Six Bulgarians jailed after spying for Russia in UK
Six Bulgarians convicted of spying for Russia in Britain have received jail sentences of up to 10 years and eight months at the Old Bailey.
Orlin Roussev, 47, who was the leader of the ring and had pleaded guilty, was sentenced to 10 years and eight months for his role in executing six 'sophisticated' operations that risked national security and the safety of the public.
His second-in-command, Biser Dzhambazov, 44, was jailed for 10 years and two months at the Old Bailey after also pleading guilty.
Katrin Ivanova, 33, one of two women who were deployed as 'honeytraps' against the group's targets, was jailed for 9 years and eight months. Mr Justice Hilliard said he accepted she would not have become involved in the crimes without meeting Dzhambazov, but he told her she had 'thrown in' her lot with him 'by free choice for better or worse.'
The other woman, Vanya Gaberova, 30, was given a sentence of six years, eight months and three weeks. While the judge made an allowance for a claustrophobia diagnosis, he told her that she knew what she was doing was for Russia and had found it 'exciting and glamorous.'
Tihomir Ivanchev, 39, one of two lieutenants, was given a sentence of eight years by the judge, who noted reports of good behaviour and the fact his involvement in the ring stopped before their arrest in 2023. The other, Ivan Stoyanov, 33, was given five years and three weeks' imprisonment after pleading guilty, albeit at what the judge noted was a late stage.
Mr Justice Hilliard told each defendant that they would need to serve half their sentence before being eligible for parole and then would be liable for automatic deportation to Bulgaria.
Earlier, he detailed six identified spy plots carried out by the defendants, some of whom he said were more culpable.
Directed by Roussev's second-in-command, Dzhambazov, he said the defendants were 'motivated by money', with 'substantial' sums of up to €1m (£842,000) discussed.
This, he said, demonstrated the 'value' of their covert activities to Russia. 'Some of the money would have covered their expenses, but not all. This enabled the defendants to live very comfortably. It must have been thought that what the defendants were doing was of value.
The spy ring was engaged in surveillance and intelligence operations between 2020 and 2023, targeting journalists and Russian dissidents.
Working out of a guesthouse in Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, it was directed from abroad by Jan Marsalek, an Austrian businessman who had fled to Russia in 2020 after the payments company he helped to run, Wirecard, collapsed amid a €1.9bn (£1.6bn) fraud.
Marsalek, who is believed to be in Moscow but is wanted in Germany over the Wirecard scandal, was working for the Russian FSB state security service and the GRU military intelligence agency.
He directed surveillance in Bulgaria, Austria and Spain of Christo Grozev, an investigative journalist who had helped implicate Russian spies in the poisoning of the opposition leader Alexei Navalny.
Sign up to Headlines Europe
A digest of the morning's main headlines from the Europe edition emailed direct to you every week day
after newsletter promotion
Marsalek also instructed gang members, including Ivanova, to steal mobile phone numbers of Ukrainian troops believed to be training at a US barracks in Stuttgart, Germany, using a military-grade spying device.
In a televised sentencing, Mr Justice Hilliard commended officers for their 'extremely thorough and determined investigative work.'
Victims targeted by the spyring had been left 'deeply concerned' and been forced to enhance their security, the judge said. He said the risk to them was obvious and Roussev would have been aware of the 'extreme actions' Russia had taken against those it regarded as an 'enemy' of the state.
Commander Dominic Murphy, head of the Met's Counter Terrorism Command, said after sentencing that the strength of the investigation into the group's surveillance operations had left the ringleaders – Roussev and Dzhambazov - with no option but to plead guilty to the charges.
'This case is a clear example of the increasing amount of state threat casework we are dealing with in the UK. It also highlights a relatively new phenomenon whereby espionage is being 'outsourced' by certain states.
Frank Ferguson, Head of the CPS Special Crime and Counter Terrorism Division, said that, by targeting individuals in the UK fleeing persecution as well as journalists opposing the Russian regime, the the group had undermined the message that the UK is a safe country for those people.
'This prolonged activity also undermined the security and safety of the UK; and there can be no doubt that each of the defendants knew exactly who they were spying for,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Just how psychopathic are surgeons?
These are the people we trust to hold a sharpened knife above our bare bellies and press down until they see blood. We let them tinker with our hearts, brains and bowels while we lie unconscious beneath their gloved hands. Surgeons live in a world of terrifying margins, where the difference of a millimetre can be the difference between life and death. That level of precision demands an extraordinary calm, or what you could also call a cold detachment. But what happens when that same self-possession curdles into something darker? In recent weeks, two surgeons have made headlines for all the wrong reasons. In France, Joël Le Scouarnec was sentenced for abusing hundreds of children – some while they lay anaesthetised in his care. In the UK, plastic surgeon Peter Brooks was convicted of the attempted murder of fellow consultant Graeme Perks, whom he stabbed after breaking into his home in Nottinghamshire. Today, Brooks was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 22 years at Loughborough Courthouse. It would, of course, be absurd to taint an entire profession with the acts of two individuals. But it does resurface a long-standing, uncomfortable question: might the very traits that make a surgeon brilliant also mask something far more troubling? 'When people hear the word psychopath, they tend to think of serial killers and rapists,' says Dr Kevin Dutton, a psychologist and the author of The Wisdom of Psychopaths. 'But the truth is that certain psychopathic traits – focus, emotional dispassion, ruthlessness, self-confidence – can predispose you to success, and in an operating theatre, they really come to the fore.' Dutton has spent much of his career trying to prove that 'bad psychopaths' – people who have these characteristics but who can't regulate them – are the ones who commit crimes. A 'good psychopath', by contrast, is someone who can dial those qualities up and down at whim. He recalls one neurosurgeon who was regularly brought to tears by bits of classical music, but who also said, 'Emotion is entropy. I have hunted it to extinction over the years.' Similarly, a cardiothoracic surgeon told him that once a patient was under, he no longer saw them as a person – just a piece of meat. 'Once you care, you are walking an emotional tightrope,' says Dutton, 'but if you see the human body in front of you as a puzzle to solve, then you are more likely to save their life.' 'There's a ruthless part of me' Gabriel Weston, a London-based surgeon and the author of Direct Red: A Surgeon's Story, describes her profession as one that requires you to 'flick off a switch'. Sent to boarding school at a young age (much of British surgery is the product of elite schools), Weston learnt early how to detach emotionally – a skill she found served her well in the theatre. 'If you asked my family, they'd say I'm very emotional in that I cry in films or at art or literature,' she says. 'But there's a ruthless part of me. I use that in surgery – and in other parts of life where emotion just gets in the way.' Over time, Weston learnt to distinguish between two kinds of surgeons: those who switch their feelings back on once they leave the operating room, and those who never do. 'They don't just have psychopathic traits,' she says. 'They live in that space permanently.' They can also come with a reputation for being not just difficult, but dangerous. Harry Thompson*, a British abdominal surgeon, describes a world of towering egos and simmering aggression. 'If you think about it, all surgeons were in the top five of their class,' he says. 'They are all very competitive, and many play sports: they want to prove they are better than everyone. And if you are at the forefront of major surgery, you think you are invincible. It's a boiling-house environment of jealousy, envy and hatred.' He recalls one consultant who stabbed a plain-clothes policeman with a disposable scalpel after being stopped for speeding en route to the theatre. Another smashed a ward office clock when a nurse arrived five minutes late. Physical assaults were, he says, more common than you would think. 'I was in one operation when a student, John, was an hour and a half late, because he overslept. The surgeon thumped the student's head against the theatre wall until he was unconscious, screamed, 'Nobody move!' then started kicking him. No one ever saw John again.' Nor is the patient always spared. 'When I was training, I saw one surgeon thump a patient for removing a drain from his own bottom after an operation because it had become painful,' says Thompson. 'The patient only admitted this (in tears) after the surgeon had made the nurses and junior doctors line up and interrogated each one in turn about who had done it.' Thompson used to work with Simon Bramhall – the liver surgeon who made headlines and was later struck off for branding his initials onto patients' livers using a laser. 'Simon had always been a bit mad,' says Thompson. 'He was fascinated by the programme Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased) and he always wore a white suit [like the character Hopkirk], tie, shoes and socks.' As for tattooing his patients' organs: the initials were discovered by his colleagues only during a second surgery when his once-subtle etching was now grotesquely enlarged by liver damage. While Bramhall's actions sparked public outrage, some in the medical community were nonplussed. Perhaps because this is a far more commonplace occurrence than we realise: an article in Harper's Magazine cited examples of anonymous ophthalmic surgeons who had lasered their initials onto retinas, and orthopaedic surgeons who had etched theirs into bone cement. 'Why would you do that? Ego, of course,' says Dutton, 'and it isn't incidental in surgery. It's selected for. From the moment you start training, you have to fight – quite literally – for your space at the operating table.' 'I find it very freeing not to be pleasant' Dutton researched which of the various disciplines within the profession had the highest rates of psychopathy, and the results are revealing. Number one is neurosurgery (which is bad luck for any fans of Grey's Anatomy), followed by cardiothoracic or heart surgery and then orthopaedic. 'The last one is brutal as you have to smash people's bones,' says Dutton. 'Cardio more than anything is about life and death, but neurosurgery is particularly interesting to me. I think it's because this is the only branch of surgery where, if something goes wrong, you leave the patient permanently crippled or blinded or incapacitated, so only very few people can take such a calculated risk under pressure.' And though these traits are often seen as typically male, women are by no means exempt. Weston says the most difficult surgeon she ever worked under was a woman. 'She was very attractive and well-liked – mostly for being gorgeous and good at her job – but privately she made my life hell. Maybe she didn't like another woman being on the team but she did that horrible thing that women do of presenting this incredibly benign face while being very cruel in private. For months, she blamed me for mistakes that weren't mine, stole credit for my diagnoses, and made me feel like my surgical skills were terrible. She was truly villainous.' And yet, Weston admits, the operating theatre offers her a rare freedom: 'If you are a woman who is quite tough and unsentimental, surgery is a really amazing environment in which you can be yourself. There are many areas of my life – mainly motherhood, but also writing – where there is an expectation that I will be softer than I am. Like Simone de Beauvoir, I find it very freeing not to be pleasant.' Perhaps there is something in all of this (criminal and violent behaviour aside) that we, as patients, secretly find reassuring. We don't want our surgeons to hesitate. We don't want them to be emotional or anxious. We want them to be brilliant: laser-focused, supremely confident, even terrifying if that's what it takes to save us. In life, we dislike arrogance. On the operating table, many of us yearn for it. 'I had one boss,' says Thompson, 'a French surgeon. He used to say: 'There are the porters, the nurses, the managers – and then there are the surgeons. Above them, God. And above God? Me.''
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Youngest girl in Britain to be charged with terror offences killed herself after being groomed by American neo-Nazis, inquest hears
The youngest girl in Britain to be charged with terror offences killed herself at children's home after being groomed and radicalised by two convicted American neo-Nazis, a coroner ruled. Autistic Rhianan Rudd, 16, plotted to blow up a synagogue and scratched a swastika into her forehead after coming into contact with the two men, one of whom was dating her mother and moved into their Derbyshire home. Rhianan was found dead at Bluebell House children's home near Newark, Notts, on May 19, 2022, five months after terror charges against her were dropped. A four-week inquest into her death heard how Dax Mallaburn, a violent US neo-Nazi with a swastika tattoo on his forearm, moved into the family home in Clowne, Derbyshire, in 2017 after forming a relationship with Rhianan's mother Emily Carter via a prison pen-pal scheme. Chesterfield Coroner's Court heard Rhianan was also in contact with Christopher Cook, from Ohio, with whom she exchanged explicit photographs. Cook, 23, a member of the banned terrorist group Atomwaffen Division, was jailed in the US in 2023 over a plot to attack power grids. Rhianan, who had a history of self-harm, was charged with six counts of terrorism in April 2021, removed from school and placed on remand at Bluebell House. But terror charges against her were later dropped in December 2021 after the Home Office report made a formal finding that she was a victim of exploitation. Rhianan was referred to the Home Office's Prevent deradicalisation programme and underwent therapy sessions. The last of six sessions was held on May 16, 2022, days before Rhianan's death. She was found hanged in the shower fully clothed. In the hours before she had posted on Instagram the message: 'I'm delving into madness.' Rhianan's family believe that the teenager should have been treated from the outset as a victim of exploitation rather than a terror suspect. Jesse Nicholls, the family's lawyer, had told the inquest she had been 'subjected to an extraordinary and exceptional level of state involvement in the period leading up to her death' and adding that her 'known vulnerability' made her unable to cope. But Judge Durran concluded on Monday that there were no systemic failures by authorities which contributed to Rhianan's death, though did say delays to accessing mental heath support presented a 'missed opportunity'. The inquest heard evidence from agencies including MI5, the Crown Prosecution Service, NHS bodies and the police. Some material relating to MI5's involvement with Rhianan was withheld on security grounds. In her conclusion, Judge Durran said that it was 'not possible' to link Rhianan's death directly to her prosecution, and that she was 'not satisfied' that the teenager intended to take her life. She concluded: 'There were number of potential stress factors in Rhianan's life in the months and days before her death. 'She had voiced concerns about a possible reinstatement of criminal proceedings and, separately, her mother's prioritisation of and choice of partner, with whom her mother had recently spent a month abroad. 'She had GCSE exams. A number of staff who worked at Bluebell House and other professionals with whom she had formed close relationships were leaving. The Prevent intervention sessions may have triggered thoughts about extreme right-wing ideology. 'She was being given greater access to her mobile phone and the internet, and she had recently been allowed unsupervised time away from the home. She added: 'It is not possible to say whether any of these stress factors, individually or collectively, more than minimally or negligibly caused or contributed to her death. 'No person regularly in contact with Rhianan had any concerns around the time of her death that she would self-harm or take her own life.' Chesterfield coroner's court heard how Mallaburn gave Rhianan extremist reading material and was suspected by police of 'inappropriate behaviour' towards her before he returned to the US in 2020. Rhianan accused him of sexually touching her shortly after she turned 14 but later withdrew the allegation. The inquest also heard claims that Mallaburn sent himself an explicit recording of Rhianan that he discovered on her old mobile phone. Judge Durran said 'he played a material role in introducing and encouraging Rhianan's interest in extreme right-wing materials'. She sad she 'individuals in the United States who further encouraged and developed her extreme right-wing views' adding: 'In particular I find that the Covid-19 lockdown period was a time during which Rhianan, isolated and unsupervised at home, engaged extensively in online discussions that contributed to her radicalisation.' Cook sent bomb-making manuals and weapons instructions to Rhianan when she was just 14, with the teenager later telling police: 'I was scared before, then I kind of just moved onto the phase of 'I love you'.' Judge Durran branded Cook, from Ohio, a 'significant radicalising influence on Rhianan'. The inquest heard that Rhianan's mother had asked police for help in September 2020, warning them that her daughter had developed an 'unhealthy outlook on fascism' and had a 'massive dislikes for certain races and creeds'. Classmates told school leaders of her intention to 'kill someone in school or blow up a Jewish place of worship'. Drawings found in her school bag included sketches of a man giving a Nazi salute. Counter-terrorism police discovered computer files relating to bomb making and a manual on how to make firearm using 3D printing. In October 2020, Rhianan was taken to hospital after carving a swastika into her forehead using the blade of a pencil sharpener 'because she wanted other people to know her beliefs and hoped that the scarring would be permanent'. She later told a social worker: 'Basically, I do not like anyone who is not white.' Concluding the inquest he judge said: 'I'm not satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, Rhianan intended to take her own life. Rhianan's death... was the result of a self-inflicted act but it is not possible to ascertain her intention. 'Rhianan was known, to family and professionals, to be vulnerable, to have autistic traits and have a history of self-harm.' The coroner added: 'I find she was highly affected by her arrest and was concerned about being sent to prison.' It was not known what Rhianan was told by her legal team when the charges were dropped but this may have had a 'psychological impact' on her, the coroner said. Afterwards, Ms Carter, said she believes her daughter's death was preventable and the agencies involved in her case need to be held accountable. Ms Carter said Rhianan was not treated as a vulnerable child, despite her autism diagnosis, and she does not believe her daughter was ever a threat to other people. The mother said: 'She was five foot one, weighed seven stone. She was tiny. 'I don't know what people thought she could do, but I don't believe that she was ever a threat. It was just what people would put in her head - brainwashed her, basically. 'They (the agencies) treated her as a child, but I don't believe they treated her as a vulnerable child. 'If you've got vulnerable children, you take extra steps to watch them, to look after them, to make sure they feel safe, even from themselves, and they didn't. Obviously, she's dead.' The mother said the moment 19 police officers and two detectives came to arrest her daughter at their family home was 'mind-numbing' and she felt 'violated' when officers turned her house 'upside down'. She said: 'It hurt ... the fact that they thought that my daughter was some sort of massive terrorist. 'They were going to put her in handcuffs, but the handcuffs didn't go small enough. Even on the smallest ones, they just fell off her hands. That's how small she was.' Nick Price, Director of Legal Services at the CPS, said: 'This is a tragic case, and I want to send my sincere condolences and sympathy to Rhianan's family. We do not prosecute young or vulnerable people lightly. Terrorism offences are extremely serious, and these are decisions our specialist prosecutors take great care over.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
I would normally stand with our police, but they've made it almost impossible
Does your heart bleed for our poor put-upon police, as they warn that their service is in 'crisis'? Or hearing of their plight, do you feel like giving them a shake? In a slight variation on the annual moan-fest that is the Police Federation conference, senior representatives of the service have penned a joint article listing their many woes. With dismal absence of originality, they complain of 'crushed' morale and thinning blue lines, as underpaid, overworked officers jack it all for early retirement to the Costas. As the Spending Review looms, behold the usual desperate attempt to guilt trip ministers into ponying up more cash. Those of us who grew up with kindly constables coming to school to talk about 'stranger danger' and the Green Cross Code yearn for the heroes of our youth. They were the human barrier between good and evil, fighting the good fight against robbers and child snatchers. How we used to look up to them and take comfort from their solid, reassuring presence on our streets. Wouldn't it be nice to experience such pure, uncomplicated feelings of admiration about the police today? The trouble is they just keep letting us down, behaving in ways that are spineless and foolish, and going after all the wrong people in all wrong ways. Modern training appears to prohibit any exercise of discretion or common sense, in favour of moronic tick box responses and rainbow coloured cars. I am reminded of this every Friday morning, when swarms of officers descend on the Embankment in central London in search of the odd trucker who might not have the right paperwork. With the luxury of crime free streets and unlimited resources this dreary weekly exercise might be worthwhile, but as dope heads, muggers and petty thieves do their worst all around, it is a very curious priority. Of course there are still good guys who are horrified by the systematic misallocation of resources. They cringe at the pursuit of totally inconsequential 'hate crimes' and even more ridiculous 'non hate crime incidents'. Still valiantly trying to catch real criminals, they were appalled by the diminishment of their roles during the pandemic, when they were forced to police petty lockdown breaches. Old pros have no difficulty understanding that flimsy complaints about unpleasant Tweets rarely require a siren-wailing response, and that having black or brown skin should never provide an exemption from the law. Tragically, these stalwarts can no longer rely on either the support or sound judgement of their bosses, who have a nasty habit of punishing bravery and initiative. Just ask poor Stg Martyn Blake, who put his life on the line in pursuit of a man with previous convictions and gangland associations – and found himself charged with murder. Having been cleared by the courts, he now faces an investigation for 'gross misconduct.' Then there's PC Lorne Castle, sacked by Dorset Police for failing to treat a knife-wielding teenager with sufficient 'respect.' The way these decent officers and others are make split second decisions in life threatening situations are treated beggars belief. Then again, some plods deserve everything they get. Witness the grotesque cowardice of the officers who allegedly tasered a confused one-legged nonagenarian after he refused orders to put down a butter knife. In that single inexplicable act, these cruel clowns brought their entire profession into disrepute. Remember all this, as they beg the Government for bigger budgets. Sorry, but I'm struggling to find my violin.
