and the best of our American experiment to rise with us, raise your voices, stand with us against authoritarianism, and let freedom reign,' he said. Springsteen, long a political opponent of the president, has made increasingly pointed and contentious public statements in recent concerts. He denounced Trump's politics during a concert last month in Manchester, calling him an 'unfit president' leading a 'rogue government' of people who have 'no concern or idea for what it means to be deeply American.' Springsteen is no stranger to Berlin. In July 1988, he became one of the first Western musicians to perform in East Germany, performing to a ravenous crowd of 160,000 East Germans yearning for American rock 'n' roll and the freedom it represented to the youth living under the crumbling communist regime. An Associated Press news story from that period says 'fireworks steaked through the sky' and hundreds of people in the audience waved handmade American flags as they sang along to 'Born in the USA.' Almost four decades later, Springsteen issued a stark warning: 'The America that I love, the America that I've sung to you about, that has been a beacon of hope and liberty for 250 years, is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent, and treasonous administration.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
France Moves to Curb ‘Ultra-fast' Fashion With Bill Targeting Shein and Temu
PARIS — As major brands scale back their sustainability initiatives, France is pressing ahead with legislation aimed at reining in 'ultra-fast fashion' platforms such as Shein and Temu, known for their extremely low-cost clothing. The bill, introduced by Anne-Cécile Violland, a member of parliament from the Horizons party, passed the Senate one year after clearing the lower house of the French Assembly. More from WWD Inditex Sales Slow as Economic Headwinds Hit the High Street Rebag Expands Access to Pre-loved Luxury Goods With New Amazon Collaboration Designer Vincent Van Duysen Opens Antwerp Home for Zara Home+ 4th Collection The unusually long gap between votes led to some watering down of the original provisions, exempting traditional fast-fashion players such as H&M, Primark, and Inditex-owned Zara. 'It's a relief that it moved forward, but there has been a shift in the goal of the legislation that it is now specifically targeting what is called 'ultra-fast fashion,'' said Pierre Condamine, spokesperson for the Anti Fast Fashion Coalition, an umbrella group of 11 environmental organizations in France. Earlier drafts had adopted a broader definition of fast fashion that included Europe-based brands. 'There is sort of a shift in what was supposed to be an environmental legislation, with the objective to shift the whole sector towards sustainable practices, while now it's sort of becoming a protectionist text,' he told WWD. The revised bill targets ultra-fast fashion directly, proposing a tax on small parcels shipped from outside the EU ranging from 2 to 4 euros per package. The fee is intended to slow the influx of packages from Chinese platforms to France, in a move reminiscent of the U.S. ending its de minimis exemption. Shein and Temu together shipped 800 million packages to France in 2024 — more than half of all parcels sent to the country. The French government will first notify the European Commission, as several measures, including a total advertising ban on ultra-fast-fashion platforms, require approval at the EU level. This process could take up to three months before the bill goes to the Assembly and Senate joint committee for resolution, likely in the fall in late September or October. Several key provisions may face scrutiny in Brussels, including the parcel fee, which could conflict with the European Commission's plan for a bloc-wide fee by 2028, and the proposed national advertising ban. Although Shein is registered in Singapore, its European headquarters in Ireland could present a legal loophole. As it stands, the bill mandates eco-contributions from fashion companies based on a 'bonus-malus' system — rewarding sustainable practices and penalizing environmental harm. Penalties could rise to 10 euros per item by 2030, though the methodology for valuing items has yet to be defined. The bill would also eliminate tax advantages for 'donating' unsold stock by ultra-fast-fashion brands, which are not permitted to destroy unsold items under an anti-waste law passed in 2020. A critical element of the bill is its specific definition of 'ultra-fast' or 'ultra-express' fashion. This distinction leaves out more traditional fast-fashion companies that have a retail presence like H&M, Primark and Zara. By differentiating between ultra-fast platforms and fast-fashion brands with physical retail locations, the legislation potentially creates a loophole for companies headquartered in Europe — Sweden, Ireland and Spain respectively — even though their production relies heavily on low-wage countries like China, India and Bangladesh via subcontractors and diffuse supply chains. The original bill passed by the Assembly featured the broader definition, but companies lobbied intensively over the past year for the narrower language, arguing that they contribute to local employment. Senator Sylvie Valente Le Hir of Les Républicains, who ushered the bill through the Senate, highlighted its targeted approach: 'We have drawn a clear line between those we want to regulate — ultra-express fashion — and those we want to preserve, accessible but rooted fashion, which employs in France, which structures our territories, which creates links and supports a local economic fabric,' she said. The industry group La Fédération Française du Prêt à Porter Féminin praised the bill as a 'step forward' in tackling ultra-fast fashion. 'It formalizes the long-standing collective commitment of many stakeholders to defend a fashion industry that respects workers, consumers, citizens, French businesses, and the planet,' the organization said in a statement. However, Condamine noted that while large global fast-fashion retailers remain profitable – Zara's parent company Inditex reported sales were up 4.2 percent in constant-currency in the first quarter on Wednesday — French high street brands like Camaieu and NafNaf have entered administration, and independent stores continue to shutter. 'The economic crisis in the clothing industry in France, it started way before Shein,' Condamine said. 'It started when fast fashion — Zara, H&M, Primark — arrived. Now they are saying if they're targeted, it will be a catastrophe [for jobs]. But they're doing great economically, and they're part of the problem.' Some lawmakers described the bill as a 'strong first signal' and indicated that fast fashion as a whole — including the European players with physical presence — could face future regulation due to unsustainable business practices. On the other hand, critics — chiefly Shein — have said the legislation punishes cost-conscious consumers and lower-income households. The company, which markets itself under the slogan 'Fashion is a right, not a privilege,' has staged events in French cities like Béziers. On Sunday, its director of government relations, Fabrice Layer, held a presentation in front of the southeastern town's city hall to rally public support for the company. 'We ultimately find ourselves with a law that is not only anti-Shein, but anti-Shein customer,' Quentin Ruffat, Shein's spokesperson in France, told AFP. 'This law, if passed, will directly penalize our customers' wallets and drastically reduce their purchasing power.' The company has also accused France's fashion establishment of protecting legacy brands and says it will continue lobbying to amend the bill further. Shein representatives did not respond to requests for comment. New research from l'Institut Français de la Mode (IFM) shows that in the first quarter of 2025, Amazon, Shein and Temu together accounted for 24 percent of online apparel sales by value, representing 7 percent of total apparel consumption across all channels. Online sales made up 29.4 percent of apparel purchases by value, including the online stores of traditional retailers. Best of WWD Walmart Calls California Waste Dumping Lawsuit 'Unjustified' Year in Review: Sustainability's Biggest Controversies of 2021 Year in Review: Sustainability's New Strides


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Poland's Presidential Election Campaign Faced Unprecedented Russian Interference, Officials Say
A man casts his ballot during the first round of the presidential elections on May 18, 2025 in ... More Warsaw, Poland. (Photo by) Poland faced a large-scale campaign of foreign interference during its recent presidential election, with coordinated efforts by Russia and Belarus to spread disinformation, undermine public trust, and influence political outcomes, according to government officials and cybersecurity experts. In May, Digital Affairs Minister Krzysztof Gawkowski said Poland was subjected to 'unprecedented' attempts by Russia to interfere in the election. These included disinformation campaigns and hybrid attacks on critical infrastructure intended to 'paralyze the normal functioning of the state.' He also noted that Russian military intelligence activity in Poland had doubled compared to the previous year. Between January and mid-May, Poland's Research and Academic Computer Network (NASK) identified over 10,000 social media accounts disseminating disinformation aimed at swaying the election. Around 400 accounts were found to be linked to the Social Design Agency, a Kremlin-funded, EU-sanctioned Russian organization involved in disinformation campaigns. The accounts promoted content echoing 'the narrative of the Russian Federation's psychological and informational apparatus,' NASK said in a statement. Some of the disinformation materials targeted a specific presidential candidate, although NASK declined to disclose which one. Identical messaging and visuals were also found on Telegram channels previously identified as participating in Russian disinformation campaigns. Gawkowski also pointed to unauthorized Facebook ad campaigns valued at 'hundreds of thousands of zlotys' that targeted presidential candidates but were not registered with any official election committee. A recent report by the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab) and Alliance4Europe detailed how Radio Belarus, the Polish-language branch of Belarus's state-run Belteleradio, ran a digital influence campaign to discredit the Polish election. Using platforms such as TikTok, YouTube, X, and Facebook, the broadcaster promoted messages questioning the legitimacy of the vote, endorsing some candidates while attacking others. According to the report, Radio Belarus used manipulative techniques to portray establishment candidates as aligned with foreign interests, criticize Poland's support for Ukraine, and boost lesser-known anti-establishment figures. By early May, the outlet had published more than 7,790 posts and videos, generating more than 16 million views and at least 542,000 engagements. Martyna Hoffman, a co-author of the report, says that while TikTok proactively used geofencing to block access to Radio Belarus's harmful content in Poland, YouTube failed to take meaningful action, issuing only standard rejections to user reports. Belarus, widely regarded as a Russian satellite state, has consistently supported the Kremlin's disinformation campaigns. The country allowed its territory to be used during Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and frequently amplifies pro-Russian messaging. In its Country Risk Election Assessment, Alliance4Europe warned that Russia and Belarus have been exploiting domestic political divisions in Poland, particularly around judicial reforms, migration and civil rights, to undermine public trust in democratic institutions. The group identified five major disinformation narratives pursued by Russia, including anti-Ukraine, anti-migrant, and anti-EU/NATO messaging. The assessment also documented several coordinated operations in the lead-up to the election. One cyberattack targeted the Civic Platform party's computer systems and was linked to Russian sources. Another involved the Polish branch of the Pravda network, which republishes content from sanctioned Russian media. Russian intelligence also attempted to recruit Polish citizens via the dark web, offering payments in exchange for spreading pro-Russian propaganda. One campaign, dubbed Operation Overload, involved impersonating news outlets to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the election. Another, known as the Doppelganger campaign, distorted Polish news stories and mimicked legitimate sources on platforms such as X and Facebook, using fake accounts to distribute misleading content. As part of a broader strategy to counter Russian disinformation and hybrid threats in Europe, the European Union banned 18 media outlets accused of deliberately spreading Kremlin-backed narratives about the war in Ukraine. In May, the bloc unveiled a new sanctions package targeting individuals and entities linked to the Kremlin's hybrid warfare efforts, including those spreading Russian disinformation on social media. Aleksandra Wójtowicz, a new technologies and digitalization analyst at the Polish Institute of International Affairs, says social media platforms made noticeably less effort to combat disinformation during this election compared to Poland's 2023 parliamentary vote. 'TikTok took a more ambitious approach, but overall, fact-checking labels and links to reliable sources were largely missing,' she adds. Poland has responded to the growing Russian threat by bolstering its cybersecurity infrastructure, including the launch of a one billion zloty (approximately $260 million) Artificial Intelligence Fund. The initiative, backed by Poland's defense and digital affairs ministries, is designed to boost cyber defenses and develop dual-use technologies to counter hybrid threats. However, a recent report by a commission investigating Russian and Belarusian influence found that Poland's counter-disinformation efforts in recent years have been "insufficient, ad hoc, inconsistent, and often superficial." In 2024 alone, Poland recorded more than 600,000 cyber incidents attributed to Russian actors, a 60% year-over-year increase. 'There is no other country within the European Union facing similar threats,' Gawkowski said.