Tensions with N.S. premier simmered as Poilievre made his sole stop in the province
For the first time this campaign, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre made a stop in Nova Scotia on Thursday — the second province he's visited led by a Progressive Conservative premier conspicuously absent from the federal party's events.
Poilievre's sole campaign trip to Nova Scotia ended without meeting Premier Tim Houston, who did not attend Poilievre's Trenton, N.S., rally just minutes from Houston's own provincial riding.
While Houston had previously said he would stay out of the federal campaign, sources say there has been tension between the two leaders for months.
During last year's provincial election, Houston told reporters he would not be inviting Poilievre to campaign with him, saying he's not a member of any federal party.
"There is no federal equivalent," said Houston last November."I'm the leader of the Nova Scotia Progressive Conservatives. There is a Conservative Party of Canada. It's a completely different party with its own leader."
Frosty call with campaign manager
Four provincial sources, who CBC News is not naming because they weren't authorized to discuss internal party matters, told CBC News that soon after, Houston's staff received a phone call from Conservative national campaign director Jenni Byrne.
The sources claim Byrne told Houston's team that if Poilievre went on to become prime minister, they would not lift a finger to help the provincial party.
The call changed the relationship between the two camps, according to sources.
On the eve of Poilievre's visit, Houston released a campaign-style video on social media, prompting some to wonder whether he was eyeing Poilievre's job.
The video included a speech Houston gave during the winter session of the Nova Scotia legislature. Houston and opposition leaders all delivered speeches in the face of threats of tariffs from the United States government.
The premier's was in the vein of the "I Am Canadian" beer ad. Houston concludes his speech by saying "I am Nova Scotian."
Speaking to reporters on Thursday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford — a friend and ally of Houston — said he had been "busting [Houston's] chops" over the video.
The video included clips of the two Progressive Conservative premiers together.
"I told him I love it," said Ford, declining to elaborate on what else he said to the Nova Scotia premier.
In a statement, the Conservative Party of Canada did not deny that the phone call with Byrne took place, but said that the two leaders have "communicated about issues of importance to Nova Scotians, both before and after the recent provincial election."
The statement said, if he is elected, Poilievre "looks forward to working closely with Premier Houston."
A statement provided by Houston's communications director, Stephen Moore, said Houston's "main concern is Nova Scotia" and he "will work with whomever forms the next government."
Earlier this year, Houston wrote identical letters to both Liberal Leader Mark Carney and Poilievre outlining what he hoped the next federal government would prioritize for Nova Scotia.
Poilievre's relationship with premiers has been under the microscope during the federal campaign, after Ford declined to endorse the Conservative leader but had breakfast with Prime Minister Mark Carney during the brief pre-campaign window after Carney was sworn in.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
5 hours ago
- Global News
B.C. government takes heat over marked growth in public payroll
B.C.'s NDP government is defending itself in the wake of new reports detailing the dramatic increase in public sector employees and the cost of payroll. The province is in the midst of a staffing shortage across key public sectors – currently short more than 1,000 teachers and six times as many nurses. But while critical positions go unfilled, the size of the public sector continues to grow, with British Columbia leading the country in the growth of taxpayer-funded jobs. 'It's gone from $5 billion worth of people (earning) over $75,000 to now $11.5 billion, so it's more than doubled,' BC Conservative finance critic Peter Milobar said. 'This government has a real problem when it comes to hiring, reining in costs and bringing things under control, and that leads to our structural deficit of over $12 billion.' Story continues below advertisement 1:57 B.C. database shows public sector salaries Critics say the size of government has increased across the board under the NDP's watch. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In 2017, there were just over 29,000 public servants. That number has increased to nearly 39,000, jumping 32 per cent over eight years. While the public sector is growing, private sector job growth is half of its historical average. The B.C. General Employees Union acknowledges the unionized workforce has grown, but says the real issue is the growth of non-union positions, and that management has increased at a pace nearly double that of union members. It's a claim that is echoed in health care, where the B.C. Nurses' Union says health authorities are top-heavy. 'Anecdotally, that's how it appears,' BCNU president Adrianne Gear said. 'From my members' perspective, it does seem like there is a lot of senior management leadership. Story continues below advertisement 'At any given time, we are almost 6,000 nurses short, that's how many vacancies we have, and when we move to full implementation of nurse-patient ratios … we are going to need many, many more nurses.' 1:20 How much could a new B.C. public sector contract cost taxpayers? The B.C. government has committed to hiring more front-line workers in health care, education and other critical occupations. But competition worldwide is intense. B.C. Premier David Eby said much of the growth is related to tackling that competition. 'They are doctors, they are nurses, they are teachers, they are people who provide vital services in our province. It is why we are leading Canada in recruiting family doctors and why we are on track to ensuring every British Columbian gets access to a family doctor. Ensuring we are competitive in wages for those doctors, ensuring we are competitive in wages for nurses, that we are the best place for a nurse to work in Canada,' Eby said. Story continues below advertisement 'It is how we are getting a handle on the big challenges we've faced in terms of closures at hospitals or shortages of nurses that are raising concerns among the profession here.' However, he admitted he was 'very concerned' about the growth in health care administration costs. He said the province is currently doing an 'extensive review' of B.C. health authorities to minimize those administrative costs. A renewed focus on B.C. resource economy, meanwhile, could bring an increase in private sector job creation. The business community is optimistic that the government is sending the right signals, but says it is waiting for the needed follow-through.
CBC
6 hours ago
- CBC
Former Manitoba NDP candidate, VP quits party, citing premier's policies and leadership style
Social Sharing A former Manitoba NDP vice-president and candidate has quit the party over what he describes as Premier Wab Kinew's "top-down leadership style" and unprogressive policies. Chris Wiebe, who ran as the NDP candidate in the southeastern Manitoba constituency of Dawson Trail in 2023 and also served as the party's vice-president for southern and southeastern portions of the province, gave up his NDP membership in March. "There are a number of reasons I would say: Dysfunctional leadership within the party itself. Also, they campaigned as progressives, but they're governing as conservatives," Wiebe said Monday in an interview outside the University of Winnipeg's Richardson College for the Environment and Science, where he works as a chemistry professor. Wiebe, who finished second to Progressive Conservative MLA Bob Lagassé by 543 votes in Dawson Trail in 2023, said he is disappointed the NDP government has made little progress since the election on climate change and does not appear to have a climate-change plan. Wiebe said he was motivated to speak out after Kinew said Friday he was open to oil shipments through Hudson Bay. Wiebe claims Kinew insisted in 2023 the party did not support pipelines. "We had multiple meetings with Mr. Kinew throughout the campaign as candidates to talk about policy, and one of his lines in the sand was no more pipelines," Wiebe said. 'Room for everybody' on Team Manitoba, says Kinew When asked about Wiebe's comments, Kinew rejected the idea his party had such a prohibition. "It's a big tent and there's room for everybody on board Team Manitoba," Kinew said Monday. Wiebe, who said he was inspired to enter politics by the late Transcona social democrat Bill Blaikie, said he does not believe there is room within the party for progressive politics and does not believe Kinew accepts input from candidates when it comes to forming policy. He said he is disappointed the Kinew government has kept some Progressive Conservative tax cuts going and contends there has been insufficient attention to core areas of government. "We're living through a third age of [Brian] Pallister," Wiebe said, referring to the former PC premier of Manitoba who won terms in 2016 and 2019. "I think that it's an austerity budget that they've given us, and health care is not getting better and education is not getting better. We're struggling with post-secondary education. So I don't see much of a difference between us and the Conservatives." Kinew laughed off this comparison. "Anyone who's seen me play basketball would reject the comparison to Brian Pallister and for what it's worth, I've never seen Brian Pallister put on a pair of skates," the premier quipped. Paul Thomas, professor emeritus of political studies at the University of Manitoba, suggested he would not be quick to dismiss Chris Wiebe. "This is not an angry, disgruntled individual like Mark Wasyliw, whose ambitions were blunted by Kinew's decision to exclude him from cabinet and then has gone on rants on social media attacking the leader," Thomas said, referring to the now-Independent MLA for Fort Garry. "This is somebody who's a reflective serious person and has some well-thought-out positions." Thomas said the Kinew government has been forced to contend with serious issues such as the U.S. trade war and Manitoba's wildfires and may not be able to focus on keeping party members happy. The professor also suggested the premier's focus on polling and popularity may impair his ability to develop policy. "He loves to please the audiences, I think, and one wonders whether that contributes to a reluctance to make tough decisions," Thomas said. Former Manitoba NDP candidate, vice-president quits party 50 minutes ago Duration 2:12 Chris Wiebe, who was a vice-president of the Manitoba NDP and ran as a candidate in the 2023 election, has quit the party over what he calls top-down leadership and unprogressive policies. Premier Wab Kinew is shrugging off the concerns.
Vancouver Sun
8 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
The long history of Canada failing to hit its military spending targets
In an ever-more insecure world, Canada's federal government has announced it will spend two per cent of its GDP on military spending. That's the standard that members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization all agreed to back in 2006, but Canada has long been a laggard, to the extent that other governments, particularly the United States, have browbeaten the country for its meagre military spending. At present, Canada spends 1.37 per cent of GDP on the military. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. In 2024, NATO released a report detailing which nations hit the two-per-cent target. Twenty-three of the defence's group's members were either at or above two per cent. This includes Montenegro, a Balkan country with a population smaller than that of Mississauga, and the two most recent NATO members, Sweden and Finland. Eight countries, including Canada, had not. Canada spends less than Italy on defence but more than Belgium. The lowest-spending NATO nation, Spain, puts 1.28 per cent of its GDP towards military spending. In July 2023, the Wall Street Journal editorial board called Canada's military spending 'pathetic .' NATO is currently considering bumping its threshold from two per cent to five per cent, something that world leaders are expected to discuss at the annual summit at The Hague in two weeks' time. Peter MacKay, who served as defence minister in the former Conservative government, told National Post in 2023 that he regrets that the Conservatives hadn't hit the target while they were in power. By 2014, he said, there was a 'great deal of fatigue around defence spending,' due to the years Canada had spent fighting in Afghanistan. 'We, the (Stephen) Harper government, were putting a lot of money into this effort to reach two per cent. And the department literally couldn't spend it fast enough,' he said. 'They would take the money and we would get wrapped around the axle literally on these big (procurement) projects. And we would, at the end of the year, have to send money back to the Treasury.' Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Monday that Canada will spend an additional $9.3 billion on defence during the 2025-2026 fiscal year, for a total of more than $62 billion, or about two per cent of GDP. But this isn't the first time that a Canadian prime minister has promised that the country would hit the target. Here's a non-exhaustive list of when Canada has promised to hit its NATO target and where its defence spending was at over the years. 1970s: At this point, Canada was spending 2.8 per cent of its GDP on its defence budget . While the 1970s were technically a period of détente in the Cold War, there were a number of close calls in the 1960s and the 1970s were a deeply unstable period. Throughout the mid-1970s, Canada's military spending began to decline, averaging about 1.9 per cent of GDP, before growing slightly through the 1980s to 2.1 per cent. April 1989: In the 1989 budget, Canada planned to cut $2.7 billion from its defence budget and close 14 of its Cold War bases. An entire military program, nearly $700 million for an icebreaker, was scrapped. November 2006: NATO member countries commit to two per cent of GDP going towards the military. At the time, Canada's defence spending was around 1.2 per cent of GDP. January 2007: During the war in Afghanistan, Stephen Harper's government was spending just over one per cent of GDP. In January 2007, the Defence Department presented Harper's cabinet with three spending options to grow the defence budget. The middle option was to spend $35 billion by 2025. As of 2025, defence spending was a bit above $30 billion . September 2014: At the NATO summit in Wales, allies reaffirmed their commitment to spending two per cent of GDP on military spending. However, just days before the meeting, figures released by the Department of National Defence showed that the federal government intended to shrink defence spending by $2.7 billion. (The government was pushing to balance the budget in advance of the 2015 election. Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau won a majority government in that election.) June 2017: Then defence minister Harjit Sajjan announced an increase of $13.9 billion in military spending over the next decade, and a plan that would put 5,000 more troops in uniform, but still leave Canada short of hitting the two per cent target. At the time, defence spending was at around 1.19 per cent of GDP. October 2020: Canada's defence spending jumped to 1.45 per cent of GDP. However, that was not because of any new spending increases, but because the economy contracted during the COVID-19 pandemic. May 2022: Then defence minister Anita Anand said that Canada is on an ' upward trajectory ' when it comes to meeting NATO targets. However, in a virtual discussion hosted by the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, she stopped short of committing to a timeline. June 2022: The Parliamentary Budget Office said that if Canada was to reach the two-per-cent target by 2027, the country would need to spend more than $75 billion more over five years . April 2023: A leaked Pentagon assessment obtained by the Washington Post revealed that Trudeau had privately told NATO officials that Canada would never reach the alliance's defence-spending target of two per cent of GDP. July 2023: NATO released a statement saying that all members have agreed to spend at least two per cent. Canada agreed to the target, but at the time had no plan to reach it. In recent years, officials have defended the government's failure to meet the two per cent target, saying that Canada has increased its military spending by 70 per cent since 2014. The Liberals announced $2.6 billion over three years on Canada's mission in Latvia, $40 billion on NORAD modernization and billions in spending on the new F-35 fighter jets (a contract that is now being reviewed.) April 2024: The Canadian government unveiled its updated military policy — Our North, Strong and Free — which included $8.1 billion in further spending. However, it was not a commitment to reach two per cent. It would get Canada to 1.76 per cent by 2029-30. June 2024: Then prime minister Justin Trudeau announced at the end of the 2024 NATO summit that Canada would reach two per cent of GDP on military spending by 2032. 'We continually step up and punch above our weight, something that isn't always reflected in the crass mathematical calculation that certain people turn to very quickly,' Trudeau said at the time. 'Which is why we've always questioned the two per cent as the be-all, end-all of evaluating contributions to NATO.' In July, Blair said: 'It was important to be realistic about how long it was going to take to make these investments, to do it the right way.' November 2024: Exclusive Postmedia-Leger polling showed that 45 per cent of Canadians don't believe that Canada will hit its commitments on military spending. In order to achieve that, Canada would need to nearly double defence spending. Just one-fifth of Canadians told pollsters they think it's possible. January 2025: Then minister of national defence Bill Blair said that Canada could accelerate its timeline of hitting the two per cent target. Instead of 2032, Blair said that Canada could hit that benchmark by 2027 by simply accelerating the timeline set out in June 2024. April 2025: During the federal election, both the Liberals and the Conservatives promised to meet the NATO spending targets. The Liberals said they would do so by boosting spending by $18 billion over four years, while the Conservatives pledged to spend $17 billion over four years. In March, U.S. President Donald Trump said that the United States wouldn't defend NATO allies that had not met their spending targets. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
