Tributes pour in after beloved journalist Patrick Barclay dies: ‘A wonderful football writer'
Tributes have poured in from the football world after beloved journalist Patrick Barclay died, aged 77.
The Football Writers' Association shared a statement on behalf of Barclay's family that read: "It is with the greatest sadness that we must announce the death of our dear Patrick Barclay.'
The FWA added that a celebration of Barclay's life will take place at a later date with full tributes to also follow.
Barclay wrote for the Independent, Guardian/Observer, Times and the Telegraph throughout his career, and also penned a number of books, including biographies on Jose Mourinho, 'Anatomy of a Winner', and Sir Alex Ferguson, 'Football - Bloody Hell!'
Former England internationals Alan Shearer and Robbie Fowler led the tributes for Barclay, who grew up in Dundee and started his career in journalism at the Dundee Evening Telegraph.
Shearer wrote: 'Ah no. Such sad news. RIP Paddy.'
While Fowler added a post with a broken heart emoji: 'A great man...RIP Patrick.'
The Independent's chief football writer Miguel Delaney said: 'Truly one of the legends of football journalism, from an era that defined that description. Paddy had an elegance about his writing, that mirrored an effervescence of personality. There are multiple stories about what a great character he was, that I had the fun of experiencing myself, and he was an extremely warm person.'
While many of Barclay's colleagues replied to the FWA's post on X, describing him as 'charming, smart and welcoming to us all' by Global Publisher of Sport DMG Media Lee Clayton.
While Fulham Football Club added: 'We're so sorry to hear this sad news about Paddy. Our thoughts and best wishes go out to his family and all who knew him.'
Chief sports correspondent Matt Lawton said: 'So sad to hear this news last night. Paddy was a charming man. The elegance in his writing for The Times and many other publications extended to everything he did.'
The Athletic's Senior football writer Oliver Kay wrote: 'Such sad news. A wonderful football writer and always such engaging company. RIP Paddy.'
Lee Parker, Chelsea's stadium announcer, added: 'Incredibly sad news. A wonderful man with encyclopaedic knowledge, humour and humility. Thinking of his family and friends.'
Adrian Bevington, former Club England Managing Director at The FA, said: 'Very sad news. Paddy was a fine writer with his own unique style and that wonderful voice. Great company, with a deep knowledge of the game, he always enjoyed a football debate and quiz. You'll be greatly missed Paddy.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Chelsea's five pricey bosses, Liverpool's gamble on Arne Slot... and Man United's mid-season swoop for Ruben Amorim - where does Thomas Frank rank in the Premier League's most expensive football managers?
Sometimes you have to blow the budget to get what you want. We often see Premier League clubs fork out frankly laughable sums of money to acquire the world's best talent on the pitch. The amount of cash chucked about is growing by the year, and Liverpool 's £116m bid to sign Florian Wirtz is the latest mammoth transfer fee to be thrown down in an era of excessive wealth in the game. The same now goes for managers, too. Gone are the days when clubs would turn to assistant coaches to step up when the hot seat becomes available. Nor do they wait until one falls out of work and they can snap them up for free. No, managers come with a cost now. Your main target is already in a job? Well, it's time to cough up. It has taken £10million for Tottenham to prise Thomas Frank from the grasp of Brentford, where he spent nine years. Funnily enough, he started his tenure as an assistant before becoming the big boss, but as I said: we don't see that anymore. While it's not quite the crazy figures being slapped about for players, it's still a big enough fee to earn Frank a place in the top 10 most expensive Premier League managers of all time. Want to know the other nine? Well, Mail Sport is taking a deep dive into the list - follow us in. =9. Maurizio Sarri - Chelsea - £5m Our first entry includes, you guessed it, Chelsea. Big fees in football and the Blues are like bangers and mash on a plate, they just marry up so well. The first of five Chelsea entries on this list is Maurizio Sarri, who they splashed £5m on to take him from Napoli in 2018. Was it worth it? Well, no, as is the case with a fair few in this top 10. Sarri, whose relationship with the Chelsea fans was less than positive, lasted just one season on the job before returning to Italy with Juventus. But he did win a trophy, as he led the club to Europa League glory. =9. Ronald Koeman - Everton - £5m Arne Slot was not the first Dutchman to land in a dugout on Merseyside. Before the charismatic but calm 46-year-old made the Premier League look like a breeze, his compatriot Ronald Koeman was in the hot seat across Stanley Park. After two highly successful years with Southampton, Everton were so impressed by Koeman that they paid the south coast side £5m for his services back in 2016. At first, it seemed like one hell of a deal. Koeman guided Everton to a seventh-placed finish in his first season in charge, in turn bringing European football back to Goodison Park following a dismal final year under Roberto Martinez. But one year of fun is all he got. Second-season syndrome hit hard for Koeman at Everton, and just two months into it he was sacked following a horrendous start to the campaign. 8. Jose Mourinho - Chelsea - £5.2m The Special One. The one that changed Chelsea. The one that brought glory to Stamford Bridge. As we all well know, Chelsea don't always hit the nail on the head when it comes to financial decisions, as will be evident the further through this feature you read. However, paying £5.2m to bring in Jose Mourinho from Porto may just be the smartest move they have made, and might ever make. It was a bold move at the time. Mourinho had just produced a miracle by winning the Champions League with Porto, but that sum of money was a massive deal in those days compared to the pennies it is seen as now. Worth every penny, and some. The Portuguese maverick guided a new-look Blues to their first top-flight title in 50 years in his very first season, before going back-to-back in his second. It was pure bliss for Roman Abramovich and the Stamford Bridge faithful - they had ripped Manchester United and Arsenal off their perch and looked unstoppable. Well, it didn't last. The third season brought a domestic cup double, but no Premier League title, and in September 2007 he surprisingly left the club. Mourinho couldn't stay away of course, but that's a story for another day. 7. Brendan Rodgers - Leicester - £8.8m Now, this is where things go up a gear. There is a sudden jump in terms of sums of money, starting with Brendan Rodgers. Following his sacking by Liverpool in 2015 - despite nearly winning the Premier League a year prior - Rodgers' stocks were low. No English side wanted to take a punt on him. Celtic gave him a lifeline, though, and boy did he take it. Rodgers flourished during an initial three-year stint in Glasgow and it took Leicester City a whopping £8.8m to drag him away from the Bhoys. The Northern Irishman's tenure began brilliantly with back-to-back fifth-place finishes in his first two full seasons, which would now be enough to earn a spot in the Champions League. Rodgers even led the club to their first-ever FA Cup triumph, beating Chelsea in the 2021 final. However, things soon went downhill and he was sacked in 2023 in the final months of what had been a dreadful campaign, in which the Foxes were relegated. 6. Ruben Amorim - Manchester United - £9.25m Manchester United's move for Ruben Amorim has cost them more than just money, that's for sure. You don't need me to tell you that his arrival has not got to plan, thus far. The hierarchy at Old Trafford initially opted to hand Erik ten Hag a new deal last summer, which meant the cost of sacking him and bringing in Amorim became much higher than it needed to be. Overall, roughly £21m was spent to fire the Dutchman and hire the Portuguese boss from Sporting Lisbon. All of that money to end up with a record-low Premier League points tally, their worst finish on record, their lowest-ever goal tally, and an abject defeat to Tottenham in the Europa League final. Now, Amorim is still in charge and he could miraculously turn things around which would mean the money was worth it. But based on the evidence so far, it doesn't look like it was. 5. Arne Slot - Liverpool - £9.42m 'Arne Slot! Na-na, na, na-na!' Jurgen Klopp was the first to sing it and now it's a song belted out on the Anfield terraces with pride with each passing week. Nobody thought that Klopp could be replaced, but the same was said about Bill Shankly. Slot is the Bob Paisley of his time, and he only cost the Reds hierarchy £9.42m. Just 8.12 per cent of the amount the club are paying to bring in the mercurial Wirtz from Bayer Leverkusen. The German will do extremely well to even get close to having the impact that Slot has had on Liverpool. Few managers just rock up to what is known as the toughest league in the world and make it look like a cakewalk in their first season. Mourinho did it 20 years ago, and Slot followed in his footsteps by bringing home a record-equalling 20th English top-flight title to Anfield. Even if the Dutchman struggles to win another in the coming seasons, the fee to bring him to Merseyside from Feyenoord will still have been worth it. =3. Enzo Maresca - Chelsea - £10m As you can see, the further up the list we go, the more recent the deals were made. And of course, the more Chelsea are involved. We have hit double figures for the first time in this feature, with Enzo Maresca being wrestled away from Leicester last summer, following an impressive promotion from the Championship - which was short-lived - for £10m. The move for the Italian has paid off, so far. In his first season in charge, Maresca guided Chelsea back to the promised land of the Champions League through a fourth-placed finish, while he also picked up the Conference League trophy as the cherry on top. Many questioned the appointment at the time, but 12 months on it is plausible to see Chelsea as challengers to Liverpool and Slot's crown next season. Maresca has done a stellar job. =3. Thomas Frank - Tottenham - £10m Here we are. The newest entry into the charts has landed alongside Maresca in third spot. When Ange Postecoglou was sacked, there was an outpouring of rage in WhatsApp group chats around the country, in offices, and on social media. Everywhere. Football fans simply couldn't believe it. After all, the Australian delivered on his promise. 'I always win things in my second year,' Postecoglou said in September, and that is exactly what he did by winning Tottenham's first trophy in 17 years via the Europa League. Still, that didn't matter to Daniel Levy who decided to hand £10m to fellow Londoners Brentford in order to bring Frank to north London, and all of a sudden the rage is no more. Whether the money will be worth it is yet to be seen, but what is telling is how Frank has managed to calm the outrage of Postecoglou's sacking simply by being appointed. That's how perfect of a fit he appears to be for the role. 2. Andre Villas-Boas - Chelsea - £13.3m The Not-so-Special One. Andre Villas-Boas was meant to be Mourinho incarnate - 'Mini Mourinho' he was once dubbed. Well, he ended up more like the Mourinho we witnessed struggle at Tottenham, or even worse. When Chelsea splashed a then eye-watering £13.5m on 33-year-old Villas-Boas to take the reins at Stamford Bridge in 2011, excitement matched the levels of when the great Portuguese boss was appointed in 2004. He was brought in as a young gun to spark life into what was an aging squad at the time, but all he succeeded in doing was nearly kill them off. Villas-Boas didn't even last the season. In March 2012, he was put out of his misery after unrest in the dressing room and amongst the fanbase. Chelsea would go on to produce a miracle in Munich two months later, winning their first Champions League title under interim boss Roberto Di Matteo, while Villas-Boas moved across London to bitter rivals Tottenham, where he would also struggle. 1. Graham Potter - Chelsea - £21.5m £3.07m. That's how much Graham Potter ended up costing Chelsea each month he was in charge. Just the seven, but it felt like a lifetime for those in Blue. Potter's arrival was meant to signify a new era at Stamford Bridge under Todd Boehly and his big-spending crew, but it ended up being a false dawn. To spend £21.5m on bringing Potter in from Brighton to then only give him seven months was baffling, but it shows just how badly things went for the English manager in west London. Most expensive managers in English football history 1. Graham Potter (Chelsea) - £21.5m 2. Andre Villas-Boas (Chelsea) - £13.3m =3. Thomas Frank (Tottenham) - £10m =3. Enzo Maresca (Chelsea) - £10m 5. Arne Slot (Liverpool) - £9.42m 6. Ruben Amorim (Manchester United) - £9.42m 7. Brendan Rodgers (Leicester City) - £8.8m 8. Jose Mourinho (Chelsea) - £5.2m =9. Ronald Koeman (Everton) - £5m =9. Maurizio Sarri (Chelsea) - £5m He had a promising start at the helm, going unbeaten in his first nine games, but it was all downhill from there. Boehly and BlueCo's patience for the Potter project wore thin rapidly, and by April 2023 they sent him packing, taking a huge financial hit in the process. Potter now manages at the other end of London at rivals West Ham, and has once again struggled to get going. But he is a slow-burner, and next season will be pivotal in the Hammers' new horizon.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Borrowed culture and a plasticine burger – welcome to the Club World Cup and almost-football
Fire up the marching band. Rouse the majorettes from their state of indifference. Put out more flags. Put out some flags. Put out a flag. Er … is anyone actually there? IShowSpeed? Can you hear me Pitbull? Welcome to the almost-World Cup, an almost-real almost-event that will perhaps, with a favourable wind, now begin to feel like almost-football. This week Gianni Infantino described Fifa's regeared tournament as football's Big Bang, referencing the moment of ignition from which all the matter in the universe was dispersed out of a previously cold and indifferent void. And to be fair, Infantino was half-right. So far we have the void. America, we have been repeatedly told, is ready for this, primed and hungry for Fifa's billion-dollar event. The evidence on the ground is: maybe. But not in a way that you'd actually notice. Instead, as the Club World Cup builds towards Saturday's opening night, Lionel Messi's Inter Miami versus Al Ahly at the Hard Rock Stadium, this is a tournament that exists at the fringe of America's densely packed attention economy, an ambient drawl of half-heard voices, noises through the wall. The last week has brought almost-news of $4 tickets, star-player platitudes, immigration officials at the opening game. And all of this in a host city where people still look a little blank and say things such as: 'The Club World-what?' and: 'Actually I like hockey, but my nephew, he loves Cristiano Ronaldo, and let me tell you, what a body that guy has.' This is a place where things keep almost-happening. Come and watch Inter Miami train on plasticised grass next to a private airfield, but no, not with Messi present. Wait! Infantino is giving a public address. Although it turns out he's sent a video message ('un momento muy importante') that people can video on their phones, while in turn being videoed by the official video crew, the only revelation from which was that Gianni appears to have acquired an excitingly badger-ish set of eyebrows. So there's that. Otherwise, at times it has felt as if the only publicity around this thing is occasional in-house footage of Infantino appearing at some sealed indoor hype-event, looking like a fringe member of the intergalactic royal family being held hostage in a luxury basement, forced to stand next to Ronaldinho and the drummer from Spandau Ballet, and talk only about massive stuff, huge things, the biggest. Through all this, Infantino has become a slightly stretched figure. Understandably so. Here is a man charged with calling an imaginary sporting world into being, out there constantly saying things that are untrue about a thing that doesn't exist to people who don't care. Three days before the big kick-off it emerged that ChatGPT had simulated the entire tournament. Paris Saint-Germain beat Bayern Munich in the final. Do we actually need to play it? And yet, of course, we do. And with a duty, not to Fifa, or to the revenues of tomorrow, but to the idea this game still belongs even in debased form to the people who care about it. It is traditional at times such as these to hammer out a tournament preview, a distillation of all that stored excitement, the cultural collisions that have led to this place, the hard-edged imponderables of elite sport, the beauty in store. Hmm, yes. About that. This will be difficult on this occasion because this thing is ersatz, a pop-up. Sport is culture, memory and connection. But this is all borrowed culture, a burger made out of Plasticine, the tournament equivalent of Qatar's desert city of Lusail, with its fake Rimini, its imitation Paris. It will be difficult because there are simply too many games, 63 of them across the next four weeks in 11 host cities, everything suitably maxed out in a country where even the act of buying a packet of crisps involves engaging with a sleeping bag full of violent toxic maize bombs, where there is a fear too many of these will be glazed, empty occasions, Warhol-ish performance pieces staged to capture a moment of perfect corporate emptiness. Next up: Ulsan HD against Mamelodi Sundowns at the Inter&Co Stadium Orlando. We'll slide down the surface of things. For all that there is a sense this must matter, because the clubs matter, that we can still ingest this thing like a sporting amphetamine, some kind of engagement generated from a standing start. There have been some odd staging decisions, but there are still epic collisions here, A-list teams in great American cities. River Plate versus Inter at the Lumen Field. Bayern and Boca Juniors at the Hard Rock. PSG and Botafogo in Los Angeles. Anything yet? A flicker of the needle? For those who don't have access to MLS there is a chance to see Messi again, here as a mobile marketing device, but also the most beautifully gifted footballer of the past 50 years. Real Madrid are genuinely interesting, the team of roving stars taking their first steps under a systems manager, crowbarred into new shapes before our eyes. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion The continuing rebuild of Manchester City is a live event. There are subplots, a Trent at Madrid arc, Simone Inzaghi squiring his new love interest, Al-Hilal, around the place with Inter also in the ballroom. João Cancelo has played for six competing clubs, so is in effect Mr Club World Cup, out there non-celebrating all his as yet nonexistent goals on the almost-biggest stage. Is it good yet? Has it hit the bloodstream? This will be harder because of the unpalatable genesis of this thing, the fact it is in the end the work of a single autocratic leader. This is, of course, the over-empowered president of Fifa, with a sense at the big kick-off that only Infantino will feel any actual sense of ownership, eyes boggling on his executive banquette, legs in the stirrups, brow heaving as he births his personal god-league and holds it slithering to his chest. It will be difficult because this entity is also deeply disruptive, a case of Fifa digging its fingers hungrily into every league and club in the world. For all the blather about inclusion, Europe has 12 teams here. Fifa is pumping most of that $1bn (£739m) prize pot into European club football, in many cases equivalent to a season's broadcast revenue. What is its mandate for doing this? Fifa is supposed to oversee and regulate, not act as an investor-disruptor, some kind of football-bro overlord. What other organisation allows this level of influence in one person, or lets its supposedly neutral leader cosy up to despots and political leaders, passing it all off, laughably, as Good for Football? So much so that the one element we know will cut Infantino to the quick is the fact Donald Trump will not be present at Saturday night's opener. Trump will instead be overseeing a huge march-past in Washington called the Grand Military Parade (a great parade, the very best parade). Gianni, I'm sorry. They always let you down in the end. By an odd coincidence it is also Trump's birthday, which does at least raise the prospect of a smudged and woozy Infantino performing his own alarmingly sensual rendition of Happy Birthday Mr President on the half-time big screen in Miami. On the day of Fifa's opener there will also be 1,500 demonstrations across the US, including in Miami, under the banner No Kings, a movement that rejects the notion of Trump as a proto-regent in his wielding of power. Does this feel familiar, as if sport is again trying to tell you something, offering a front-row seat at the circus? It even feels right that this should be happening in Florida, a place built out of tax breaks and real estate finagling, a vast sun-baked fun palace, and now the green sunken hub of the football world. Let the games begin. There is, for all the absence of pre-energy, a lot more at stake here than a Tiffany trophy.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Spurs finally have an unpredictable head coach – but Thomas Frank is efficient too
'We are finding our feet in the best league in the world. We are developing a way of playing that is a little bit more pragmatic.' Those are the words of Thomas Frank, speaking at the end of the 2022-23 season, in which his Brentford side finished ninth in the Premier League despite having by far the lowest wage bill in the top flight, at £99m. The pragmatism he spoke of had helped Brentford overachieve for a second successive season after promotion to the top flight two years earlier. There is, in general, a strong correlation between wage bill and league position, but Brentford consistently defied their financial disadvantage under Frank to become established members of the top flight, something plenty of other clubs have failed to do in recent years. When Frank led Brentford to that top-half finish, they were one point and one place behind Tottenham, who have just appointed Frank as their head coach. That was despite Spurs having a wage bill of £251m, more than two and a half times that of Brentford. If ever there were an advert for how to make the most of what you have to work with, Frank was it. And as he proudly said, pragmatism was at the heart of what he had done. Brentford had won promotion with a possession-based style, consistently dominating their opponents and playing teams off the park. They ranked in the league's top five for possession in each of Frank's two full seasons in charge in the Championship, and scored more goals than every other team in the regular season in those campaigns (80 in 2019-20 and 79 in 2020-21). But Frank recognised things would have to be different in the top flight. 'We've found a way that is difficult to play against,' he said in 2023. 'We know that if we go toe-to-toe with [the best teams], it will definitely minimise our chances to win. Now we go toe-to-toe in a different way that is a bit more defensive but, hey, you're playing against six of the best teams in the world.' It worked; in Brentford's second season in the Premier League, they won six, drew three and lost three of their 12 games against the traditional big six. Frank has shown an adaptability that Spurs' last few managers have lacked. Their recent managers have jumped between the defence-first, win-at-all-costs football of José Mourinho and Antonio Conte (as well as Nuno Espírito Santo briefly), and the adventurous, attacking and sometimes downright reckless game of Ange Postecoglou. These managers were steadfastly wedded to a way of playing, and that ended up being their downfall. Spurs failed under win-now managers in Mourinho and Conte, and had hoped to build something stronger and more sustainable with the ultra-possession-focused football of Postecoglou. Ultimately, however, his reign ended, ironically, with a Europa League triumph playing a brand of football more akin to that of his predecessors. He had adapted in Europe to do what Mourinho and Conte – and even Mauricio Pochettino and Harry Redknapp before them – could not and won a trophy, but the damage had already been done in the league. He recorded the club's worst Premier League finish (17th) and the chair, Daniel Levy, pulled the trigger. Now, Spurs are turning to someone who is happier to adapt than any of their recent managers. Frank had to be flexible at Brentford because, as he said last month, they are 'a selling club'. They have been a selling club throughout their rise up the divisions under the ownership of Matthew Benham, whose data-driven approach has been key to their success. Part of their philosophy is to cash in players when the right offer arrives. In the past six years, they have consistently sold their highest goalscorer, with Neal Maupay, Ollie Watkins and Ivan Toney moved on for big money and Bryan Mbeumo expected to depart this summer. They have also sold David Raya, Saïd Benrahma and Ezri Konsa, and have adapted every time. Maupay, Watkins, Toney and Mbeumo are different types of forward, but each has succeeded under Frank. He is a master of working with the tools at his disposal. Postecoglou's predictability at Tottenham was one of his biggest weaknesses. 'You can see what their ideas are very clearly,' an unnamed coach at another Premier League club recently told the Athletic. Under Frank, their tactics may even change from week to week. He prioritised possession at Brøndby and in the second tier with the Bees. 'I got the label in Denmark of having a tiki-taka and possession-based team,' he once said. Brentford had the sixth-lowest average possession share in the Premier League this season (47.7%), but they also showed they could dominate the ball when they wanted to, beating Ipswich with 64.6% of possession in October, for example. Frank wants his teams to play through the opposition's press if they can, but he is also happy for players to go direct to avoid playing their way into trouble in their own half. Brentford have ranked in the top five for the proportion of passes played long in each of their four seasons in the Premier League, with their rate as high as 16.6% in 2022-23. That rate dropped to 13.1% this past season after the departure of target man Toney, but was still the fifth-highest in the league. These numbers speak to that pragmatism. Brentford aren't a long-ball team; they have plenty of very capable footballers and keep the ball on the floor as much as possible. But they are also well aware of their limitations and try to play in a way that means those limitations aren't a problem. Over their time in the Premier League, they have moved further towards the style they used in the Championship as they have grown in confidence and ability. The below graphic charts how their football has developed in six full seasons under Frank. Postecoglou's Tottenham were built to play short passes – only Manchester City (6.0%) played a lower proportion of their passes long in Premier League games this past season than Spurs (7.3%) – but they showed on their Europa League run how effective they can be with a more direct approach. All of this is not to say that Frank will turn Tottenham into as direct a team as Brentford, just that he is likely to encourage his players to play balls into the channels far more than Postecoglou did. And the direct style in the Europa League run shows there is something to work with for him on this front. Despite the fact Brentford don't have much of the ball and go long more than most, they by no means sit back and soak up pressure. In fact, they ranked sixth in the Premier League this past season for high turnovers (winning the ball within 40 metres of the opposition's goalline), with 319, one fewer than Tottenham, who were one of the league's most active pressers. The difference between the teams is that, whereas Spurs pressed at almost every opportunity when playing 'Angeball' in its purest form, Brentford pick and choose their moments more wisely. Only Brighton made more pressures in the final third (2,922) than Spurs (2,908), but Brentford were way down in 14th (2,265). And yet Brentford made only one fewer high turnover than Spurs. Perhaps they are just smarter with their pressing? That could be something Spurs need given their players sustained so many injuries last season playing Postecoglou's relentlessly high-intensity game. Spurs ranked third in the Premier League for distance covered (111.5km per game) and second for off-ball runs (6,043), while Brentford were 10th and 11th respectively. With Champions League football to contend with, perhaps a less taxing style will benefit the players, though Frank has never managed a team in a full European campaign, so it remains to be seen how he fares on that front. Efficiency is the name of the game for Frank, and that could be crucial in a busy season at a club expected to take the cups seriously and facing at least eight Champions League games. Brentford were efficient at both ends of the pitch throughout Frank's reign. 'We're a big believer in making the chance bigger,' said Frank in 2022. 'It's about creating good opportunities where we increase the opportunity to score.' The numbers show they put this idea into practice extremely well. In the Premier League this past season, the average expected goals value of each Brentford shot (0.14 xG) was higher than any other team in the division. A season before, they had ranked second (0.13 xG/shot), and the season before that they were first (0.14 xG). In their four seasons in the Premier League, they make up three of the top 10 seasonal averages for xG per shot. It follows that they take most of their shots from inside the area, taking up four of the top 10 seasonal averages for proportion of shots taken within the 18-yard box. Their rate of 77.0% in 2024-25 was the highest by any team in any of the past four seasons. Creating chances close to goal was also important to Postecoglou, and Tottenham's 2024-25 season is eighth in the above list, so again this could be an area in which the players enjoy a feeling of some continuity when Frank comes in. Frank has his team work hard to keep the quality of their opponents' chances down, with only Liverpool (63.3%) and Arsenal (63.5%) facing a lower proportion of shots from inside the box in the Premier League this past season than Brentford (64.1%). Brentford also faced the lowest quality chances on average, with the lowest xG per shot conceded in the division (0.09 xG). They do concede a lot of shots, though. Only rock-bottom Southampton (681) conceded more than Brentford's 647 in the Premier League. But the fact that six sides conceded more xG (56.1) and seven teams conceded more goals (57) shows how efficient they were in defence. Much of Frank's philosophy is about extracting the maximum from any situation, and he is not ashamed of placing great emphasis on set pieces. Only Arsenal (66), Liverpool (61) and City (58) have scored more goals from set pieces over the past four Premier League seasons than Brentford (54). Frank's side lead the way for expected goals from set pieces (64.7 xG), and by a long way, with Arsenal (60.5 xG) their nearest challengers. They also have the highest xG per shot from set pieces (0.10 xG). When it comes to dead balls, Brentford boast a remarkable efficiency, part of which is down to how bold they are in such situations. In an interview with the Coaches' Voice in 2022, Frank explained how he pushes all his players into the attacking third when they have a chance to launch a long throw into the box. 'If you don't take risks, you also take risks,' he said. Spurs will hope Frank, who has brought his Brentford set-piece coach Andreas Georgson with him, can replicate his set-play success in north London. Clearly, Frank has plenty of strings to his bow. He is open to different things and willing to learn and use new techniques. He embraces data and proudly looks for efficiency at every juncture. Making a change was a big call from Daniel Levy, but Frank looks like a risk worth taking. This is an article by Opta Analyst
