
The science speaks for itself — but it needs an amplifier to be heard
A few years ago, I had a chance to bring Bill Nye into a story about the Great Lakes. He was running the Planetary Society — Carl Sagan's old post — and had millions of science-hungry followers. My pitch was simple: connect the public's fascination with space to the mysteries of Earth's own unexplored frontiers — deep freshwater sinkholes in Lake Huron, ancient ecosystems, and the links to alien oceans like those on Jupiter's moon Europa.
It was a ready-made narrative bridge, and Bill was in.
This wasn't hypothetical. I had direct contact with Bill's second-in-command. He was confirmed as interested. I brought the proposal to the head of communications at my office within NOAA. There was interest there too. But then, everything stopped. No call. No email. No follow-up. The moment passed.
That missed opportunity wasn't just frustrating. It was emblematic of a larger, systemic failure in science: a persistent reluctance to prioritize communication, even when the cost is high and the stakes are clear.
Today, scientists are losing jobs. Programs are vanishing. Budgets are being stripped to the bone. This isn't happening because the science is flawed. It's happening because science has failed to bring the public along. In the absence of clear narratives, bad ones take root. And as a filmmaker who works at the intersection of research and public awareness, I've seen what happens when the story isn't told.
But I've also seen what happens when it is told, and told well.
My film, ' The Erie Situation,' explored the causes and consequences of harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie — complex problems shaped by policy, pollution and power. In one scene, we featured a local man who frequently fell ill after spending time on the lake. That moment of human experience helped shift perception of the issue. And more than that, it shifted the course of actual research.
The University of Toledo Medical Center credits the film — and their interaction with our crew — as the inspiration for launching a community health study on the long-term effects of harmful algal blooms. That same man is now part of the study. That's the power of storytelling when it's done right.
Stories like this make science visible. They give people a reason to care. My friend Eddie Verhamme, a former president of the International Association for Great Lakes Research, understood this; he was instrumental in guiding our team through the scientific and policy dimensions of the algal bloom crisis. Without his trust and collaboration, the story wouldn't have reached the public in the way it did. That kind of vision should be the rule, not the exception.
But far too often, researchers and institutions still treat communication as a side task — a luxury, or worse, a risk. The assumption is that science will speak for itself. That assumption is wrong.
We are living in a moment where science is being actively undermined. Where institutions are being dismantled. Where the public is told that their scientists are either elites or frauds. In this environment, silence is not neutrality — it's surrender.
If you're a researcher, here's what I'd ask you to consider: Value your story. And value the story your work is telling — especially if it feels obscure, complex or niche. You're doing it for a reason. It's more than a paycheck. It's a problem being solved. A question being answered. A risk being reduced. Somewhere, your work will affect someone's life, livelihood or health. That story needs to be told.
So learn to tell it. Or partner with someone who can. Learn to speak to people who don't speak your language. Who don't trust your institutions, because if you're only speaking to your peers, you're preaching to a shrinking choir.
And if Nye ever offers to help amplify your science, for the love of science, just say yes.
David J. Ruck is a documentary filmmaker who formerly worked for NOAA's Office of National Marina Sanctuaries. He currently produces educational films for the federal government through his small business, Great Lakes Outreach Media, and is an independent producer working with Detroit Public Television, where he was awarded Best Independent Producer in 2024 by the Michigan Association of Broadcasters.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Friday the 13th solar storm could bring auroras to 18 US states this weekend
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Skywatchers in up to 18 U.S. states could witness auroras in the coming days as a "moderate" geomagnetic storm rocks Earth's magnetic field, starting on Friday (June 13). On Wednesday (June 11), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Space Weather Prediction Center issued an initial alert for a G2 (moderate) geomagnetic storm starting on Saturday (June 14). On Friday, the center released an updated warning that the storm could begin later the same day. The space weather event is predicted to end on Sunday (June 15) or Monday (June 16). The disturbance has the potential to rise to a G3 (strong) geomagnetic storm over the weekend, according to but this is not guaranteed. Some other outlets have reported that the storm could reach G4 (severe) status. However, these reports have likely arisen from confusion surrounding a statement from the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, which was explaining what happened during a different G4 storm that occurred earlier this month, and the upcoming storm will not be anywhere near as intense. Geomagnetic storms are disturbances to Earth's magnetic field, or magnetosphere, triggered by fluctuations in the solar wind. They are normally caused by giant clouds of magnetized particles from erupting solar flares, known as coronal mass ejections (CMEs). However, in this case, the disturbance is being caused by a co-rotating interaction region — turbulence in the solar wind caused by fast-moving streams colliding with slower wind ahead of them — that originated from a large "coronal hole" on the solar surface. These disturbances can squeeze Earth's magnetosphere, potentially causing widespread aurora displays at unusually low latitudes. They can also cause temporary radio blackouts, damage power infrastructure on the ground and cause satellites to fall from the sky as Earth's atmosphere soaks up excess energy and expands. (Geomagnetic storms are classified using a scale that ranks their intensity from G1 (minor) to G5 (extreme) — which is very rare.) Related: The US isn't prepared for a big solar storm, exercise finds The 18 states that could see auroras starting tonight are Alaska, Montana, North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, South Dakota, Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Idaho, Washington, Oregon, New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Wyoming, according to Live Science's sister site The aurora could also be seen in the U.K. and parts of Europe. However, there is no guarantee that you will see auroras if you live in these areas, as your view may be obscured by cloudy weather, haze from wildfires or light pollution. RELATED STORIES —We are fast approaching the sun's 'battle zone' — and it could be even worse than solar maximum, experts warn —X-class solar flares hit a new record in 2024 and could spike further this year — but the sun isn't entirely to blame —A mysterious, 100-year solar cycle may have just restarted — and it could mean decades of dangerous space weather Solar activity has been high in recent years thanks to solar maximum — the most active phase of the sun's roughly 11-year cycle of activity, when our home star's magnetic field completely flips. This phase began in early 2024, much earlier than initially predicted, and is likely now coming to a close. But solar activity could remain high for several years to come. In May 2024, Earth experienced a G5 geomagnetic storm — the most powerful in 21 years, with some of the most widespread auroras in the last 500 years — after at least five different CMEs hit our planet in quick succession. This storm was so powerful that it caused tractors and other GPS-controlled machinery to dance from side to side across several U.S. states.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Proposed budget cuts could ground NASA's momentum amid global space race
The Brief NASA faces historic budget cuts that could roll funding back to 1961 levels. Officials warn the proposal threatens U.S. leadership in space amid rising global competition. Sen. Ted Cruz is pushing for a $10B boost to protect key programs. CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - NASA could see its largest funding cut in more than half a century under a new federal budget proposal, raising alarm among scientists, lawmakers, and space advocates as global competition in space intensifies. What we know NASA is facing a proposed budget cut exceeding 25%, which would reduce funding to levels not seen since 1961—the dawn of American human spaceflight. The Planetary Society and multiple elected officials warn this would be the largest financial setback in the agency's history. The Biden administration's budget plan would significantly scale back NASA's capabilities just as international competitors, particularly China, expand theirs. What we don't know The proposed cuts have not been finalized, and it remains unclear how much of the original proposal will survive the legislative process. Details on which specific NASA programs would see the deepest reductions have not been fully released, leaving advocates and workers in a state of uncertainty. The backstory NASA has long been a symbol of American innovation and leadership in space. Over the past decade, the agency has pursued ambitious goals, including returning to the Moon and building a permanent lunar outpost. The proposed cuts come at a time when the U.S. is trying to maintain dominance in space amid rising geopolitical tensions and rapid advancements by China. Big picture view With both public and private space efforts surging worldwide, critics say now is not the time to throttle back. Florida, home to NASA's Kennedy Space Center and a hub for aerospace jobs, could be particularly affected by cuts. The concern extends beyond jobs—it's about America's ability to lead in space exploration and defense. What they're saying The proposal would slash the space agency's budget by more than 25%, dropping funding to levels not seen since before human spaceflight began. According to the Planetary Society, the proposed budget would roll NASA's funding back to 1961 — the year astronaut Alan Shepard became the first American in space. "This budget is unprecedented in terms of the cuts it proposes and in the radical nature of some of its shifts," said Casey Dreier, Chief of Space Policy at The Planetary Society. "Levels not seen since before human spaceflight existed." Florida officials and space industry advocates are also sounding the alarm, calling the proposal a dramatic step backward. "What is being proposed is a pretty dramatic cut — I think it's up to 26%," said Congressman Mike Haridopolos, who added that the battle for funding in Washington is far from over. "These are just proposals. Nothing has been put into place whatsoever." The proposed cuts come at a time when international pressure is mounting, especially with China's rapid advancements in space exploration and technology. Critics argue that shrinking NASA's budget now would weaken the U.S. position in low-Earth orbit and beyond. "It does put the nation on a 'reliance structure' for technologies and capabilities that are, at best, untested, and at worst, nonexistent," added Dreier, warning that America's leadership in space could be jeopardized. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz has introduced a countermeasure in the Senate — a $10 billion funding boost to support key NASA priorities, including the Gateway lunar outpost and operations aboard the International Space Station. Supporters say maintaining strong investment in NASA is essential for national security, innovation and scientific progress. "Space dominance is important because we see the nefarious acts done by the Chinese throughout space," Rep. Haridopolos said. STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 35 ORLANDO: Download the FOX Local app for breaking news alerts, the latest news headlines Download the FOX 35 Storm Team Weather app for weather alerts & radar Sign up for FOX 35's daily newsletter for the latest morning headlines FOX Local:Stream FOX 35 newscasts, FOX 35 News+, Central Florida Eats on your smart TV The Source This story was written based on information shared by the Trump administration, NASA, Casey Dreier, Chief of Space Policy at The Planetary Society and Rep. Mike Haridopolos.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hurricane forecasters will go without a key tool this season
For the past four years, a fleet of drone vessels has purposefully steered into the heart of hurricanes to gather information on a storm's wind speeds, wave heights and, critically, the complex transfer of heat and moisture between the ocean and the air right above it. These small boats from California-based company Saildrone also film harrowing footage from the ocean surface in the middle of nature's most powerful tempests—videos that are scientifically useful and have also gone viral, giving ordinary people windows into storms. Importantly, Saildrone vessels were being used by federal scientists to improve forecast and warning accuracy. But they won't be in forecasters' suite of tools this year. The company 'was unable to bid' on a contract for this season, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration spokesperson Keeley Belva told CNN. The reason why concerns the timing of NOAA's solicitation for this season's contract, according to a NOAA employee speaking on condition of anonymity. NOAA sent out its request for contract proposals too late, preventing Saildrone not just from bidding, but from pre-deploying its fleet to multiple launching ports on the Atlantic and Gulf Coast in time for hurricane season. It's another example among many of the ways the Trump administration has fumbled storm preparedness and response efforts as the season begins, leading to fears of less accurate hurricane projections compared to recent years. The Saildrone news came just as NOAA was roiled by staffing cuts through firings, early retirements and other incentives used to shrink the agency. Morale has plummeted, especially in the wake of the Trump administration's budget proposal that would eliminate the entire branch of the agency that does oceanic and atmospheric research, which could wipe out hurricane research activities if enacted. Even if it isn't, the Trump administration could use other means to implement such steep cuts. Belva did not provide details when asked for specifics about the issuance date for the proposals request and the reasons for the delay given the start of hurricane season on June 1. She cited 'ongoing' discussions with Saildrone about potential future deployments with NOAA. 'NOAA continues to explore the use of other uncrewed systems in meeting the agency's data needs within hard-to-access regions of tropical cyclones during the 2025 season,' Belva added. 'The agency is preparing for the use of uncrewed surface vehicle deployments with industry partners for the 2026 season.' NOAA will still field new technologies this season to gain a better understanding of how hurricanes work and how strong individual storms are, including ultra-high altitude weather balloons, said Joe Cione, the lead meteorologist for emerging technologies at the agency's Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory. But all of these new tools are aerial assets, not ocean-based, as the saildrones were. With saildrones missing in action this hurricane season, meteorologists will lack continuous, direct observations of hurricanes' strongest winds near the surface of the ocean and temperatures of the warm water that fuels the storms. The agency will still use dropsondes—bundles of sensors that can measure the fierce winds as they fall through the storm after being dropped out of hurricane hunter aircraft. But they only offer a glimpse into a blip of time at a particular location in a storm, whereas the saildrones can loiter for hours or longer, providing rare observations from the lowest level of the atmosphere, said NOAA oceanographer Gregory Foltz. Saildrone observations were set to be piped directly into forecast models through newer, faster processes this year with the goal of boosting accuracy, Foltz said. In addition, forecasters at the National Hurricane Center would have been able to use saildrone data to better determine a storm's structure and intensity when issuing an advisory. The boats had another unexpected benefit: Their dizzying videos helped warn people in harm's way of a storm's ferocity, Foltz said. The videos may play a role in peoples' decisions to evacuate by showing how severe conditions are, he said. NOAA's aerial technology this season will hopefully bolster the data forecasters have to work with. During the next three weeks, NOAA's hurricane hunters will be conducting clear air tests of some of those new platforms. Cione, who focuses on identifying promising technologies for weather research and forecasting at the Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, touted airborne drones like the Black Swift SØ drone. It weighs just three pounds and will be deployed into storms from the belly of a NOAA WP-3 hurricane hunter aircraft. These drones can fly low in a storm for extended periods, recording winds, temperatures and other parameters in the little-sampled lowest 1,500 feet of a hurricane. 'Our situational awareness goes way up,' Cione said, when readings come back from within this layer of air. Researchers will also be using tiny, light instrument packets known as 'Streamsondes' that can be dropped from an aircraft. These fall more slowly than the standard dropsondes and therefore gather more data. This year, Cione says, researchers may work to 'swarm' Streamsondes, or drop as many as 50 of them in a matter of minutes, into an area of interest within a storm to pinpoint what a hurricane's winds and air pressure are, for example. None of these aerial platforms will provide the clear video feeds that people may have become accustomed to from the saildrones the past four years, though, nor can they reliably measure winds and sea surface temperatures for long periods of time. Ultimately, Foltz said, researchers want to get aerial and ocean-based observations at the same time for a more three-dimensional glimpse into the inner workings of nature's most powerful storms. That includes uncrewed underwater drones collecting data beneath storms, he added. 'We need everything in the atmosphere and the ocean together,' Foltz said. 'That's a big goal of ours.' That won't happen this year, but assuming NOAA's research division still exists next year, it could get closer to being realized in 2026. 'You don't know how important something is until you take it away,' Foltz said of the saildrones' data contributions.