
Does karma really work? Do bad people really pay the price? Here's what new study says
Self-praise and harsh judgement
Live Events
Attribution bias and the need for justice
Cultural nuances
Implications beyond belief
FAQs
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
A sizable number of people across the world believe in karma—the idea that good deeds bring rewards and bad ones attract wrath of the universe. A new study, published by the American Psychological Association, shows how people apply this belief differently when thinking about themselves versus others.The study, published on May 1, in APA's Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, revealed that people are more inclined to attribute their own good fortune to karmic rewards while viewing others' suffering as deserved punishment.As per a CNN report, the research team led by Cindel White , a PhD candidate from York University, analysed responses of over 2,000 participants from the United States, India, and Singapore. These participants were asked to write about karmic experiences of their own lives and that of others.The results were striking with nearly 59 per cent of the participants describing positive events they experienced as karmic reward. In contrast, nearly 92 per cent of these participants saw that the negative outcome others faced was karmic punishment.Explaining the same, White said that thinking about karma gives people scope to take personal credit and feel pride, even when it is not clear what makes them deserving of the good outcome. However, she added, it also allows people to see others' suffering as justified retribution.The researchers, reportedly, said that this tendency is a part of attribution bias. This is a well-documented psychological pattern, wherein people explain events in ways that protect their self-esteem.Patrick Heck, a psychologist at US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, noted that people generally want to feel good about themselves and karma gives a convenient framework to do so.Additionally, the acceptance that karma-inflicted punishment exists for others fits into the structure of believing in a just world. The belief in a just world enables people to make sense of random events or unfair happenings.The study has also included cultural differences , allowing them to compare how people from western nations like the United States think as opposed to those from places like India and Singapore. It inferred that Americans showed a stronger self-enhancing bias while Indians and Singaporeans were relatively self-critical. However, the overall pattern can be observed across cultures.Experts feel that these biases reflect truly in real life. Yudit Jung, an Emory University psychology professor, told CNN that notions of deservingness might stoke social prejudices like racism and classism. She advised that compassion and the perception of shared humanity may help counter such biases. The team headed by White intends to study in another research how karma beliefs affect decision making.A: The key finding states that individuals have a tendency to perceive good things in their own lives as karmic rewards and bad things occurring to others as deserved punishment.A: Yes, Indian and Singapore participants were less self-enhancing biased than American participants, reflecting cultural differences in self-perception.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
2 hours ago
- News18
How Family Aspirations Changed In India Over Decades? UN Report Tells Stories Of 3 Generations
Last Updated: Across India, the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) has plummeted from about 6 in 1960 to 2 today, as per the UNFPA report. India is moving from large, necessity-driven households to smaller, aspiration-led ones. The recent UNFPA's State of World Population 2025 report features a compelling story of three generations from a single family in Bihar, showcasing this journey of change and its broader implications Saraswati Devi, now 64, was married at just 16 in 1976. By age 30, she had five sons, reflecting a time when the average woman in India had six children, fewer than a quarter used contraception, and under half completed primary school. There was virtually no personal choice — childbearing was determined by tradition, utility, and family or community expectations. Schooling increased gradually and by the 1980s and '90s, more girls were finishing primary education and had slightly better access to contraception. But families still aimed for multiple children. Anita Devi, Saraswati's daughter-in-law, married at 18 in the late 1990s. She ended up having six children; four daughters and two sons. 'I initially wanted only one or two children, just one girl and one boy. We are poor, and raising a large family is difficult… But talking about family planning was not easy in my family, and my husband was against contraception," Anita was quoted as saying in the UNFPA report. But fertility rates began to decline, reflecting slow uptake of family planning and shifting norms. The UNFPA reports states that today, nearly 70 per cent of women use contraception, over 90 per cent complete secondary school, and the average fertility is around two children, down from six. A Story Echoed Across India – and the World This generational narrative is not isolated. Across India, the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) has plummeted from about 6 in 1960 to 2 today. The report links this shift to: A dramatic rise in female education (from less than 50 per cent primary completion in the 1960s to more than 90 per cent today) Contraceptive use climbing to nearly 70 per cent Women increasingly making independent decisions about their bodies and futures But the story isn't purely celebratory. The UNFPA warns it reflects a 'fertility aspirations crisis": one in three adult Indians (36 per cent) experience unintended pregnancies, and 30 per cent report having fewer — or more — children than they desired, with 23 per cent experiencing both. Why These Changes Matter India's TFR has fallen to 1.9–2.0, now below replacement level (2.1), placing it in the demographic trajectory of ageing nations. Replacement level is the average number of children a woman needs to have in order for a population to exactly replace itself from one generation to the next, without migration. The globally accepted replacement level is 2.1 children per woman. While nearly 68 per cent of the population is currently of working age — a potential economic boon — the window to harness this before an older population overtakes is closing. Reproductive autonomy vs structural support: Despite gains in choice, persistent economic burdens, gender inequality, and inadequate childcare or parental leave systems mean many cannot achieve their ideal family size — even if they want to, says the report. Turning Aspirations into Reality: A Policy Imperative UNFPA asserts that the focus must shift from controlling fertility to unlocking reproductive agency, where individuals can freely and confidently decide if, when, and how many children to have. For India, this translates into scaling up affordable childcare and parental leave, promoting gender-equitable domestic norms, ensuring accessible reproductive healthcare and family planning and supporting economic security through jobs and housing. India's journey from 'as many as possible" to 'as few as desired" mirrors broader global demographic shifts. The tale of three generations — from Saraswati's five to Pooja's deliberate two — captures how deeply family aspirations have evolved. But tellingly, many still cannot align their reproductive lives with their desires. As UNFPA concludes, the real challenge of fertility lies not in how few children are born, but in whether people have the freedom and support to reach their desired family size. Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 11, 2025, 14:14 IST News india How Family Aspirations Changed In India Over Decades? UN Report Tells Stories Of 3 Generations


Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
A flawed attempt at delivering Gaza aid led to a wave of deaths
Israeli army officers and American military contractors looked on from their joint operations center late last month with concern. A new attempt to hand out food and other aid to thousands of hungry people in Gaza had just launched, and it was about to be overwhelmed. A crowd surged through the newly constructed gates at the site in Rafah. Chaos and looting quickly followed. Some 40 American contractors working for a private security company retreated. Outside the distribution center, Israeli troops opened fire to warn off the crowds. It was the beginning of a cycle of dysfunction and violence that would play out repeatedly over the following days, derailing the latest attempt to get food into the hands of the people who most need it. The events of May 27 exposed how the Israeli military and the new nongovernment group it is working with, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, were unprepared to deal with wide-scale hunger and desperation in the enclave after a year and a half of war. An Israeli military official said the American contractors made a mistake by withdrawing and allowing the Rafah site to be destroyed. It hasn't reopened since. A spokesperson from Safe Reach Solutions, a private U.S. company contracted by GHF to secure the aid, said that the retreat followed a protocol designed to safeguard lives. SRS is responsible for securing the aid sites, while the military secures the surrounding area, where the shootings have taken place. Both sides have complained privately of coordination problems. Two weeks on, the organizers still haven't fully figured out how to make the initiative work. At least five times last week, Israeli forces fired toward Gazans as they were heading to distribution sites, saying some people had deviated from an approved route and continued to approach troops. Gazan authorities say more than 100 Palestinians have been killed while trying to access aid. The Israeli military official said the military and the Americans are making improvements as they learn what works on the ground. Coordination and work with the American contractors is improving, the official said. The aid effort is run by the newly formed GHF, a foundation incorporated in Delaware in February. GHF came to the project without a lot of knowledge about Gaza, according to people familiar with the plan. It is currently led by Evangelical leader Johnnie Moore, a former Trump campaign adviser. GHF and SRS work closely together with the Israeli military in a handful of joint operation centers in southern Israel staffed by dozens of people at a time. The military shares intelligence with the Americans including details of military operations in the vicinity of the aid sites. The military and GHF had prepared for smaller crowds than the tens of thousands who have come to the sites, said an Israeli military officer involved in the aid effort. The officer said this expectation was based on Hamas's opposition to the aid plan and the distribution site's distance from al-Mawasi, a tent encampment housing much of Gaza's displaced population. GHF initially planned to open three sites in southern Gaza and one in central Gaza. SRS stationed a few dozen people at each location including local Gazans to distribute the aid. It wasn't enough—the food has run out quickly and there is often chaotic overcrowding at sites. On some days, only one of the four hubs has been operating. And when some sites do open, they usually do so for a limited period, sometimes for 45 minutes in total, before closing when supplies run out. Gazans who have visited aid sites in the past two weeks say they often try to arrive early at the sites to ensure they get aid before it runs out, even though it isn't permitted. The Israeli military, GHF and SRS said they had anticipated the size of the large crowds at the sites correctly. 'We knew the need was overwhelming, and we prepared accordingly, expecting turnout beyond what we could service," a spokesperson for SRS said. Gazans describe chaotic scenes at aid sites, with violence sometimes breaking out over who gets food. An initial plan to employ biometric specialists conducting facial recognition screenings was dropped for the moment as it has proved unfeasible given the large crowds, said one person involved in the operation. GHF has said it is working to improve its effectiveness. It is piloting a program that will distribute aid directly to communities, rather than making Gazans travel to one of its distribution centers. It is also aiming to open more distribution sites and has created a special lane for accessing aid for women and children. To date, the group says it has distributed approximately 232,800 boxes of aid. In recent weeks, hundreds of American contractors, many of them former special forces, have arrived in Israel. They are receiving around $1,000 a day, including on days off, according to people familiar with the matter. They are housed in several hotels in southern Israel, many sporting arm and leg tattoos, baseball caps and sunglasses. At a hotel in the city of Ashkelon in southern Israel last week, some contractors could be seen carrying mini fridges and rice cookers to their rooms. Gazans complain of poor communication from GHF and the Israeli military. Operating hours are often changed and announced at the last minute on GHF's Facebook page, which launched on May 28. In comments on the Facebook page and an official GHF WhatsApp group, Gazans criticize the unfairness of the distribution method, discuss looting by thieves and say they are confused by opening hours. 'Credibility is 0%. This morning you said Netzarim at 6 a.m. Then at 4:30 you said distribution was over," reads one of two dozen angry comments in Arabic on GHF's Facebook page on Monday. 'At times they tell us to return, and that there will be no aid today. And then two hours later they open," said Abdullah Jouda, 24, who has visited aid sites in Rafah in recent days. He said he was fired on as he made his way to an aid site in Rafah on June 1 and watched a person next to him die. Internal wrangling has been a problem, too. GHF's chief executive stepped down on the day it was supposed to launch, saying he couldn't abandon the humanitarian community's principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence. Boston Consulting Group, which had helped advise on the plan, said last week that it was cutting ties with the initiative and fired two partners after an internal investigation, saying they carried out unauthorized work. Humanitarian groups have refused to join the initiative, saying it puts Palestinians in too much danger by requiring them to travel through a war zone for food and that Israeli military presence near aid sites is dangerous. Other problems abound. GHF says Hamas has threatened Gazans on the ground who collaborate with the initiative. Israel says efforts by Hamas to disrupt the plan show how Israel is successfully cutting off the ability of the U.S. designated terrorist group to steal aid and sell it to fund its war effort. Hamas denies it steals aid. The military contractors have at times grown frustrated. SRS was initially hired by the U.S. and Qatar to guard an Israeli-constructed corridor in Gaza called Netzarim during a cease-fire starting in January. But staff contracts weren't extended as expected after Israel resumed fighting in the enclave in mid-March. This left the company in limbo for weeks, leading many hires to return to the U.S., according to one SRS hire. By the time SRS learned in the spring that a new contract would start, this time with GHF, they only had a few weeks to hire enough people for the operation, according to the SRS hire. The company had to work fast and launched a LinkedIn hiring campaign for roles such as 'video analyst." More than 20 countries as well as the European Union and United Nations have criticized the aid plan, saying it unnecessarily puts civilians at risk. Food and humanitarian goods had entered Gaza since the start of the war via aid groups and the United Nations, which delivered to hundreds of distribution centers throughout the enclave. The Israeli government has repeatedly denounced Hamas for looting U.N. aid shipments, but the U.N. denies the claims. On the ground in Gaza, meanwhile, many Palestinians are torn between their desperation for food and their concern for their safety as they make their way to distribution sites. Samaher Abu Audeh, 40, says she worries each morning when her husband, Issa, leaves their tent in al-Mawasi and heads to a distribution center in Rafah. She sometimes asks him not to go, but he insists as he must feed their five children. On Monday morning she prayed again he would return safely. 'May God ease his way and bring him back safely today," she said. 'Maybe he'll bring flour, so I can bake for the kids. Hunger is killing them." Write to Anat Peled at


India Gazette
13 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Deeply saddened by tragic road accident...": Indian High Commission in Kenya
Nairobi [Kenya], June 10 (ANI): The Indian High Commission in Kenya has expressed grief over the loss of lives of five Indian nationals who lost their lives in a road accident in Kenya's Nyandarua County. As per the Indian Mission in Qatar, a group of 28 Indians from Qatar were visiting Kenya, where their bus met with an unfortunate road accident yesterday. The Indian High Commission in Kenya noted that the road accident occurred at Ol Jororok-Nakuru Road in Nyandarua County, in which 5 Indian nationals lost their lives. In a post on X, the High Commission said that the consular team from the High Commission is on the ground and is in close contact with the local authorities to extend all necessary support. Both missions shared helpline numbers for reaching out. It said, 'We are deeply saddened by the tragic road accident on Ol Jororok-Nakuru Road in Nyandarua County, in which 5 Indian nationals have lost their lives. Our heartfelt condolences to the bereaved families. We pray for the swift recovery of the injured. The consular team from the High Commission is on the ground and is in close contact with the local authorities to extend all necessary support. We can be reached at +254 734916532.' The Indian Mission in Doha also shared the details in a post on X. It said, 'A group of 28 Indians from Qatar were visiting Kenya, where their bus met with an unfortunate road accident yesterday. As per available information, 5 Indian nationals have lost their lives in the accident. Officials from HCI Nairobi are on the ground and extending all help (1/2) '@Indiainqatar is also in touch, including with ICC, ICBF & other community groups in extend sincere condolences to the families and friends of those who have unfortunately passed Embassy could be reached on mobile number +974 55097295 for queries/assistance(2/2).' Additionally, in a statement from the Kerala Chief Minister's Office, it was mentioned, 'On June 9, at around 7 pm Indian time (4.30 pm Kenyan time), a tourist bus carrying a group of 28 Indians who had come for tourism met with an accident. They had come from Qatar for tourism. The accident took place at Nyahururu, 150 km from Nairobi.' It further added, 'Loka Kerala Sabha members have intervened through Norka Roots ( Non- Resident Keralites Affairs). The Loka Kerala Sabha has informed that the Indian citizens, including the injured Malayalis, will be shifted to hospitals in Nairobi. They informed that the injured who are currently in hospitals in Nyahururu will be taken to Nairobi by road or air ambulance by night and the bodies of those who died in the accident will also be taken to Nairobi. The Malayali Association and members of the Lok Kerala Sabha have also informed that the injured will be treated at Nakuru and Aga Khan hospitals in Nairobi.' The statement by the CMO Kerala mentioned, 'For assistance, services and information, Keralites can contact the help desk of the Norka Global Contact Center at 18004253939 (toll-free number, from India) and +91-8802012345 (missed call, from abroad). As soon as the accident was reported, former members of the World Kerala Sabha in Kenya, G.P. Rajmohan and Sajith Shankar, and members of the Kerala Association of Kenya, reached the spot.' (ANI)