logo
Mother and baby home survivors to take High Court case over their exclusion from redress scheme

Mother and baby home survivors to take High Court case over their exclusion from redress scheme

Irish Examiner23-05-2025

A group of 556 survivors of mother and baby homes are to take a landmark High Court case over their exclusion from the State redress scheme.
The Department of Children approved a compensation scheme for survivors of the institutions last year, but the strict criteria means children who were in a home for less than six months are not eligible for a payment.
The criteria also includes deductions to payments if an individual spent more than 180 days in a hospital, while some notoriously brutal institutions have been excluded from the scheme altogether.
The exclusions have been widely criticised for failing to help up to 34,000 people who suffered in the institutions.
A test case, to be heard at the High Court on July 21 and 22, will seek to include other homes that are currently outside the remit of the redress scheme.
The survivors, who will be represented by the firm Coleman Legal, include:
345 survivors from eligible institutions who have been excluded from the scheme;
145 survivors from Temple Hill/St Patrick's Guild, which is not covered by the compensation scheme;
66 clients from St Joseph's home in Stamullen, which also falls outside the redress project.
The €800m compensation package offered to survivors is the largest in the history of the State, but there has been a poor uptake to date.
The latest figures from the Department of Children show 6,462 applications have been made, with 4,228 general and work-related payments processed so far.
A further 1,840 enhanced medical card entitlements have been notified to the HSE, and 520 health support payments have been made.
Solicitor Norman Spicer, from Coleman Legal, contacted the minister for children last November and again in recent weeks to try to get agreement on issues raised by the survivors but said the case was being 'fully defended by the State'.
'Among the concerns, principally, are the restrictions towards former child residents of these institutions.
'Namely, an arbitrary 180-day minimum residency requirement and the other being that many institutions which were not examined by the commission have been excluded entirely from the scheme.
'I previously wrote to the children's Oireachtas committee to highlight these concerns, and the committee roundly endorsed my recommendations to add Temple Hill/St Patrick's Guild, Westbank Orphanage, and the two Stamullen-based, St Clare's/St Joseph's institutions, to the list for redress.
It beggars belief that the minister doesn't just add these institutions and remove the 180-day rule given that at this stage it is already clear that the number of eligible applicants is far below what had been projected, and the scheme is already several hundred million under budget.
'The matters are listed for trial on July 21 and 22 and will be heard together. These proceedings are being fully defended by the State.
'We again call on Minister Norma Foley to intervene and add these institutions to the list for redress and provide some measure of acknowledgement to the survivors who are still dealing with the legacy of these wretched institutions.'
In a statement, a spokesperson for the Department of Children said: 'The department does not comment on matters that are the subject of legal proceedings.
'That said, the Chief State Solicitors Office represents the department in respect of these legal proceedings and correspondence is not ignored.'
Read More
Just over €65m paid out in mother and baby home redress scheme

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gynaecologist refused to refer woman who later developed breast cancer for mammogram
Gynaecologist refused to refer woman who later developed breast cancer for mammogram

Dublin Live

time15 hours ago

  • Dublin Live

Gynaecologist refused to refer woman who later developed breast cancer for mammogram

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A Dublin-based gynaecologist has been found guilty of poor professional performance over refusing to refer a woman with an inverted nipple who later developed breast cancer for a mammogram because he believed she was too young for such a scan. An inquiry by the Medical Council found two allegations of poor professional performance proven against Jarosław Kryźanowski over his treatment of the patient at his clinic in the Medicus Medical Centre at the Park Shopping Centre in Prussia Street, Stoneybatter, Dublin 7. A fitness-to-practise committee ruled that the gynaecologist had failed to have due regard to the significance of an inverted nipple in the patient at his clinic on September 25, 2020 as well as failing to arrange for appropriate investigations to be carried out, including but not limited to a mammogram. The committee also found a separate allegation proven that Dr Kryźanowski had carried out breast ultrasounds on the woman on September 25, 2020 and May 20, 2021 when he did not have the required skill or expertise. Counsel for the Medical Council, Caoimhe Daly BL, claimed the doctor's actions failed to meet the standards to be reasonably expected of a registered medical practitioner. Dr Kryźanowski, who represented himself at a two-day hearing, disputed the Medical Council's claim that his actions constituted poor professional performance. The Polish medic qualified as a doctor in 1978 and has been registered to practise in Ireland since March 2008. Although he is eligible for retirement, the inquiry heard he continues to practise at clinics in Ireland and Poland. The patient gave evidence that she had chosen Dr Kryźanowski because he was described as a breast specialist. The inquiry heard that the gynaecologist carried out a breast ultrasound on the woman in September 2020 but refused her request to be referred for a mammogram as he believed it was an invasive procedure and unnecessary given her age. The patient discovered a lump on her breast about six months later but was told when she visited Dr Kryźanowski again in May 2021 that she was too young to have a mammogram. The woman was aged 43 at the time. She became worried when the gynaecologist said he did not see anything after conducting another ultrasound on her breast even though she claimed her lump was "very visible." The woman was ultimately referred for a mammogram by Dr Kryźanowski and attended the Mater Misericordiae University Hospital later that day where it was confirmed she had Stage II cancer of her right breast and lymph nodes. She subsequently underwent surgery to remove the lump In July 2021 after which she was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The inquiry heard she is now just on medication. Explaining its findings, the committee's chairperson Marie Culliton said the patient was a credible witness while an expert witness had given evidence that the woman's condition merited an urgent referral to a breast clinic to be seen within two weeks. Although Dr Kryźanowski had pointed out that many medical facilities were closed in September 2020 because of the Covid-19 pandemic as part of his explanation for not referring the patient for a mammogram, Ms Culliton said breast clinics had only been closed for two weeks in April 2020. Ms Culliton said referrals for mammograms for breast cancer patients were not limited during the pandemic. The inquiry heard expert evidence that all breast radiologists must have a minimum of one year sub-specialist training but that Dr Kryźanowski had admitted he has no speciality in radiology. Ms Culliton noted that the gynaecologist had made remarks which indicated that he did not recognise that ultrasounds were unable to detect all forms of breast cancer and that mammograms were the key test in working up breast symptoms in women over 35. She observed that Dr Syliva O'Keeffe, a consultant radiologist at St James's Hospital, had also testified that it can be difficult to perform an ultrasound behind a nipple because of shadow. Dr O'Keeffe observed that Dr Kryźanowski appeared to lack knowledge about the complexity of breast disease. Ms Culliton said the fitness-to-practise committee would make its recommendation on sanction, which is not made public, to the Medical Council. Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store