Philippines to probe claims of sand dredging for Beijing's South China Sea expansion
The Philippines is investigating claims that sand dredged from its coastal waters has been used in China's artificial island construction in disputed parts of the South China Sea , raising concerns over domestic complicity, ecological damage and national security.
Advertisement
President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr has ordered a full inquiry into the allegations following testimony in a Senate hearing on Wednesday, where a top intelligence official said sand from Manila Bay and other areas might have ended up as landfill for Chinese military outposts.
Ashley Acedillo, deputy director general of the National Intelligence Coordinating Agency (NICA), told senators that Chinese-linked reclamation and dredging activities had happened in several parts of the country, including the Cagayan province.
'There were earlier reports that sand taken directly from our coastal areas was being used as landfill, reportedly even in some of our disputed territories,' Acedillo said during a hearing of a Senate special committee on Philippine maritime and admiralty zones.
While no conclusive evidence has been presented, the intelligence agency is examining whether sand from Philippine sources was exported to support Beijing's reclamation efforts, which have transformed the maritime landscape of the South China Sea over the past decade.
Advertisement
Press Secretary Claire Castro confirmed the president's directive, saying the investigation would examine any wrongdoing by local officials.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
17 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Philippine senators face mounting pressure over delays to VP Duterte's impeachment trial
Mounting calls from legal scholars, civil society and protest groups are putting the Philippine Senate under pressure to launch an impeachment trial against Vice-President Sara Duterte-Carpio – even as her allies move to have the case dismissed. The House of Representatives transmitted the Verified Complaint for Impeachment to the Senate on February 7 – just before the 19th Congress adjourned ahead of midterm election campaigning – triggering a constitutional requirement for the upper chamber to convene as an impeachment court 'forthwith'. However, Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero has repeatedly delayed proceedings, citing scheduling constraints and the need to tackle priority legislation first. The Senate resumed session on June 2, but Escudero has said the impeachment trial will only begin on Wednesday, just days before Congress again goes into final recess on Friday. That would leave the trial to be resumed, if at all, by the incoming 20th Congress in late July. 02:02 Philippine VP Sara Duterte to fight impeachment case in escalating clash with Marcos Jnr Philippine VP Sara Duterte to fight impeachment case in escalating clash with Marcos Jnr A lawyer by training, Escudero has drawn scrutiny for his interpretation of the constitutional term 'forthwith'. He told reporters it did not mean 'immediately' but rather 'within a reasonable period', arguing that if the framers of the 1987 Constitution had meant instant action, 'they should have used the word 'immediately''.
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
South China Sea: Beijing's 4 core principles held up as route to peace in disputed waters
A state-backed think tank has put forward China's 'four core principles' as a constructive framework for addressing disputes in the South China Sea , while blaming regional tensions on external actors who fuel rival claimants' actions and weaken the 'willingness for maritime cooperation'. 'China has long been committed to managing tensions and differences with disputing parties, and exercising great restraint in disputes', Xinhua Institute, a think tank affiliated with state news agency Xinhua, said in a research report released on Sunday. China would uphold its four core principles, 'which have withstood the test of time' to transform the disputed waterway into a region of peace and cooperation, it added. According to the report, these principles are: resolving disputes through consultation on an equal footing, managing differences through rules-based co-management, achieving positive outcomes through mutually beneficial cooperation, and opposing interference from external forces while encouraging them to play a constructive role. China formally presented its blueprint for cooperation in the South China Sea in 2002 through an agreement with Asean. Beijing's expansive claims over the busy, resource-rich waters are contested by several member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, including Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines, a US treaty ally. Since 2023, face-offs between Chinese and Philippine vessels in disputed waters have become more frequent, particularly near Scarborough Shoal, Second Thomas Shoal and, most recently, the Sandy Cay coral reef.
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
Not much substance to the Philippines' cabinet reshuffle
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at letters@ or filling in this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr recently called for the resignation of all cabinet secretaries after his party's poor performance in the midterm election. What does this say about his leadership? In the Philippine system, legislators and cabinet secretaries occupy two very distinct spheres. Legislators are elected by popular vote, in a test of public sentiment or campaign strength. These factors are outside the control of cabinet secretaries, who are appointed by the president based on trust. Legislators craft and pass laws. Cabinet secretaries implement laws and advise the president on matters related to their department. Using electoral outcomes to evaluate appointed officials risks blurring the line between the two spheres. It suggests their work should somehow influence voter sentiment, when they should be focused on delivering effective policy outcomes and building institutions that outlast terms of office. Certainly, the midterm election could be a measure of a president's popularity. But it is not an appropriate metric for assessing those who are not elected officials. If Marcos' intention is to bring about change without having to name underperformers, the gesture comes across more as a display of power. It avoids the more difficult job of sifting through details to address the root causes of problems and coming up with targeted solutions.
