The wildcard seats of the 2025 federal election
In the battle between the major parties trying to form government, marginal seats are the focus.
It's where the advertising is concentrated, and the party leaders tend to spend their time.
They have the biggest hand in determining which party will form the next government.
Stay updated:
Catch the latest interviews and in-depth coverage on
As the crossbench grows and the independent and minor party vote along with it, the two-party preferred vote is becoming a less useful predictor of how the electorates will fall.
Australian politics is getting increasingly fragmented, and beneath the arm-wrestle for government, there are lots and lots of interesting contests where local issues and candidates could throw up unexpected results.
We're not saying these seats are likely to change hands, but we're keeping an eye on them because they're some of the most likely candidates for surprises.
And if these seats change hands, we're looking at a very different electoral map.
Here are just six of the potential wildcards of election 2025.
Franklin
The seat in southern Tasmania has been held by Labor since 1993, but Labor MP Julie Collins is facing a stronger fight than usual this election from a candidate who has campaigned against the salmon industry that operates on the western end of the seat.
Former ABC journalist Peter George has launched a campaign heavily influenced by environmental issues, and is trying to tap into
A lot would have to go Peter George's way for him to win, but the primary votes will tell us quite a bit about how locals are feeling about the issue.
The Greens candidate suspended his campaign after nominations had closed due to his non-renounced New Zealand citizenship. That could help Peter George, and former Greens leader Bob Brown has even endorsed the independent. However, the Liberal Party is recommending voters preference Labor over the independent. That's likely to hurt his chances.
Former Liberal member and current Clarence mayor Brendan Blomeley is also running in this seat as an independent, adding another complication.
Dickson
Anthony Albanese paid a visit to Liberal leader Peter Dutton's seat of Dickson on the very first day of this campaign. Whether that was out of a genuine view Labor can win the seat, or some early-campaign mind games, we can't be sure.
Mr Dutton holds the seat on a thin margin — just 1.7 per cent — but conventional wisdom would suggest he shouldn't have much trouble retaining the seat. He's now got the much higher profile of being opposition leader, and first-term governments usually lose votes rather than gain them.
Read more about the federal election:
Want even more? Here's where you can find all our 2025
Dickson has been a marginal seat for much of the time Mr Dutton has held it. This is not the first time Labor has made an effort to win the seat, and they haven't been successful yet. An opposition leader has also never lost their seat at a federal election.
But Labor has certainly been wanting people to think this seat is in play. It has claimed to have upped its advertising spend in the seat, and it has sent senior frontbenchers to Dickson regularly through the campaign.
Independent Ellie Smith also has the potential to disrupt things and peel votes away from Mr Dutton.
Calare
This seat in the central west of NSW is an interesting three-horse contest. Andrew Gee was first elected as a Nationals MP in 2016, but quit the party in 2022 over its opposition to the Voice to Parliament referendum and is running in this election as an independent.
Can his personal profile as the incumbent MP win over the naturally-Nationals voting electorate and see off a challenge from the party's candidate Sam Farraway?
This race is made even more unpredictable by independent Kate Hook, who is running for the second time after coming second in the seat in 2022. Could Andrew Gee and Sam Farraway divide the conservative vote and improve Kate Hook's position in the count?
Moore
In Perth's northern suburbs, Moore is a traditionally safe Liberal seat. Having said that, the massive swings to Labor in WA last election put this seat on a margin of just 0.9 per cent. You'd expect this high Labor vote to retreat this year, but there are other factors to consider in this seat.
Since 2013, Ian Goodenough has been the member for Moore. But he lost Liberal preselection to Vince Connelly, who used to represent the now-abolished seat of Stirling.
Ian Goodenough is running as an independent and is not recommending preferences to any candidate. The Labor candidate is Tom French, and independent Nathan Barton has received funding from Climate 200 as well.
Watson
This seat, along with the seats of Blaxland and Calwell, is one to watch to see if the government handling of the Israel-Gaza war has had an impact on Muslim voters.
A group called The Muslim Vote is backing independent candidates in each of those seats, hoping to mobilise the community over the conflict. They're hoping to replicate a similar exercise in last year's UK election, where five independent pro-Palestine MPs defeated Labour incumbents. But that's a tougher proposition in Australia.
These are all relatively safe Labor seats, and it seems unlikely that
Richmond
Covering the north-east tip of NSW including Byron Bay, Ballina, Tweed Heads and Murwillumbah, this used to be a reliably conservative seat but there's been a leftward shift.
Labor has held the seat continuously since 2004. On paper, the government holds this seat against the National Party with a safe margin of 8.2 per cent. But if there had been a primary vote swing from Labor to the Greens of just 1.3 per cent, Labor's Justine Elliot would've been excluded from the count with the Greens going on to win the seat.
The Greens are naturally hopeful of a gain here. For the second time, performer and comedian Mandy Nolan is their candidate.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
37 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Anthony Albanese suggests NSW and Victoria should be considered to host major 2032 Olympic events, sparking stern rebuke from Qld officials
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has suggested consideration should be made for two 2032 Brisbane Olympic Games sports to be held outside of Queensland. The 2032 Brisbane Olympic Games plot has continued to thicken after the Labor leader said the tennis and rowing could potentially be held in New South Wales and Victoria and that the Sunshine State lacked the appropriate facilities to host the two sports. Appearing on the most recent episode of the Two Good Sports podcast uploaded on Friday, Mr Albanese said there was a 'bit of a debate going on' over the venue plan. 'I've been meeting with (2032 Organising Committee President) Andrew Liveris as well as with the Queensland Premier (David) Crisafulli about where it goes,' he told the podcast. 'For example, are we really going to do rowing in Rockhampton on the Fitzroy River when there are some pretty good facilities at Penrith (in Sydney's west)?' The PM, who has flown to Canada for the G7 summit, cast doubt on Queensland's ability to accommodate the two sports and questioned why taxpayer funds would be used to develop new facilities when there were existing amenities in Sydney and Melbourne. 'There's a debate over tennis and what's needed there in Brisbane as well," Mr Albanese told the Melbourne-based podcast. 'You have pretty good tennis facilities." However, the Crisafulli state government was quick to pounce on the unexpected comments, vowing that Brisbane would host all Olympic events. A Queensland government spokesperson told the Courier Mail on Friday that 'we are working with all levels of government to implement the 2032 Games Delivery Plan, which will see Rowing in Rockhampton and Tennis played at the upgraded Queensland Tennis Centre.' Mr Crisafulli previously stated that his government would guarantee 'Melbourne will not be taking the tennis from Brisbane'. Tennis Queensland CEO Cameron Pearson also weighed in on the stoush, and resoundingly backed his home state, saying 'the Premier confirmed in March that Olympic and Paralympic tennis will be played in Brisbane, and we've had productive discussions since'. Yet, despite vocal protest from high-ranking Queensland officials, the Prime Minister added 'it might be that you just can't do everything in one spot in the future' and that it was 'legitimate for there to be proper discussion'. Hosting the rowing in the notoriously crocodile "infested" waters of the Fitzroy River in Rockhampton has attracted ridicule and furore, with a recent hydrological study also concluding the river drops to almost zero flow in the winter months when the games are due to be held. A Brisbane 2032 spokesperson reiterated the venue master plan process was still ongoing and that many details were still yet to be determined. 'Delivering world-class fields of play that provide an optimal performance environment for athletes remains key for Brisbane 2032 and ensuring International Federations are involved in planning and delivery will help achieve this outcome,' a Brisbane 2032 statement read. In response to the row, an Albanese government spokesperson said there needed to be a 'common sense approach' in the planning of the games and that any changes to the scheduling would be decided in tandem with the Queensland government.

Sydney Morning Herald
5 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Government relying on Latham for workers' compensation reforms
Maverick MP Mark Latham has indicated he is open to supporting the government's workers' compensation reforms, but only with a raft of amendments, while the Coalition hopes it can roll back a tightening of criteria for long-term payouts. The public accountability and works committee received a confidential briefing from Treasurer Daniel Mookhey and bureaucrats on Thursday, aiming to allay concerns about the drivers of Labor's plan to curtail access to compensation for psychological injuries. Two years after Premier Chris Minns refused to work with Latham, the dynamics of the seven-person committee have left the rogue MP with the casting vote on whether the legislation will return for a vote during budget week, in late June, or whether the inquiry continues indefinitely. After the government's reforms were referred for a second interrogation by a parliamentary inquiry, their fate hinged in part on Thursday's briefing. Mookhey has said that without reform the system will collapse while rising premiums push businesses under. But the Coalition, Greens and upper house independents have questioned government efforts to jam the legislation through parliament, particularly given a key plank of the reforms would cut off compensation for some of the state's sickest workers. Loading The second inquiry was established to allow crossbenchers to interrogate assumptions underpinning Mookhey's reforms. A public hearing will take place on Tuesday, a month after a snap inquiry heard only 27 of the hundreds of employees impaired by workplace psychological injury each year would be eligible to claim long-term benefits under the minimum 31 per cent Whole of Person Impairment (WPI) rating proposed by the government. Describing Thursday's briefing as 'fairly useful', Latham said some aspects of the workers' compensation reforms introduced by the Victorian Labor government in March 2024 were superior as they dealt with the long-term structural problem of nebulous claims, where the link between injury and a claimant's work is unclear. While he would prefer the bill to be voted on by June's end, Latham said he would not rubber stamp the legislation, seeking to amend it to include the 'best of the Victorian reforms', including tightening definitions around bullying and harassment to restrict claims.

The Age
6 hours ago
- The Age
Government relying on Latham for workers' compensation reforms
Maverick MP Mark Latham has indicated he is open to supporting the government's workers' compensation reforms, but only with a raft of amendments, while the Coalition hopes it can roll back a tightening of criteria for long-term payouts. The public accountability and works committee received a confidential briefing from Treasurer Daniel Mookhey and bureaucrats on Thursday, aiming to allay concerns about the drivers of Labor's plan to curtail access to compensation for psychological injuries. Two years after Premier Chris Minns refused to work with Latham, the dynamics of the seven-person committee have left the rogue MP with the casting vote on whether the legislation will return for a vote during budget week, in late June, or whether the inquiry continues indefinitely. After the government's reforms were referred for a second interrogation by a parliamentary inquiry, their fate hinged in part on Thursday's briefing. Mookhey has said that without reform the system will collapse while rising premiums push businesses under. But the Coalition, Greens and upper house independents have questioned government efforts to jam the legislation through parliament, particularly given a key plank of the reforms would cut off compensation for some of the state's sickest workers. Loading The second inquiry was established to allow crossbenchers to interrogate assumptions underpinning Mookhey's reforms. A public hearing will take place on Tuesday, a month after a snap inquiry heard only 27 of the hundreds of employees impaired by workplace psychological injury each year would be eligible to claim long-term benefits under the minimum 31 per cent Whole of Person Impairment (WPI) rating proposed by the government. Describing Thursday's briefing as 'fairly useful', Latham said some aspects of the workers' compensation reforms introduced by the Victorian Labor government in March 2024 were superior as they dealt with the long-term structural problem of nebulous claims, where the link between injury and a claimant's work is unclear. While he would prefer the bill to be voted on by June's end, Latham said he would not rubber stamp the legislation, seeking to amend it to include the 'best of the Victorian reforms', including tightening definitions around bullying and harassment to restrict claims.