logo
Give 65-year-olds automatic Japanese-style health MOTs, social care report urges

Give 65-year-olds automatic Japanese-style health MOTs, social care report urges

Glasgow Times20 hours ago

The move to a preventative approach would likely lead to a better quality of life for older adults and potentially fewer care home admissions, the Institute For Public Policy Research (IPPR) said.
The think tank has set out a plan to stop the 'spiralling costs' of adult social care, referring to a £23.3 billion bill for local authorities in 2023/24.
Its findings are supported by Sir Andrew Dilnot, the architect of reform recommendations more than a decade ago, who said the 'yawning and indefensible gap in our collective welfare provision' must be addressed urgently.
The state of adult social care in England is under review by the Casey Commission, which aims to set out a plan for how to implement a national care service, as promised by Labour in its election manifesto.
The first phase of the review is expected to report next year, although recommendations from the initial probe will be implemented in phases over the course of 10 years.
Social care leaders have raised concerns over the potential timeline of 2036 for some reforms to be introduced.
The second phase of the commission, setting out longer-term reforms, is due to report by 2028.
The IPPR has set out its own recommendations, insisting that there should be a 'right to live and age well' as part of any reforms.
Among the measures suggested in its latest report is automatic assessment of the care needs of all adults turning 65 as well as those receiving other disability-related benefits.
The report stated Government 'should look to the Japanese model of proactive assessments' and while funding will be needed for such a move, 'a more effective state social care system would invest in, not drain, the economy'.
The report said Japanese people are automatically assessed for a range of support including home-based help with cooking and dressing to residential respite and some nursing or medical care for long-term conditions when they turn 65 years old.
It stated: 'Care is managed by community comprehensive support centres, which employ long-term care specialists, care managers, and social workers.
'This model emphasises preventative care and home-based services, reducing both cost and reliance on institutional care while supporting family caregivers.
'Japan has half the number of people in care homes as the UK, despite a much older population.'
The report's other recommendations include investment in exercise groups and community centres to support older people and those with disabilities to stay healthy and active, as well as further training and development for carers, enabling them to give more personalised care.
The IPPR also argued there must be a care costs cap, based on Dilnot Commission recommendations, but with additional central Government funding.
Proposals for an £86,000 cap on the amount an older or disabled person would have to pay towards their social care support at home or in care homes were scrapped by Labour last year.
Sir Andrew Dilnot said he supports the IPPR report's recommendations (Fergus Burnett/PA)
Sir Andrew, who chaired the 2010 commission into adult social care, said the IPPR paper 'argues powerfully and persuasively that good social care provision can be a wonderful way of enhancing human flourishing'.
He added: 'For far, far too long we have had a social care system that fails us all – those who need care, those who provide care, and those who might need care in the future.
'Acting now can transform lives for those with care needs, create a vibrant and exciting care sector, and finally fill this yawning and indefensible gap in our collective welfare provision. Let's do it.'
Sir Andrew previously deemed it 'completely unnecessary' to wait three years for the commission's longer-term recommendations and argued it is 'perfectly feasible' for the Government to set out by the end of this year what it is going to do.
IPPR research fellow Dr Annie Williamson said: 'A proactive approach to adult social care, including universal MOT-style assessments at 65 and early support, could help people maintain independence for longer while reducing long-term costs.
'A shift to prevention will mean fewer care home admissions, better quality of life for older adults, and more sustainable funding. As the UK grapples with rising demand and strained budgets, this kind of forward-thinking reform offers a way out.'
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Through our 10-Year Health Plan, we will shift healthcare from treatment to prevention to help people live longer, healthier lives.
'This includes diagnosing and treating conditions earlier, predicting and preventing problems before they become serious, and helping people to live healthier lifestyles.
'At the same time, Baroness Casey has begun her work on the Independent Commission into adult social care, which will start a national conversation and provide recommendations for a National Care Service that is fair and affordable for all – and works alongside the NHS.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NHS drug charges row hits deadlock
NHS drug charges row hits deadlock

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

NHS drug charges row hits deadlock

Ministers have failed to agree a crucial deal on NHS drug charges that was meant to be at the centre of a plan to boost growth. Talks on Friday between the Government and pharmaceutical industry bosses ended without an agreement on how much the NHS is able to claw back in rebates on drugs. Ministers had been hoping to be able to address industry complaints of unfairness prior to the publication a strategy for the sector, expected next week. One senior pharmaceutical executive said: 'If a [NHS clawback] deal is not secured, it's a missed opportunity for the life sciences sector plan and one which blocks the UK's ambition to be a life sciences superpower.' Another said that the UK needed to show it wanted to make the scheme competitive again, adding: 'Without that, all the high statements of ambition or new strategies in the world are not going to make the UK a leading life sciences centre.' The Department of Health launched a review of NHS rebates earlier this year under pressure from Donald Trump and the pharmaceutical industry. Ministers said they would take into account the 'concerns of the US president' that countries are unfairly keeping prices low relative to the high drug costs in the American health system. Under the trade agreement signed between the two nations earlier this year, the Government agreed to 'endeavour to improve the overall environment for pharmaceutical companies operating in the UK'. The failure to secure a deal ahead of the publication of the sector strategy follows months of wrangling. Under the current rebate scheme, known as VPAG, pharmaceutical companies have to hand at least 23pc of their revenue from sales of branded medicines back to the NHS. The scheme cut the drug bill by £3bn last year. However, pharmaceutical bosses have warned the scheme is preventing the launch of cutting-edge medicines in the UK. They have pressed for the UK to cut the rate of rebates into single digits, a level seen elsewhere in Europe. The life sciences strategy is one of several sector plans announced as part of Labour's industrial strategy. Others were published this week. A spokesman for the Government said: 'Economic growth is our number one priority and we're taking decisive action to unlock innovation and drive investment in the UK's world-class pharmaceutical sector. As part of this, we continue to work closely with industry on a rapid review of our voluntary scheme for medicines pricing. 'With our work and investment, we will make sure the next game changers in medicine are developed here in Britain, for the benefit of our health at home and abroad.'

Fact check: How much do resident doctors earn, and what do they want?
Fact check: How much do resident doctors earn, and what do they want?

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Fact check: How much do resident doctors earn, and what do they want?

This roundup of claims has been compiled by Full Fact, the UK's largest fact checking charity working to find, expose and counter the harms of bad information. In May, the Government accepted recommendations from the Review Body on Doctors' and Dentists' Remuneration to give resident doctors (previously called 'junior' doctors) a pay rise of 4% plus £750. But the British Medical Association (BMA) says this is not enough to make up for the 'erosion' in the value of their pay that it says has happened since 2008. It is therefore balloting resident doctors about whether to strike. This fact check looks at what NHS resident doctors in England earn and what the BMA is asking for, and explores some of the claims currently circulating about their pay. Doctors have just been awarded a pay rise, so why are they threatening to strike? The BMA argues that the value of resident doctors' pay has been eroded by inflation since 2008/09, and it has published hourly pay figures showing what the pay 'restoration' it is asking for would look like. These pay figures amount to a 29% rise on the basic rates from 2024/25, instead of the 5-6% pay rise the Government announced. The Government, by contrast, says resident doctors have received the highest pay rise in the public sector for 2025/26, and that it expects average full-time basic pay for a resident doctor to reach about £54,300 in 2025/26 following the new deal. What resident doctors currently earn In the latest data for February 2025, there were 77,287 resident doctors working for NHS England. (Although a few are part-time, making this the equivalent of 74,666 full-time doctors.) These are working, qualified doctors who are also in the process of training towards a specialty, which can take a decade or more. They do not include consultants, GPs, surgeons or other senior doctors who have completed their specialist training. Resident doctors begin work after graduating with a medical degree. They are supervised by a more senior doctor, but as they gain experience some may also begin to supervise their more junior colleagues. Resident doctors need to pass exams at various points. In short, there are many different types of resident doctor, with different levels of seniority and pay. When speaking about basic pay only, for a 40-hour week, resident doctors currently earn between £38,831 and £73,992 a year, as recommended by the pay review body in May. At the time of writing however, they are still being paid at last year's rates while they wait for the new level to be applied. The Government has said they will receive the extra money, backdated to April, in August, at which point their actual pay will shift to the higher rate. The new rate amounts to a rise of about 5-6% on last year, depending on a doctor's pay grade, with the higher grades receiving slightly smaller rises in percentage terms. What about extra earnings? Basic pay does not cover everything that resident doctors earn. In the latest data for staff earnings, which covers the year ending March 2025, NHS England estimates how much different types of medical staff earned in that period. In practice, resident doctors typically earn almost a third more than their basic salary from other sources. Most of the extra pay comes from working extra hours and working unsocial hours, but it also includes geographic differences and other considerations. So does the average resident doctor now earn £54,300, as the Government says? The Government says: 'We expect the average full-time basic pay of a resident doctor will reach about £54,300 in 2025-26.' We asked the Department of Health and Social Care how this figure was calculated, and it shared its method with us. We were not able to replicate its calculations exactly, but we do know there are more resident doctors on the higher pay grades than on the lower ones, so an average in the higher part of the range seems plausible. According to NHS England workforce figures for February 2025, the resident doctor workforce breaks down as follows: – Foundation Doctor Year 1: 8,265 doctors, 11% of the total – Foundation Doctor Year 2: 7,394 doctors, 10% of the total – Core Training: 24,839 doctors, 32% of the total – Specialty Registrar: 36,789 doctors, 48% of the total It is difficult to say precisely how much the average resident doctor earns, because we can't exactly match the pay data we have to the numbers in each pay grade – and the latest NHS estimates cover earnings in the year to December 2024, before the latest pay rise was announced. Do resident doctors really earn £17/hour, as claimed by some? We've seen some claims on social media about resident doctors being paid £17 an hour. For example, one post on X which was shared by the BMA said: '£17/hr to save your life. That's the reality for NHS resident doctors in England'. This is potentially misleading, as the £17 figure seems to refer to the hourly rate of £17.56 cited by the BMA, which refers to basic pay only, for first-year doctors only, and for the last pay deal before the 2025/26 rise was announced – and the figure should in any case be £18, if rounding to the nearest pound. After the backdated pay rise, the BMA says the lowest hourly rate of basic pay will be £18.62. Full Fact has written in the past about claims which may appear to be about the pay of junior doctors in general, but are based on figures that apply only to the minority of them who are in their first year (about 11%). A BMA spokesperson told us: 'BMA publishes clear hourly rates which clearly show £17.56 as the wage per hour earned by a FY1 doctor in England. This is a fair comparison for use against other 40-hour per week jobs. FY1 doctors work on teams that save people's lives daily in the NHS. Their basic rate of pay is not affected by additional hours they might take on.'

Falkirk councillors support push for young carers to get a break
Falkirk councillors support push for young carers to get a break

Daily Record

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Record

Falkirk councillors support push for young carers to get a break

Members also agreed to support the annual Young Carers Action Day and sign a covenant pledging their support Falkirk councillors unanimously agreed to give their support to young carers and push for their right to get a break when needed. At a meeting of Falkirk Council this week, a joint motion was proposed by Labour Councillor Anne Hannah who highlighted the "fantastic job" that carers do - in particular young carers. ‌ She said: "At the end of this week, we will be going into recess and many of us will be going off to have a break. Carers do not have that option and young carers are often doing a job 365 days a year or 366 in a leap year." Her motion asked the council to write to the Scottish Government asking it to support young carers' right to a break. Councillors also agreed to sign up to the UK wide Young Carers Covenant and support the annual Young Carers Action Day, which takes place in March. Cllr Hannah said: "There will no costs involved to the council but we are asking the Scottish Government to take up this issue." ‌ She praised the work that is already being done to support young carers but added: "We can always do more!" The SNP's Councillor Fiona Collie seconded the motion and said she was very aware of the excellent work that is being done in Scotland, although she agreed "there is much more to do". Cllr Collie said she herself had cared for her disabled father, adding it was an experience that: "I would and could not regret for a moment". ‌ "I value every second we had with him - but it came at a cost," she said. "Being a young carer or young adult carer brings significant challenges in all areas of a young person's life - often reduced educational opportunities and life chances, with a life much different from their peers." But, she added: "We can change this picture. It's important that we support young carers as early as we can and make a commitment to doing so across the services that we provide young people." ‌ Cllr Collie told the meeting : "I didn't know I was a carer. I had no idea that I'd been one. "It's testament to the work of Young Carers and the organisations working with them that today we are talking about young carers, Young Carers Action Day and the covenant and how we as councillors and as a council, and through the HSCP can deliver the support that they need to thrive." Councillors from all parties and Independents gave their support to the motion unanimously.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store