logo
Charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver spark backlash after incident with ICE agents

Charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver spark backlash after incident with ICE agents

Yahoo21-05-2025

New Jersey Rep. LaMonica McIver was charged on Monday for allegedly assaulting law enforcement officers outside of an ICE detention facility earlier this month, a move the congresswoman claims was "purely political."
Acting U.S. Attorney Alina Habba announced she was charging the congresswoman with assaulting and impeding a law enforcement officer.
On May 9, McIver, along with a few other members of Congress and Ras Baraka, the mayor of Newark, New Jersey, were protesting outside of Delaney Hall, a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility.
MORE: Newark Mayor Ras Baraka arrested at ICE facility while joining Democrats to conduct 'oversight'
Tensions at the protest escalated and pushing and shoving allegedly occurred, according to the U.S. attorney.
"Representative LaMonica McIver assaulted, impeded, and interfered with law enforcement in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 111(a)(1)," Habba said in a statement. "That conduct cannot be overlooked by the chief federal law enforcement official in the State of New Jersey, and it is my Constitutional obligation to ensure that our federal law enforcement is protected."
"No one is above the law -- politicians or otherwise. It is the job of this office to uphold Justice, regardless of who you are. Now we will let the justice system work," Habba added.
President Donald Trump also claimed McIver was "out of control" while commenting on the charges at the Capitol on Tuesday.
"I have no idea who she is," Trump told reporters. "That woman was out of control. She was shoving federal agents. She was out of control. The days of that crap are over in this country. We're going to have law and order."
MORE: What we know about the foreign college students targeted for deportation
Following the charges, McIver alleged in a statement that the decision was politically motivated.
"The charges against me are purely political -- they mischaracterize and distort my actions, and are meant to criminalize and deter legislative oversight," McIver said. "This administration will never stop me from working for the people in our district and standing up for what is right. I am thankful for the outpouring of support I have received and I look forward to the truth being laid out clearly in court," she added.
The complaint alleges McIver tried to "thwart the arrest" of Baraka after he had been told to leave the secured area of the facility because, unlike the congresspeople, he did not have lawful authority to be there. She is accused of making "forcible contact" with authorities, including allegedly slamming her forearm into a Homeland Security Investigations agent and pushing and using "each of her forearms to forcibly strike" an ICE officer, according to the complaint.
The complaint includes multiple stills from officer body camera footage showing what prosecutors allege were McIver's "multiple attempts to forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, and interfere with the agents attempting to take the Mayor into custody."
The charges against Baraka were dropped by the U.S. attorney.
Baraka said in a statement on X that he was glad the trespassing charge against him was dismissed, but that he stands with McIver and believes she will be "vindicated."
"I want to be clear: I stand with LaMonica, and I fully expect her to be vindicated," the mayor wrote.
Top House Democrats also released a joint statement defending McIver on Monday, vowing to "vigorously" respond to what they say is an illegitimate abuse of power.
"An attack on one of us is an attack on the American people. House Democrats will respond vigorously in the days to come at a time, place and manner of our choosing," the leaders said.
Additionally, the party leaders noted that McIver toured the facility after the alleged altercation.
"There is no credible evidence that Rep. McIver engaged in any criminal activity, and she would not have been permitted to tour the facility had she done anything wrong," the lawmakers claimed.
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the charges were brought following a "thorough review of the video footage."
"If any person, regardless of political party, influence or status, assaults a law enforcement officer as we witnessed Congresswoman McIver do, you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law," Noem wrote on X. "We thank our brave ICE law enforcement officers for their service to this great nation."
Charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver spark backlash after incident with ICE agents originally appeared on abcnews.go.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

San Antonio City Council election results show changing politics
San Antonio City Council election results show changing politics

Axios

time17 minutes ago

  • Axios

San Antonio City Council election results show changing politics

San Antonio City Council District 1 incumbent Sukh Kaur held on to her seat in Saturday's runoff election, in which three new city councilmembers were also elected in a political shakeup. Why it matters: A new generation of councilmembers can help shape a range of transformative city plans as they work with new mayor Gina Ortiz Jones over the next four years — but they'll also have to contend with a possible budget deficit and cuts to services. By the numbers: Kaur beat out conservative neighborhood leader Patty Gibbons 65% to 35% in the downtown area district, which now also includes some neighborhoods north of Loop 410. The big picture: The San Antonio City Council could have a starker political divide. It'sgaining one more progressive and one more conservative member, who are taking over seats previously held by business-friendly and moderate Democrats. Ortiz Jones is expected to lead as a progressive. The latest: In District 6 on the Far West Side, Ric Galvan (50.1%) beat Kelly Ann Gonzalez (49.9%) by just 25 votes. Both have progressive backgrounds running in a district that has previously elected Republicans and business-friendly Democrats. In District 8 on the Northwest Side, Ivalis Meza Gonzalez (57%) beat Paula McGee (43%). Meza Gonzalez is the former chief of staff to Mayor Ron Nirenberg, while McGee had experience on city boards and support from the Republican Party of Bexar County. In District 9 on the North Side, Misty Spears (57%) beat Angi Taylor Aramburu (43%), putting this more conservative district back in Republican hands for the first time in eight years. Spears has been the director of constituent services for Republican Bexar County Commissioner Grant Moody. Flashback: The four districts headed to the June runoff after no one earned more than 50% of the vote in the May 3 election. District 4 on the Southwest Side is newly represented by Edward Mungia, a former staff member in the office. He won outright in the May election.

As Trump administration aims to boost mining, drilling and fishing, Spokane office dedicated to workers' safety remains in jeopardy
As Trump administration aims to boost mining, drilling and fishing, Spokane office dedicated to workers' safety remains in jeopardy

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

As Trump administration aims to boost mining, drilling and fishing, Spokane office dedicated to workers' safety remains in jeopardy

Jun. 7—WASHINGTON — Among the more than 150 executive actions President Donald Trump has taken since assuming office in January are orders that aim to boost oil and gas drilling, mining and commercial fishing in the United States. But in response to another one of those executive orders, which created the "Department of Government Efficiency" and directed federal agencies to cut costs, the Department of Health and Human Services has effectively shuttered a Spokane facility that for decades has helped prevent harm to workers in those same high-risk industries. On March 31, employees at the Spokane Research Lab of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, or NIOSH, were notified that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had decided to terminate them in accordance with Trump's order and as part of his agency's "broader strategy to improve its efficiency and effectiveness to make America healthier." Tristan Victoroff, an epidemiologist in NIOSH's Western States Division, said he and his colleagues thought they might escape the Trump administration's sweeping effort to slash the federal workforce because their work supports enterprises the president says he wants to grow. "The industries that we work in, particularly with the mining program and the Western States Division — oil and gas, wildland firefighting, commercial fishing, mining — our mission does support those workers," said Victoroff, a union steward with the American Federation of Government Employees Local 1916. "We had considered ourselves to be in line with the administration's priorities, and so it really did come as a surprise when they essentially eliminated NIOSH." Union members in Spokane were notified on May 2 that they had been placed on paid administrative leave and their jobs would be eliminated on July 2. That termination is temporarily on hold after courts in California ruled later in May that the Trump's administration's mass firing of federal workers likely violated the Constitution. Facing a separate lawsuit from a West Virginia coal miner and backlash from both Republicans and Democrats in Congress, Kennedy reinstated about 300 of the 900 fired NIOSH employees in May. That move didn't officially spare any workers in Spokane, but researchers in NIOSH's Spokane Mining Research Division said they were told by their supervisors to return to work on an as-needed basis to wind down projects while technically remaining on leave. "We're kind of in an in-between," said Casey Stazick, a union steward and materials engineer in the Spokane Mining Research Division. "We got our termination notices that said we're put on administrative leave unless told otherwise by a supervisor. Then, right around the same time, there was also an order that came down saying that we were critical employees, even though we're still getting fired." Victoroff said his colleagues in the Western States Division all remain on administrative leave and at risk of losing their jobs, pending the outcome of the lawsuit filed by AFGE and other organizations. After the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on May 30 upheld a lower court's injunction that blocked the mass firing, the Trump administration immediately appealed to the Supreme Court, which could either rule on the case or let the lower court's ruling stand. The Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, didn't respond to questions from The Spokesman-Review about the rationale for the termination or any plans to rescind it. In response to an earlier inquiry, HHS said on May 22 that Kennedy "has been working hard to ensure that the critical functions under NIOSH remain intact" and that "ensuring the health and safety of our workforce remains a top priority for the Department." In the May 2 emails, reviewed by The Spokesman-Review, NIOSH employees were told their termination "does not reflect directly on your service, performance, or conduct" and was happening because "your duties have been identified as either unnecessary or virtually identical to duties being performed elsewhere in the agency." Contrary to that explanation, documents and emails obtained by The Spokesman-Review show that Kennedy eliminated entire divisions of NIOSH, leaving virtually no one to focus on safety for hard-rock miners, oil and gas workers, commercial fishermen, farmworkers or wildland firefighters. That approach seems to have enabled the department to sidestep a federal law that requires an agency to define a "competitive area" subject to downsizing and gives priority to military veterans and those with longer tenure. Most of the NIOSH jobs that Kennedy restored are based in West Virginia and Ohio, two states dominated by Republicans in Congress, and focus on high-profile programs including screening for black lung disease in coal miners and monitoring the health of firefighters who responded to the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Brendan Demich, a union steward with AFGE Local 1916 and an engineer at NIOSH's facility in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, said the department seems to have restored only a limited number of jobs that have drawn attention from the public, labor unions and Congress. Kennedy announced in March that he would slash his department's workforce from 82,000 to 62,000 and combine multiple agencies under a new "Administration for a Healthy America." In a class-action lawsuit filed on Tuesday, HHS employees who lost their jobs allege the department knew it was using "hopelessly error-ridden" data to carry out the mass termination in March. In a court filing on Monday, lawyers for HHS said the department had complied with a West Virginia judge's order to restore jobs at a NIOSH office in Morgantown, West Virginia, but an attorney representing the miner who brought the case said those employees haven't been given the tools they need to do their jobs. The West Virginia case does not apply to employees in the Spokane facility. A report released on Monday by Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., points out that NIOSH's current annual budget of $362.8 million represents just 0.2% of the discretionary part of the HHS budget. That's about 0.005% of the total federal budget, and NIOSH research has saved about $1 billion each year, according to the senator's report. "The Trump administration's unfathomable decision to gut NIOSH and fire nearly every person at the Spokane Research Lab is a devastating and shortsighted move that puts workers everywhere at risk," Murray said in a statement that accompanied the report. "These thoughtless firings don't just risk Americans' health and safety in the workplace today, but threaten decades of progress toward preventing workplace hazards. Researchers in Spokane who have dedicated their careers to protecting workers across the country are being kicked to the curb because Donald Trump and his conspiracy theorist Health Secretary don't have a clue what NIOSH does and don't care to learn." Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., also voiced support for the Spokane researchers in a statement on Thursday. "The dedicated team at NIOSH's Spokane facility conducts research that protects miners and other Americans with dangerous jobs," Cantwell said. "Closing NIOSH will mean more blue-collar workers suffering debilitating diseases from chemical exposure or dying in accidents. We should be increasing the Spokane Research Lab's budget to fund more innovation and safety, not shutting them down." Trump's budget request to Congress, released May 30, includes $73.2 million for NIOSH — about 80% lower than the current fiscal year — including $66.5 million for mining research, $5.5 million for the agency's national cancer registry for firefighters and $1.2 million for mesothelioma research. According to an email to NIOSH employees from the agency's director, obtained by The Spokesman-Review, Trump's request doesn't include funding for the Western States Division in Spokane. Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho, said in a brief interview on Wednesday that ensuring safety for miners and oil and gas workers is "incredibly important" and emphasized that the president's budget request is only a suggestion. It will ultimately be Congress, he said, that decides how much funding NIOSH gets. "These are things that were done by the DOGE people, and they were people who didn't have the same experience of dealing with the overall budget as we do up here," Risch said, noting that employees at the Department of Government Efficiency have admitted that they have made mistakes. "When we sat down with the DOGE guys, they said, 'Look, we were given a job. We went and did this job. We understand you guys are experts on this. When we're done, it's going to be up to you,'" Risch said. "What we're going to do is take a healthy look at what these jobs entail. It's going to be looked at seriously and responsibly through the appropriations process." Murray, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, has been less patient with Kennedy and DOGE, which was spearheaded by billionaire Elon Musk before his public falling-out with Trump last week. In an interview on Wednesday, the Washington senator said she has repeatedly tried and failed to reach the HHS secretary's team, joking that they must have also fired everyone who answered the phones. "We are looking at all the options, obviously, for next year," Murray said. "Writing our appropriations bills, looking at language, working in a bipartisan way, to make sure that funds that we, Congress, decide are appropriated will actually have to be implemented by the administration." The Spokane Research Lab also has support in the House from Rep. Michael Baumgartner, a Spokane Republican who has written two letters calling on Kennedy to reconsider the termination of its employees and visited the facility on Tuesday. Baumgartner's office didn't say whether he had received a response to either letter from the HHS secretary. The Spokane facility's nationwide reach has earned it support from other influential Republicans in Congress, including Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota. In a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing on March 20, Rounds told Kennedy that terminating NIOSH jobs in Spokane had resulted in the loss of a $1.2 million mine safety grant to the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology, which also relies on NIOSH for "critical technical support." "We need to protect our miners," Kennedy replied, pledging to work with Rounds' office. "We need to protect them because they are the future of our country." In a hearing of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, Murkowski asked Trump's nominee to lead the Occupational Safety and Health Administration — a regulatory agency that relies on NIOSH research — how he would do his job without data from NIOSH. The nominee, David Keeling, replied that it would be difficult, but he would consider replacing NIOSH with "private entities." Asked why she thinks the Trump administration eliminated the NIOSH jobs, Murkowski told The Spokesman-Review on Thursday, "They were looking for cuts, and as we've seen in many departments, it seems somewhat indiscriminate and arbitrary." "I think what we're working through still is some of the DOGE recommendations, where you're not fully appreciating the role and the function of many of these federal employees," she said. "My hope is that they're going to be actually looking at this now and realizing we need this information." Murkowski said she has stressed to Kennedy how important NIOSH is for Alaska's commercial fisheries. Another concern, she said, is that valuable researchers could choose to leave public service while their jobs are in limbo. "When you are sending the signal to that federal employee that maybe what you've been doing is not what we want to continue, people are making their own determinations and leaving, and now we've got all these vacancies," Murkowski said. "I think you're going to see a resettling. I just don't know when." After earning an engineering degree at the Colorado School of Mines, Stazick worked in the private sector before she took a job with NIOSH at the Spokane Research Laboratory in 2020. She knew it would mean taking a pay cut but liked working to improve workers' safety, not just a company's bottom line. "It was a really big incentive for me to go and take a big pay cut and go into the public sector," said Stazick, 27. "With this engineering degree that I could be using to make someone a bunch of money, it just felt nice that the work I was doing was affecting people's lives and safety." NIOSH named Stazick one of its "rising stars" in 2022, and she developed her expertise in the corrosion of metal support structures for underground mines. She worked with miners to replace bolts that were corroding within six months — causing roof failures — with more durable materials. "It's just upsetting," she said of the mass layoffs. "I'm at a career transition point again. I had found something I was really passionate about. So, yeah, the whole thing has been upsetting." Stazick's colleague Brad Seymour, another mining engineer and union steward, is at the other end of his career. When he started at the Spokane facility in 1986, it was run by the now-defunct U.S. Bureau of Mines. He planned to work for about one more year, to make it an even 40. "The thing that's discouraging about it is that I don't think it was discussed well within the leadership," Seymour said of the mass firing. "So it came as a shock to everybody. And because of that, the cuts were not handled in a very thoughtful manner." Seymour has dedicated his career to helping miners prevent collapses and "rock bursts" caused by the extreme pressure in deep underground mines. That's in the interest of mining companies, but he said the engineers working for companies don't have the time or the incentives to do the kind of research that happens at NIOSH, which benefits the whole industry. Coeur d'Alene-based Hecla Mining was forced to close its Lucky Friday Mine in Mullan for more than a year and spend over $30 million in improvements after accidents killed two miners and injured seven more in 2011. A spokesman for Hecla declined to comment on NIOSH research. Early in his career, Seymour worked to improve cemented backfill methods — where miners fill underground voids with mill tailings and other material to prevent cave-ins — at the Cannon Mine in Wenatchee. Those improvements, he said, were adopted by mining companies around the world and helped fuel a gold-mining boom in Nevada in the 1990s. Just like those benefits to the mining industry, the negative effects of ending NIOSH research could take years to be borne out, the workers in Spokane warned. Art Miller, who retired from the Spokane Mining Research Division at the end of 2020, started his career by working to reduce diesel emissions that were harming miners deep underground, then the government paid for him to go back to school and earn a doctorate in particle science. He became the resident expert in silica dust, the airborne form of the mineral also called quartz, which is abundant in hard-rock mines. When inhaled, it can cause silicosis, an incurable lung disease that leads to severe breathing problems and sometimes to death. "When you're drilling and blasting and crushing these materials, you're going to have a lot of silica in the air, but you don't know how much, because there's no way to measure it easily," Miller said. "You can take a sample and send it to a lab, which is the current, standard way of doing it, but most people often don't bother to do that, because it's a pain in the butt and takes a long time. By the time they get the results back, it might not be meaningful to what they were doing the day that it happened." For years, Miller sought support to develop a portable, real-time silica monitor, similar to the gas monitors commonly worn by coal miners. He finally secured funding soon before he retired, and hired an engineer to continue the work. The project had made good progress, Miller said, but that work is "man-on-the-moon kind of research" that the mining industry won't fund on its own. "The private sector is dollar-driven," he said. "There's no way they're going to do it unless they absolutely know it's going to make money for them. Normally and historically, they're not motivated to do it." The work of preventing diseases like silicosis also falls on the public sector, Miller said, because the worst symptoms often don't emerge until years after a worker retires. While people can die from silicosis — 12,900 do each year, a 2019 study found — it more commonly causes disability and makes affected people more susceptive to other diseases, like tuberculosis. "They usually just have a horrible life and maybe die early, so it's not a real problem for the operator, for the mining guy," Miller said. "He's not going to see the ugliness of it. That's going to be when they're my age, and they're having trouble breathing, and they end up dying 10 years earlier than they otherwise would have. By then, they're long gone from where they worked, and there's no responsibility tied to the people who put them through that." Orion Donovan Smith's work is funded in part by members of the Spokane community via the Community Journalism and Civic Engagement Fund. This story can be republished by other organizations for free under a Creative Commons license. For more information on this, please contact our newspaper's managing editor.

Marines could be sent to L.A. protests, Hegseth says
Marines could be sent to L.A. protests, Hegseth says

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Marines could be sent to L.A. protests, Hegseth says

June 8 (UPI) -- The Los Angeles Sheriff's Department arrested one person overnight in Paramount, a city in Los Angeles County, amid ongoing protests against raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, officials said Sunday. The sheriff's department confirmed the arrest by email to UPI but did not provide any further details about the arrest. More protests have been planned in Los Angeles ahead of the arrival of National Guardsmen called up by President Donald Trump to curb the demonstrations, as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he might send in U.S. Marines if necessary to aid them. "The National Guard, and Marines if need be, stand with ICE," Hegseth said. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to UPI late Saturday that the administration has "a zero tolerance for criminal behavior and violence," especially violence allegedly targeted at law enforcement. Protesters clashed with police in riot gear in Los Angeles on Saturday as outrage mounted over a series of ICE raids carried out last week across southern California. Trump then ordered 2,000 members of the National Guard to Los Angeles, later thanking them Saturday night for their "good job" in handling the protests. "Great job by the National Guard in Los Angeles after two days of violence, clashes and unrest," Trump said on his Truth Social platform. "These radical left protests, by instigators and often paid troublemakers, will not be tolerated." Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said afterward on social media that no National Guardsmen had yet arrived. "Just to be clear, the National Guard has not been deployed in the City of Los Angeles," she said. Trump, who pardoned mask-wearing demonstrators who rioted at the U.S. Capitol in 2021, also said protesters would not be allowed to wear masks. Demonstrators have criticized ICE officers for also wearing masks while conducting raids. Federal law does not explicitly forbid them from wearing masks but they are required by law to clearly identify themselves with badges or patches and to state their identity in an arrest. "Masks will not be allowed to be worn at protests. What do these people have to hide, and why?" Trump said of the protesters. "Again, thank you to the National Guard for a job well done!" The streets were quiet in Los Angeles around 7 a.m. local time, The New York Times reported. Meanwhile, the Northern California Coalition for Just Immigration Reform said Saturday that it would be organizing a protest rally outside the California State Capitol on Monday. "The Trump administration's baseless deployment of the National Guard is plainly retaliation against California, a stronghold for immigrant communities, and is akin to a declaration of war on all Californians," the ACLU's division in southern California said in a statement. "The only threat to safety today is the masked goon squads that the Trump administration has deployed to terrorize the communities of Los Angeles County," the organization said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store