Norwegian Refugee Council slams Israel plan to take over Gaza aid
Israel's security cabinet said there was "currently enough food" in the territory which has been under full Israeli blockade since March 2, and approved overnight the "possibility of humanitarian distribution" in Gaza.
"We cannot and will not do something which is fundamentally against humanitarian principles," Jan Egeland told AFP.
He said "the United Nations agencies, all other international humanitarian groups and NGOs have said no to be part of this idea coming from the Israeli cabinet and from the Israeli military."
Israel has accused Hamas of diverting humanitarian aid -- which Hamas denies -- and said its blockade was necessary to pressure the militant group to release Israeli hostages.
Egeland said the Israeli government wanted to "militarise, manipulate, politicise the aid by allowing only aid to a few concentration hubs in the south, a scheme where people will be screened, where it's a completely inoperable system."
"That would force people to move to get aid, and it would continue the starvation of the civilian population," he said, adding: "We will have no part in that."
Advertisement
"If one side in a bitter armed conflict tries to control, manipulate, ration aid among the civilians on the other side, it is against everything we stand for," he stressed.
Meanwhile, the UN's Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), said the Israeli scheme "will mean large parts of Gaza, including the less mobile and most vulnerable people, will continue to go without supplies."
International aid organisations as well as Palestinians in Gaza have for weeks warned of a dire humanitarian situation on the ground.
The UN's World Food Programme (WFP) has said it has depleted its food stocks and that the 25 bakeries it supports in Gaza have closed due to a lack of flour and fuel
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local Norway
5 days ago
- Local Norway
Norway votes down plan to limit investment in Israeli companies
Lawmakers voted by 88 to 16 against a proposal to order the fund to withdraw from companies "that contribute to Israel's war crimes and the illegal occupation" of the West Bank. Norway's sovereign wealth fund, fuelled by vast revenue from the country's oil and gas exports, is the biggest the world and has nearly $1.65 trillion invested around the globe. The government though is under pressure to use its financial clout to influence Israeli policy in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, where its settlement policy has been deemed illegal under international law. In a letter signed by about 50 non-governmental organisations, Norway's main union LO called on the Labour government to ensure that the fund's investments were in line with the country's legal obligations. The UN special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories on May 20 urged Oslo to "fully and unconditionally divest from all entities linked to Israel's unlawful presence in the occupied Palestinian territory". Francesca Albanese said Norway's fund held $121.5 billion -- or 6.9 percent of its total value -- in companies "involved in supporting or enabling egregious violations of international law in the occupied Palestinian territories". Advertisement Norwegian Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg in response called for an end to violence, the liberation of Israeli hostages kidnapped on October 7, 2023 and the resumption of humanitarian aid. But he said the fund's investments "do not violate Norway's obligations under international law". The fund is regulated by a raft of ethical rules and has already divested from 11 companies because of their activities in the occupied West Bank. In May, it withdrew its investment in Paz Retail and Energy, which distributes fuel in Israeli settlements. Relations between Norway and Israel have soured since May 2024, when the country joined Spain and Ireland in recognising the state of Palestine
Local Norway
24-05-2025
- Local Norway
Joint statement: A Nordic call for immediate and decisive action on Gaza
To the Governments of Europe and the Institutions of the European Union, The time has come to break the deafening silence with which much of the international community has observed the continuing devastation in Gaza. The scale of destruction is unconscionable: over 50,000 Palestinians have lost their lives, the overwhelming majority of them women, children, and non-combatant civilians, among them hundreds of journalists and humanitarian workers. The calculated obstruction of humanitarian aid by the State of Israel amounts, in effect, to the deployment of starvation as a weapon of war. What we are now witnessing appears to be the systematic expulsion of an entire population, a policy tantamount to ethnic cleansing. We, the undersigned, urge the governments of Europe and the European Union to act without delay to halt the commission of war crimes and to prevent the further deterioration of an already catastrophic humanitarian crisis. It is incumbent upon Europe to deploy the full weight of its diplomatic, legal, and economic instruments to secure an immediate and sustained ceasefire, the unconditional release of all hostages, and the unhindered delivery of essential humanitarian relief, including medical supplies, food, and water, to the civilian population. Should such diplomatic entreaties fail to yield compliance, the European Union must stand ready to impose targeted political and economic sanctions on those responsible. Hamas, long designated a terrorist organisation, bears grave responsibility for crimes against both Israeli and Palestinian civilians. Many of its senior figures had been indicted before their deaths by the International Criminal Court (ICC). The State of Israel, like all sovereign nations, possesses the inalienable right to defend itself. Yet this right does not, and must not, extend to the perpetration of war crimes or crimes against humanity. Those Israeli officials and military personnel accused of such offences have likewise been subject to ICC indictment. As State Parties to the Rome Statute, all European Union member states are legally bound to uphold the authority and impartiality of the Court, irrespective of the political sensitivity of its findings. International humanitarian law must be applied consistently, without favour or exception. All violations, whether committed by state or non-state actors, must be rigorously investigated and prosecuted. Impunity, in any form, corrodes the foundations of international order. Advertisement A reversion to the political and territorial status quo ante of October 2023 offers no sustainable path to peace. A just and enduring resolution to this conflict demands the creation of a viable, sovereign Palestinian state, living in peace and security alongside Israel. As an essential step toward reviving a credible peace process, we call upon all European governments that have not yet done so to extend formal recognition to the State of Palestine. Such recognition would not only affirm the Palestinian people's right to self-determination but also serve as a catalyst for renewed diplomacy. Europe must work in close partnership with its Arab neighbours and international allies to reconstitute a political process capable of delivering a two-state solution founded on justice, equality, and mutual recognition. An apartheid-like regime in the region, one that systematically denies equal rights on the basis of ethnicity or religion, is neither morally tenable nor politically sustainable. In the event that a two-state solution proves unattainable, the only acceptable alternative is the establishment of a single democratic, secular state in which all citizens, irrespective of faith or ethnicity, enjoy equal rights, protections, and responsibilities. The gravity of this moment calls for principled leadership and unflinching resolve. The European Union must rise to the occasion and act in defence of human dignity, international law, and the possibility of a just and lasting peace. Advertisement Signatories: Bertel Haarder – Minister of Education of Denmark (1982-94, 2007-10) Heidi Hautala – Minister for International Development of Finland (2011–13) Peter Hultqvist – Minister for Defence of Sweden (2014–22) Thorbjørn Jagland – Prime Minister of Norway (1996–97), Minister for Foreign Affairs (2000–01) Morgan Johansson - Minister for Justice of Sweden (2014-22) Martin Lidegaard – Minister for Foreign Affairs of Denmark (2014–15) Ann Linde – Minister for Foreign Affairs of Sweden (2019–22) Mogens Lykketoft – Minister for Foreign Affairs of Denmark (2000–01) Elisabeth Rehn – Minister of Defence of Finland (1990–95) Pertti Salolainen – Minister for Foreign Trade of Finland (1987–95) Pär Stenbäck – Minister of Education and Foreign Affairs of Finland (1979–83) Villy Søvndal – Minister for Foreign Affairs of Denmark (2011–13) Erkki Tuomioja – Minister for Foreign Affairs of Finland (2000–07, 2011–15)
Local Norway
19-05-2025
- Local Norway
After Brexit: What's at stake in the landmark UK-EU summit?
Here are the main issues at stake, with sensitive details still being thrashed out in hardball negotiations that are set to go down to the wire. One EU diplomat complained about the British attitude and suggested relations were a little strained in the run up to the summit. "They want everything and they're giving nothing," the diplomat told AFP, on condition of anonymity. Defence pact Both parties are hopeful of reaching agreement on a security deal as Europe races to rearm over fears about Russian aggression and that President Donald Trump is uncommitted to protecting the continent. The deal would allow Britain to attend certain ministerial meetings and take part in some European military initiatives and missions. It would also aim to further involve the British defence industry in European efforts to develop its own military industrial base, benefiting UK defence companies such as BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce. The deal could lead to London accessing a 150-billion-euro ($167-billion) defence fund being set up by the bloc although a further agreement would be needed to give Britain's defence industry full access to the EU programmes. Advertisement Fishing Discussions have been complicated by some EU countries, including France, working behind the scenes to link the signing of the defence partnership to the renewal of an agreement giving EU fishing boats access to British waters. EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas voiced confidence this week that fish quotas do not need to be agreed before penning the security deal. But negotiations on this point were heading for the eleventh hour, with EU diplomats yet to sign off on the compromise being drawn up by the European Commission. The current five-year fishing agreement expires in 2026. EU countries want the agreement rolled over, in return for slashing red tape for British food exports -- a key item on London's wish list. But Britain is understood to be offering four more years of access to its waters, less than hoped for on the EU side -- which may seek to curtail the food checks deal as a result. Advertisement Standards Starmer has suggested the UK is ready for dynamic alignment with EU standards on food and agricultural products to ease trade between Britain and the bloc. The goal is to reduce the burdensome bureaucracy associated with inspecting different products, which hinders the smooth flow of goods. "I think that British people are proud of the high standards that we have, and we want to maintain those standards," the prime minister told the Guardian recently, referring to regulations mostly inherited from the EU. The newspaper also reported that he accepted that the European Court of Justice would be involved in resolving disputes. He pointed out that it already ensures the proper implementation of an existing agreement governing the control of goods between Northern Ireland, which is in the UK, and neighbouring Ireland, an EU country. Youth mobility This is the key last-minute sticking point along with fish. The EU last year proposed a scheme that would allow British and European 18- to 30-year-olds to study and work in the UK and vice versa. Starmer's Labour government initially rejected the idea but is now open to a possible controlled programme that does not increase the UK's net migration numbers. According to the Times newspaper, this could mean a "one in one out" policy that caps the number of participants. It would also be time-limited. Starmer is trying to cut immigration in the face of soaring support for arch-Eurosceptic Nigel Farage's anti-immigration Reform UK party, which made big gains in recent local elections. London is believed to have refused an EU request to lower university fees paid by EU students to align with the rate paid by their British counterparts.
