logo
COVID-19: Who do the new vaccine guideline changes affect?

COVID-19: Who do the new vaccine guideline changes affect?

Two experts answer key questions about the recent COVID-19 vaccine guideline changes. Image credit: MR.. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently announced more key changes to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination.
Per these changes, the CDC no longer recommends COVID-19 vaccines to pregnant people or healthy children.
The only populations for whom the shots are still recommended are older adults and people at high risk of developing severe COVID-19 following infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes this illness.
These changes have caused some concern as a new, more transmissible variant of SARS-CoV-2 has emerged in the United States.
On May 27, 2025, the United States Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a social media post that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would no longer be recommending COVID-19 vaccination to pregnant individuals or healthy children.
The announcement came shortly after another statement published by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), which suggested that COVID-19 immunization programmes should, going forward, focus on older adults and those at high risk of developing severe disease, should they become infected with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.
These changes to the official immunization schedule have spurred questions and caused some concern, particularly as a new, more transmissible variant of SARS-CoV-2, called NB.1.8.1, has emerged in the U.S.
Medical News Today has spoken to Daniel Ganjian, MD, FAAP, board certified pediatrician at Providence Saint John's Health Center in Santa Monica, CA, and Monica Gandhi, MD, MPH, an infectious disease specialist at the University of California, San Francisco, to answer the most pressing questions.
One concern when it comes to the potential impact on pregnant people is that a lack of access to COVID-19 vaccination might actually increase the risk of pregnancy complications.
'If COVID-19 vaccines are no longer recommended for pregnant individuals, pregnant individuals would lose a key intervention that reduces their risk of severe COVID-19, ICU [intensive care unit] admission, preterm birth, and perinatal death,' Ganjian told MNT .
In a similar vein, Gandhi emphasized:
'Although I completely agree that the people most in need of booster COVID-19 shots ever year are those who are older (65 years or older) and those [who are] immunocompromise[d] or [have] multiple medical conditions, pregnant women are actually relatively immunocompromised and so are at risk of severe COVID-19.'
'So, I would have preferred that the guidance did not name healthy pregnant women as not needing the shot,' she told us.'
Insofar as children are concerned, while kids who are healthy overall may run a lower risk of developing severe COVID-19, infection with the coronavirus that causes it could nevertheless impact their health in unexpected ways.
It could, for instance, trigger long-term conditions that may lead to other complications.
'For children, removal of COVID-19 vaccine recommendations would increase the risk of severe COVID-19, hospitalization, and complications such as multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), particularly among those with underlying medical conditions,' Ganjian said.
'The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends COVID-19 vaccination for all children 6 months of age [and older], as vaccine effectiveness against severe outcomes is well established,' he added.
Still, he did note that, even with the current changes to the vaccination recommendations, 'children with immunocompromising conditions or other high-risk comorbidities may still have access to vaccines under specific clinical indications,' although, he cautioned, 'this would depend on regulatory and public health policy decisions.'
Gandhi noted that while 'healthy children with previous immunity — either from vaccination or previous infection — do not need COVID-19 vaccinations,' those who have not had a chance to acquire that immunity could now be left exposed to health risks.
Thus, 'I would prefer children without previous immunity to get the COVID-19 vaccine,' she told us.
'From a public health perspective, rescinding broad recommendations would likely signal a shift in risk assessment, possibly due to changes in epidemiology, variant severity, or vaccine effectiveness, but would also risk increased morbidity [disease susceptibility] in vulnerable populations,' Ganjian cautioned.
Gandhi emphasized that a more discerning approach might prioritise the health and safety of pregnant people by offering them vaccine boosters, while reiterating that children who have already developed some immunity should be O.K. without further vaccination.
'I think pregnant women should get booster shots because they [are] relative[ly] immunocompromise[d]. Healthy children with prior immunity (either from natural infection or the vaccine) do not need COVID-19 boosters if we take a risk-based approach to vaccination.'
— Monica Gandhi, MD, MPH
On a related note, Gandhi also expressed some concern about the FDA's recent recommendation, also mentioning the NEJM statement from May 2025, to conduct plac ebo-controlled trials for new COVID-19 vaccines. This is because, at this point, participants receiving a placebo instead of a vaccine might be left unnecessarily exposed to severe disease.
'The original COVID-19 vaccine trials (such as with the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines) used a placebo-controlled design because there was no prior COVID-19 vaccine, so using a placebo as a comparison was ethical,' she explained.
'However, we now have COVID-19 vaccines, and it would not be ethical to compare a new COVID-19 vaccine with a placebo in a vulnerable individual (e.g. an older person) when their control could be a prior COVID-19 vaccine formulation,' Gandhi pointed out.
'For instance, I would never allow my 90-year-old father to be in a vaccine trial where he was either getting a new COVID-19 vaccine or a placebo, as being in the placebo arm would leave him unprotected, and he is in the category of individuals who need a yearly booster COVID-19 shot,' she admitted candidly.
One question that remains is whether, given the changes to recommended COVID-19 vaccination schedules, pregnant people and parents who may still wish to vaccinate their children might still be able to access the shots privately.
'Based on current knowledge, pregnant individuals or parents who wish to vaccinate their children may still be able to access COVID-19 vaccines through private purchase or off-label use if available, but this would depend on regulatory status and local healthcare provider policies.'
'However, insurance coverage and public health supply may be limited if recommendations are withdrawn,' he also cautioned.
Immune System / Vaccines
Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / Viruses
COVID-19

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump admits he's ‘disappointed' in Musk for slamming ‘big beautiful bill' as Tesla boss hits back with flurry of posts
Trump admits he's ‘disappointed' in Musk for slamming ‘big beautiful bill' as Tesla boss hits back with flurry of posts

The Sun

time14 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Trump admits he's ‘disappointed' in Musk for slamming ‘big beautiful bill' as Tesla boss hits back with flurry of posts

Former president Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk's relationship started rocky, but the pair have since reconciled, with Musk fully endorsing Trump and interviewing him on X Spaces on August 12. In 2022, Elon Musk and Donald Trump publicly feuded on X, then still known as Twitter. Trump called Musk a liar and "bulls**t artist" during a rally in Alaska. "Elon is not going to buy Twitter," Trump said at the time. "You know, he said the other day, 'I've never voted for a Republican.' I said, 'I didn't know that - you told me you voted for me. So he's another bulls**t artist, but he's not going to be buying it." In response to Trump's critiques, the SpaceX founder clapped back. "I don't hate the man, but it's time for Trump to hang up his hat & sail into the sunset," Musk posted. Musk also went on to buy X months later. The X owner said he had previously voted mostly for Democrats since becoming a United States citizen in 2002. Musk initially backed Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to be the Republican Party's presidential nominee. "My preference for the 2024 presidency is someone sensible and centrist," Musk wrote on X in 2022. "I had hoped that would [be] the case for the Biden administration, but have been disappointed so far." His shift in political parties might be attributed to his plummeting relationship with President Joe Biden who didn't invite Musk to the 2021 White House electric vehicle summit. Despite their past issues, Trump and Musk's relationship took a turn in March after they met at Mar-a-Lago. Trump was also previously against electric vehicles but has since changed his stance. "I'm for electric cars," he said at a rally earlier this month. "I have to be, because Elon endorsed me very strongly. So I have no choice." Following the assassination attempt at Trump's rally in July, Musk announced his support for the former president. "I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery," Musk wrote on X after the shooting. During a recent press conference, Trump spoke highly of Musk. "I respect Elon a lot. He respects me," he said. "Elon, more than almost anybody I know, he loves this country. He loves the concept of this country, but like me, he says this country is in big trouble, it's in tremendous danger." Musk has been pictured at events at Mar-a-Lago and the UFC, buddying up with Trump. Trump selected Musk to lead the Department of Government Efficiency - a taskforce aimed at cutting bureaucracy.

Donald Trump 'disappointed' with Elon Musk after he turned on his 'big, beautiful bill'
Donald Trump 'disappointed' with Elon Musk after he turned on his 'big, beautiful bill'

Sky News

time28 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Donald Trump 'disappointed' with Elon Musk after he turned on his 'big, beautiful bill'

President Donald Trump has said he is "disappointed" with Elon Musk after the billionaire publicly criticised his signature tax bill. Mr Trump suggested that his former backer and adviser missed being in government - and has "Trump derangement syndrome". He added: "I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot." On Tuesday, the world's richest man called the president's tax and spending bill "outrageous" and a "disgusting abomination". The bill, which includes multi-trillion-dollar tax breaks, was passed by the House Republicans in May, and has been described by the president as a "big, beautiful bill". The tech billionaire attacked the tax cuts on his platform X on Tuesday, writing, "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store