Florida lawmakers revisit gun laws, Parkland families push back
A newly introduced bill would lower the minimum age to purchase a gun from 21 to 18, reversing a measure passed in response to the Parkland shooting. Debbie Hixon, whose husband Chris was killed that day, opposes any rollback of the law.
"That law has really saved a lot of lives across the state," Hixon said.
Tony Montalto, whose 14-year-old daughter Gina Rose Montalto was among the victims, also opposes the measure.
Debate over guns on college campuses
Another bill under consideration would allow firearms on college and university campuses. Montalto believes that only well-trained security personnel should carry weapons in those settings.
"Well-selected and well-trained should be the ones with weapons on campus," Montalto said. "I don't feel that our students are in such jeopardy that they need to carry as well."
FIU sophomore Vinh Le also expressed concerns.
"If everybody has a gun, then it might cause shootings," Le said.
Lawmakers and leadership weigh in
State Sen. Randy Fine, who introduced the Senate versions of both bills, defended the proposals. His office referred to past press releases, in which he stated:
"The Second Amendment does not take the semester off when you step on a college campus."
Regarding lowering the gun purchasing age, Fine argued the current law is inconsistent.
"After the Marjory Stoneman Douglas School Safety Act passed in 2018, I committed to addressing the inconsistency that allows an 18-year-old to be given a firearm by a parent or purchase one in a private transaction but not from a licensed firearms dealer," he said.
Gov. Ron DeSantis has also voiced support for open carry in Florida.
Hixon, Montalto, and other Parkland families plan to travel to Tallahassee to speak with lawmakers in an effort to prevent changes to existing gun laws.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Millions will lose Medicaid under Trump's tax law. Here's the final tally.
About 10 million Americans are expected to lose health insurance under President Donald Trump's tax cut and spending law, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said. Over the next decade, 7.5 million people will lose Medicaid coverage due to changes under the law, the CBO said in an analysis released Monday, Aug. 11. Nondisabled adults on Medicaid will be required to get a job, volunteer or enroll in school to maintain their Medicaid coverage. And states must double Medicaid eligibility checks to twice a year. Another 2.1 million people will shed Affordable Care Act coverage over the next decade, the CBO said. And 400,000 more will lose coverage due to impacts of the law — nicknamed the One Big Beautiful Bill — which was backed by Congressional Republicans. The CBO earlier said the legislation, which Trump signed on July 4, would add $3.4 trillion to the federal deficit. The law extends the 2017 tax cuts, ends taxes on tips and overtime, and bolsters border security, among other things. The CBO also estimated low-income Americans will lose about $1,200 per year due to Medicaid changes and reductions in food assistance. Middle-income households are expected to gain $800 to $1,200. Meanwhile, the law's tax cuts will benefit wealthier Americans by about $13,600 per year, even though these households with pay about $190,000 in federal taxes annually, the CBO said. Millions more could lose their health insurance When the bill passed the Senate, the CBO estimated it would leave about 11.8 million Americans without health insurance through 2034. The law signed by Trump won't cut as deep because it excluded a provision that would've penalized states extending Medicaid to undocumented residents. Still, another 5 million could lose coverage if Congress doesn't extend the expiring COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits that have made Affordable Care Act plans more affordable for consumers, according to earlier CBO estimates. Consumers who use those pandemic-era tax credits will see the amount they need to pay spike an average of more than 75%, according to KFF, a health policy nonprofit. The combination of the tax law, expiring tax credits and overall rising medical costs will make insurance premiums more expensive for everyone. Insurers plan a median premium increase of 18% for 2026 plans, which would be the largest ACA insurance price hike since 2018, according to a Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker report released Aug. 6.
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
House Republicans want another megabill. One GOP senator says it could be ‘damaging.'
And Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) said he's open to considering as many as 200 tax proposals from his members that were ultimately not included in the first megabill. But most senators have questions about what could go into another reconciliation package — and they're casting doubts on whether it's even politically possible to do this all over again. 'You have to have a reason to do it,' said Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.). 'It's not easy to do, so you have to have a purpose for doing it in the first place.' That unifying purpose for Republicans the first time around was a desire to deliver Trump a major legislative victory early in his second term and prevent a tax hike that they feared would weaken the economy. Republican leaders' decision to throw in a debt limit extension through 2026 as Treasury warned the nation would soon exceed its borrowing authority added a do-or-die incentive. 'Without the pressure, I don't see how you get it done,' said one Republican senator, granted anonymity to speak freely, about prospects for passing a second reconciliation bill without an existential impetus for action. 'I don't think I see what the pressure is here.' At the same time, despite the White House's enthusiasm for another reconciliation bill, administration officials have not yet told lawmakers what policies they want considered, according to three people speaking on condition of anonymity. Sens. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) — chairs of the committees on Armed Services and Budget, respectively — also said before leaving for recess they have not received guidance from the White House. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), chair of the Senate Commerce Committee, said he still hadn't heard from the administration about its broader set of legislative priorities heading into the fall. At this point, the loudest reconciliation push in the Senate is coming from deficit hawks like Sen. Ron Johnson, who wants to use another bill to cut spending further than what conservatives were able to achieve in the first package. 'Leadership is telling us we'll do one or two more reconciliations in this Congress,' the Wisconsin Republican told reporters earlier this summer. 'So the clock's ticking' While Senate Majority Leader John Thune has left the door open to doing a second reconciliation bill, he hasn't provided a specific timeline for doing so. One of the three people waiting to hear from Trump said the push for another party-line package is coming not as much from the administration as from the House. There, Budget Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) has said lawmakers should try to rework policies cut from the first reconciliation bill to comply with Senate rules. But there's skepticism in the Senate that the House will be able to successfully relitigate those proposals. 'My sense is that there's more enthusiasm in the House than in the Senate, and that makes sense,' said Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.). 'They can do things with 51 votes anyway, most of what we have to do requires 60. And that means that senators, if you have a desire to actually legislate, need to find ways to legislate — and reconciliation is damaging to that relationship.' But House Republicans are also navigating their own slim margins and ideological divides. Conservatives and centrists clashed over cuts to Medicaid and clean energy tax credits in the 'big, beautiful bill,' and lawmakers could have a diminished appetite for further battles over hot-button issues, especially heading into an election year. Some House GOP aides were alarmed earlier this week when a hard-line think tank, the Economic Policy Innovation Center, pitched an extended moratorium on Medicaid funding for large abortion providers in a Republican Study Committee staff briefing. RSC leadership has stressed its megabill working group is designed at this point to generate ideas and put down markers, but EPIC's recommendation could be a harbinger of other disputes to come. Meanwhile, Republicans are already struggling to sell voters on the first megabill back in their home states and districts, where town halls and other constituent events in the early weeks of recess have so far been rocky. One House Republican, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said there would be some 'hesitancy' to dive back into reconciliation. 'We did so much in the first,' the member said. 'It's going to be harder to do a second one.'
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
What is the Home Rule Act? Trump just invoked it to ‘rescue' Washington, DC
President Donald Trump just invoked a decades-old law in a bid to crack down on crime in the nation's capital. In an Aug. 11 press conference, he said he was employing Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, permitting him to federalize the city's police department. 'I'm announcing a historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse,' Trump said. 'This is Liberation Day in D.C., and we're going to take our capital back.' He also vowed to deploy the National Guard to 'restablish law, order and public safety,' mirroring tactics used during recent protests in Los Angeles. Multiple Democratic lawmakers condemned the president's move, denouncing it as an example of executive overreach and a political distraction. Passed by Congress in 1973, the District of Columbia Home Rule Act granted the city limited self-governing powers while leaving other authorities in federal hands. For the first time, it permitted D.C. residents to elect their own city council and mayor. However, it established significant oversight powers for Congress, including allowing lawmakers to review all legislation passed by the city council. 'The Home Rule Act is the result of the ongoing push by District residents for control of their own local affairs,' according to the city council's website. 'The existing local government is the most expanded form of self-government since the establishment of the District as the seat of the federal government.' Section 740 of the act — invoked by Trump — is concerned with the control of the police in emergency situations. 'Whenever the President of the United States determines that special conditions of an emergency nature exist which require the use of the Metropolitan Police force for Federal purposes, he may direct the Mayor to provide him, and the Mayor shall provide, such services of the Metropolitan Police force as the President may deem necessary and appropriate,' the section states. However, there are limits on the president's authority to federalize the city police. The president is only permitted to take control of the police department for a maximum of 48 hours without alerting Congress, the act states. But, if the president provides a written letter to the ranking members 'of the Committees on the District of Columbia of the Senate and the House of Representatives,' he may continue to exercise control of the police department for 30 days. After one month, this authority can only be extended by a joint resolution from the Senate and the House. Before invoking the legislation, Trump previously expressed interest in repealing the Home Rule Act, telling reporters on Aug. 5, 'We have to run D.C.' In his Aug. 11 press conference, Trump portrayed Washington, D.C. as a city plagued by lawlessness. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged out maniacs and homeless people,' the president said. But, official data paints a more complicated picture. While D.C.'s crime rates remain higher than other cities by certain measures, they are steadily improving. So far in 2025, violent crime has decreased 26% year-over-year, with homicides down 12% and robberies down 28%, according to police department statistics. Total crime is also down by 7%. And in 2024, violent crime in the District of Columbia fell by 35% from 2023, reaching its lowest level in over three decades, according to the Department of Justice. Still, Washington's homicide rate in 2024 was among the highest of the nation's largest cities, behind St. Louis, New Orleans and Detroit, according to the Center for Public Safety Initiatives at Rochester Institute of Technology. The falling crime rate in the capital mirrors a broader national trend of reduced violent crime in recent years, following a pandemic-era surge, according to CBS News. FBI Director Kash Patel noted this positive progression during Trump's press conference, stating, 'The murder rates are plummeting. We are now able to report that the murder rate is on track to be the lowest in U.S. history, in modern reported U.S. history.'
