Natiowide Shrimp Recall Update as FDA Sets Highest Alert
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued its highest risk classification for approximately 64,000 pounds of recalled shrimp sold across the United States.
The FDA's Class I recall — reserved for fears of serious health issues or death — applies to about 3,200 cases of frozen shrimp distributed to Whole Foods stores.
Tri-Union Frozen Products, also known as Chicken of the Sea Frozen Foods, issued a voluntary recall for its "Raw P&D Tail-On White Shrimp" due to "undeclared sulfites" on May 6. The FDA designated it a Class I recall on June 24.
Newsweek contacted Tri-Union and Whole Foods via email on Wednesday for further details.
Stock image. The FDA has issued a Class I risk classification for approximately 64,000 pounds of recalled shrimp sold across the United States.
Stock image. The FDA has issued a Class I risk classification for approximately 64,000 pounds of recalled shrimp sold across the United States.
Getty Images
Why It Matters
A Class I risk classification represents "a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death," according to the FDA.
This recall impacted consumers nationwide who purchased shrimp from Whole Foods, heightening public safety concerns regarding seafood contamination and mislabeling.
Prompt notification enables consumers to avoid illness and demonstrates the role of regulatory agencies in maintaining public safety.
What To Know
The FDA notice said the shrimp were "sold exclusively to Whole Foods USA."
"Whole Foods uses some of the product for its retail in-store deli," it added. "Product was distributed to various Whole Foods stores across the country. The remaining portion of the lot, is passed through to a downstream customer in Canada."
Key Recall Details
The product description reads: "Frozen Shrimp - packaged in 5lb frozen IQF blocks/4 blocks to a case."
Unlabeled case packaging reads: "Raw P&D Tail-On White Shrimp."
UPC code: 1 08432370 0405 5
Lot numbers: 669/18WH/124; 669/19WH/134; 669/20WH144; 669/30VH/127; 669/01HH/003; 669/03HH011
Best-by dates: July 18, 2026; July 19, 2026; July 20,2026; September 30, 2026; October 01, 2026; October 03, 2026.
Why Was the Shrimp Recalled?
The shrimp contained "undeclared sulfites," the FDA said.
Sulfites are a group of sulfur-based compounds commonly used in foods as preservatives and to maintain color and freshness. They are often found in processed foods, wines, dried fruit, and some seafood products. The FDA requires that foods containing at least 10 parts per million (ppm) of sulfites to declare this on their packaging, as exposure can affect consumers with sensitivities.
While most individuals can tolerate sulfites without issue, people with sulfite sensitivity — especially those with asthma — may experience serious reactions. Symptoms may include difficulty breathing, hives, abdominal pain, or, rarely, life-threatening anaphylaxis. Serious reactions can occur within minutes of exposure.
The FDA estimates that less than one percent of the U.S. population is sulfite-sensitive, though the number is higher among individuals with asthma.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that approximately 25 million Americans had asthma as of 2021. Of these, research indicates that about 5-10 percent (or approximately 1.25–2.5 million people) could react to sulfites.
What Happens Next
The FDA said the recall remains ongoing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
36 minutes ago
- Washington Post
FDA requires updated warning about rare heart risk with COVID shots
WASHINGTON — The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday it has expanded existing warnings on the two leading COVID-19 vaccines about a rare heart side effect mainly seen in young men. Myocarditis, a type of heart inflammation that is usually mild, emerged as a complication after the first shots became widely available in 2021. Prescribing information from both Pfizer and Moderna already advises doctors about the issue.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Chocolates Recall Map Shows States With New Warning
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Kilwins Quality Confections, LLC, is voluntarily recalling its Mocha Truffles due to fears the product may contain undeclared pecans. Newsweek reached out to the company via email for comment Wednesday night. Why It Matters Numerous recalls have been initiated in 2025 due to the potential of damaged products, foodborne illness, contamination and undeclared food allergens. Millions of Americans experience food sensitivities or allergies every year. According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the nine "major" food allergens in the U.S. are eggs, milk, fish, wheat, soybeans, Crustacean shellfish, sesame, tree nuts and peanuts. The agency also warns that people with an allergy or severe sensitivity to pecans potentially "run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products." What To Know In the alert, the FDA says the mocha truffles may have been sold at nine Kilwins retail stores across seven states, including one in Orange Beach, Alabama, at 4751 Main St., Unit F113, along with three in Florida, in Winter Park, Coral Springs and Vero Beach. The additional sites include Thomasville, Georgia; Annapolis, Maryland; Portsmouth, New Hampshire; Alexandria, Virginia; and the 16 Market Street store in Wilmington, North Carolina. Below is a map highlighting the states with the potentially affected stores: The FDA alert says the recalled product may have been sold at these locations from April 28, 2025, until May 30, 2025, and the agency added that as of Wednesday, there have been no reported illnesses related to the recall. The recalled truffles were typically sold from the chocolate display cases inside stores and could be packaged in any of the following, the agency says: 4564 Family Assortment 9 oz 4565 Family Assortment 14 oz 4566 Family Assortment 28 oz 4567 Family Assortment 42 oz 4574 Truffle Assortment 5 oz 43109 Truffle Assortment 8 oz 43110 Mocha Truffles 75 oz 44121 Truffle Assortment 75 oz What People Are Saying The FDA alert, in part: "The recall was initiated after it was discovered that a product containing pecans was distributed in packaging that did not reveal the presence of pecans." In an email to Newsweek in January, the FDA said: "Most recalls in the U.S. are carried out voluntarily by the product manufacturer and when a company issues a public warning, typically via news release, to inform the public of a voluntary product recall, the FDA shares that release on our website as a public service. "The FDA's role during a voluntary, firm-initiated, recall is to review the recall strategy, evaluate the health hazard presented by the product, monitor the recall, and as appropriate alert the public and other companies in the supply chain about the recall," the FDA continued. It added: "The FDA provides public access to information on recalls by posting a listing of recalls according to their classification in the FDA Enforcement Report, including the specific action taken by the recalling company. The FDA Enforcement Report is designed to provide a public listing of products in the marketplace that are being recalled." Additional information on recalls can be found via the FDA's Recalls, Market Withdrawals, & Safety Alerts. What Happens Next Customers who have purchased the recalled mocha truffles in the mentioned time frame are urged to dispose of the product or return it to a Kilwins location for a full refund, the FDA notes. People with additional concerns may call the company at 231-347-3800 from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. ET weekdays.
CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
What to know about thimerosal, a target of RFK Jr.'s new CDC vaccine advisers
A century ago, one of the biggest safety concerns about vaccines involved bacterial contamination. In 1916, four young children died in South Carolina after receiving typhoid vaccine that had been contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. Twelve years later, 12 children in Queensland, Australia, died from tainted immunizations against diphtheria. In the 1930s, vaccine makers began using a preservative called thimerosal to stave off microbial growth in their products. For the next six decades, it didn't receive much notice; ill effects appeared limited to minor local injection-site reactions, according to the US Food and Drug Administration. That changed in 1999, when US health officials asked pharmaceutical companies to remove thimerosal from vaccines. There was no evidence that it caused harm in the quantities used, but thimerosal contains a form of mercury, and questions had emerged about whether it could cause neurotoxicity when given in childhood vaccinations. Vaccine makers have removed it from all but a few shots, such as multidose vials of flu vaccine. In the meantime, subsequent studies have confirmed no link between thimerosal in vaccines and neurodevelopmental issues, including autism, and autism rates have continued to rise. So public health experts were puzzled when the preservative appeared on the agenda for this week's meeting of outside vaccine advisers to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 'I actually don't know any pediatric practices that even use that multidose influenza vaccine,' said Dr. Sean O'Leary, a pediatrician at Children's Hospital Colorado and former liaison to the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, for the American Academy of Pediatrics. The group is meeting on Wednesday and Thursday for the first time since US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dismissed the committee's previous 17 members, claiming they had conflicts of interest, and days later installed eight new advisers. Public health experts and lawmakers have called into question the credentials and backgrounds of some of the new panelists, and just before the meeting began, one member withdrew during the financial holdings review, an HHS spokesman said, bringing the panel down to seven. A presentation 'regarding thimerosal in vaccines' is scheduled for Thursday morning, followed by 'proposed recommendations' specifically about thimerosal in flu vaccines, according to an agenda posted Monday. The meeting is scheduled to conclude with a vote on the latter, a move that could lead to official CDC policy if adopted by agency leadership – or, without a confirmed director in place, by Kennedy. The last-minute addition of thimerosal to the agenda was a red flag for vaccine experts, who consider the science settled and fear that Kennedy – who led an anti-vaccine group called Children's Health Defense – is seeking to sow doubt about vaccine safety. Another former Children's Health Defense leader, Lyn Redwood, is slated to make a presentation on the topic at the meeting. Here's how thimerosal became such a hot-button issue. In 1997, Rep. Frank Pallone, a New Jersey Democrat concerned about mercury pollution in his community's lakes and rivers, attached an amendment to a US Food and Drug Administration reauthorization bill that would require the agency to catalogue intentionally introduced mercury compounds in drugs and food. That led to a possibly startling discovery: 'As people looked in vaccines, there was the potential that, by six months of age, infants could have received more thimerosal than was listed in several sources of what was considered safe levels of mercury,' said Dr. Walter Orenstein, who was director of the National Immunization Program at the CDC at the time. But those limits were set for methylmercury, the kind found in some fish, which is known to be toxic. Thimerosal contains ethylmercury, a different compound that's 'intrinsically less stable, and more readily metabolized, than methylmercury,' said Dr. Matthew Rand, an associate professor in the Department of Environmental Medicine at the University of Rochester who studies mercury toxicity. That means it's cleared from the body more quickly than methylmercury, according to the CDC, 'and is therefore less likely to cause any harm.' The FDA notes that there were no existing guidelines for ethylmercury. Still, the finding led to a number of emergency meetings among federal health officials and outside groups to determine what should be done, Orenstein recalled. 'While there was no evidence of harm from thimerosal, the general feeling was, 'let's get rid of it, because we don't need it,' ' he said. Moving to single-dose containers alleviated the need for a preservative, although it came at a higher expense for manufacturers. In 1999, the FDA sent a letter to manufacturers of US vaccines requesting their plans to remove thimerosal, and by 2001, the compound had been removed from or reduced in all vaccines routinely recommended for children under 6 in the US, according to the CDC. The message from public health agencies, Orenstein said, was 'we're going to make safe vaccines even safer.' But the die was cast. Vaccines had already been tied to autism in 1998 by British doctor Andrew Wakefield, who published a since-retracted paper that claimed the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine was linked to autism, although not because of thimerosal – the MMR vaccine never contained the preservative. Still, parents of children with autism were seeking answers. One of those parents was Redwood, who said that in 1999, she tallied up her son's mercury exposure and found 'at two months of age, he had received 125 times his allowable exposure to mercury based on EPA's guidelines in his weight.' 'That was a real answer for me,' Redwood said in a video posted by Children's Health Defense this month, 'because my son at this time was almost 5 years old, and he had regressed developmentally after his first year of life and was diagnosed with autism.' Redwood, a nurse practioner, decided to become an advocate, speaking at events and publishing papers about thimerosal and autism. The uproar over a potential link between thimerosal and autism came as a surprise to Orenstein and colleagues. 'Mercury itself had never been implicated as a major cause of autism,' Orenstein said. 'But this was a major, major concern.' It led to a number of studies of the issue, including a 2004 assessment by the Institute of Medicine (now known as the National Academy of Medicine) that concluded 'the body of epidemiological evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism.' It made the same conclusion for MMR vaccines and autism. A 2010 study by the CDC also found no link. And 'even after thimerosal was removed from almost all childhood vaccines, autism rates continued to increase,' the agency noted, 'which is the opposite of what would be expected if thimerosal caused autism.' Still, those who continued to push the disproven autism connection included Kennedy, who published a book in 2014 called 'Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak.' Its subtitle calls for the 'immediate removal of mercury – a known neurotoxin – from vaccines.' It rejects the findings of the 2004 Institute of Medicine report and warns that millions of children in the US and around the world 'appear to be at risk of injury from the thimerosal in vaccines.' Thimerosal is still present in 'a small percentage of flu vaccines, confined to multidose vials,' according to a post from the Vaccine Integrity Project, a group focused on countering vaccine misinformation that was started at the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, or CIDRAP. The group suspects that thimerosal is included on ACIP's agenda this week – with a presentation by Redwood and a vote by the committee – 'to put greater focus on and generate more public discussion about vaccine risk.' HHS didn't return a request for comment about Redwood's involvement in this week's meeting, and Redwood declined to comment. Her presentation slides, however, were posted ahead of the meeting and continued to claim thimerosal presents safety risks. One slide initially included in the presentation cited a study in animals that appeared not to exist; its apparent lead author told CNN he'd published a study with a similar title, but in a different journal, in different animals, and with dramatically different findings — ones that didn't appear to show a link between autism and thimerosal. The slide presentation was subsequently updated to remove that slide. CDC staff also posted its own review of the data, citing nearly two dozen studies showing 'the evidence does not support an association between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism spectrum disorder or other neurodevelopmental disorders.' During her Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee confirmation hearing on Wednesday, Dr. Susan Monarez, President Donald Trump's pick to lead the CDC, said, 'I have not seen a causal link between vaccines and autism.' The decision to remove thimerosal from most vaccines, despite no evidence of harm, had other consequences. At the same time the FDA made its request to vaccine makers, US health authorities advised that babies born to mothers known to be negative for hepatitis B not receive a shot for that virus at birth, but at two months to 6 months of age, as thimerosal was phased out. But about 10% of hospitals 'suspended use of the hepatitis B vaccine for all newborns, regardless of their level of risk,' wrote Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine scientist at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and a member of the FDA's outside advisory committee on vaccines, in a 2007 perspective piece in the New England Journal of Medicine. 'One three-month-old child born to a Michigan mother infected with hepatitis B virus died of overwhelming infection.' Orenstein looks back on the decision to remove thimerosal as a hard one. 'The fear would be keeping it in there, doing a study over two or three years and then it showed harm, and lo and behold, for three years, we used this vaccine and this component was harmful,' he said. 'Since we didn't know what the results would be of any of the studies at the time, we thought it better to just get it out of there. 'The autism issue,' he added, 'didn't play any role in the initial decision.' CNN's Brenda Goodman contributed to this report.
