The Lens: Taiwan's death penalty and its clash between human rights and local feelings
If you are interested in being a regular contributor for The Lens, please apply by clicking this link.
Last week's response
Chan Bo-wen, 16, HKCCCU Logos Academy
Chan Bo-wen attends HKCCCU Logos Academy. Photo: Handout
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the state-sanctioned execution of an individual for committing a specific crime. Since 1976, more than 85 nations have abolished the death penalty, with human rights organisation Amnesty International stating that it breaches human rights laws.
In January, Taiwan carried out its first use of capital punishment in five years, executing rapist and murderer Huang Lin-kai.
Despite its reputation as Asia's most liberal democracy, capital punishment remains broadly popular in Taiwan, according to opinion polls.
The execution led to strong pushback from the European Union and human rights groups, with the EU's diplomatic service calling for Taiwan to abolish the death penalty.
The EU is a leading donor of global humanitarian aid, providing millions of people worldwide with need-based assistance.
With all its constituent countries having abolished the death penalty, the EU should have a right to give opinions on the legality and ethics of the death penalty globally.
The EU is actively developing its foreign policies, which are influenced by humanitarian and geostrategic concerns; hence, it should also be free to get involved in this particular discussion.
The vast majority of Taiwanese citizens support the death penalty as a way to prevent serious crimes. This could be due to the attitude of Taiwan's largest opposition party, the Kuomintang, which strongly supports capital punishment.
Being the largest single party in the legislature, its position on the criminal justice system strongly affects public sentiment.
Furthermore, Taiwan is a collectivistic society that heavily emphasises group harmony. Individuals who disrupt the collective welfare are viewed as deserving of harsh punishment, backed by the need for retribution.
Read up on the issue in last week's The Lens
Read and observe
Greenland residents overwhelmingly reject US annexation, according to a new poll. Photo: Xinhua
According to a recent poll, the vast majority of Greenland residents do not want their island to become part of the United States, as envisioned by US President Donald Trump. Trump has signalled that he wants the Arctic island – which is believed to hold large untapped mineral and oil reserves – to become part of the US.
He has suggested the possibility of using force or tariffs to annex the territory.
When asked if they wanted to become part of the United States, 85 per cent of Greenlanders said no, according to the poll published in the Danish Berlingske and Greenland's Sermitsiaq dailies.
Six per cent of those polled said they were in favour, and nine per cent were undecided, according to the poll by the Verian agency.
'It's the first poll that asked a representative section of Greenland's population, and I think this is very important,' Kasper Moller Hansen, a political-science professor at the University of Copenhagen, said. 'I think this poll shows very clearly that they do not want to be American,' he added.
Around 45 per cent of Greenlanders view Trump's interest in their island as a 'threat', while 43 per cent view it as an 'opportunity'. Another 13 per cent are still undecided, according to the poll.
The poll questioned 497 respondents aged 18 and older between January 22 and 26, with a margin of error of 1.9 to 4.4 percentage points.
Greenland has 57,000 residents.
Officials in Greenland, which depends heavily on Denmark for subsidies, have long been pushing for independence but have said they are open to doing business with the United States.
A day after Trump was sworn in as president, Greenland's Prime Minister Mute Egede insisted that Greenlanders 'don't want to be American'.
Staff writers and Agence France-Presse
Research and respond
Why do you think US President Trump is interested in annexing Greenland? Do you think the US has a right to fight for this land?
What does the poll signify about Greenlanders' attitudes towards this dispute?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
2 hours ago
- RTHK
Russia says pushing offensive further into Ukraine
Russia says pushing offensive further into Ukraine A road sign marks the entrance to the Dnipropetrovsk region. Photo: AFP Russia said on Sunday it was pushing into Ukraine's eastern industrial Dnipropetrovsk region for the first time in its three-year offensive – a significant territorial escalation amid stalled peace talks. Moscow, which has the initiative on the battlefield, has repeatedly refused calls by Ukraine, Europe and US President Donald Trump for a full and unconditional ceasefire. At talks in Istanbul last week it demanded Kyiv pull troops back from the frontline, agree to end all Western arms support and give up on its ambitions to join the Nato military alliance. Dnipropetrovsk is not among the five Ukrainian regions over which Russia has asserted a formal territorial claim. It is an important mining and industrial hub for Ukraine and deeper Russian advances into the region could have a serious knock-on effect for Kyiv's struggling military and economy. Dnipropetrovosk was estimated to have a population of around three million people before Russia launched its offensive. Around one million people lived in the regional capital, Dnipro. Russia's defence ministry said forces from a tank unit had "reached the western border of the Donetsk People's Republic and are continuing to develop an offensive in the Dnipropetrovsk region". The advance of Russian forces into yet another region of Ukraine is both a symbolic and strategic blow to Kyiv's forces afer months of setbacks on the battlefield. There was no immediate response from Ukraine to Russia's statement. Moscow in 2022 said it was annexing the frontline Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk and Zaporizhzhia regions, which it did not have full control over. In 2014, it seized the Crimean peninsula following a pro-EU revolution in Kyiv. In a set of peace demands issued to Ukraine at the latest talks, it demanded formal recognition that these regions were part of Russia – something Kyiv has repeatedly ruled out. (AFP)
South China Morning Post
a day ago
- South China Morning Post
EU pushes for ‘independence' from China and US – but can it achieve it?
Over the same period, the European Union has held out an olive branch to Beijing, seeking concessions on economic matters in exchange for better political ties. The consensus now in Brussels is that China has chosen not to grab it Sandwiched between two uncompromising superpowers, a growing number of European leaders are pushing for Europe to become a more self-reliant force. They want the bloc to free itself from dangerous dependencies on the US for defence and technology, on China for raw materials and cleantech goods, and on Russia for energy. 'A new international order will emerge in this decade,' European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said last week. 'If we do not want to simply accept the consequences this will have for Europe and the world, we must shape this new order. History does not forgive either dithering or delaying. Our mission is European independence.' French President Emmanuel Macron – the biggest champion of strategic autonomy – agreed.
HKFP
2 days ago
- HKFP
Trump, Xi hold long-awaited phone call on US-China trade war
US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke Thursday, with both sides agreeing to talks to prevent an all-out trade war over tariffs and global rare earth supplies. Trump said the call reached a 'very positive conclusion' and that they agreed to meet in person — but Beijing issued a more muted readout saying that Xi spoke of a need to 'correct the course' of ties. The call — the first to be publicly announced since Trump returned to power in January — comes after Beijing and Washington accused each other of jeopardizing a trade war truce agreed last month in Geneva. Trump said a high-level US trade team including his treasury secretary, commerce secretary and US trade representative would meet Chinese officials soon. 'The call lasted approximately one and a half hours, and resulted in a very positive conclusion for both Countries,' Trump said on Truth Social. 'President Xi graciously invited the First Lady and me to visit China, and I reciprocated. As Presidents of two Great Nations, this is something that we both look forward to doing,' he added. Trump said they would announce the time and place later. But the leaders did not discuss Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Trump said, despite long-standing US hopes that Beijing could exert influence over Moscow to end the war. 'The conversation was focused almost entirely on TRADE,' said Trump, adding that they hoped to have resolved issues over crucial rare earth minerals used in tech products. Relations between superpower rivals Beijing and Washington have been fraught since April, when Trump introduced sweeping worldwide tariffs that targeted China most heavily. At one point the United States hit China with additional levies of 145 percent on its goods as both sides engaged in tit-for-tat escalation. China's countermeasures on US goods reached 125 percent. Trump had described Xi as recently as Wednesday as 'extremely hard to make a deal with.' Chinese state media said Trump had requested the call. There was no immediate confirmation from the White House. 'Correcting the course' In its more restrained readout, Beijing said that relations needed more work. 'Correcting the course of the big ship of Sino-US relations requires us to steer well and set the direction, especially to eliminate all kinds of interference and even destruction, which is particularly important,' Xi told Trump, according to state news agency Xinhua. The agency reported that the pair discussed the self-ruled democratic island of Taiwan, which China claims as part of its territory and has threatened to seize by force. Xi warned his US counterpart that Washington should handle the issue 'with caution' to avoid Taiwanese separatists 'dragging China and the United States into the danger of conflict,' Xinhua said. But Xi also extended Trump a welcome to return to China, according to the agency, following an earlier trip during his first term in 2017. Until Thursday, the two leaders had not had any confirmed contact since the Republican returned to power in January, despite frequent claims by the US president that such a call was imminent. Beijing and Washington agreed in Geneva last month to slash their staggeringly high tariffs for 90 days, but the two sides have since traded blame for derailing the deal. Trump argued last week that China had 'totally violated' the terms, without providing further details. China's commerce ministry hit back by saying the Trump administration had introduced 'discriminatory restrictive measures,' including revoking some Chinese student visas in the United States. Trump has separately ramped up tensions with other trade partners, including the European Union, by vowing to double global tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50 percent from Wednesday.
