‘Ridiculous' cuts to AI cancer tech funding in England could cost lives, experts warn
Ministers have cut millions of pounds of funding for potentially life saving AI cancer technology in England, which cancer experts warn will increase waiting times and could cause more patients to die.
Contouring is used in radiotherapy to ensure treatment is as effective and safe as possible. The tumour and normal tissue is 'mapped' or contoured on to medical scans, to ensure the radiation targets the cancer while minimising damage to healthy tissues and organs.
Normally, this is a slow, manual process that can take doctors between 20 and 150 minutes to complete. AI auto-contouring takes less than five minutes and costs around £10-£15 per patient.
Research shows that AI contouring can cut waits for radiotherapy by more than five days for breast cancer patients, up to nine days for prostate cancer patients and three days for lung cancer patients.
In May 2024, the Conservative government announced £15.5m over three years to fund AI auto-contouring for all hospitals providing radiotherapy. Work continued on the scheme after the general election, with online webinars and follow-up calls for radiotherapy departments held in September.
The 51 trusts offering radiotherapy continued to work on installing the cloud-based technology, with a number using it early, in the belief the funding was secured.
But in February, in an email seen by the Guardian, Nicola McCulloch, the deputy director of specialised commissioning at NHS England, said the funding had been cancelled 'due to a need to further prioritise limited investment'. There would no longer be a centrally funded programme to support implementation of the technology, she said.
The decision means many radiotherapy departments face a return to manual contouring, prompting accusations that the government is ditching digital and going back to analogue cancer care.
Analysis by Radiotherapy UK has calculated that removing funding for AI contouring in England will add up to 500,000 extra days to waiting lists for breast, prostate and lung cancer alone and leave each of the 51 trusts with a £300,000 shortfall.
Waiting lists for radiotherapy are already long. Figures show that in January, 60% of cancer patients waiting to begin radiation treatment, nearly 1,000 people, waited longer than two months, and 23% waited more than 104 days.
The chair of Radiotherapy UK, Prof Pat Price, said: 'The government cannot laud the advent of AI in one breath, and allow this to happen. Far from moving from an analogue to digital NHS, when it comes to radiotherapy it feels like the opposite is happening. This wrong-footed decision will exacerbate the impact of severe staff shortages.'
The leading oncologist urged ministers to intervene. 'Some departments are so short-handed that they're shutting machines down because no one is there to operate them and nationally, radiotherapy vacancy rates are running at 8%. This investment in AI could have alleviated some of these pressures. Without it, cancer patients will wait longer than necessary for treatment, potentially costing their lives.'
Clive Peedell, a consultant clinical oncologist at South Tees Hospitals NHS foundation trust, said: 'This is a really catastrophic mistake. Half of all cancer patients will need radiotherapy at some point during the course of their treatment. Labour is supposed to be the party of the NHS, but instead it is going against innovation in cancer care.
'To just turn the tap off is ridiculous. We've had a big increase in cases, but we are managing our workloads because AI is helping us. If we can't get the funding to keep using it, we'll have to go back to planning treatment by hand. So we'll probably have to employ more staff or have much longer waiting lists because of this terrible decision.'
Jane Richards (not her real name), a manager working in radiotherapy services, said the decision to pull funding for AI contouring felt like a betrayal. Her area had implemented the technology already, believing the funding from NHS England was assured.
'Every time I see Keir Starmer or Wes Streeting talking about the importance of AI, I get frustrated,' she said. 'We're not talking about the future of a technology, we're talking about something that we are making use of in the here and now and we are demonstrating has an impact, yet we don't have central funding for it.
'So I feel incredibly angry. If you can only fit two patients into one manual radiotherapy planning clinic instead of four using AI contouring, and you've got four patients coming in each week, waiting lists are going to grow exponentially. And if they face longer waits, their prognosis will be worse.'
Spencer Goodman, a professional officer for radiotherapy at the Society of Radiographers, said: 'Radiographers recognise AI's potential to improve patient care efficiency. Withdrawing funding for AI technologies that help define radiation fields in radiotherapy is a step backward. Given the current workforce shortage, proven AI tools can help streamline processes and enable faster, more accurate patient treatment, benefiting both providers and patients.'
A spokesperson for the Department of Health said 'funding has not been cut', but did not refer directly to the AI contouring funding decision. 'This government is investing £70m in radiotherapy over the next year to replace old machines, so that patients can access the latest technology available.'
They said AI was already being used in various areas of healthcare, including breast cancer diagnosis, and that the government's national cancer plan was aimed at improving prevention, diagnosis, treatment and research.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
Medical staff who responded to Southport knife attacks honoured by King
Paul Smith, a senior paramedic team leader, treated victims at the scene where Bebe King, six, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and Alice Dasilva Aguiar, nine, were murdered and 10 others injured at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class last July. Mr Smith, who works for the North West Ambulance Service, was awarded a British Empire Medal (BEM) for his services to the community in Merseyside after 'he put the needs of the injured before his own safety', the NHS said. I'd like to recognise those staff who were involved in the response to the knife attack in Southport last summer. These awards rightly honour their incredible dedication and commitment in an awful situation Sir Jim Mackey, NHS chief executive Dr George Bramham, who was also a first responder, received the same honour. Martin Johnson and Elizabeth Parsons, who were part of the surgical team in theatre who treated people sent to Southport Hospital after the stabbings, have been given the same medals. Sir Jim Mackey, NHS chief executive, praised the staff for their 'incredible dedication and commitment in an awful situation'. Meanwhile, Reverend Martin Abrams, a spiritual care and chaplaincy manager, has been made a Member of the Order of the British Empire (MBE) for services to the community in Merseyside and west Lancashire. This stands as a legacy of the work to address health inequalities by driving forward a powerful vision of exceptional quality healthcare for all, ensuring equitable access, excellent experience and optimal outcomes Professor Bola Owolabi, NHS England He played a key role in the community after the horrors of the attacks, the health service said. Other NHS staff receiving honours include Professor Bola Owolabi, a GP and director of inequalities at NHS England, who was made a Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) for her services to reducing health inequalities. Professor Owolabi said: 'This stands as a legacy of the work to address health inequalities by driving forward a powerful vision of exceptional quality healthcare for all, ensuring equitable access, excellent experience and optimal outcomes.' Sir Jim added: 'I want to give my heartfelt congratulations to all the people working in the NHS that have received honours, who work tirelessly everyday to care for their patients. 'I'd also like to recognise those staff who were involved in the response to the knife attack in Southport last summer. These awards rightly honour their incredible dedication and commitment in an awful situation. 'The NHS is made up of highly committed and dedicated people that work hard to give the best possible care to patients, and these honours recognise their skill, compassion and bravery.'
North Wales Chronicle
10 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Ban on advertising and safeguard for child patients added to Assisted Dying Bill
The new parts to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill were voted in on Friday as a second day of debate on various amendments came to a close. It is expected the next major vote on the overall Bill could take place next Friday, which could see it either fall or pass through to the Lords. Impassioned debate heard the Bill described by Conservative MP Kieran Mullan as a 'deeply consequential and highly contentious piece of legislation for our society'. He argued not enough time has been allocated for debate on such a divisive issue, but health minister Stephen Kinnock said there had been more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent so far, and more than 500 amendments had been considered at committee stage earlier this year. On Friday a majority of MPs approve a new clause, tabled by Labour MP Dame Meg Hillier, to ensure medics cannot raise the topic of assisted dying with under-18s. Her separate amendment to prevent health workers from bringing up the issue with adults patients before they have raised it was voted down. The amendment on child patients was hailed as a 'first major Commons defeat' by opposition campaigners Care Not Killing which welcomed 'MPs removing the ability of doctors to raise unprompted assisted suicide with children'. A group of Labour MPs opposed to the proposed legislation called it an '11th hour rejection of the claims made about the safety of this Bill' which 'proves that confidence is slipping away from it'. They also cautioned that MPs might not have a copy of the final Bill by the time they vote 'on this life and death issue' next week, as some outstanding amendments will still be being considered on Friday morning. A ban on advertising assisted dying should the Bill pass into law has also been approved. An amendment, by fellow Labour MP Paul Waugh, to limit exceptions on that ban did not pass. He said the ban as it stands has 'unspecified exceptions, which could make the ban itself worthless', warning online harms from ads about assisted dying on TikTok 'could be a reality without the tighter safeguards in my amendment'. A number of other amendments were passed, including a provision for assisted dying deaths to not automatically be referred to a coroner and around the regulation of substances for use in assisted dying. Other issues debated included an amendment requiring the Health Secretary to publish an assessment of the availability, quality and distribution of palliative and end-of-life care one year after the Bill passing into law. Pledging her support for the amendment, which was tabled by Liberal Democrat Munira Wilson, Kim Leadbeater said MPs should not have to choose between supporting assisted dying or palliative care as it is not an 'either/or' conversation for dying people. She said palliative care and assisted dying 'can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days', and urged MPs to support 'all options available to terminally ill people'. Ms Wilson's amendment is supported by Marie Curie, which said it is 'desperately needed as the end-of-life care system is in crisis, with huge gaps in services and a lack of NHS leadership on this vital part of our health and care system'. It is expected that amendment could be voted on next Friday. One MP, who became emotional as she recalled the death of her husband who she said had been 'in extreme pain' with terminal cancer, urged her colleagues to 'mind our language' after words like 'murder' were used. Liberal Democrat MP Caroline Voaden, whose husband died of oesophageal cancer, said it is 'so wrong' to use such language. She said: 'This is about helping people die in a civilised way and helping their families not go through a horrendous experience of watching a loved one die in agony.' The beginning of Friday's session saw MPs add a new opt-out clause to the Bill. The amendment, meaning no person including all health and social care professionals, can be obliged to take part in assisted dying had been debated and approved last month, but has now been formally added to the Bill. The Bill passed second reading stage by a majority of 55 during a historic vote in November which saw MPs support the principle of assisted dying. Demonstrators both for and against a change in the law once again gathered outside Parliament to make their views known on the Bill. Sarah Wootton, chief executive of Dignity in Dying which is in favour of a change in the law, said: 'Our country is closer than ever before to the safe, compassionate, and tightly regulated assisted dying law that so many people want, from all walks of life and every part of the country.' But former MP Caroline Ansell, from Christian Action Research and Education (Care), which opposes assisted dying, urged parliamentarians to vote against the Bill. She said: 'It is irredeemably flawed in principle and in detail. Parliament should close the door to assisted suicide and focus on truly compassionate and life-affirming forms of support.' As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines.
The Courier
11 hours ago
- The Courier
EXCLUSIVE: NHS Fife should be ‘grovelling and apologising' to trans row tribunal nurse, says Kemi Badenoch
NHS Fife should be 'grovelling' and saying sorry to the nurse at the centre of the transgender changing room row tribunal, Kemi Badenoch has said. The UK Tory leader is 'shocked' that the health board is yet to reach a settlement with Sandie Peggie, who works at Kirkcaldy's Victoria Hospital. Ms Peggie was suspended by NHS Fife after she told trans doctor Beth Upton that she felt uncomfortable at the two of them sharing a locker room. The A&E nurse sued the health board and the employment tribunal is set to resume next month after hearing two weeks of evidence in February. Ms Badenoch spoke exclusively to The Courier about the case after her speech to Conservative members at the party's conference in Edinburgh. The Tory chief was stunned when she first heard about the controversy. 'I was very shocked,' she said. 'What the NHS should be doing is grovelling and apologising, and settling very quickly. 'I am shocked that they continue to pursue this case. It is unconscionable.' Ms Badenoch said NHS Fife and other public bodies should take a close look at the Supreme Court's landmark recent gender ruling. Judges declared that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the equality act refer to biological women and biological sex. The Tory leader added: 'I think people are going to look back at this era, and wonder what was in the water that meant so many of these public authorities were messing around like this. 'We need to bring back common sense.' Ms Badenoch's remarks pile further pressure on the under-fire health board ahead of the tribunal reconvening. Last month NHS Fife was rebuked by a watchdog over its 'poor handling' of questions over how much the case has cost. Scottish Information Commissioner David Hamilton criticised the health board for failing to do any proper checks to find the information requested by several publishers, including The Courier. We had previously reported that NHS Fife was keeping the cost of the tribunal secret. A spokesperson for NHS Fife said: 'NHS Fife is not pursuing any legal claim in relation to this matter. 'Instead, it is the claimant in this case who is pursuing a legal claim against NHS Fife. 'The claimant has stated publicly that she is determined to continue with the legal action, as is her right. 'As the respondent, NHS Fife is required to continue to defend the case. 'As stated previously, the case involves a range of complex matters, including an internal investigation that was initiated following concerns raised by a member of staff. 'NHS Fife believes it had a responsibility to fully investigate such matters.'
