New report reveals major global shift in shopping habits: 'Robust growth'
A new report reveals the paper bag market is on the upswing, with increased consumer awareness about the troublesome effects of plastic waste among the factors.
Future Market Insights estimates that the paper bag market will have a value of $10.3 billion by 2035 with a compound annual growth rate of 4.4% over the next decade.
It identified five key trends driving this demand: retail expansion, brand customization, government regulations banning single-use plastics, food safety, and sustainability.
While shopping with reusable bags and bringing your own silicone takeout containers to restaurants are perhaps some of the most impactful ways to reduce waste, the burgeoning paper bag market is nonetheless a step in the right direction for businesses.
Paper bags are generally recyclable and biodegradable. On the other hand, plastic bags are derived from polluting dirty fuels, and their manufacturing process involves toxic chemicals, as the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme explains.
They take up to 1,000 years to break down, contributing to the untimely deaths of hundreds of thousands of marine creatures that mistake them for food each year.
According to FMI, the food and beverage sector leads paper bag growth, with a news release revealing the industry accounts for 46% of the market share. Brown kraft paper is the most popular material in the paper bag market, as it is more cost-effective than white kraft paper and requires fewer chemical treatments.
Perhaps surprisingly, FMI didn't cite food safety as the primary factor accelerating the food and beverage industry's adoption of paper bags, even though microplastic pollution is linked to health complications, including cancer, dementia, and reproductive difficulties.
In the release, it highlighted policies outlawing single-use plastic bags and businesses' desire to advertise their sustainability commitments as key drivers of the growth.
It also listed "high demand for greaseproof and food-grade paper bags" as a factor, underscoring how public health can benefit from eco-friendly policymaking as businesses pivot to meet consumer demand for sustainability.
When you think about a product's packaging, which of these factors is more important to you?
The way it looks
The information it provides
The waste it produces
I don't think about packaging at all
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Regardless of which factor weighs more in the accelerated push, transitioning away from plastics is still a win on multiple levels.
Ismail Sutaria, lead consultant in packaging at FMI, suggested that the paper bag market's "robust growth" could change the packaging game.
"To ensure long-term success, manufacturers need to focus on improving the durability and water resistance of paper bags while addressing cost concerns through sustainable production innovations," Sutaria said.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
9 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Grocers need to do a better job of explaining prices, shoppers say
Grocery shoppers have only a lukewarm impression of the steps supermarket operators have taken to communicate about factors that could or already do affect what they pay for food, according to survey results released Thursday by research firm The Feedback Group. Respondents to the poll of about 1,100 shoppers, conducted this spring, gave an average score of about 2.5 on a scale of 1 to 5 when asked if their primary grocery store has "communicated in some way" about how tariffs might impact prices. People were only slightly more pleased with the way stores have explained why groceries have become more expensive over the past few years, giving an average grade of just under 3. While people who participated in the survey placed the highest level of blame for increases in supermarket prices over the past few years on government policies and actions, they also indicated that they think grocers are benefiting from price increases. Respondents said they believe grocers have a profit margin of 30%, a figure that was down slightly from a similar poll The Feedback Group conducted last year. Grocery chains recorded a net profit margin after taxes of 1.6% in 2023, according to figures from FMI - The Food Industry Association. The majority (87%) of participants said they expect the tariffs the Trump administration has announced - but not fully implemented - would cause their grocery bills to increase, with only about half saying they thought their costs would increase significantly. Sixty-one percent of respondents said they are "stressed about rising grocery prices," although the figure varied significantly by generation. Seven in 10 participants who belong to Generation X reported that grocery inflation is stressful for them, compared with 65% for Generation Z and 36% for the Silent Generation. Asked which types of groceries they expect to become more expensive because of tariffs, almost 90% of poll participants said they think the prices of imported foods would increase. Two-thirds believe household goods will become pricier because of tariffs, while 63% of respondents said they think meat and poultry costs would go up. More than 60% of participants said they are buying more items on sale because of grocery inflation, which has recently eased. Half said they eat at home more frequently, while about 40% have bought more private label products. Copyright 2025 Industry Dive. All rights reserved.
Entrepreneur
21-05-2025
- Entrepreneur
PE/VC Investments Face Slump in April, Strong Exits Expected in Second Half of 2025
Private equity and venture capital (PE/VC) investments in India declined by 20 per cent in April 2025 compared to March 2025 in value terms, according to an EY-IVCA monthly PE/VC roundup. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. Private equity and venture capital (PE/VC) investments in India declined by 20 per cent in April 2025 compared to March 2025 in value terms, according to an EY-IVCA monthly PE/VC roundup. Vivek Soni, Partner and National Leader, Private Equity Services, EY said that April 2025 recorded USD 4.7 billion in PE/VC investments, 6 per cent lower than investments in April 2024 and 20 per cent lower than in March 2025 with the number of deals in April 2025 being 4 per cent lower year-on-year. "The pure-play PE/VC investments in April 2025 (USD 2 billion) declined by 51 per cent compared to April 2024 (USD 3.9 billion). This was offset by increased investment in the real estate and infrastructure asset class, which saw a growth of 175 per cent year-on-year (US$2.7 billion in April 2025 versus USD 984 million in April 2024). Compared to March 2025, pure-play PE/VC investments declined by 54 per cent (USD 4.2 billion in March 2025), and real estate and infrastructure investments grew by 65 per cent (USD 1.6 billion in March 2025)," said Soni in the report. Soni added that in terms of the number of deals, pure-play investments declined by 6 per cent, whereas the real estate and infrastructure asset classes grew by 6 per cent year-on-year. Notably, in April 2025, deals in startup investments emerged as the highest at USD 1.8 billion, followed by credit investments at USD 1.1 billion. According to the report, the country's retail and consumer sector is undergoing significant transformation, presenting a compelling opportunity for private equity and venture capital investors. Growth is mainly driven by the ongoing digital revolution and technological advancements, with rising urbanization and disposable income. Ujwal Sutaria, Founder and General Partner at TDV Partners, said that it is encouraging to see the growth in startup investments despite the overall investment decline. This showcases that the "dry powder" that VCs had been sitting on for a while is actually getting deployed now. "I can see the same across TDV Partners' portfolio companies as well, where many companies are closing their next rounds. The exit scenario was grim due to macro uncertainty, which was reflected in turbulent public markets. As the tariff between countries gets finalised in the coming months," said Sutaria. "I expect the second half of the year to be stronger for exits. There are a dozen startups that are lined up for IPOs, which will give good liquidity to investors, instilling stronger confidence in the Indian startup ecosystem, bringing in more new capital than before," said Sutaria. The report said that PE/VC investments in April 2025 totalled USD 4.7 billion, 6 per cent lower than the US$4.9 billion recorded in April 2024. The number was also 20 per cent lower than the USD 5.9 billion recorded in March 2025. The number of deals in April 2025 declined by 4 per cent year-on-year, with 108 deals compared to 113 in April 2024, while remaining consistent with the deal count in March 2025 (108 deals).
Miami Herald
19-05-2025
- Miami Herald
Grocery industry fights for SNAP as program faces massive cuts
The top trade organizations representing supermarkets are urgently calling attention to the importance of SNAP as a proposal that would slash the government assistance program's funding moves forward in Congress as part of a tax-cut megabill. Last week, the House Agriculture Committee advanced legislation that would cut as much as $300 billion in nutrition spending as well as overhaul SNAP by requiring states to help fund the program's benefits, Politico reported. On Sunday, the House Budget Committee passed the tax cut bill, clearing the way for a House floor vote, which could happen this week, Reuters reported. SNAP cuts on the federal level would help fund the party's domestic policy plan and some farm bill programs, Politico noted. The chairman of the House Agriculture Committee has said that too many "work-ready" people are on SNAP, arguing for stricter work requirements for participants in the food assistance program. The proposed cuts come at a time when consumers continue to worry about their grocery spending and how trade policies could potentially increase the cost of goods, including food. Walmart is bringing back its $6.99 minimum basket fee for SNAP consumers who place online orders under $35, Reuters reported at the end of April. As of February, more than 42 million people participate in SNAP, up 2% from the same time last year, according to the USDA. SNAP accounts for around 5% of all supermarket purchases, the FMI - The Food Industry Association shared during a webinar last week, and retailers have shared with investors how reductions in SNAP funding can hurt their sales. SNAP is "very well received across the political spectrum," Jennifer Hatcher, FMI's chief public policy officer and senior vice president of government and member relations, said during the webinar. Fifty-nine percent of people are opposed to cutting or reducing SNAP funding, while one-third are in favor, Hatcher said, citing a survey of 1,000 people Fabrizio, Lee & Associates and FMI conducted in late April. The proposed SNAP cuts have struck a dissonant chord with the grocery industry, with the National Grocers Association saying it is "deeply concerned by the cuts and programmatic cost shift changes" in the proposed legislation. "SNAP is not only essential to fighting food insecurity, but [is] also a proven economic engine for thousands of local communities across the country," NGA President and CEO Greg Ferrara said in a statement on Tuesday. SNAP funding not only addresses food insecurity but also supports the economies of local communities, such as by generating over $4.5 billion in state and federal tax revenue annually, Ferrara noted. The trade association had previously cited data that every $1 invested in SNAP generates $1.79 of economic activity in communities. "[The] committee's proposal to shift costs to states is a concern given the challenging headwinds that states face," Ferrara said. Earlier in May, the NGA said it met with representatives of four Democratic members of Congress to urge Congress to limit SNAP funding cuts. "We urge Congress to pursue balanced reforms and solutions that strengthen the program, eliminate waste and fraud, and uphold the health and economic well-being of American families, while preserving American jobs in our food chain and grocery industry," Ferrara said last week. FMI is advocating for the continuation of federal governance of SNAP to ensure continuity. "We believe complex, differing SNAP restrictions sorted by states would cause delays, errors and disputes, further slowing the checkout speeds, frustrating customers and increasing operational costs," Hatcher said. By a 57%-to-39% margin, survey respondents want a single national standard on what SNAP can be used for, according to FMI. To help ensure stakeholders have up-to-date information as discussion of SNAP policy changes continues, FMI recently launched a new website to provide the survey data and serve as a resource for information about the current discussions around SNAP. Along with the federal proposal, approximately 25 states this year have considered restricting SNAP participants from buying specific items like candy and soda, and those state policy changes would require getting a waiver from the USDA, Hatcher said, noting that Arkansas, Indiana, Nebraska and Iowa have already submitted waiver requests. FMI has pushed back on efforts to limit how SNAP participants use their benefits, noting that "the best results" are those that make resources available like dietitian-supported recipes or curated shopping experiences, Hatcher said. FMI has said that different state policies could confuse shoppers and retailers. "The future strength of this program isn't just a policy issue-it's a moral imperative and an economic necessity," Leslie G. Sarasin, FMI president and CEO, said in a statement. Peyton Bigora contributed reporting. Copyright 2025 Industry Dive. All rights reserved.
