UK to ban ‘sim farms' used by scammers to send mass fraud messages
Sim farm devices capable of holding multiple sim cards enabling scammers to send thousands of scam text messages at once are to be banned under plans to crack down on fraud.
The ban, the first of its kind in Europe, will make the possession or supply of the devices without good reason illegal, with unlimited fines in England and Wales and a £5,000 fine in Scotland and Northern Ireland.
The Government said the devices are used by criminals to hold multiple sim cards, which as well as allowing scammers to send out thousands of messages to people at the same time, can also be used to create verified accounts on social media and other platforms in large volumes.
The Home Office said recent data showed fraud had increased last year by 19%, and now accounts for more than 40% of all reported crime in England and Wales.
Fraud minister Lord Hanson said: 'Fraud devastates lives, and I am determined to take the decisive action necessary to protect the public from these shameful criminals.
'Two-thirds of British adults say they've received a suspicious message on their phone – equivalent to more than 35 million people – which is why cracking down on sim farms is so vital to protecting the public.
'This marks a leap forward in our fight against fraud and will provide law enforcement and industry partners with the clarity they need to protect the public from this shameful crime.
'This Government will continue to take robust action to protect the public from fraud and deliver security and resilience through the Plan for Change.'
Nick Sharp, deputy director for fraud at the National Crime Agency (NCA), said: 'Fraud is the crime we are all most likely to experience, and one that causes victims significant emotional and financial harm.
'We know that fraud at scale is being facilitated by sim farms, which give criminals a means and an opportunity to contact victims at scale with relative ease.
'The ban announced today is very welcome. It will give us a vital tool to step up our fight against fraudsters, target the services they rely on, and better protect the public.'
The Government said the new ban will come into effect six months after the Crime and Policing Bill receives royal assent.
Scam text messages have become an increasingly common problem in recent years, with mobile operators regularly introducing new technology to help spot and block them before they reach the public.
Rachel Andrews, head of corporate security at Vodafone UK, said the ban on sim farms was an 'important step' in preventing fraud.
'Vodafone UK is committed to protecting all our customers from fraud, including activity enabled by sim farms,' she said.
'So far this year we have blocked over 38.5 million suspected scam messages, and in 2024 that figure reached over 73.5 million for the year.
'As an industry, UK telecoms operators have blocked more than one billion suspected scam messages since 2023.
'However, we cannot fully tackle fraud in isolation; collaboration between industry and government is crucial.
'This is a really important step taken by the Home Office and we fully support the inclusion of sim farms in the upcoming legislation.
'We look forward to working together on this issue.'
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'We welcome this move but let's not pretend Labour led the charge. This builds directly on the work the Conservatives did last year to crack down on sim farms through the Criminal Justice Bill.
'These devices are the weapon of choice for fraudsters. We acted to close that loophole, and it's right that Labour are finally scrambling to catch up.
'Enforcement is now key, as criminals will always look for new ways to abuse the system. Ministers must ensure this legislation is watertight, or it risks being a ban in name only.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
33 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Two-bedroom cottage with picturesque river views hits market for just £1… but closer look reveals exactly why
It could be the perfect love nest - but there's just one big problem DOER-UPPER Two-bedroom cottage with picturesque river views hits market for just £1… but closer look reveals exactly why A DOER-upper called Love Cottage is on sale for a bargain price - but is hiding a grim secret. The two-bed home - which boasts picturesque river views - is listed with a starting price of just £1 as it goes up for auction, though needs a lot of work. Advertisement 7 The exterior and garden area at Love Cottage is completely overgrown Credit: SWNS 7 The view of Pembroke Dock from the property is picturesque Credit: SWNS 7 The interior also needs plenty of TLC Credit: SWNS The property in Pembroke Dock, Pembrokeshire, requires a total revamp - but could be the perfect love nest. It could work as a holiday let, long-term rental or renovation project for a keen developer. Sean Roper, of Paul Fosh Auctions, said: 'The mid-terraced property has certainly seen much better days. "But there is plenty of scope presented by what is there and added to that the property has a very large garden which could also be exploited and an auction guide price of just £1!" Advertisement He went on to say the expansive garden extends down the rear of Meyrick Street, offering "a number of development opportunities" subject to planning permission. 'The first could be to renovate and refurbish to a high standard for holiday lets due to its proximity to many of Pembrokeshire top tourist areas," said Mr Roper. "Typically, a refurbished two-bedroom cottage would generate in the region of 28k per annum net as a holiday let. "A second option could be to renovate and refurbish to a high standard as a long term let." Advertisement Mr Roper said demand could be high for a refurbished property like this is marketed to young professionals and local workers - with the potential for £900pcm in rent. Another option would be to do it up and sell it for up to an estimated £185,000 or sell the garden space. "Parcels of land could be sold to individual houses along Meyrick Street and then retain the house with a portion of the remaining garden space," explained Mr Roper. The cottage sits close to the main shopping area of Pembroke Dock, with good links to the A40, while there is also a nearby rail station and the A477 provides access to the heart of Milford Haven Centre. Advertisement Bwthyn Cariad is one of some 80 plus lots which will be sold online at Paul Fosh Auctions which starts at midday on June 24 and ends from 5pm on June 26. Nine British beauty spots where you can buy your dream home for 30% less than the asking price By Sam Walker BUYERS in nine areas around the UK could get their dream home for hundreds of thousands of pounds cheaper than the asking price. New data has revealed the British beauty spots where average property sales prices are much lower than average listing prices. House prices have surged across the UK to reach record highs in recent months with affordability still a major challenge for many buyers. But those looking to purchase in nine postcodes can bag some major bargains, according to data from house buying company Upstix. In Salcombe and Lincombe, Devon, buyers can shave 14.69% off the average listed price of a property. The average price of homes there is £842,271, but the average actual sale price is £718,514 - a £123,757 difference. In North Sunderland in the north east of England, and the county of Cumbria, buyers face paying £317,612 for a typical property, despite the average listed price being £450,995 - a 29.58% or £133,383 difference. Meanwhile, in Ellesmere and Cockshutt in the West Midlands, the average listed price of homes is £372,531. However, the average sales price in the same areas is £297,477 - a 20.15% or £75,054 bargain. Unsurprisingly, buyers in London could save the most in cash terms when looking at house sales prices versus listed prices. Properties in the capital city list for an average of £1,503,674, but sell for £1,303,664 - a more than £200,000 gap and 13.30% drop off. The data from Upstix also reveals that buyers face vast disparities between listed prices and actual house prices across postcodes in the East of England, East Midlands and South East England. Buyers in places such as Woodbridge and Rendlesham in Suffolk could bag up to 16.29% off on house prices in these spots, saving potentially £80,261. In postcodes covering Oakham and Cottesmore in the East Midlands savings of 12.72% can be made, while in the south east Mayfield and Five Ashes in East Sussex buyers can grab an 11.40% saving. Click here to read more. 7 The derelict cottage could be flipped and sold for a profit Credit: SWNS 7 It's been left to go to ruin Credit: SWNS 7 But with a guide price of just £1 - it could be worth it Credit: SWNS Advertisement
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Cuts to BBC World Service funding would ‘make us less safe', MPs tell ministers
Hours before Rachel Reeves stood up to deliver her budget last year, government officials were still in tense negotiations with bosses at the BBC over how much the World Service would be given. The amount they were haggling over was relatively small – just £5.5m out of a total budget of £400m. But BBC chiefs warned the government that if the cuts were imposed on them, they would have to close several language stations in parts of the world where the Russians already hold influence. Doing so would be a gift to Moscow, they added. The argument worked, and the BBC got the extra cash it was asking for. But executives at the corporation worry that their appeal to Britain's soft power might not prove so effective this time, especially in light of the government's recent cuts to the aid budget. 'The government is asking the World Service to model cuts that would definitely mean having to close important parts of the service,' said one person familiar with the negotiations. 'The BBC's lobbying worked last time, but this round is proving harder.' The Guardian recently revealed the government had asked the World Service to model two scenarios: one where their funding remains the same in cash terms; and one where it would be cut by 2% each year in cash terms. Each scenario would see the budget fall behind inflation, and could mean it ends up to £70m short of what its bosses believe it needs. Jonathan Munro, the global director of the BBC, said: 'When it comes to international impact and influence, the BBC World Service is the UK's most powerful asset. 'While we currently deliver news in 42 languages to over 400m people every week, at the greatest value for money compared to other international news providers, we are ambitious about going further to provide independent news where there is a vital need.' The service is just one institution promoting Britain's soft power abroad, but it is arguably the most powerful, reaching 450m people a week, according to the broadcaster's own figures. When pollsters asked people from around the world about various British exports and organisations, the BBC came out well ahead of any other, with nearly 80% having heard of it and nearly 50% saying it made them feel more positively about the UK. In comparison, only about 55% had heard of the monarchy, and only 25% said it made them view the UK more favourably. According to the same research, which the BBC commissioned, the organisation is also the most trusted of any global news outlet, ahead of CNN, Al Jazeera and Sky News. Jonathan McClory, the managing partner at Sanctuary Counsel and an expert on soft power, said: 'It's a gratuitous accident of history that we have the BBC World Service. You couldn't recreate it if you were starting from scratch, but it enables us to shape a global information landscape and promote British values, such as a free press, transparency and broad support for human rights.' Ministers say they understand this. Jenny Chapman, the international development minister, told the Guardian: 'The World Service do tremendous work, work that nobody else can do … They are soft power, an absolute gold standard resource. We respect that.' But supporters of the organisation fear that budgetary pressure has left its influence on the wane. In 2014, the coalition government stopped funding the world service, leaving the BBC to pay for it purely out of the licence fee. Two years later the government restored some direct funding, which was ringfenced for certain language services, but at a much lower level. Most of the service's £400m budget still comes from licence fee money – a situation the director general, Tim Davie, has warned is not sustainable, especially when domestic operations are being cut. Both scenarios that the government has asked BBC bosses to draw up for the World Service would involve closing certain parts of it. While it will not shut down operations in entire countries, BBC insiders say they are likely to have to close certain foreign language services where there are relatively few people who speak that language. Those services in places close to Russia – which corporation bosses warned last year would be closed if more money was not forthcoming – are once more on the chopping block. The problem with closing operations, even those with relatively small audiences, is that it can give Russia and China a perfect opportunity to push their own propaganda. When the BBC ended its long-wave BBC Arabic radio service in Lebanon, for example, Russian-backed media took over that exact frequency and began broadcasting on it instead. And on the day that thousands of pagers used by Hezbollah all simultaneously exploded in Lebanon, BBC monitors said they picked up what Davie later called 'unchallenged [Russian] propaganda' on that station. The BBC's research has found that its trust level was largely unchanged from four years ago at 78%. Trust in both Russia Today and China Global Television Network had jumped however, from 59% to 71% and from 62% to 70%, respectively. Last week Caroline Dinenage, the Conservative chair of the culture, media and sport select committee, wrote to cabinet ministers warning: 'Without sufficient resources, it could lead to more situations where the world service withdraws or reduces its services and Russian state media fills the vacuum, as in Lebanon. 'Ahead of the spending review, I invite you to reassure us that the government is not seeking to make a 2% cut to its funding of the World Service, at a time when it is vital to our strategic priorities, and that the government will not require cuts that will lead to the BBC having to close one or more language services.' Such arguments have worked with Reeves and her officials in the past. But the chancellor is hemmed in like never before, having already promised major funding increases for defence, the health service and local transport. Dinenage said: 'Ministers have told us that the world service bolsters UK security. Cutting its funding now would undoubtably make us all less safe.' A Foreign Office spokesperson said: 'Despite a tough fiscal situation, we continue to back the World Service, providing a large uplift of £32.6m this year alone, taking our total funding to £137m. 'The work they do as an independent and trusted broadcaster is highly valued by this government, as our continued financial support shows.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Justice Jackson warns Supreme Court is sending a 'troubling message'
"It is particularly startling to think that grants of relief in these circumstances might be (unintentionally) conveying not only preferential treatment for the Government but also a willingness to undercut both our lower court colleagues' well-reasoned interim judgments and the well-established constraints of law that they are in the process of enforcing," Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote. Jackson was dissenting from the conservative majority's decision to give Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency complete access to the data of millions of Americans kept by the U.S. Social Security Administration. Once again, she wrote in a dissent joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, "this Court dons its emergency responder gear, rushes to the scene, and uses its equitable power to fan the flames rather than extinguish them." A district judge had blocked DOGE's access to "personally identifiable information" while assessing if that access is legal. Jackson said a majority of the court didn't require the administration to show it would be "irreparably harmed" by not getting immediate access, one of the legal standards for intervention. "It says, in essence, that although other stay applicants must point to more than the annoyance of compliance with lower court orders they don't like," she wrote, "the Government can approach the courtroom bar with nothing more than that and obtain relief from this Court nevertheless." A clock, a mural, a petition: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's chambers tell her story In a brief and unsigned decision, the majority said it weighed the "irreparable harm" factor along with the other required considerations of what's in the public interest and whether the courts are likely to ultimately decide that DOGE can get at the data. But the majority did not explain how they did so. Jackson said the court `plainly botched' its evaluation of a Trump appeal Jackson raised a similar complaint when the court on May 30 said the administration can revoke the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans living in the United States. Jackson wrote that the court "plainly botched" its assessment of whether the government or the approximately 530,000 migrants would suffer the greater harm if their legal status ends while the administration's mass termination of that status is being litigated. Jackson said the majority undervalued "the devastating consequences of allowing the Government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending." The majority did not offer an explanation for its decision. More Supreme Court wins for Trump In addition to those interventions, the Supreme Court recently blocked a judge's order requiring DOGE to disclose information about its operations, declined to reinstate independent agency board members fired by Trump, allowed Trump to strip legal protections from 350,000 Venezuelans and said the president can enforce his ban on transgender people serving in the military. Jackson disagreed with all of those decisions. The court's two other liberal justices - Sotomayor and Elena Kagan - disagreed with most of them. More: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson can throw a punch. Literally. The court did hand Trump a setback in May when it barred the administration from quickly resuming deportations of Venezuelans under a 1798 wartime law. Two of the court's six conservative justices - Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito - dissented. Decisions are expected in the coming weeks on other Trump emergency requests, including whether the president can dismantle the Education Department and can enforce his changes to birthright citizenship.
