GE2025: Campaigning kicks into high gear following suspenseful Nomination Day
[SINGAPORE] From 11th-hour switcheroos to a shock walkover and even a historic four-cornered fight, Nomination Day on Wednesday (Apr 23) was riddled with suspense and surprises up to the very last minute, as Singaporeans were kept guessing about the final slates in several key battlegrounds for the May 3 general election (GE).
With the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) claiming victory in Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC via a walkover – the first since 2011 – a total of 92 out of 97 seats across 33 constituencies will be contested, with 206 candidates in the race.
Arguably the biggest surprise stemmed from Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong's move to lead the PAP team in Punggol GRC, having helmed Chua Chu Kang GRC since 2011.
His move is reminiscent of Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat's last-minute switch to anchor East Coast GRC in 2020, to fend off the challenge from the Workers' Party (WP).
Taking DPM Gan's place in Chua Chu Kang GRC is Manpower Minister Tan See Leng, who had said earlier that he would anchor the party's Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC slate.
Ahead of Nomination Day, there was some speculation that Punggol GRC could be helmed by Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean, after he said he was not contesting in Pasir Ris-Changi GRC. DPM Heng was also widely expected to defend East Coast GRC or be redeployed to Punggol GRC.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Instead, as Nomination Day proceedings drew to a close at noon, it became clear that SM Teo and DPM Heng were not going to be fielded anywhere. Their departure from politics – after 33 years and 14 years, respectively – brings the number of retiring political officeholders to six.
Speaking to reporters on Wednesday afternoon, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong explained the thinking behind the redeployments, noting that he moved DPM Gan to Punggol as it was 'really not easy to find a senior office-holder of a similar stature' to take over from SM Teo.
With PM Wong in the west in Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC and Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong in central Singapore's Ang Mo Kio GRC, the prime minister said: 'That's a better distribution of our senior leadership for the campaign. If we are elected, that's also a better spread of leadership to make sure that we can cover the whole of Singapore.'
Asked how he thinks voters will take to the PAP's strategy of redeploying ministers at the last minute, PM Wong said this was not the first time this has been done, and that preparing for an election was 'always a dynamic matter' with many moving parts.
'We try our best not to have too many movements, but from time to time, we have to make some of these, and we have done so in this election,' he said.
With the Workers' Party not contesting as expected in Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC, the PAP team of Speaker of Parliament Seah Kian Peng, Minister of State Faishal Ibrahim, three-term MP Tin Pei Ling as well as first-time candidates Goh Pei Ming and Diana Pang were declared elected.
At about 1pm, WP secretary-general Pritam Singh wrote on Facebook that his party had decided not to deploy a team in Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC, given its limited resources, particularly after the electoral boundaries were redrawn. The leading opposition party ended up fielding 26 candidates in eight constituencies.
Over in Tampines GRC, a historic four-cornered fight is taking shape – the first for a group representation constituency in a GE – involving the PAP, WP, National Solidarity Party (NSP) and People's Power Party.
WP expects tough fight
Shortly after Nomination Day proceedings, Singh told reporters outside Poi Ching School, one of the nine nomination centres, that he expects the GE to be a 'tough fight' for the WP, even if last-minute changes to the PAP's line-up were to be expected.
'We expected this because it is no coincidence to me, at least, that areas WP would likely contest were reserved to the end, when the PAP were making their announcements,' he said.
Workers' Party chief Pritam Singh speaking to the press outside the Poi Ching School nomination centre after Nomination Day proceedings. PHOTO: REUTERS
Asked if WP had made a miscalculation by not contesting in Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC, and is instead facing a four-cornered showdown in Tampines GRC, Singh said: 'It's not a case as if everyone knew in advance that the PAP would field the slate (in Marine Parade GRC).'
'I'm not going to say it's a weakened slate because there's no such thing as weak candidates,' he said. 'I'm sure they were watching where we were going, but this is what we've decided to do.'
Singh is helming WP's Aljunied GRC team again with two new faces – lawyer Fadli Fawzi, who was fielded in Marine Parade GRC in GE2020, and AI startup founder Kenneth Tiong. This put to rest earlier speculation that Singh would move elsewhere, given that the Aljunied has been a WP stronghold since 2011.
Instead, Aljunied MP Faisal Manap, who made his political debut in 2011, is leading WP's team that includes four first-timers in Tampines GRC.
Senior counsel Harpreet Singh, touted as WP's 'star catch', will go head-to-head with DPM Gan in Punggol GRC.
Meanwhile, WP's Andre Low, a former disputes lawyer, will square off against the PAP's Ng Chee Meng in the newly carved out Jalan Kayu SMC, where the labour chief is hoping to stage a political comeback after losing in Sengkang GRC in GE2020.
Other key battlegrounds to watch
Another key constituency to watch is West Coast-Jurong West GRC, where the PAP and Progress Singapore Party (PSP) are set for a rematch.
Minister for National Development Desmond Lee leads the PAP team consisting of Senior Parliamentary Secretary Shawn Huang, three-term MP Ang Wei Neng and two first-timers – orthopaedic surgeon Hamid Razak and lawyer Cassandra Lee.
Their opponent is PSP's A-team, comprising its top three leaders – former PAP MP Tan Cheng Bock, secretary-general Leong Mun Wai and vice-chair Hazel Poa – as well as two newcomers Sani Ismail, who runs a condo management firm, and Sumarleki Amjah, who heads business development in a multinational firm.
PSP's A-team comprising its top three leaders is set for a rematch with the PAP in West Coast-Jurong West GRC. PHOTO: MARK CHEONG, ST
In an address to supporters at the Nan Hua High School nomination centre, Leong challenged Desmond Lee to a debate on policies, saying this would help voters decide who has better ideas.
He later told reporters that the PSP was willing to accept the debate in any form and on any topic.
In total, PSP is fielding 15 candidates across six wards – two of which are group representation constituencies.
Responding to PSP's challenge, Desmond Lee said 'there are platforms during GE for political parties to debate policies'.
He said his team has put out 'detailed proposals and local plans to benefit residents', adding that PSP should do the same.
Up north, Sembawang GRC is one of four constituencies facing a three-cornered battle.
The PAP team led by Health Minister Ong Ye Kung will jostle with the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) team led by party vice-chairman Bryan Lim and the NSP team led by party chief Spencer Ng.
In the neighbouring Sembawang West SMC, PAP backbencher Poh Li San will defend her turf against SDP secretary-general Chee Soon Juan.
Soon after the Nomination Day proceedings were over, all the candidates wasted no time hitting the trail as the nine-day campaign kicked off.
With campaigning now in full swing, all eyes will be on the return of physical rallies for the first time in a decade. Such rallies were not allowed in GE2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic at the time.
The police on Wednesday released a list of 51 designated rally sites that parties can make use of from Apr 24 to May 1.
Among them are two venues earmarked for lunchtime rallies – in the promenade area beside UOB Plaza, and The Lawn at Marina Bay.
Separately, all political parties that have fielded at least six candidates are eligible for two party political broadcasts that will be aired on national TV on Apr 25 and May 1.
For more election coverage, visit our GE2025 microsite.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Forum: What about a safety net for local students wanting a place in university?
I was heartened to learn that our Government is extending support to the 151 Singaporean students at Harvard (S'porean undergrads at Harvard can continue studies in universities here, June 6). I am sure the Government will similarly extend support to Singaporean students at other elite US universities if the situation deteriorates there. I sympathise with the Singaporeans studying at Harvard, but I wonder if the message is that our local universities do in fact have the capacity to take in more local students. Or is it that our local universities will reduce the number of places available to local students, to accommodate the returning US students? Many local students do not have the financial resources to seek an overseas education, and universities at home are their only option. But due to limited capacity, not every eligible applicant is accepted. So, I was surprised to learn that local universities are able to accommodate the affected Singapore students at Harvard. Wouldn't this be at the expense of eligible local applicants? Finally, these Ivy League students no doubt have the ability and resources to study in the US. They took the decision to study abroad willingly. In the face of adversity, is our Government expected to offer a safety net back home? What about a safety net for local students? Roy Tan Choon Kang More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
11 hours ago
- CNA
Singaporeans living in Los Angeles take extra precautions amid immigration protests
Some Singaporeans living in Los Angeles say they are taking extra precautions, like avoiding downtown LA, as US immigration protests enter the fourth day. They tell CNA that the Singapore embassy has also not issued any warnings or advisory notes, as the bulk of the Singaporean community who are still there feel relatively safe.
Straits Times
3 days ago
- Straits Times
Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far?
An art installation at the Padang. Vocal naysayers recently accused the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. PHOTO: ST FILE Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far? SINGAPORE – At a time when most people understand that the personal is political, individual views have become a battleground of virtue – equality, good; hierarchy, bad. Elitism? The worst possible kind of social evil. Yet, take a step back from this instinctive repulsion and there might be benefits to muddying the waters. Elitism, the belief that an elite group, however defined, should be entitled to the reins of power has been the norm throughout much of history. Whether it is the clergy, kings with their divine right, the Confucian scholar or today's fintech bros, there have been groups in each time period that societies tend to value and reward. It was only with increasing democratisation, and a growing disenfranchisement at the chasm between the top and the rest, that elitism has become a byword for undeserved privilege and gross injustice. This brief trip back in time is not to rehabilitate elitism, but to show that the current period against it – or at least one that pays lip service to not believing in an elite class – may be an aberrant one. In the West, this has been taken to extremes, manifesting in a debilitating disregard fo r e xperts and fatal results during the Covid-19 pandemic against the advice of doctors to vaccinate. In Singapore, it is the elite schools that are targeted, in the idealistic slogan that every school is a good school. Though, for perplexing reasons, this scepticism has not yet been extended to the natural reverence the majority of Singaporeans harbour for lawyers and doctors. Their expertise is assumed to be universally applicable – a mentality that has narrowed parents and students' conception of what success looks like. In any case, the ills of elitism have been thoroughly aired, including the type of entitled, discompassionate divas that it ends up producing. The very consensus of who deserves to be elite has also fractured. I wonder, though, if this enmity has led to some unexpected side effects. This is a train of thought sparked by recent reactions to the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative set out during the Budget statement in 2025. Self-sabotage Under the scheme, $100 would be given t o Si ngaporeans aged 18 and above for the consumption of the local arts, redeemable from September. One would expect rejoicing, but there was uproar from a group of vocal naysayers. They accused the credits of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. Why? Because the money could be better spent on support for groceries. This, I thought, was a case of anti-elitism as self-sabotage. Central to this worldview was that the arts is an elitist activity patronised only by the rich and the hyper-educated aesthete, when one type of activity for the elite and one for the others is exactly the sort of segregation and self-limiting mentality that perpetuates divides. There was no sense that this $100 in credits was a way of making the perceived barrier more permeable. To put it in context, the Government also announced $800 in CDC vouchers. This was bread for all, and roses too. Yet another potentially problematic by-product is that the word 'elite' has since been tainted by association. No one dares lay claim to the word 'elite', or acknowledge that someone else may be elite in his or her field. The rare exemption is perhaps in sports, where athletes accept the cut-throat nature of their competition, and where non-athletes are so tangibly outside their league that there is no point in pretending otherwise. This is not in itself a problem – elite is after all just a word – though I find no easy replacement term that can immediately convey excellence to the same degree. But it incidentally comes at a time when there is a general reluctance to impose any kind of objective standard, supplemented by that compassionate but useless invention: the consolation prize. This applies to things: Is no one taste now better than another? As well as people, where so many takes on social media are considered equally valid, measured just by virality. It is the kind of ChatGPT mentality where how often something is repeated or the number of clicks on a website can influence results, with no regard to its truth value. The war against elitism may have come at the expense of standards and good sense. Reclaiming elite This impulse to drag discourse to the same level – usually downwards – has the right intentions, timely given that, for so long, highly selective elitist standards have been imposed as objective metrics. To right the ship so discourse is levelled upwards though, perhaps elite can be thought of as separate from elitism, rehabilitated without the corresponding concentration of resources and power. This should be expanded so that who is elite becomes not just about education but also because of other qualities – role models people can aspire to in different contexts. What constitutes an elite has always been reliant on man-made barometers, negotiated by the community. There should be no shame in aspiring to be elite. Anti-elitism should not mean an absence of the elite, but that all who put their heart and minds to it should have a fair shot at claiming its pedigree, or getting closer to it. It is a lifelong dusting off of mediocrity, and it begins with first recognising what is good. Hear Me Out is a new series where young journalists (over)share on topics ranging from navigating friendships to self-loathing, and the occasional intrusive thought. Check out the Headstart chatbot for answers to your questions on careers and work trends.
