logo
United Utah, Forward Party merge after first-of-its kind vote. Up next? A new name

United Utah, Forward Party merge after first-of-its kind vote. Up next? A new name

Yahoo29-04-2025

Supporters of the Forward Party mingle at a joint convention between the United Utah and Utah Forward parties, where members of both parties voted to merge into one. The convention took place at Salt Lake Community College in Taylorsville on April 26, 2025. (Courtesy of Alora Casper, Executive Director of United Utah Party)
Two of Utah's centrist parties have officially joined forces in hopes of growing a movement to break away from a two-party, 'us-versus-them' system.
The United Utah Party and the Utah Forward Party held an unprecedented combined convention on Saturday at Salt Lake Community College in Taylorsville, where both parties voted nearly unanimously to approve a memorandum of understanding to formally merge under the umbrella of the national Forward Party.
An 'unprecedented' merger of 2 centrist parties: United Utah Party looks to join Forward Party
It's the first time two political parties have ever joined together in the state of Utah. Party officials said they're coordinating with the state's top election officials in the lieutenant governor's office to facilitate the merger, for which no legal process exists in state law.
Still, the parties are charting their own path for the merger, for which the now-approved memorandum of understanding lays out a process that will take place over the next several months.
The new party's name, the MOU stipulates, 'shall be the 'Utah Forward Party,' the 'United Forward Party' or such other name selected and approved by the National Forward Party.'
On Saturday, both parties voted independently to approve the merger before combining in a joint session, where leaders gave speeches applauding the merger as a momentum-building move for Utah's moderate and centrist movement.
Speakers included newly-elected Chair Michelle Quist — who last year ran as United Utah's candidate for attorney general — and Sen. Dan Thatcher, a former Republican from West Valley, who recently announced he'd left the GOP to join the Utah Forward Party.
'There are real problems that Utahns are facing, but our leaders aren't listening because they're too busy trying to win their partisan blood sport,' Quist said. 'The two-party system has not served us well. … We cannot see beyond the us-versus-them mentality. So it's time to move beyond that psyche and look to do what's best for Utahns.'
Former New Jersey governor and EPA administrator Christine Todd Whitman — who co-founded and co-chairs the national Forward Party alongside businessman and onetime presidential candidate Andrew Yang — also spoke Saturday, encouraging Utahns to break the stranglehold of the two-party system, which she said is more focused on winning than representing Americans.
'I honestly believe that we are within a hair of losing our democracy,' Whitman said. 'There is, to me, an unconscionable lack of respect for the rule of law, the lack of respect for the Constitution. … It's not about solving problems, it's about staying in power.'
She pointed to states like Utah, where most districts are largely controlled by 'one party,' the GOP, resulting in elections where 'voters don't have a choice. There's one candidate, and that's it. And that has never served the public.'
'When all an incumbent has to do is worry about their base in the primaries, they don't care about the rest of the people. To heck with it, and they don't represent the rest of the people when they get in,' Whitman said.
Utah senator announces he's leaving the Republican party, joining Utah Forward Party
Yang also issued a prepared statement in a news release issued by party leaders, pointing to Gallup polling that shows roughly 60% of Americans agree that the U.S. needs a third major party because the Republican and Democratic parties 'do such a poor job' of representing Americans.
'It's no wonder why,' Yang said. 'The existing parties have failed to address the biggest issues facing voters. People want job security and to plan for their retirement; they want their kids to be safe, they want to live in a nation of laws that protect them, they don't want to be told they need to hate their neighbors if they disagree with them on some policy position. They want their representatives to pay attention to their lives and listen to their needs.'
Instead, Yang said, 'the legacy parties are focused on maintaining power and the 'us versus them' fight that keeps their fundraising totals high.'
Yang said Utah is at the 'forefront' of the Forward Party's effort to build a '50-state movement.' So far, the Forward Party or an affiliate party is recognized in 13 states, Whitman said, compared to just five states two months ago. Plus, she said the party has 50 elected officeholders who have affiliated in some way with the Forward Party. Their goal, she said, is to be 'on the ballot in all states' by the next presidential election, in 2028.
'We are growing,' she said. 'We're growing fast. We're growing big.'
Thatcher, when he took the podium, told the crowd of roughly 250 that came to Saturday's convention that, 'you're not crazy.'
'You're not imagining it. Things are really, really bad right now,' said the former Republican senator — who in recent years became no stranger to bucking the GOP party line before he unaffiliated last month. 'The absolute contempt coming from the (Utah) Legislature this year just completely blew my mind.'
Thatcher said for years he had been 'concerned about the direction' the Republican party was heading, 'but I always believed that the GOP would come back to its founding principles.'
However, when lawmakers tried to amend the Utah Constitution to weaken voters' ballot initiative powers and give the Legislature the ultimate and final say on all types of ballot initiatives with Amendment D — a ballot question the courts ultimately voided because its language written by GOP legislative leaders was misleading — Thatcher said that 'completely made it clear that it's not going to happen.'
'Because I believe the GOP has ceased to uphold the rule of law, because they are no longer grounded to the Constitution, and because they're not even following their own platform, which was why I joined them in the first place, they are no longer entitled to my support,' Thatcher said.
Instead, he said the Forward Party better 'respects my principles of rights, of reason, and of respect.'
'The Forward Party is different from anything I've ever seen before,' Thatcher said. 'It is why I feel so at home in this place that feels clean. I feel safe in this room. I feel respected in this room. I feel like I can disagree with someone and not have any name-calling or our tables flipping.'
More than anything, Thatcher said he joined the Forward Party because he wants 'to fight for people, for decency, for representation.'
'It is so freeing to stop saying 'we' as I talk about the completely crazy things that the (Republican) party is doing to people,' he said. 'But moreover, it feels so good to say 'we' as I talk about the crazy things the Forward Party is doing for people.
Below is the MOU approved by both parties on Saturday:
MOU - UUP Fwd Merger (Final) (1) signed

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans clobber Democrats in Congressional Baseball Game for fifth straight year
Republicans clobber Democrats in Congressional Baseball Game for fifth straight year

New York Post

time32 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Republicans clobber Democrats in Congressional Baseball Game for fifth straight year

Republican lawmakers crushed their Democratic counterparts Wednesday at the annual Congressional Baseball Game in Washington, DC. The GOP's 13-2 win over the Dems in Nationals Park marks the fifth straight year Republicans have defeated their political rivals on the diamond. Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.), who was seriously injured in a ladder fall two years ago, pitched five innings for the GOP, striking out seven Democrats. 9 The Democratic team stood on the field during the national anthem at the annual Congressional baseball game. Getty Images 9 Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-CA) pitched for his party on Wednesday. Getty Images 9 Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) sported his red uniform as he hit a ball during the event. Getty Images 'I am going to take an ice bath tomorrow,' Steube quipped after the game. The MVP award went to Rep. August Pfluger (R-Texas), who made a spectacular diving catch to end the first inning after Democrats loaded the bases. Pfluger's close play went viral on social media. 'Proud to have been selected MVP for this year's Congressional Baseball Game!' the Texas Republican wrote on X. 'Couldn't have asked for a better support team here in DC! Another huge win for Republicans.' The game was far more subdued than last year's edition, which saw anti-Israel protesters disrupt the national anthem and climate change activists rush the field. 9 U.S. House Majority Leader Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) fist bumps Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX). Getty Images 9 Scalise holds the trophy after the Republicans win the annual Congressional baseball game at Nationals Park. Getty Images 9 U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) reacts during the annual Congressional Baseball Game for Charity at Nationals Park in Washington, D.C. on June 11, 2025. REUTERS Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) greeted her colleagues in the Democratic dugout at one point during the game and received cheers from the blue team's fans. More than 30,000 tickets were sold for the game, which raised $2.8 million for dozens of charities. 'Team GOP takes the WIN!! 🏆🇺🇸 Proud to take the field with my Republican colleagues tonight and bring home the win,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) wrote on X. 'We raised $2.8 million for local charities. We're not tired of winning!' 9 U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson was spotted in the crowd during the game. REUTERS 9 U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) celebrates after running to home plate. Getty Images 9 Both teams celebrate on the field after the Republicans defeated the Democrats. REUTERS In 2017, Scalise was shot by a left-wing extremist during a GOP team practice in Alexandria, Va., a day before that year's edition of the game. Republicans hold an overall edge over Democrats in the series by five games, with 47-42 record.

What to know about 'No Kings' protests against Trump's policies on Saturday
What to know about 'No Kings' protests against Trump's policies on Saturday

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

What to know about 'No Kings' protests against Trump's policies on Saturday

Opponents of President Donald Trump's administration are set to rally in hundreds of cities on Saturday during the military parade in Washington for the Army's 250th anniversary — which coincides with Trump's birthday. The 'No Kings' protests are set to take place to counter what organizers say are Trump's plans to feed his ego on what is also his 79th birthday and Flag Day. The Army birthday celebration had already been planned. But earlier this spring, Trump announced his intention to ratchet up the event to include 60-ton M1 Abrams battle tanks and Paladin self-propelled howitzers rolling through the city streets. He has long sought a similar display of patriotic force. Why is it called No Kings? The 'No Kings' theme was orchestrated by the 50501 Movement, a national movement made up of everyday Americans who stand for democracy and against what they call the authoritarian actions of the Trump administration. The name 50501 stands for 50 states, 50 protests, one movement. Protests earlier this year have denounced Trump and billionaire adviser Elon Musk, the now former leader of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, a government organization designed to slash federal spending. Protesters have called for Trump to be 'dethroned' as they compare his actions to that of a king and not a democratically elected president. 'They've defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services,' the group says on its website, referring to the Trump administration and its policies. 'They've done this all while continuing to serve and enrich their billionaire allies.' Why are they protesting on Saturday? The No Kings Day of Defiance has been organized to reject authoritarianism, billionaire-first politics and the militarization of the country's democracy, according to a press release from No Kings. It is happening to counter the Army's 250th anniversary celebration — which Trump has ratcheted up to include an expensive, lavish military parade. The event, will feature hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers. It also happens to be his 79th birthday and Flag Day. 'The flag doesn't belong to President Trump. It belongs to us,' the No Kings website says. 'On June 14th, we're showing up everywhere he isn't — to say no thrones, no crowns, no kings.' Where are the protests? Protests in nearly 2,000 locations are scheduled around the country, from city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, according to the No Kings website. No protests are scheduled to take place in Washington, D.C., however, where the parade will be held. The group says it will 'make action everywhere else the story of America that day.' No Kings plans instead to hold a major flagship march and rally in Philadelphia to draw a clear contrast between its people-powered movement and what they describe as the 'costly, wasteful, and un-American birthday parade' in Washington, according to the No Kings website. What is planned at the No Kings protests? People of all ages are expected to come together in the protest locations for speeches, marching, carrying signs and waving American flags, organizers said in a call Wednesday. On the group's website it says a core principle behind all No Kings events is a commitment to nonviolent action, and participants are expected to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation with those who disagree with them. How many people are expected to participate? The No Kings Day of Defiance is expected to be the largest single-day mobilization since Trump returned to office, organizers said. Organizers said they are preparing for millions of people to take to the streets across all 50 states and commonwealths.

National Guard General Flames Trump for LA Deployment Orders
National Guard General Flames Trump for LA Deployment Orders

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

National Guard General Flames Trump for LA Deployment Orders

The former vice chief of the National Guard has denounced President Donald Trump's deployment of troops in Los Angeles as 'bad for all Americans concerned about freedom of speech and states' rights.' Trump made the extraordinary decision to send 2,000 troops into L.A. over the weekend as anti-ICE protests continued to intensify. The president said federalizing troops was necessary to 'address the lawlessness' in California after protesters opposed an illegal immigration crackdown from ICE officials by blocking highways and setting self-driving cars on fire. The president previously called in the National Guard against Black Lives Matter protesters during his first term in 2020, where the deployment request was approved by many local governors. This time however, the ruling has been strongly opposed by California's Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who accused Trump of 'manufacturing a crisis' and said the move was 'purposely inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.' In a statement reported by Fox News on Sunday, retired Maj. Gen. Randy Manner, the former acting vice chief of the National Guard Bureau, condemned the president's actions. 'The president's federal deployment of the National Guard over the official wishes of a governor is bad for all Americans concerned about freedom of speech and states' rights,' Manner said. 'The governor has the authority and ability to respond to the civil disturbances with law enforcement capabilities within his state, augmented as necessary by requesting law enforcement assistance from other governors. 'There are over a million badged and trained members of law enforcement in this country for the governor to ask for help if he needs it. While this is presently a legal order, it tramples the governor's rights and obligations to protect his people. This is an inappropriate use of the National Guard and is not warranted.' Typically the National Guard is forbidden from carrying out civilian law enforcement except in times of emergency, but this was sidestepped after Trump invoked a federal law known as the Title 10 authority under which the president can supersede the state governor as the top of the command chain during times of emergency. The law can be invoked under three circumstances, AP reports: If the U.S. has been invaded or is in danger of being so, if there is a significant threat of rebellion against the federal government or in the event the president is unable to 'execute the laws of the United States,' through conventional means. However, the law also states that the orders are to be executed 'through the governors of the States,' meaning it is not clear if Trump has the authority to deploy National Guard troops in California without Newsom's consent. In an interview on Sunday, Newsom accused the president of being a 'stone-cold liar' after claiming the two of them spoke about deploying the guardsmen during a phone call on Friday. 'We talked for almost 20 minutes and he barely, this issue never came up,' Newsom told MSNBC. 'I tried to talk about L.A., he wanted to talk about all these other issues. We had a very decent conversation.' 'He never once brought up the National Guard. He's a stone-cold liar,' the governor added. 'He said he did. Stone. Cold. Liar. Never did.' 'There's no working with the president. There's only working for him, and I will never work for Donald Trump.' Newsom said on Sunday the state of California planned to sue the Trump administration for deploying troops without their consent, in a move which has little precedent in U.S. history. 'Donald Trump has created the conditions you see on your TV tonight. He's exacerbated the conditions. He's, you know, lit the proverbial match. He's putting fuel on this fire, ever since he announced he was taking over the National Guard—an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act,' Newsom said. 'And we're going to test that theory with a lawsuit tomorrow.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store