NATO head certain Trump committed to mutual defence
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte says he has no doubt US President Donald Trump is committed to the alliance's Article 5 mutual defence clause after remarks by US President Donald Trump on his way to a meeting of the military alliance.
Speaking to reporters en route to the summit in The Hague, Trump said there were "numerous" definitions of Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, which declares that an attack against one NATO member shall be considered an attack against all of them.
"I'm committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an exact definition when I get there," Trump said.
"You know, I've become friends with many of those leaders — and I'm committed to helping them," says @POTUS on NATO."By having a unified system, I think we're going to have stronger peace, better peace." pic.twitter.com/kuLKok0BJL— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 24, 2025
"I have no doubt that the US is totally committed to NATO, totally committed to Article 5," Rutte told reporters.
The two-day summit in the Netherlands is intended to signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin that NATO is united and determined to expand and upgrade its defences to deter any attack from Russia.
Trump also posted a screenshot of a message from Rutte congratulating him on his "decisive action in Iran" and getting all NATO allies to agree to spend more on defence.
pic.twitter.com/NIjnQbuwIJ— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 24, 2025
"Europe is going to pay in a BIG way as they should, and it will be your win," Rutte's message read, indicating the effort he has put into keeping on the right side of Trump and ensuring the summit is a success.
The summit and its final statement will be focused on heeding Trump's call to spend five per cent of GDP on defence - a significant jump from the current two per cent goal.
It is to be achieved both by spending more on military items and by including broader security-related spending in the new target.
The Kremlin accused NATO of being on a path of rampant militarisation and portraying Russia as a "fiend of hell" in order to justify its big increase in military spending.
Russia has cited its neighbour's desire to join the US-led transatlantic military alliance as one of the reasons why it invaded Ukraine in 2022.
NATO was founded by 12 countries in 1949 to resist the threat from the communist Soviet Union.
Russia denies any plan to attack the alliance, which now boasts 32 members, but Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said it was "largely a wasted effort" to assure the grouping of this because it was determined to demonise Russia.
"It is an alliance created for confrontation ... It is not an instrument of peace and stability," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
14 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
An axis of bystanders: Iran conflict reveals true nature of an alliance the West feared
If the Iranian regime survives the conflict with its sworn enemies, it will be no thanks to its powerful autocratic comrades, China and Russia. With a fragile ceasefire now holding after Israel and the United States launched strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, Tehran has emerged a more diminished and isolated figure on the international stage. Yet its supporters in Beijing and Moscow proved unwilling to come to its rescue – even as US President Donald Trump and his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu mused openly about regime change. If Russia's invasion of Ukraine gave rise to a so-called new axis of CRINK powers (China, Russia, Iran and North Korea) – as many western experts argued it had, pointing to the countries' varying levels of support for Moscow's war efforts – then the past 12 days have demonstrated its limits. This unofficial grouping, according to a theory popularised in Washington circles, represents an emerging 'axis of upheaval', coalescing around a shared ideological view of anti-US hegemony and is pursued through strengthening diplomatic, economic and military ties. Loading But when tested this month, the heavy hitters – China and Russia – offered only rhetorical support for Iran. In Beijing's case, those statements were particularly cautiously worded. An 'axis of resistance' became an 'axis of bystanders', as Tom Miller from consultancy firm Gavekal Research put it. With its resources tied up in Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin made it clear that no concrete support was coming from Moscow.
The Age
14 minutes ago
- The Age
An axis of bystanders: Iran conflict reveals true nature of an alliance the West feared
If the Iranian regime survives the conflict with its sworn enemies, it will be no thanks to its powerful autocratic comrades, China and Russia. With a fragile ceasefire now holding after Israel and the United States launched strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, Tehran has emerged a more diminished and isolated figure on the international stage. Yet its supporters in Beijing and Moscow proved unwilling to come to its rescue – even as US President Donald Trump and his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu mused openly about regime change. If Russia's invasion of Ukraine gave rise to a so-called new axis of CRINK powers (China, Russia, Iran and North Korea) – as many western experts argued it had, pointing to the countries' varying levels of support for Moscow's war efforts – then the past 12 days have demonstrated its limits. This unofficial grouping, according to a theory popularised in Washington circles, represents an emerging 'axis of upheaval', coalescing around a shared ideological view of anti-US hegemony and is pursued through strengthening diplomatic, economic and military ties. Loading But when tested this month, the heavy hitters – China and Russia – offered only rhetorical support for Iran. In Beijing's case, those statements were particularly cautiously worded. An 'axis of resistance' became an 'axis of bystanders', as Tom Miller from consultancy firm Gavekal Research put it. With its resources tied up in Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin made it clear that no concrete support was coming from Moscow.
Sky News AU
17 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Donald Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize over Israel-Iran cease-fire
President Trump was formally nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize on Tuesday for his efforts in securing the Israel-Iran cease-fire. In a letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) recommended Trump for the prestigious prize 'in recognition of his extraordinary and historic role in brokering an end to the armed conflict between Israel and Iran and preventing the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet.' 'President Trump's influence was instrumental in forging a swift agreement that many believed to be impossible,' added Carter, who has represented the Peach State's Savannah-based 1st District since 2015. 'His leadership at this moment exemplifies the very ideals that the Nobel Peace Prize seeks to recognize: the pursuit of peace, the prevention of war, and the advancement of international harmony. 'In a region plagued by historical animosity and political volatility, such a breakthrough demands both courage and clarity. President Trump demonstrated both, offering the world a rare glimpse of hope.' Trump, 79, on Monday evening announced a cease-fire between Iran and Israel — and proposed naming the conflict the '12 Day War' — just two days after ordering an unprecedented US attack on three Iranian nuclear sites in support of Israeli strikes. Members of national parliaments, university professors, and others can submit nominations for the award, though Trump has made clear he doesn't expect to win it. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do,' Trump wrote Friday on Truth Social after his administration helped broker a peace deal between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for this, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between Serbia and Kosovo.' In remarks to reporters, Trump noted the Abraham Accords of 2020, in which his administration brokered diplomatic relations between Israel and four Arab nations. 'I should have gotten it four or five times… They won't give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals,' he said. Three sitting presidents have won the Nobel Peace Prize, including Republican Teddy Roosevelt in 1906 for brokering a peace deal between Russia and Japan. The other two commanders-in-chief to win the prize were Democrats Woodrow Wilson (1919) and Barack Obama (2009), with the latter receiving the award fewer than nine months after he took office. 'Among the reasons it gave, the Nobel Committee lauded Obama for his 'extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples'. Emphasis was also given to his support — in word and deed — for the vision of a world free from nuclear weapons,' the peace prize's website says of the award. Obama's award drew criticism — including from Trump and fellow Republicans — as he presided over expansive US drone warfare, provided arms for bloody extremist-led rebellions in Libya and Syria and supported a $1 trillion plan to rebuild the US nuclear arsenal. Former President Jimmy Carter was honored in 2002 for 'decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts,' and former Vice President Al Gore scooped the prize in 2007 for popularizing public concern about climate change. Originally published as Donald Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize over Israel-Iran cease-fire
