Reflecting on the 1976 Soweto uprisings
As this time approaches of June 16, I often realise that we just overcame the apartheid system not long ago. I often get that people want to make us forget, as if we're talking about something that happened many moon, says the writer..
It was at this time that the momentum had already been building up; the Afrikaans language policy was the final straw, and thus began the countdown to the Soweto uprising, a historical moment that caused a shift in South Africa. I applaud the students of 1976 for their bravery in standing up for the unfair and unjust past educational system.
As this time approaches of June 16, I often realise that we just overcame the apartheid system not long ago. I often get that people want to make us forget, as if we're talking about something that happened many moons ago, how I wish I could also see that way too, maybe my problem is that I like to create mental images or scenes in my mind and end up having a present feeling.
However, for me, this moment is not just a moment for reflection on how ruthless the apartheid was, but it is also a moment of admiration and a reminder to myself that change begins with the youth. I will be turning 37 years old by August this year, and this marks a turning point into economic reality in the South African context.
Many doors of career development are closed for me, and according to my culture, I am now in a position to contribute to the family and community. I am considered to have fully matured and am in a position to offer mentorship to young people and uphold values.
However, my reality and the reality of other 37-year-old black South Africans is that we are frustrated, there is a feeling of shame or guilt because we are unable to fulfil those milestones. But it is at this time also that I recharge and reset my mind, getting ready to once again fight the economic emancipation.
Having read about the leading events towards the Soweto uprising, a historical moment, I realised that every decision I take daily regarding my life is leading towards my breakthrough. It is my wish that every young South African who is facing the struggle of unemployment and other related issues be strong and courageous and stand up and fight for their future again and again! And again!
Maditaba Mmatli
Unisa Student
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Youth Day public holiday: Long weekend lies ahead for South Africa
South Africans are counting down the days until the next long weekend – and the good news is that it's mere days away! Those who like to diarise days off work will no doubt be well aware that the next official day off work is Monday, 16 June when Youth Day will be celebrated. Youth Day is the day on which South Africans honour the youth that were ambushed by the apartheid regime police in Soweto on 16 June 1976. On the day over 500 youths were killed. On the morning of 16 June 1976, thousands of black students went on a protest rally from their schools to Orlando Stadium. They were protesting against an official order which made Afrikaans compulsory in black township schools throughout the country. The use of local languages was prohibited in these schools whilst the constitution supported that Afrikaans and English be made the official languages of the country. The rally was meant to be a peaceful protest with the intentions to plea with government not to make Afrikaans compulsory in schools. However, things got out of control when the police were called in to disperse the crowds and riots broke out. Although the protests of 16 June 1976 resulted in a number of casualties, the youth of 1976 played a role in fighting and overcoming the inequality and oppression caused by apartheid. Following the advent of democracy in 1994, the new democratic government declared 16 June as National Youth Day and June as Youth Month. Although South Africans will enjoy fewer public holidays in 2025, there will be more long weekends this year than in 2024. Mzansi had 14 public holidays in 2024, but there will only be 13 days this year – and only 12 will be actual days off work. Of course, the fewer days off, the better for business in the country. Working South Africans will not get a day off to celebrate National Women's Day in 2025 because the public holiday falls on Saturday, 9 August. The Public Holidays Act (Act No 36 of 1994) determines that whenever any public holiday falls on a Sunday , the Monday following it will also be a public holiday. However, for public holidays that fall on a Saturday , it's just a 'normal' weekend day. The exciting news is that there are FIVE long weekends in 2025. The first was thanks to Human Rights Day on Friday, 21 March which gave South Africans 21-23 March off. The second was the Easter weekend with a four-day 18-21 April break to enjoy your chocolate. The third was thanks to Freedom Day falling on Sunday, 27 April, meaning Monday, 28 April was a holiday – and another three-day weekend. Monday, 16 June (Youth Day) will mean another three-day long weekend in mid-year, while the fifth and final long weekend in another four-day one with Christmas and the Day of Goodwill (Boxing Day) falling on a Thursday and Friday, respectively. Diarise the following public holidays in 2025 and plan your vacations accordingly! Wednesday, 1 January: New Year's Day Friday, 21 March: Human Rights Day Friday, 18 April: Good FridayMonday, 21 April: Family Day Sunday, 27 April: Freedom Day
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
NPA's Leadership Crisis: Eroding Legal Integrity in Favour of Political Expediency
Clyde N.S. Ramalaine | Published 1 day ago Clyde N.S. Ramalaine On 3 June 2025, the Free State High Court in Bloemfontein ruled that the extradition of Moroadi Cholota from the United States to South Africa was unlawful. This landmark judgment has not only released the state's key figure in the high-profile R255 million asbestos corruption case but also cleared the way for the prosecution of others involved. Still, it has also exposed deep procedural and constitutional failings within South Africa's prosecutorial regime. Her unlawful extradition from the United States and subsequent release by the Free State High Court reveal more than just procedural oversight , they expose systemic dysfunction, a repurposing of primary objectives of the NPA as articulated in its strategic ethos within the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and unravels the credibility of South Africa's anti-corruption drive. The Ruling A Blow to Prosecutorial Credibility Presiding over the matter, Judge Phillip Loubser was unequivocal: " The prosecution has not found reasonable doubt, or at all, that there was a valid or lawful request from South Africa for the extradition of Ms Cholota from the United States. It follows that if there was no valid extradition request, then the extradition itself was without any basis and, therefore, unlawful ." The National Prosecuting Authority's (NPA) failure to adhere to the legally mandated process in the extradition request of Moroadi Cholota reveals not merely a procedural blunder, but an institutional failing. By initiating the extradition request instead of the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, as explicitly required by law, the NPA not only invalidated its case but compromised the integrity of South Africa's justice system on the international stage. The NPA will contend that this is not the first time it has led to extradition cases and that this is the first instance in which a case has been registered in this regard. It will furthermore argue that it is appealing the Schultz case, which constitutes a legal precedent. Notwithstanding this counter, the NPA cannot deny that this deviation from legal protocol suggests either gross incompetence or a willful disregard for constitutional processes, raising serious ethical questions about accountability within the NPA. Moreover, by allegedly providing misleading or incomplete information to U.S. authorities, the South African state stands accused of deception — a charge that, if substantiated, undermines its moral authority and diplomatic credibility, and reveals a prosecutorial body more concerned with performance politics than with the pursuit of justice. The unlawful handling of Cholota's extradition reflects a disturbing pattern in which the state weaponises legal instruments while bypassing constitutional safeguards. This erosion of legal integrity in favour of political expediency suggests the NPA, whether by design or acquiescence, has become a tool in internal power struggles rather than a guardian of justice. In failing to uphold the rule of law and misleading an international partner in the process, the NPA exposes a justice system teetering between institutional collapse and captured governance. The court's ruling on the lack of jurisdiction underscores a foundational pillar of constitutional and international law, that the legitimacy of a trial is inseparable from the legality of the accused's presence before the court. In Moroadi Cholota's case, the unlawful initiation of the extradition process rendered her transfer to South Africa constitutionally defective, thereby stripping the court of jurisdiction to try her. Any attempt to prosecute her under such conditions would not only violate Section 35 of the Constitution, which guarantees fair trial rights and due process but also contravene international legal norms governing extradition and state sovereignty. This ruling affirms that procedural integrity is not merely a technicality, but a substantive requirement of justice; the state cannot bypass lawful channels to secure an accused and still claim the authority to prosecute. To do so would be to legitimise executive overreach, dismantle legal safeguards, and invite the erosion of the rule of law under the guise of criminal justice. Systemic Indictment of the NPA The judgment handed down by the Free State High Court should not be read in isolation; it must be understood as a judicial demand for accountability, procedural discipline, and institutional humility. The NPA's failed prosecution of Ms Moroadi Cholota is, regrettably, not an isolated mishap . In a 2023 article co-authored with Paul M. Ngobeni (available at: " /", we called for the NPA leadership to be held accountable as we critically examined eight high-profile cases pursued by the NPA under the rubric of its ' state capture ' prosecutions. Our analysis revealed a pattern of endemic institutional failures, particularly under the leadership of the current National Director of Public Prosecutions, Advocate Shamila Batohi. Among the most pressing concerns were the following: Politicisation of Prosecutions The NPA's alignment with factional battles in the ANC undermines its credibility. Its selective use of the Zondo Commission's findings, non-binding and inadmissible in court, has raised alarms about the weaponisation of commissions of inquiry to serve political ends. Strategic Misuse of Evidence The collapse of cases like the Estina Dairy Farm prosecution revealed the dangers of substituting public rhetoric for admissible evidence. The NPA has repeatedly stumbled in converting politically sensational findings into courtroom success. Selective Disclosure and Narrative Framing The NPA has routinely withheld countervailing evidence, especially in asset forfeiture cases such as Optimum Coal, to curate a prosecutorial narrative while undermining procedural fairness. Civil society organisations such as Freedom Under Law and Corruption Watch have raised repeated concerns about this trend. Institutional Inefficiencies Structural deficiencies, ranging from poor leadership and resource mismanagement to political interference, continue to plague the NPA's capacity to lead credible prosecutions. These points not only relate to individual accountability but also to the need for institutional redesign. The location of the NPA under executive control remains a structural vulnerability. Lack of Accountability and Transparency The NPA has consistently deflected public criticism, painting itself as the victim of attacks rather than accepting legitimate concerns about its performance. This erodes public confidence and corrodes prosecutorial independence. Calls for an independent oversight body to scrutinise prosecutorial decisions have gained renewed urgency. NPA's Compulsive Overreliance on Appeals – Default Mechanism As expected, the NPA informed South Africa that it intends to appeal the court's findings. While the doctrine of appeal is a constitutional provision, it is important to appreciate the context and primary intentions of the state in pursuing such an appeal. A fundamental yet under-examined pathology within the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is its compulsive reliance on appeals, not as a last resort for justice, but as a default mechanism to shield prosecutorial ineptitude. At the heart of this phenomenon lies a psychology unmoored from accountability: senior prosecutors and executive leadership pursue prolonged legal contests not at their own personal or professional expense, but through the seemingly bottomless reservoir of the public fiscus. This distance between institutional action and individual consequence fosters a culture of indifference towards both fiscal prudence and judicial efficacy. The decision to appeal, often against the weight of legal reasoning and precedent, is thus less a matter of legal necessity than a strategic deflection—an effort to postpone institutional reckoning, preserve internal reputations, and obscure prosecutorial failures. There appears to be little regard for the economic burden imposed on the state, the rights of the accused whose lives are held in indefinite legal limbo, or the broader erosion of public trust in the justice system. In the Cholota case, this is strikingly evident: despite the court's scathing findings, the NPA has signalled its intention to appeal, oblivious to the potential litigation costs should the state be sued for unlawful detention or rights infringements. This illustrates a prosecutorial psychology that prioritises institutional face-saving over constitutional integrity, emboldened by the knowledge that the price of legal misadventure will not be borne by those who authorise it. In the final analysis, the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP), Advocate Shamila Batohi, can no longer be exempt from the dismal performance of the NPA . She, together with her senior executive team, must be held accountable for the institution's persistent failures, including the frivolous pursuit of appeals and plausible wasteful expenditure incurred in cases that consistently collapse in court. The NPA's demonstrably poor track record in successfully prosecuting its claimed state capture cases, cases that fail to withstand legal scrutiny, underscores a leadership crisis at the heart of the institution. In this epoch, Batohi cannot dismiss these matters as merely 10 to 12 cases out of thousands. She must acknowledge the National Prosecuting Authority's spectacular failure in effectively prosecuting its state capture cases. Judge Loubser's ruling is a reaffirmation of the rule of law. It demonstrates that even in the face of public and political pressure, courts remain the final guardians of constitutional integrity. This case should serve as a caution to state institutions: no matter the political stakes, constitutional due process cannot be bypassed without consequence. The state's case against Moroadi Cholota symbolises both a failure of the prosecutorial machinery and a moment of constitutional reckoning. Unless the NPA undertakes urgent internal reform, beginning with depoliticised leadership appointments, independent oversight mechanisms, and full adherence to international legal procedures, its credibility will remain under siege. This case is not merely about an individual wrongfully prosecuted , but about an institution, the NPA, that appears adrift from constitutional moorings, caught between political ambition and legal obligation, often repurposed for nefarious intentions. * Clyde N.S. Ramalaine is a theologian, political analyst, lifelong social and economic justice activist, published author, poet, and freelance writer. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Tensions rise as memorial for former Zambian president Lungu takes place in South Africa amid ongoing dispute with government
One of the most contentious issues is the Zambian government's reported insistence on taking full control of former President Edgar Lungu's funeral arrangements. A memorial service for Zambia's former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu is being held today at the Cathedral in Pretoria, South Africa, under a cloud of political tension and unresolved conflict between his family and the Zambian government. Mourners, including members of the Patriotic Front (PF), Lungu's former ruling party, filled the cathedral as emotional tributes were paid to the late statesman. However, the atmosphere was not one of peace. Instead, it reflected the deepening rift over Lungu's legacy, his cause of death, and the government's controversial handling of his passing. The 68-year-old former president died last Thursday in a South African hospital, where he had been undergoing treatment for an undisclosed illness. Since his death, speculation and accusations have surfaced, with some PF leaders claiming Lungu may have been poisoned — a charge the Zambian government has not addressed publicly. According to hospital sources, government officials allegedly tried to repatriate Lungu's body to Zambia without the family's consent. Medical staff say they were intimidated and threatened, prompting outrage from PF leaders and human rights groups alike. Speaking at a media roundtable in Sandton, Johannesburg, PF Secretary General Mangani Nakacinda condemned the government's actions, calling them 'a calculated political manoeuvre to seize control of the narrative.' Nakacinda added, 'This is no longer just about mourning a former president — it is about defending his dignity and our democracy.' One of the most contentious issues is the Zambian government's reported insistence on taking full control of Lungu's funeral arrangements. The Lungu family, backed by PF allies, has resisted this, citing concerns about trust and transparency. So far, the standoff has stalled any official state funeral plans. Adding to the pain and confusion, two of Lungu's children were allegedly denied permission to leave Zambia to attend their father's memorial in South Africa. Family representatives say the travel ban is another example of the administration's 'deliberate cruelty.' Inside Zambia, the situation is increasingly volatile. PF members have vowed to 'fight until the end' to expose what they claim is a campaign to erase Lungu's political legacy and prevent scrutiny into the events leading to his death. Meanwhile, the government appears determined to maintain authority over the funeral process, citing protocol and national interest. The late president's political comeback in 2023 had reignited tensions in the country. After years of relative silence, Lungu announced his intention to run in the 2026 elections, challenging the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND) and its leader, President Hakainde Hichilema. In response, the Constitutional Court ruled him ineligible, sparking legal and political protests. Shortly after, Lungu was stripped of all state benefits, including security and medical support, further isolating him. PF leaders claim these actions left him vulnerable, even hindering access to vital medical treatment in the months before his death. As his body remains in South Africa and legal negotiations continue behind the scenes, today's memorial has become more than a moment of remembrance — it is a flashpoint in a deepening national crisis. 'The treatment of former President Lungu is a reflection of the state of our democracy,' said Brian Mundubile, a senior PF figure. 'This is about justice, truth, and respect — not just for him, but for all Zambians.'With the cause of Lungu's death still unconfirmed and calls for an independent investigation growing louder, today's service may not be the end of mourning but the beginning of a prolonged battle for answers.
