‘Crucial' skills needs will not be met unless system changes, MSPs told
The skills needed to sustain and grow the Scottish economy will not be met unless changes to the system are made, industry leaders have told MSPs.
Holyrood's Economy and Fair Work Committee was told that businesses are being 'heard' but 'not being listened to' when it came to pleas for a better-skilled workforce.
Paul Sheerin, chief executive of Scottish Engineering, criticised the Scottish Government for 'smashing' the work of Skills Development Scotland (SDS) into the Scottish Funding Council (SFC).
Ministers previously announced that responsibility for providing national training programmes, including apprenticeships, will move from SDS to the SFC.
But Mr Sheerin warned that would mean efforts to fix the 'worsening' issue of a 'skills crisis' in Scotland could stall as 'our eye is off the ball' during the transition.
Asked if he had confidence Scotland would meet its current need for skills, he said: 'On the current path? No.'
Paul Campbell, employer engagement group chairman at the Scottish Apprenticeship Advisory Board, also said he was 'not convinced' the current system would deliver the skills the country needs.
Asked if businesses were able to influence policy around skills, Mr Sheeran said the 'current landscape for skills reforms' is 'unclear to industry'.
He said: 'I think today they would say that their views might be heard, but they're not being listened to, and they're certainly not being acted on.
'From all of the feedback consultation that we've put in since the start of this Skills Review I don't think I can point to any one thing where there's been an action which has reflected the input from industry, and that's a great cause of frustration.'
Scottish Financial Enterprise chief executive Sandy Begbie, who also appeared before the committee, said 'supply and demand' for skills and jobs was not being met in Scotland.
He said his industry had been 'calling out for skills for years', calls which he said had become even greater following the Covid pandemic.
He told the committee: 'I've always viewed this as a supply and demand, almost, equation. The supply and demand are not aligned at the moment.'
He called for the Scottish Government to come up with a clear vision for skills in Scotland that would provide 'clarity' to businesses and education.
'I think that direction is hugely important and it's not what we have at the moment,' he said.
Jack Norquoy, director of public affairs and communications for Scottish Renewables, said the need for skills was crucial to the energy industry, as well as the wider economy.
He said: 'Industry is willing to play our part, but we do hit the challenge when it comes to the public sector, in terms of apprenticeships, in terms of our colleges as well, who are absolutely key at this.'
Mr Norquoy said skills were the 'key barrier' to business but also the 'key opportunity' to grow the economy.
He said the skills system must be more 'agile and responsive' which will be 'crucial' to the country's economy.
He added: 'I think there is absolutely a need for the education and skills system to take into account the needs of industry better.
'There are frustrations in that regard in terms of how effectively we can input our needs into the system so that we can create, as I say, that agile and responsive, particularly in regard to colleges.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Does Dumbarton fate prove Scottish game needs independent regulator?
And, as administrators for Dumbarton prepare to dissolve one of Scotland's oldest clubs and start again as a newco, years of mismanagement of the League Two club have reinforced the conviction of the local MSP that football clubs should be offered some form of protection from rapacious owners. Whether they want it or not. 'My experience with Dumbarton Football Club strengthens the case for an independent football regulator. 'In the past few years, Dumbarton has lost out to too many owners whose true interest lay beyond the club itself. 'I would like, at the very least, the SFA to be given greater responsibility and power to clamp down on speculative owners. However, inaction by the football authorities makes the case for an independent regulator stronger.' While independent regulation is common in other industries, the Scottish football authorities are member organisations run by clubs for clubs. And those same clubs don't care for the idea of an independent regulator telling them how to run their business. Owners and directors might be subjected to fit and proper checks more stringent than a self declaration form or the limited rules set down in Article 10.2 of the SFA handbook. Clubs might see a light being shone on their darkest alcoves. The game might be forced to confront sectarian singing or bottles, vapes and fireworks being lobbed around grounds by adopting strict liability, a justice system clubs virulently oppose. There might even be a review of the decision by Premiership sides to ban artificial pitches in the top flight by season 2026/27. Addressing Holyrood's health, social care and sport committee in December 2023 Scottish FA Chief Executive Ian Maxwell flagged up the significant differences between the game north and south of the border and described Scottish football governance as "robust" when it came to dealing with financial issues. A regulator, he argued, was unnecessary. Since then Dumbarton and Inverness Caledonian Thistle have endured insolvency events. Livingston have been embroiled in a lengthy court battle with their shareholders and Hamilton Academical have been docked 15 points and incurred the wrath of fan groups for announcing plans to leave their home town and move to Cumbernauld instead. The SFA and SPFL argue that the levers are already in place to to deal with rule breaches and misbehaviour. Hamilton's application to move 14 miles to Broadwood is under review while the league recently handed Celtic and Rangers suspended punishments for unruly supporter behaviour at the Premier Sports Cup semi-finals. The SFA have introduced measures to deal with misconduct at domestic cup games. Clubs which suffer an insolvency event as a result of financial mismanagement, meanwhile, can expect a 15 point deduction. Simon Barrow, co-founder of the SFSA and lead author of the 2023 report 'Rebuilding Scottish Football', which led to a parliamentary debate last year and the establishment of a Scottish Government-hosted roundtable on the development of the game, believes football is tinkering while Rome burns. 'With clubs like Dumbarton and Inverness Caledonian Thistle going into administration and the need to strengthen and invest in the game from the grassroots upwards increasing in urgency, effective transparency and accountability in financial and related matters is crucial,' argues Barrow. 'It is important to see through the cloud of dust that can easily be thrown up by the issue of whether, like England, Scotland should move towards having a statutorily backed regulator for football. 'That is clearly a backstop. But it does not have to be the starting point for discussion. We should first agree the principle that a public facing industry in receipt of the public's money in a variety of ways should be publicly accountable. 'Independent scrutiny is the way to achieve that. It is also essential for building confidence and trust in Scottish football, and for encouraging people to put money into its future. It's a win-win situation. Dumbarton Rock towers above Dumbarton Football Stadium (Image: Christian Cooksey) Read more: What future for Albion Rovers, a storied name of the past? Scottish football needs to say no to newco and get 'robust' governance 'What it means is qualified assessors having the power and information to examine who owns and runs the game, how public interest can be made central, and how Scottish football's finance, governance and conduct can be improved and strengthened. 'Practically, there are a variety of ways that independent scrutiny, short of a statutory regulator, can operate. That is what the conversation should be about.' Critics of an independent regulator argue that the scheme is an expensive and unnecessary layer of bureaucracy. Some of the issues which plague Scottish football – such as pyrotechnics and missiles - are matters governed - in theory at least - by the criminal justice system. Clubs pay Police Scotland good money and expect them to earn it. Speaking after a Hampden AGM where clubs signed up to tougher rules around crowd disorder for cup games governed by the SFA CEO Maxwell acknowledged that football had to do more to combat anti-social behaviour in the stands. The Scottish Government, meanwhile, are scheduled to host another Round Table to discuss some of the issues surrounding the game. The implied threat underpinning the talks is clear. If football fails to clean up its act then the politicians reserve the right to step in at some unspecified date in future. Even if the will to do so is weak. One senior figure – speaking on condition of anonymity - told Herald Sport that an independent regulator in Scotland had always been an idea promoted by former first minister Henry McLeish as a vehicle for Henry McLeish. 'The regulator down south was a tool to stop the Super League, something which was never relevant in Scotland. To stop heritage assets being removed like changes to colours and crests, which has already been achieved through the SFA and to get 20% of income through to the lower leagues, which is roughly where we are in Scotland anyway. 'Clubs like Dumbarton, Inverness and so on are where they are because of their own individual circumstances. It has nothing to do with anything that a regulator could change. All a regulator brings is bureaucracy, costs and administration paid for by the industry. 'All we will see down south is a rising number of legal fights between clubs being regulated and the regulator.' Legal disputes in football are now commonplace. Last season the English Premier League spent £45million on legal costs due to various disputes and arbitration revolving around financial fair play regulations. Cases involving Manchester City, Everton, Nottingham Forest, Chelsea and Leicester City demonstrate that wealthy owners of football clubs don't care much for external scrutiny of how they spend their money. Some believe that the main benefactors of a football regulator will be lawyers. In Scotland, at least, the issue is hypothetical because there is currently no plan for a Football Governance Bill. Unless Labour secure power in the Holyrood elections next year there appears to be no political will to introduce a regulator in Scotland. 'The row over the Offensive Behaviour in Football Act put the SNP government currently in power off the idea of legislating football,' says Paul Goodwin, co-founder of the Scottish Football Supporters Association in 2015. 'I think we are still in a recovery period from that.' A critic of the SFA and SPFL Goodwin senses no real movement towards an independent regulator in Scotland, but believes there should be. 'Part of the challenge football faces is the history of being anything but open and anything but transparent. There are conflicts of interest everywhere. 'I am not saying that an independent regulator will go in and say, 'you can't get your league structures right, I am going to fix it.' 'But what an independent regulator might do is look at the financial distribution model and say, 'why is Scotland the only country in Europe where solidarity money coming from UEFA is not filtering down to the lower levels of the game? 'The problem here is that the SFA, like the SPFL, is run by the clubs for the clubs. It's self interest that dictates everything. 'The SFA should be overseeing the governance of our game but they come under so much influence from clubs in the SPFL. And, let's be honest here, turkeys do not vote for Christmas.'
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Scottish clubs set to push for football alcohol ban lift
The moves comes after St Johnstone chairman Adam Webb branded the current legislation 'discriminatory' and 'offensive.' St Johnstone are one of a number of clubs pursuing applications to establish pre-match fan zones next season. And the Scottish football authorities hope the widespread implementation of controlled zones selling alcohol to fans in supervised conditions will persuade Holyrood to relax a ban introduced as a response to disorder between Rangers and Celtic fans at the 1980 Scottish Cup final. Read more: First Minister John Swinney recently warned that the government were 'not sympathetic' to the idea of reviewing the legislation. Privately, however, senior figures inside Hampden believe that stance could change after next year's Scottish parliamentary elections. Successful fan zones up and down the country, they believe, can hope to accelerate the process. St Johnstone chairman Webb told Herald Sport: 'We intend to have a fan zone operating before our games and if you do that for a season and there are no reports to the police of any problems then it should be able to be expanded. 'We need to take gradual steps and adopt a logical, rational approach instead of the current one size fits all. 'The situation is unique to Scottish football and the 'one size fits all' attitude is so unfair. It makes no sense. 'We understand that there has been violence at certain games and certain clubs and that the police probably ought to have a role in whether or how alcohol can be sold at certain games. I get that. 'But when Saints are playing clubs where there is no real history of animosity in the Championship and we still can't have an open situation where people who want to drink can have a beer then that makes no sense. 'Where there is a game where violence might be anticipated, then conditions will be placed upon alcohol sales. We understand that, but I think it's time to take it forward and review this. 'You look at other sports in Scotland enjoy carte blanche to sell alcohol, like rugby. 'That would anger me as a Scottish football fan and I would be lobbying my political parties and if they heard that from enough fans, loudly enough, then maybe the law would change and we wouldn't have to be sneaking around the edges on this. 'The ban is discriminatory, it's offensive and it makes all football fans out to be hooligans. And that's just not true. 'There are clubs and games where there would be no problem at all and this law has to go. 'I'm okay with gradual change, but we can't just take no for an answer forever.' Mindful of the divisive nature of the debate, Webb believes fan zones are a logical starting point. 'Let's make sure everyone feels comfortable about it. In the Premiership there is obviously more sensitivity and concern, but you could still have some test policies, some test program, that could be tried out over a season. New things could be tried.' While the SPFL and SFA have continued to quietly lobby the Scottish Government on the issue, their cause was undermined by various instances of crowd disorder towards the end of the season. Scenes in Glasgow city centre were followed by a bottle being thrown on the pitch during the Rangers-Celtic game at Ibrox, while Aberdeen defender Jack McKenzie was struck on the face by the back of a seat thrown from the stand during a game against Dundee United. In a statement yesterday the SPFL revealed that notices of complaints have now been raised against Aberdeen, Celtic and Partick Thistle over incidents which occurred at the end of the season.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump says Iran nuke deal 'hardliners' killed in Israel strikes
After Israel launched a large-scale attack on Iran's nuclear sites June 13, Trump said in a post online there "is still time" for Tehran to make a deal. "There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end," Trump wrote. "Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left." Live updates: 'Before there's nothing left,' Trump pushes Iran to make nuclear deal The Trump administration has been negotiating with Iran over the country's nuclear program, with the aim of preventing Iran from having nuclear weapon capability. To Bash, Trump said Iran "should have listened." "I don't know if you know but I gave them a 60-day warning and today is day 61," the president said. "They should now come to the table to make a deal before it's too late. It will be too late for them. You know the people I was dealing with are dead, the hardliners," he added. The strikes killed the head of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, and the country's top two military officials, in addition to several nuclear scientists. Bash said she asked Trump if the people he "was dealing with" died as a result of Israel's June 13 attack. "They didn't die of the flu," he said, sarcastically. "They didn't die of Covid." Contributing: Zac Anderson, USA TODAY
