More than 1,200 mothers and 900 children impacted by Dutch fertility scandal
A popular Dutch fertility clinic used sperm from dozens of donors far more than the 25 permitted times for over a decade, affecting hundreds of children and mothers.
One of the Netherlands ' largest fertility clinics, Medisch Centrum Kinderwens (MCK), used sperm from at least 36 donors many more times than permitted between 2006 and 2017, Dutch news outlet Nos reported, affecting more than 900 mothers and 1,200 children.
Dutch youth minister Vincent Karremans said it was an 'appalling' case which would understandably lead to anger and questions from those affected.
'They are now confronted with the news that their children belong to a larger kinship network than they had expected or wanted. The children appear to have more half-brothers or -sisters than thought,' he said in response to questions from Nos.
'And the donors appear to have more offspring than they themselves thought. I can imagine that this can have a major impact on each of them.'
In April, Nos's current affairs programme Nieuwsuur shocked the Netherlands when it revealed that Dutch fertility clinic practices had resulted in at least 85 mass donors.
A mass donor is someone who has more than 25 offspring, which was the maximum limit permitted by the country's professional association of gynaecologists until 2018, when the limit was reduced to a maximum of 12 families per donor.
MCK confirmed it had 36 mass donors, and blamed previous management for ignoring the guidelines.
In a statement to Nos, MCK director Wouter van Inzen blamed the number of mass donors on a donor shortage and high demand from mothers, as well as the 'desire for multiple children from the same donor within one family'.
Current management took over in 2015 and ended the practice in 2017, but Mr van Inzen said the clinic decided not to approach the donors and parents involved in the issue 'in consultation with the professional group'.
The Donorkind Foundation, an advocacy group, said: 'Prospective parents are nothing more than paying customers, donors are a kind of raw material and donor children nothing more than products'.
Priamos, the sperm donors' association, said the clinic's actions were "irresponsible and unscrupulous".
Donors were asked from 2006 whether they wanted to donate for 25 families, rather than 25 children, and their contracts allowed a certain number of children to be conceived in other countries.
Priamos said while those contracts were in breach of the rules, all the donors the association spoke to thought donating to 25 families was permitted.
'We are not aware of any donor who was made aware that the rules were being violated. Donors do not need to know the rules either. They can assume that they will be treated fairly by the clinic,' the association told Nos.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Why milk, cheese (and even a smidgen of butter) is good for your health
Queue for a coffee in your local café and you'll hear a dizzying array of orders – oat flat whites, almond macchiatos, soya lattes. Increasingly rarely will anyone order a drink made with dairy, which has fallen so far out of fashion that in some circles it's become a dirty word. Since the 1970s, our consumption of cow's milk has halved – from an average of 140 litres per person per year to 70. Today, just under 35 per cent of British households buy plant-based alternatives, according to data firm Kantar, with annual sales of oat milk alone topping £275 million – up from £155 million five years ago. But while vegan alternatives are generally considered better for the environment than cow's milk, is giving up dairy good for our health? The latest research suggests not. A new study from the University of Reading has found that including dairy in your diet may help control blood sugar levels more effectively than a plant-only diet – and could help prevent diabetes. Participants were either vegetarians who included dairy in their diets, or vegans. Blood tests showed the dairy group had higher levels of acetyl carnitine – a compound that helps cells use fat for energy and reduces oxidative stress, the damage that can occur when blood sugar is too high. And this is far from the only benefit. 'Eating dairy is one of the easiest ways to get enough calcium,' says Dr Emily Leeming, a microbiome scientist at King's College London, dietitian and author of Genius Gut. Calcium is vital for bone health, muscle, nerve and heart function – and it's also strongly linked to protection against bowel cancer. The largest study to date on diet and bowel cancer found that people who ate more dairy tended to have a lower risk of developing the disease. 'An extra 300mg of calcium – found in a typical glass of milk – is associated with a 17 per cent lower risk of bowel cancer,' says Dr Leeming. Alongside calcium, 'dairy contains a high level of protein and other important nutrients including vitamin B12, iodine, phosphorus, potassium and riboflavin,' says Laura Southern, founder of London Food Therapy. So what type of dairy should we be going for – and how much? Skip to: Milk Cheese Yogurt Butter Milk can lower your risk of heart disease Many adults today claim to be lactose intolerant – a condition in which the body doesn't produce enough of the enzyme lactase to break down the sugar in cow's milk. It's believed to affect around 15–20 per cent of the population. Cow's milk protein allergy is common in babies – affecting around seven per cent of those under one – but most outgrow it, and in adults it's very rare. For most people, then, choosing a plant-based alternative is a lifestyle decision – but one that could have unintended health consequences. Our declining intake of cow's milk has led to a drop in iodine consumption – a trace mineral that's crucial for thyroid function. A 200ml glass of milk provides around 70mcg of iodine, half the adult recommended daily intake of 140mcg. 'Iodine is quite difficult to find in our diets, but it goes into cattle feed – which means it's in milk,' says Southern. 'We need iodine for our thyroid hormones. Thyroid disorders can cause low energy levels, poor metabolism, fertility problems and issues with foetal development during pregnancy.' Contrary to what many believe, milk isn't likely to make you gain weight or raise your cholesterol. Research from the University of Reading found that milk drinkers had lower cholesterol levels – and a 14 per cent lower risk of coronary heart disease. And semi-skimmed or skimmed options may not be the healthier choice. A 2024 study in the US revealed that drinking whole milk was associated with lower weight, BMI and obesity prevalence. Some plant-based drinks are fortified with calcium, vitamin B12 and iodine – others are not. Organic versions, which are the least processed, cannot legally be fortified. And while some fortified drinks contain added calcium, not all forms are equally well absorbed. The calcium in cow's milk is naturally occurring – and more readily used by the body. 'Cow's milk is a really good package of nutrients in an unprocessed bundle,' says Southern. Eat cheese to ward off dementia Cheese has long been vilified for its high levels of saturated fat and salt – but recent research suggests it offers far greater health benefits than previously assumed. In 2023, a review of dozens of studies by scientists in China and at Harvard University found that eating cheese – around 40g per day – was linked to a lower risk of heart disease, stroke and dementia. A possible explanation for its cardiovascular benefits may lie in its fermentation process, says Southern. 'The beneficial microbes break down the lactose – or milk sugar – and the proteins in cheese. Those are the elements that can have an inflammatory effect in the body,' she explains. 'What's left are the health-promoting components.' Bacteria in many cheeses – including Parmesan and cheddar – break down milk proteins into compounds similar to those found in blood pressure drugs known as ACE (angiotensin-converting-enzyme) inhibitors, potentially helping to prevent hypertension. Fermentation also produces vitamin K, which has been shown to slow the build-up of calcium deposits in the arteries and valves of the heart. Camembert and Edam contain the highest levels. A 2023 study of older adults in Japan found that eating cheese was associated with better cognitive function and lower rates of dementia. The cheese-eating group also had slightly lower BMIs and blood pressure – and walked faster. Hard cheeses are particularly rich in calcium. Parmesan contains 19 per cent of the recommended daily amount in just one 30g serving. Official guidance recommends no more than 30g of cheese a day. 'We don't want to eat too much because of its fat content, but I advise clients to measure two fingers' worth of hard cheese, chop it up and sprinkle it into a salad,' says Southern. 'That way you're getting the benefits, plus flavour, protein and satiety.' Vegan alternatives are another matter. 'They're mostly salt and fat and are very highly processed,' says Southern. 'Most varieties aren't health-enhancing – and cheese is notoriously difficult to replicate.' The benefits of the good bacteria in 'live' yoghurt for the gut microbiome are well established – making a daily portion one of the healthiest dairy choices around. 'I often advise clients to start their day with a couple of tablespoons of fermented or Greek yoghurt with seeds,' says Southern. 'It's very satiating, provides a high level of protein and helps keep blood sugar steady throughout the morning.' Several major studies have highlighted further health advantages. The most recent – published in Gut Microbes – showed that long-term consumption of two or more servings of yoghurt per week was linked to lower rates of one type of bowel cancer. Another study, based on data from 5,000 people, found that eating 40g of yoghurt daily lowered the risk of liver cancer by 5.4 per cent. Research from the Medical Research Council's epidemiology unit at the University of Cambridge also found that people who regularly ate natural, unsweetened yoghurt had a 28 per cent lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes than those who never consumed it. Still not convinced? A comprehensive 2023 meta-analysis published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, which examined data from almost 900,000 participants, found that higher yogurt intake was significantly associated with a lower risk of death from all causes – and from cardiovascular disease. Dairy-free alternatives generally contain far less calcium, protein and potassium – although some now include added probiotics to support gut health. Butter – stick to small amounts Who doesn't love a slice of hot toast slathered in melting butter? Delicious as it is, butter is high in saturated fat – so 'moderation is key,' says Southern. One analysis, which included data from more than 600,000 people, found that moderate butter consumption wasn't linked to a higher risk of heart disease – and may even offer slight protection against type 2 diabetes. But compared to other forms of dairy, its benefits are limited. 'New research has shown that it's not just the nutrients themselves that affect health – it's how they're packaged within a food, something called the food matrix,' says Dr Leeming. She points to a study comparing the matched nutrients in cheese and butter, which found that cheese lowered levels of 'bad' LDL cholesterol – while butter did not. 'It suggests the food matrix plays a role in how our bodies respond,' she says. A major study published earlier this year, involving more than 200,000 people followed over 30 years, found that those who consumed more plant-based oils – particularly olive, rapeseed and soya – had a 17 per cent lower risk of death than those who regularly ate butter. 'We don't need to be frightened of butter,' says Southern. 'Although plant-based spreads are now largely free from unhealthy trans fats, I'd still choose butter for toast or baking. But for cooking, a good quality oil is much better for us.'
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Women who have weekly sex are happier in relationships, study finds
A new study has revealed that women who have sex at least once a week are the 'happiest' in their relationship. Scientists found 85 per cent of women who had sex once a week described themselves as 'sexually satisfied'. In contrast, only 66 per cent of women who had sex once a month reported the same level of relationship bliss, and the figure fell to 17 per cent among those who had intercourse less than this. Alexandra Janssen, author of the study and researcher at the University of Manchester, told 'While the study shows an association between frequency of sex and sexual relationship satisfaction, this is only a correlation.' Janssen added: We don't know whether women are happier because they are having more sex, if they are having more sex because they are happier, or if they are happier and having more sex because of other factors-perhaps they don't have kids. Also, the fact that women who have less sex are also less satisfied in their relationship isn't particularly surprising.' The data showed that satisfaction was also higher for women who reported more regular orgasms and rated sex as an important part of their life. Janssen went on: 'What I found interesting in the study was that, while women who orgasmed more frequently were generally happier in their sex lives, women who orgasmed 100 per cent of the time weren't the most satisfied. 'This contradicts the belief that women are most satisfied when they have an orgasm at every sexual encounter. It shows that women don't have to orgasm every time they have sex to be satisfied in their relationship. I hope that this takes the pressure off women who might struggle to achieve orgasm 100 per cent of the time.' Janssen's study also found that women who rated sex as 'very important' had happier love lives than those who did not. Other findings from the study, published in the International Journal Of Sexual Health, found that of the women surveyed those aged 18 to 24 were most likely to report being sexually satisfied. In contrast, women over the age of 45 were the least likely to report being happy with their intimate relationship. The study was based on a survey of 483 women from New Zealand who had been in a committed relationship within the past year. The authors noted their study did have some limitations. One was that being a survey, there was no way to verify if what the women reported was true. Another was that the group of predominantly heterosexual women surveyed was not very diverse, which could limit the scope of findings to other groups.
Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
NHS to offer women under 50 fewer cervical screenings
Millions of women will be offered NHS cervical screening less often under radical plans. Those below the age of 50 will be called forward every five years instead of three. The changes were announced on Tuesday by NHS England, who said they were backed by clinical evidence that just as many cancer cases would be detected. Health chiefs said the changes would enable 'millions of women and people with a cervix in England to benefit from more personalised cervical screening' from next month. Under the NHS screening system, which replaced smears, cells are tested for the presence of Human Papillomavirus (HPV), which causes almost all cervical cancer. Currently, women aged 25 to 49 in England are offered such checks every three years, with screening every five years for those aged 50 to 64. If HPV is detected, checks are repeatedly annually, with further investigations if any cell abnormalities are found. More regular screening is also offered to those with a recent history of HPV. Under the new system, checks on those with positive results will remain as regular. But the standard gap for those who test negative will extend from three years to five for women aged 25 to 49. This puts it in line with the gap for older women, in a similar approach to that adopted by Australia, the Netherlands and Sweden. Under the NHS plan, if a woman aged between 25 and 49 had a negative result, but previously had a positive test, they would still get a test three years later. Health chiefs said the new approach was more 'personalised' than previous approaches. Screening will also continue to be offered to trans men if they still have a cervix. The NHS has this week rolled-out digital invitations and reminders for cervical screening via the NHS App, as part of a new 'ping and book' service to boost uptake and help save thousands of lives. Eligible women will first receive a notification through the app to alert them to book a screening appointment, followed by a text message if the app notification is not opened. Letters will remain in place for those who need them. DIY tests It comes as the health service prepares to roll out DIY tests allowing women to 'self-sample' at home if the prefer. Health officials have said such tests could be rolled out as soon as January if the move is recommended by the UK National Screening Committee. The self-checks will allow those who do not attend appointments the option to do their own tests at home, ordering the kit on the app. The NHS said the rollout of testing, which is far more accurate than older methods, means women will be able to safely have longer gaps between screening. Studies have shown that if a patient tests negative for HPV they are extremely unlikely to go on to develop cervical cancer within the next decade. Research on a pilot scheme involving 1.3 million women, led by King's College London researchers and published in the BMJ in 2022, showed that five-yearly screening is as safe as three-yearly, that the same number of cancers are found and less frequent cervical screening tests are needed. It comes after they considered evidence, including a 2022 study of 1.3 million women in England. Some other countries, including Wales and Scotland, have already extended the gap to five years, after it was recommended by the UK National Screening Committee in 2019. Other countries have gone further. In Sweden, women aged 23 to 49 have checks every five years with seven year intervals for those aged 50 to 70. In the Netherlands, women are invited for screening every five years from the age of 30. If a woman tests HPV negative after the age of 40 the screening interval is extended to 10 years. Australia – which aims to become the first country in the world to eliminate cervical cancer – offers checks every 5 years for women aged 25 to 74. The NHS in England has urged women to come forward for cervical screening, with latest figures showing more than 5 million are not up to date with check-ups. Dr Sue Mann, the NHS's national clinical director for women's health, said: 'Taking a more personalised approach to cervical screening will help ensure everyone eligible can make the most of these life-saving services, while sparing them appointments that they don't need. 'The NHS is following robust evidence on how often women need to be safely screened, and by putting invitations and reminders straight in women's pockets on their phones, we're making it easier than ever to take up screening appointments. 'Make sure you come forward for your screening when you're invited, even if it was weeks, months or years ago. If you think you are due but have not yet had an invitation, speak to your GP practice.' For decades, the NHS offered smear tests, which checked cervical cells for abnormalities. If abnormalities were found samples were tested for HPV. But since 2019, the system has been changed so the tests check for HPV in the first instance. Cell abnormalities As HPV infection comes before cell abnormalities develop, the new system has been found to be more accurate and to detect more women who may be at risk. NHS officials have pledged to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040. Michelle Mitchell, the chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 'We welcome this change to cervical screening in England, which is the result of years of vital research to make screening more effective and has shown it is safe to extend the time between tests. 'Screening, alongside the roll out of the HPV vaccine – which Cancer Research UK scientists helped develop – have seen cervical cancer rates drop by around a quarter since the early 1990s, and we look forward to even more progress.' Athena Lamnisos, the chief executive of The Eve Appeal, a cancer charity, said: 'Every single case of cancer that can be prevented, should be, and this new guidance is good news for those at low risk because they will no longer need to go for cervical screening as often.'
