Gangster Chhota Rajan acquitted in 21-year-old case
MUMBAI: With a key witness admitting that he was uncertain about the identity of the person who made calls about threats, a special CBI court this week acquitted gangster Chhota Rajan in a
21-year-old case
where he is accused of ordering the violent closure of a construction site after a builder did not pay his dues to certain other businessman.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
It was alleged that the builder's accountant escaped with injuries after the goons hired at Rajan's behest opened fire.
Judge AM Patil said, "In the present case in hand, it was the duty of the prosecution to establish how the present accused is connected with the other accused and when he entered into such conspiracy. But, they failed to prove the same. It can be said that the prosecution has failed to prove the guilt of the accused."
Rajan (69) will continue to remain in jail as he is serving a life sentence for the 2011 murder of journalist J Dey. The 2004 case against Rajan and others was among the 71 cases that were transferred to CBI after he was deported from Bali in 2015. The injured victim Prakash More, was among the 23 witnesses cited by the prosecution. More revealed that in 2004, he was employed as an accountant at the premises of M/s Shelter Maker India Private Limited, an entity owned by Nandkumar Harchandani, situated at Manjarekar Wadi, Teli Galli, Andheri (East), where development activities were in progress.
He further submitted that on Sept 16, 2004, between 10.15am and 10.30am, while present on duty , a group of approximately six to seven individuals forcibly entered the office. Two members of this groupexclaimed in Hindi, "The boss told you to stop work, didn't he?"
He further deposed that upon his denial of any knowledge, one of the individuals discharged the firearm; however, he evaded the bullet. The remaining individuals present outside assaulted him.
Thereafter, he contacted Harchandani and narrated the incident.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
31 minutes ago
- NDTV
Ex-Tax Officer's Properties Worth Over Rs 7 Crore Attached In 'Disproportionate Assets' Case
Ghaziabad: The Special Judge of the Anti-Corruption CBI Court in Ghaziabad on June 2 issued an ad-interim order for the attachment of 14 immovable properties, worth over Rs 7 crore, belonging to the then Additional Commissioner of Income Tax in connection with an alleged Disproportionate Assets (DA) case, said a statement from CBI. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had registered the case on September 22, 2022, alleging that the officer, while serving in various capacities--Deputy Commissioner, Joint Commissioner, and Additional Commissioner--in Income Tax offices across New Delhi, Moradabad, Lucknow, and other locations between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2018, amassed disproportionate assets valued at Rs 7.52 crore, far exceeding his known sources of income. The probe revealed that the accused and his family members had acquired 14 immovable assets, estimated to be worth several crores. These properties are spread across Ghaziabad, Lucknow, Hardoi, Barabanki, and even Goa, the statement said. CBI officials confirmed that the investigation is still ongoing. A day ago in a separate case, CBI has recovered approximately 3.5 kg of gold, 2 kg of silver, valued at around Rs 3.5 crore and around Rs 1 crore in cash during searches at the premises of a senior Indian Revenue Service (IRS) officer in Delhi who was arrested recently for allegedly demanding Rs 45 lakh in bribe. The searches by the CBI led to the recovery of substantial assets and incriminating materials, including documents related to a bank locker and 25 bank accounts with various banks. The officials also recovered papers linked to immovable assets and properties in Delhi, Mumbai, and Punjab. The total valuation of the seized movable and immovable assets is still being assessed. The CBI has stated that the investigation is ongoing.
Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Kamal Haasan, and the Tamil vs Kannada over-reaction
The cacophony of outrage over Kamal Haasan's remark that Kannada was 'born out of Tamil' has reached an unseemly but not unexpected crescendo — it follows a pattern seen whenever the politics of language and the language of hurt sentiments are invoked. It has gone all the way to the Karnataka High Court, which advised Haasan to apologise and questioned his credentials to make such a statement, asking, 'Are you a historian, linguist?' But there are other pertinent questions, which the Court didn't ask: Is such escalation over a misinformed comment proportionate or justified? Does one need to be an expert, or even correct, to exercise the right to free speech? Is this an appropriate use of the state's time and resources? The fallout of Haasan's remark saw apologies demanded, protests held, effigies burnt, a police complaint filed, a state minister calling for a ban on screening the actor-politician's film Thug Life in Karnataka and the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce promptly obliging him. There is a history and a context to this mobilisation of linguistic grievance: In the present, it is exacerbated by growing resentment over the presence of people from other states, particularly Hindi speakers. Alongside this is an older anxiety over the dominance of Tamil speakers in Bengaluru, in the backdrop of the regional rivalry between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. Looming over it all, but sometimes unmentioned in the context of North-South and South-South tussles, is the shadow of English. All this — with parallels across multiple states, for instance in neighbouring Maharashtra — creates fertile ground for a politics of relentless prickliness that makes mountains out of molehills. It can lead to violence, and often has. Haasan is wrong about Kannada and Tamil, and appears to be ill-informed about the history of the Dravidian languages. One did not come from the other — the two are better characterised as sisters. He has refused to apologise. The question is not whether or not he's been wise. What's questionable is the clamour for an apology — it comes from a place of parochialism. What is needed, instead, is an imagination that is broad enough to accommodate the aspirations of regional and linguistic subnationalism and address people's legitimate concerns about the future of their mother tongues. Also needed is a self-confidence to engage fruitfully with an increasingly cosmopolitan reality. Political leaders could do worse than take a leaf out of Karnataka Deputy CM D K Shivakumar's book. In one of the most sensible responses to this controversy, he said, 'We are not enemies; we are all friends. I don't want to comment on it because I don't know the history of that issue.'
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
NDPS court allows Rhea Chakraborty to travel abroad for work
MUMBAI: A special court under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act has permitted actor Rhea Chakraborty to travel abroad for professional commitments between June 1 and September 15. Chakraborty, who was booked in a drugs case linked to the death of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, has been granted leave to visit Sri Lanka, Serbia, and various European countries to shoot for a new project. In an order dated May 29, Special Judge CS Datir noted that Chakraborty had previously travelled abroad with the court's permission and had complied fully with all bail conditions. 'There is no occasion that she had infringed the bail conditions,' the court observed. Chakraborty was arrested by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) on September 8, 2020, along with her brother and others, on allegations of financing and procuring drugs for Rajput's consumption. The case followed a complaint by Rajput's father, which led to a wider investigation into drug use within the film industry. The Bombay High Court granted Chakraborty bail in October 2020. In her recent application, Chakraborty stated that she was required to travel for the filming of Stepsons S1, an international production. She requested temporary release of her passport for visa processing, adding that she had travelled abroad earlier without incident. The prosecution opposed the plea, arguing that there was no documentation confirming her role in the series and raising concerns about the possibility of her absconding. However, the court rejected these concerns, stating that Chakraborty is a Mumbai resident with 'deep roots in society', and held that the likelihood of her fleeing is minimal. 'Considering her request and keeping in mind her past behaviour, I am inclined to allow her to travel abroad for the aforesaid period,' the court ruled. The actor has been directed to submit her travel itinerary, including addresses and contact details of her stay abroad. In March this year, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a closure report in the Sushant Singh Rajput death case, clearing Chakraborty of abetment charges. The CBI had taken over the probe from the Mumbai Police following Rajput's father's allegations.
