Rail deal worth £500m will help save Scunthorpe steelworks, says minister
British Steel is to supply 337,000 tonnes of rail track, which will secure thousands of manufacturing jobs, in an agreement which comes two months after the Government used emergency powers to prevent the blast furnaces from immediate closure.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, who is visiting the site in North Lincolnshire to finalise the deal, said it 'truly transforms the outlook for British Steel and its dedicated workforce in Scunthorpe'.
Workers at the British Steel site in Scunthorpe will make rail tracks (Danny Lawson/PA)
British Steel is to supply a minimum of 337,000 tonnes of long and short rail.
A further 80-90,000 tonnes is to be provided by other European manufacturers and deals are expected to be announced shortly, the Department for Transport (DfT) said.
In March, Chinese firm Jingye, which bought British Steel in 2020, proposed to shut Scunthorpe's two blast furnaces and other key steelmaking operations.
This came despite months of negotiations and a £500 million co-investment offer from the Government, the DfT said.
As a result, Jingye launched a consultation which it said would affect between 2,000 and 2,700 jobs.
In April, the UK Government used emergency powers to take control of British Steel and continue production at the site.
The Scunthorpe plant has been producing steel for Britain's railways since 1865.
The Network Rail contract, worth an estimated £500 million, starts on July 1 and is set to provide the company with 80% of its rail needs.
To ensure security of supply, Network Rail is set to award smaller contracts to some European manufacturers, who will supply specialist rail products alongside British Steel.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is finalising the deal (Joe Giddens/PA)
Ms Alexander said: 'This landmark contract truly transforms the outlook for British Steel and its dedicated workforce in Scunthorpe, building on its decades-long partnership with Network Rail to produce rail for Britain's railways.
'After taking urgent action to step in and save these historic blast furnaces from closure, we've now helped secure their long-term future by backing British Steel with meaningful Government contracts, protecting thousands of skilled manufacturing jobs in the process.
'This crucial investment in our railway infrastructure shows we are delivering on our Plan for Change commitment to raise living standards in every part of the UK and ensure economic growth is felt by working people in our proud industrial heartlands.'
The agreement is the first major public procurement since the emergency legislation was passed.
The Government sees it as being complimentary to the UK and US trade deal which aims to lower tariffs and protect jobs across key sectors, including steel.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'This is great news for British Steel and a vote of confidence in the UK's expertise in steelmaking, which will support thousands of skilled jobs for years to come.
'Following our decisive action to step in and save steelmaking at Scunthorpe in April, this contract will give the sector the security to supply the steel we need for the infrastructure of the future, as part of our Plan for Change.'
Network Rail's group director for railway business services Clive Berrington said: 'We are committed to buying British where it makes economic sense to do so and British Steel remain extremely competitive in the provision of rail and will remain our main supplier in the years ahead.'
Craig Harvey, British Steel's commercial director for rail, added: 'The contract represents a huge vote of confidence in UK workers and British industry, underpinning the vital role we play in ensuring millions of passengers and freight operators enjoy safe, enjoyable and timely journeys on Britain's railways.'
Charlotte Brumpton-Childs, national officer at the GMB union, said: 'When British Steel was in crisis a few months ago, one of GMB's key asks to the Chancellor was to ensure Britain's railways were built with domestic steel.
'This is a crucial first step in securing the future of our steel industry.
'Ministers must now ensure other infrastructure projects follow suit to make sure British Steel has a constant flow of orders.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
27 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
What's behind the drive to cut public spending 'waste'?
Why does the Scottish Government need to cut spending in this way? Mr Sousa explained: "The Scottish Government is not allowed to borrow cash to fund any day-to-day spending, so it must make sure that its spending matches its funding. "This includes the block grant, as well any additional tax revenues from devolved Scottish taxes (including income tax) and the transfer of funds for social security devolution. "The Scottish Government's more generous pay policy in recent years means that the average wage of public sector employees in Scotland is about 5% higher than the UK average. READ MORE: "Coupled with Scotland's larger share of employment made up of public sector workers, this creates significant pressure for the Scottish Government. "The Scottish Government's social security system is also forecast to cost £2 billion a year more than the block grant adjustments [from the UK Government], between both devolved payments and payments without an equivalent outside of Scotland. This must be paid from a Budget that is only modestly growing year-on-year. "If we project recent growth rates for expenditure on some of the largest areas – pay, procurement, funding for local government – and even under conservative paybill arrangements relative to recent years, spending would exceed the projected funding (using data from the SFC and applying that to the Spending Review settlement) by well in excess of £1 billion. "And that's before we take account – for example – of any grants to third sector organisations or subsidies to public and private companies in charge of delivering transport." How can the Scottish Government cut back on 'public sector inefficiencies'? Mr Sousa: "If the Scottish Government doesn't want to change social security or tax, that would mean discretionary [or reduced] spending. "It could mean fewer public sector employees – be it through redundancies or not filling vacant posts, although that runs the risk of not having the right skills to deliver the Scottish Government's priorities. "It could also mean a less generous public sector pay policy, although that of course means more difficulty in avoiding industrial action. It could also mean cutting back on procurement spending, which has been growing – even if we abstract from the pandemic peak – by 7% a year in cash terms in recent times. And it could also mean less funding available for councils – although given the pressures in local government, that might mean difficulties in delivering services and pressure on council tax." Is the Scottish Government's objective to cut waste by up to £1bn a year by 2029/30 doable? Mr Sousa: "Every government always want to cut inefficiencies and not impact on service delivery. "And of course there are things that could be better. Last week, the Fraser of Allander Institute highlighted that the UK Government's targets on efficiency stretch credulity in the Spending Review, and the Scottish Government's appear headed the same way. "It's inconceivable that the exact same services will be delivered by spending £1 billion less. Rather, the Scottish Government will need to prioritise what really is important. "To govern is to choose, and choices will be coming down the track. In some sense, the limits on borrowing the Scottish Government is subject to will make this hard to avoid by the end of the decade. The timetable doesn't seem impossible – but it'll take time to implement, and no doubt will mean real decisions about what to do and crucially what not to do."
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Labour MP calls for SNP Government to launch Scottish child grooming inquiry
EXCLUSIVE: Joani Reid said there is "even less understanding" about the scale of the problem in Scotland and the "lack of information is simply unacceptable." Scotland needs its own child grooming inquiry, a Labour MP insists after a major probe into Asian sex gangs was announced south of the border. Joani Reid's call comes months after seven members of one of Scotland's biggest child sex abuse rings, known as 'the beastie house', were handed life-long sentences. She urged First Minister John Swinney to launch a Scottish grooming inquiry after Keir Starmer yesterday committed to a probe into the gangs south of the border. East Kilbride and Strathaven MP Reid said: 'Young women and girls are being exploited by organised grooming gangs in Scotland just as they have been across England. 'Strathclyde University's Professor Alexis Jay, the UK's leading expert on sexual exploitation, made this clear to MPs earlier in the year. 'The truth is we have even less understanding about the scale of this problem in Scotland. That is simply unacceptable. 'It is vital Scotland is fully engaged with any statutory inquiry. We urgently need Police Scotland, local councils, and the Scottish Government to share their knowledge, and learn crucial lessons.' Joani, grand-daughter of legendary trade unionist Jimmy Reid, added: 'If the Scottish Government does not intend to hold its own dedicated inquiry, we need clear reasons why – not the vague responses we've had so far. This issue is too serious and urgent to leave unanswered. 'The first immediate step should be introducing a clear legal duty to report suspected child abuse. It's hard to under-stand why the Scottish Government continues to delay on mandatory reporting. There is broad consensus among child protection experts such legislation is urgently needed. 'I hope the First Minister recognises how important it is to act swiftly and decisively to safeguard Scotland's young people. We cannot allow bureaucracy or complacency to put children at further risk.' The UK Government rejected calls for a public inquiry earlier this year. It instead said it was focusing on putting in place the recommendations already made in a seven-year national inquiry by Professor Jay. But the Prime Minister announced on Saturday a full probe would be held after a review by Baroness Louise Casey. The report linked the grooming gang issue to men of Pakistani origin and said people were ignored for fears of racism. Local authorities and institutions that failed hundreds of victims will be held to account. The inquiry can also order local deep dives into historic cases. The National Crime Agency will lead a new crackdown on perpetrators, taking on cases that weren't properly dealt with. It will also look at over-hauling local responses to these crimes to end the culture of denial that failed young girls. Reid previously asked the Scottish Government to make it a legal obligation to report sexual abuse for those working with kids. Her call comes months after seven members of one of Scotland's biggest child sex abuse rings – known as 'the beastie house' – received life-long sentences. Three victims under 13 were subjected to a catalogue of abuse at a filthy drug den in Townhead, Glasgow, over a seven-year period from 2012. Police said they suffered 'unimaginable abuse'. Offences included rape, attempted murder and assault. The victims were known to child protection services before police opened a probe in 2020. They were added to Glasgow City Council's child protection register in 2018 and were the subject of regular social services meetings – especially after an allegation of physical abuse was made in June 2019. One girl, said to run wild in her community, was described as gaunt and had the worst case of head lice an expert had seen in her 30-year career. The seven members of the ring – all drug addicts – were convicted in January following a nine-week trial in 2023. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Child sexual abuse and exploitation has a devastating impact, which is why we are taking action to ensure that children are protected from harm. 'The independent Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry is undertaking an extensive review of child protection policy and practice in Scotland and will report with recommendations for further development in due course. We have also established a national multi-agency Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation Strategic Group, of which Professor Alexis Jay is a member, to consider all UK and Scottish work and make recommendations to Ministers accordingly. 'In Scotland, all healthcare and education professionals already have a duty to report child abuse. The case for introducing mandatory reporting more widely remains under active consideration, and we are continuing to engage closely with key partners, including Police Scotland, Social Work Scotland and Child Protection Committees Scotland, on this important issue.'
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
SNP Government names date for abolition of two child benefit cap in Scotland
EXCLUSIVE: Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville provided more details of a policy that was the centrepiece of the SNP Government's Budget. SNP Ministers will scrap the two child benefit cap weeks before the beginning of the Holyrood election. Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville told the Record the curb on social security payments will be lifted from March 2nd next year. The limit was introduced by the previous Tory Government and restricts access to some means-tested benefits to two kids. After Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer refused to axe the cap, First Minister John Swinney used his budget to promise his devolved government would step in. Under the SNP Government mitigation scheme, payments could work out at nearly £3,500 for affected children. Somerville, who will visit a nursery in Edinburgh today, said the policy will mean 20,000 fewer children will live in relative poverty next year. She said: 'The Scottish Government has consistently called on the UK Government to end the two-child cap. Reports suggest that they are looking at the impact it is having. But the evidence is clear and families and Scotland can't wait any longer for the UK Government to make up its mind to do the right thing and scrap the cap once and for all. 'The Two Child Limit Payment will begin accepting applications in March next year. At less than 15 months from when we announced this in the Scottish budget, this will be the fastest that a Scottish social security benefit has been delivered. 'This builds upon the considerable action we have taken in Scotland, including delivering unparalleled financial support through our Scottish Child Payment, investing to clear school meal debts, and continuing to support almost 10,000 children by mitigating the UK Government's Benefit Cap as fully as possible. 'However, austerity decisions taken by the UK Government are holding back Scotland' s progress. Modelling published in March makes clear that if the UK Government act decisively on child poverty, they could help to take an estimated 100,000 children out of poverty this year.' Recent reports have suggested Starmer could axe the cap across the UK as part of the Government's eagerly-anticipated child poverty strategy.
