Nigel Farage speaks for voters on net zero. Here's how we know
It may sound bizarre now, but only a few weeks ago, many political analysts were convinced that Nigel Farage's opposition to net zero would cost him lots of votes. One polling expert even declared that it could be Reform's Achilles' heel.
Frankly, that strikes me as a touch improbable. In reality, I suspect the opposite is true: Mr Farage speaks for voters on net zero. And here's how we know.
This week, a new polling firm called Merlin Strategy asked voters for their views on tackling climate change. But here's the crucial thing, it didn't merely ask them: 'Do you support net zero?' Instead, it asked them which was more important: action to achieve net zero, or cutting the cost of living. And guess what they said? Almost 60 per cent chose cutting the cost of living, while a mere 13 per cent chose net zero.
A telling outcome. Asked, in isolation, whether they back urgent action on climate change, voters may say yes. When they're asked whether they would prioritise it over their own personal finances, however, it's a different story.
There's more to it than that, though. In my view, this result doesn't just show that the overwhelming majority of people think the cost of living is more pressing than net zero. It shows that they don't really believe in net zero full stop.
After all, if they did genuinely believe in it, they would prioritise it ahead of literally any other issue. Because they'd be shrieking: 'Never mind about the price of the weekly shop! Or the economy, NHS, crime, schools or potholes! We absolutely have to put net zero first – otherwise we'll soon be facing climate catastrophe, the collapse of civilisation, and the end of life on Earth as we know it! And then it won't matter how expensive our grocery bills are – because we'll all be dead!'
Evidently, however, most voters hold no such fears. So next time Ed Miliband claims that the public supports net zero, perhaps someone could politely explain this to him.
In a way, the situation reminds me of Labour during the Jeremy Corbyn years. Mr Corbyn's fans used to get terribly excited because, in isolation, his policies actually tended to poll very well. When it came to the crunch, however, most voters clearly decided they had greater priorities. At the election of 2019, for example, they proved to be rather more interested in getting Brexit done than in, say, nationalising broadband, or free bus travel for the under-25s.
This is why politicians have to be wary when trying to find out what voters want. It all depends on how you ask.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stormont strategy to tackle poverty 'not fit for purpose,' says charity
The first draft strategy agreed by the Northern Ireland Executive to tackle poverty is "not fit for purpose", according to a children's charity. An anti-poverty strategy was first proposed in 2006, with the aim of reducing social exclusion and deprivation. In March, Stormont's Executive Committee was found by a court ruling to be in breach of its legal obligation to adopt the strategy. BBC News NI has now seen a leaked copy of the document, which was agreed by executive ministers earlier in May, but has yet to be made public. Trása Canavan of Barnardo's NI, who is also chair of the Anti- Poverty Strategy Group, was among groups who met Communities Minister Gordon Lyons earlier this week about the document. She said she had "serious concerns that it will not make any difference to the lives of the children, families and communities that our organisations support every day, and we raised this with minister Lyons this week". "The current draft of the Anti-Poverty Strategy is not fit for purpose. "It clearly shows that the government has committed no new actions or funding to tackle poverty in Northern Ireland." The 28-page paper sets out the executive's approach to tackling poverty over the next 10 years. It outlines efforts already being taken by various departments to help minimise the risks of people falling into poverty in Northern Ireland, as well as reducing its impacts and ways to help people get out of poverty. The document states that poverty is "not a problem which the executive can solve in isolation", but one that requires community groups, business, councils and voluntary groups to help. It adds that the strategy will be accompanied by a programme of delivery to be updated on an ongoing basis. Ms Canavan added that earlier this year her group had outlined what it wanted to see in the document in order for it to be effective. "This included clear and time-bound targets, a lifecycle approach, new actions and clear funding commitments, rather than counting work that is already under way. "Unfortunately, the draft strategy does not meet any of these key principles. "It is quite simply not good enough for the people of Northern Ireland. "Our group remains committed to working constructively with the government to eradicating poverty in Northern Ireland." The SDLP, Stormont's official opposition, said it is "impossible to be anything other than deeply underwhelmed" by the strategy. Mark H Durkan said the executive should be "embarrassed to present a document that reads more like a list of vague hopes than a plan of action". The paper sets out measures already being taken by the executive and says it will "continue to deliver a package of welfare mitigations" while lobbying Westminster on reforms and to maintain the triple lock on pensions. It adds that legislation being brought by Education Minister Paul Givan will ensure all school uniforms are affordable, and that strategies on fuel poverty will be developed. It also promises that "everyone, including those in or at risk of poverty, has access to good quality, affordable and sustainable homes". But Durkan said: "This document acknowledges the direct link between housing and poverty and yet the Executive have confirmed they will only build half of the homes intended this year. "The strategy also fails to confront one of the most damaging policies hitting low-income families: the two-child limit. Ministers have the power to address these issues, but once again they've chosen not to." When it was agreed last month by the executive, First Minister Michelle O'Neill said the plan probably could "go further" but denied there was a row between Sinn Fein and the DUP over it. Communities Minister, Gordon Lyons, whose department oversaw the design of the draft strategy, said it had "drawn heavily on the work that has already been carried out". The DUP minister succeeded Sinn Féín's Deirdre Hargey in the role when Stormont was restored in 2024 after a two-year hiatus. The Department for Communities said: "The draft Strategy reflects the Executive's priorities in the context of the ongoing fiscal and other challenges we face. "The minister has listened to a wide range of views ahead of the consultation launch, which will give people from all communities a chance to have their say on how we tackle poverty and transform lives in Northern Ireland. "Minister Lyons would encourage all stakeholders in this area to provide their feedback when the consultation formally opens." It added that officials were working to launch the consultation as soon as possible. Alliance assembly member Sian Mulholland told BBC NI's Sunday Politics programme that she had been "a bit disappointed" by the draft document. "After the anticipation and the waiting, we had a closed briefing session with our committee to talk through it," she said. She said she believed it showed a "lack of ambition". "We have been waiting so long for it and in the context of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report, the NI Audit's report on poverty and child poverty in Northern Ireland we aren't seeing the recommendations and the lessons that should have been learned from the child poverty strategy making its way into this document," she added. You can watch Sunday Politics on BBC iPlayer. Stormont found in breach of duty on anti-poverty Anti-poverty strategy could 'go further' says first minister
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spending Review to include £86bn science and tech package
An £86bn package for the science and technology sector will help fund research into drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries, the government has said ahead of Wednesday's Spending Review. The package also includes up to £500m for regions across the UK with local leaders having a say on how it is spent, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said. Chancellor Rachel Reeves, whose review will outline day-to-day departmental and investment budgets over the next few years, said investing in the sector would create jobs and boost security. But research backers have warned that the government needs to do more to secure the UK's reputation for science on the world stage. Spending Review: Massive cheques from the chancellor for some - but what do totals hide? Reeves admits some will lose out in spending review Spending Review: When is it and what might Rachel Reeves announce? Reeves will set out departmental spending plans on Wednesday, with the package for science and technology expected to be worth more than £22.5 billion-a-year by 2029. DSIT said "every corner of the country" would benefit, with communities able to direct funding to expertise specific to their areas. In Liverpool, which has a long history in biotech, funding will be used to speed up drug discovery. Northern Ireland will receive money to develop defence equipment, while south Wales will use the money to design microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The chancellor said: "Britain is the home of science and technology. Through the plan for change, we are investing in Britain's renewal to create jobs, protect our security against foreign threats and make working families better off." Tony McBride, director of policy and public affairs at the Institute of Physics, welcomed the funding but said the government would need to commit to a decade-long plan to train workers. "This must include a plan for the skilled workforce we need to deliver this vision, starting with teachers and addressing every educational stage, to underpin the industrial strategy," he said. John-Arne Rottingen, chief executive of Britain's biggest non-governmental research funder Wellcome, warned that visa costs for scientists from overseas, financial challenges at universities and a budget that was not adjusted for inflation could hamper the government's ambitions. "The UK should be aiming to lead the G7 in research intensity, to bring about economic growth and the advances in health, science and technology that benefit us all." The shadow technology secretary, Alan Mak, said the investment for the sector seemed to be a "copy and paste" of Conservative plans set out in its manifesto last year. "As Labour and Reform squabble over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are creating a serious plan for government to deliver growth and give you your country back," he added. Earlier this week, Reeves admitted that not every government department would "get everything they want" in Wednesday's review, saying she had turned down requests from ministers and argued a squeeze on funding was a "product of economic reality". Reeves said her fiscal rules on borrowing to pay for public services were "non-negotiable" and insisted they were necessary because of "Conservative maltreatment" of the economy. The Treasury said earlier this year that the chancellor's fiscal rules would ensure day-to-day spending was matched by tax revenues, meaning the government would only borrow to invest. Big chunks will go to favoured departments, with suggestions of an extra £30 billion for the NHS over three years. Whitehall insiders have told the BBC they expect the spending review will be "ugly", and that ministers have been fighting over winning small amounts of cash for their respective departments.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Leo, the first US pope, criticises nationalist politics at Sunday Mass
By Joshua McElwee VATICAN CITY (Reuters) -Pope Leo criticized the emergence of nationalist political movements on Sunday, calling them unfortunate, without naming a specific country or national leader. Leo, the first pope from the U.S., asked during a Mass with a crowd of tens of thousands in St. Peter's Square that God would "open borders, break down walls (and) dispel hatred." "There is no room for prejudice, for 'security' zones separating us from our neighbours, for the exclusionary mindset that, unfortunately, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms," said the pontiff. Leo, the former Cardinal Robert Prevost, was elected on May 8 to succeed the late Pope Francis as leader of the 1.4-billion-member Church. Before becoming pontiff, Prevost was not shy about criticizing U.S. President Donald Trump, sharing numerous disapproving posts about Trump and Vice President JD Vance on X in recent years. The Vatican has not confirmed the new pope's ownership of the X account, which had the handle @drprevost, and was deactivated after Leo's election. Francis, pope for 12 years, was a sharp critic of Trump. The late pope said in January that the president's plan to deport millions of migrants in the U.S. during his second term was a "disgrace." Earlier, Francis said Trump was "not Christian" because of his views on immigration. "A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges, is not Christian," Francis said when asked about Trump in 2016. Leo was celebrating a Mass for Pentecost, one of the Church's most important holidays.
