logo
Study: Medicaid cuts would take a toll

Study: Medicaid cuts would take a toll

Politico3 hours ago

Presented by
WASHINGTON WATCH
The changes to Medicaid that the House passed last month and the Senate is now considering could lead to between 8,000 and nearly 25,000 preventable deaths, according to a new study published Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
The changes, which are part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, include work requirements for most adults to qualify for Medicaid coverage and criteria under which states could lose a part of their federal payments if they offer coverage to undocumented people.
How so: Researchers at Harvard Medical School and the City University of New York's Hunter College calculated the health harms that would affect an estimated more than 7 million people who, according to the Congressional Budget Office, would lose their Medicaid coverage.
The death estimates are based on peer-reviewed analyses of the effects of previous Medicaid reforms, such as a Massachusetts health care reform and an analysis of Medicaid expansion in three states before the Affordable Care Act took effect.
Why it matters: 'Implementing the current House bill would lead to 1.9 million people losing their personal physician, 1.3 million forgoing needed medications, and [380,270] women going without a mammogram,' the researchers wrote.
More than 1 million people would incur medical debt, and about a quarter-million people would be refused treatment because of such debts, they add.
Researchers note that their projections should be seen as approximations since they're based on CBO estimates of coverage loss that might be off the mark and on extrapolation from studies that assessed policy changes similar but not identical to those in the House bill.
What's next: On Monday, Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) unveiled the Senate's portion of the bill the House passed in May.
The draft Senate version could make it harder for states that expanded Medicaid to use financial loopholes to get higher Medicaid payments, POLITICO's Robert King reports.
WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE
This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care.
Loneliness among older adults isn't associated with an increased risk of death, says a new study from the University of Waterloo's School of Public Health Science in Canada, contradicting the former U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy's assertion — and others' — about the link.
Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Danny Nguyen at dnguyen@politico.com, Carmen Paun at cpaun@politico.com, Ruth Reader at rreader@politico.com, or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@politico.com.
Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: Dannyn516.70, CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01.
WORLD VIEW
European Union member countries neighboring Russia and Belarus are preparing their hospitals for war.
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland are among the nations revisiting crisis-response protocols for health-care facilities, organizing training exercises, investing in ballistic helmets and vests and shifting operating theaters underground, POLITICO's Giedre Peseckyte reports.
Why it matters: Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago, the threat of military conflict has loomed large for those countries that were once part of the USSR or of Russia's sphere of influence and are now EU and NATO members.
'It's not a question of if [Russia] will attack,' said Ragnar Vaiknemets, deputy director general of the Estonian Health Board, which oversees preparedness for crises from pandemics to war. 'It's a question about when.'
While an attack on a NATO country should, in theory, trigger a response from the military alliance, including the United States, the Eastern-front countries see war readiness as urgent.
How so: Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics in Lithuania, which is about 30 miles from the border with Belarus — a country ruled by a dictator aligned with Russian
President Vladimir Putin is developing underground infrastructure, shelters, helicopter landing sites and autonomous systems that would allow it to function even if electricity or water supplies were cut off.
Along with supplying body armor for ambulance crews, Estonia would distribute satellite phones to maintain communications if traditional networks fail. Electrical generators are being installed across the country's health care system, following Ukraine's experience with Russian strikes that routinely cut off civilian power. And there are plans to establish an independent internet network, if needed.
The small Baltic country is also procuring mobile medical units — pop-up treatment facilities deployable in emergencies — which should help address the currently limited critical-care capacity in Europe.
Estonia has also allocated nearly $29 million for mass casualty supplies, including orthopedic gear, tourniquets and trauma kits.
The stockpiles would ensure that hospitals can operate until supplies from allies reach them, Vaiknemets said, adding that NATO is crucial to securing supply routes.
In Latvia, the Covid-19-era demand that health care facilities maintain a three-month supply of medicines comes in handy for war preparations.
'I have never thought that I would say thanks to Covid, but thanks to Covid … we found financial resources,' said Agnese Vaļuliene, health ministry state secretary.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lawmakers aim to stop U.S. from joining Israel's military campaign against Iran

time21 minutes ago

Lawmakers aim to stop U.S. from joining Israel's military campaign against Iran

As Israel and Iran continue to trade strikes in the Middle East, lawmakers are set to introduce bills and resolution aimed at preventing the United States from getting involved in Israel's military campaign against Iran. While the efforts are in their early stages, the legislation is unlikely to garner sufficient support to override the will of President Donald Trump and his supportive Republican majorities in both chambers of Congress. Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, on Monday introduced a resolution he says will "prevent war with Iran" as he expresses concern at the idea that the U.S may get involved in Israel's campaign against Iran. 'It is not in our national security interest to get into a war with Iran unless that war is absolutely necessary to defend the United States. I am deeply concerned that the recent escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran could quickly pull the United States into another endless conflict,' Kaine, D-Va., said. 'The American people have no interest in sending service members to fight another forever war in the Middle East. This resolution will ensure that if we decide to place our nation's men and women in uniform into harm's way, we will have a debate and vote on it in Congress.' Separately, Vermont independent Sen. Bernie Sanders introduced the No War Against Iran Act on Monday to "prohibit the use of federal funds for any use of military force in or against Iran absent specific Congressional authorization." Sanders has several co-sponsors including Democratic Sens. Peter Welch of Vermont, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Jeff Merkley of Oregon, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, Ed Markey of Massachusetts, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, and Tina Smith of Minnesota. '[Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu's reckless and illegal attacks violate international law and risk igniting a regional war. Congress must make it clear that the United States will not be dragged into Netanyahu's war of choice,' Sanders wrote in a statement. 'Our Founding Fathers entrusted the power of war and peace exclusively to the people's elected representatives in Congress, and it is imperative that we make clear that the President has no authority to embark on another costly war without explicit authorization by Congress.' Senate Majority Leader John Thune avoided saying whether he would put Kaine's resolution on the Senate floor when asked on Tuesday. He said that any action on the matter would be 'getting the cart ahead of the horse,' but that there could be a more 'fulsome discussion' later on what the role of Congress should be amid the conflict. 'This is something that's happened the last few days. I think the President is perfectly within his authority in the steps that he has taken. You know clearly, if this thing were to extend for some period of time, there could be a more fulsome discussion about what the role of Congress should be, and and and whether or not we need to take action,' Thune said. A resolution is a statement or expression of a sentiment that, if passed, has no legal authority. An act has legal authority, but even if passed by the Republican-controlled Congress, it would have to be signed into law by Trump. In the House, Kentucky Republican Thomas Massie joined California Democrat Ro Khanna to introduce a bipartisan War Powers resolution on Tuesday meant to ensure that Congress asserts its constitutional authority to declare war under 50 U.S. Code Ch. 33. "This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution," Massie said. "I'm introducing a bipartisan War Powers Resolution tomorrow to prohibit our involvement. I invite all members of Congress to cosponsor this resolution." Khanna, one of the bill's initial cosponsors, quote tweeted Massie's post, calling for "No war in Iran," and equating the current situation in Iran to Operation Iraqi Freedom, the 2003 invasion of Iraq. "No war in Iran. It's time for every member to go on record. Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq or do you stand with the American people?" Khanna posted. "I am proud to co-lead this bipartisan War Powers Resolution with Rep. Massie that is privileged and must receive a vote," Shortly after Massie's and Khanna's posts, New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and fellow Squad member Rashida Tlaib of Michigan expressed their support for the effort. Ocasio-Cortez, in a reply to Massie, said that she would be "signing on," to the resolution. In her post, Tlaib, said that the American people wouldn't fall for "it" again, contrasting today's debate on Iran's nuclear capabilities to October of 2002, when Congress approved a bipartisan Authorization for the Use of Military Force ahead of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. "I look forward to supporting this War Powers Resolution. The American people aren't falling for it again," Tlaib said. "We were lied to about "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq that killed millions (plus) forever changed lives. It's (unconstitutional) for Trump to go to war without a vote in Congress."

'It just baffles me': Senate Republicans sound alarm over Medicaid changes, spending in Trump megabill
'It just baffles me': Senate Republicans sound alarm over Medicaid changes, spending in Trump megabill

Fox News

time26 minutes ago

  • Fox News

'It just baffles me': Senate Republicans sound alarm over Medicaid changes, spending in Trump megabill

Senate Republicans are steadily moving along in their quest to advance President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," but some remain dissatisfied with one of the most crucial portions of the package. The Senate Finance Committee unveiled its portion of the budget reconciliation package Monday night that deals directly with making the president's first-term tax cuts permanent and the more controversial proposed changes to Medicaid, niche tax issues and Biden-era green energy subsidies. Senate Republicans met behind closed doors to get a crash course on the bill, and some left distraught over provisions they hoped they would see on the cutting room floor. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., can only afford to lose three votes in the upper chamber. And due to the nature of budget reconciliation, which allows lawmakers to skirt the filibuster, he can't count on Democrats, who would demand serious changes to the broader legislation, to help get the package across the line. The changes to the Medicaid provider tax rate, which were a stark departure from the House GOP's version of the bill, particularly ruffled feathers among Republicans who have warned not to make revisions to the healthcare program that could shut down rural hospitals and boot working Americans from their benefits. "I want changes," Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said. "I'm still not satisfied with where we are on Medicaid." The Senate Finance Committee went further than the House's freeze of the provider tax rate, or the amount that state Medicaid programs pay to healthcare providers on behalf of Medicaid beneficiaries, for non-Affordable Care Act expansion states, and included a provision that lowers the rate in expansion states annually until it hits 3.5 percent. To date, 41 states and Washington, D.C., have opted into the Medicaid expansion program. The idea behind the changes to the provider rate taxes was to help pay for Trump's mammoth bill in part and discourage the remaining states from opting into Medicaid expansion. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., argued, for a state like his dotted with rural hospitals, that the bill "is not a good development" for their survival. "I mean, it's really not," he said. "And in order to pay for increased subsidies for the Green New Deal? I mean, it just baffles me." The Senate's version of the tax package does add more flexibility to green energy tax credits than the House's, an issue pushed for by a handful of Senate Republicans who wanted to see the truncated phase-out of the credits in the House bill slowed down. Senate Republicans met with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz Tuesday afternoon to discuss the Medicaid tweaks in the bill. Oz said the White House did "not believe" changing the provider tax would influence the ability of hospitals to stay viable. "In fact, the provider tax and the state-directed payments are often used to pay institutions that have the best connections to the government of the state, not necessarily the hospitals that need the help the most," he said. "It is important that we clean up this system." Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., sought to extinguish anger among his colleagues, noting that Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, and Senate leaders were still working on what the final product would look like. "Everybody's got an opinion, and I think it's gonna be that way right up until we vote," he said. Fiscal hawks were not pleased with the bill, either. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., has stumped for a return to pre-COVID-19 pandemic era spending, a gouge to federal spending that would be trillions of dollars more than the rough goal of $2 trillion in spending cuts that some Senate Republicans are eying. He believed there was "no way" that the current parts of the broader reconciliation package could be fixed and stitched together by the Senate GOP's self-imposed July 4 deadline. "The problem is it just simply doesn't meet the moment," he said. But Crapo cautioned he and lawmakers were still working out the kinks and that a resolution to his colleagues' issues could still be found. "All I can say is that we will work it out," Crapo said. "We have to work that out, not only among our colleagues in the Senate, but with the House and with the White House."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store