logo
Nighttime curfew in LA as Trump vows to 'liberate' city

Nighttime curfew in LA as Trump vows to 'liberate' city

Khaleej Timesa day ago

A nighttime curfew was in force in Los Angeles on Tuesday as local officials sought to get a handle on protests that Donald Trump claimed were an invasion by a "foreign enemy."
Looting and vandalism has scarred the heart of America's second biggest city as largely peaceful protests over immigration arrests turned ugly after dark.
"I have declared a local emergency and issued a curfew for downtown Los Angeles to stop the vandalism, to stop the looting," Mayor Karen Bass told reporters.
One square mile (2.5 square kilometres) of the city's more-than-500 square mile area will be off-limits until 6am (1300 GMT) for everyone apart from residents, journalists and emergency services, she added.
Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels.
One protester told AFP the arrest of migrants in a city with large foreign-born and Latino populations was the root of the unrest.
"I think that obviously they're doing it for safety," she said of the curfew.
"But I don't think that part of the problem is the peaceful protests. It's whatever else is happening on the other side that is inciting violence."
Small-scale and largely peaceful protests — marred by eye-catching acts of violence — began Friday in Los Angeles as anger swelled over ramped up arrests by immigration authorities.
At their largest, a few thousand people have taken to the streets, but smaller mobs have used the cover of darkness to set fires, daub graffiti and smash windows.
Overnight Monday 23 businesses were looted, police said, adding that more than 500 people had been arrested over recent days.
Protests have also sprung up in cities around the country, including New York, Atlanta, Chicago and San Francisco.
'Provide protection'
Trump has ordered 4,000 National Guard to Los Angeles, along with 700 active-duty Marines, in what he has claimed is a necessary escalation to take back control — despite the insistence of local law enforcement that they could handle matters.
A military spokeswoman said the soldiers were expected to be on the streets later Tuesday or some time on Wednesday.
Their mission will be to guard federal facilities and to accompany "federal officers in immigration enforcement operations in order to provide protection."
Demonstrators told AFP the soldiers "should be respected" because they hadn't chosen to be in LA, but Lisa Orman blasted it as "ridiculous."
"I was here for the Dodger parade," she said referring to the LA team's World Series victory.
"It was 100 times bigger. So the idea that the Marines here, it's a big show. The president wants a big show."
The Pentagon said the deployment would cost US taxpayers $134 million.
Photographs issued by the Marine Corps showed men in combat fatigues using riot shields to practice crowd control techniques at the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach.
'Behaving like a tyrant'
Two dozen miles (40 kilometers) north, the sprawling city of Los Angeles spent the day much as it usually does: tourists thronged Hollywood Boulevard, tens of thousands of children went to school and commuter traffic choked the streets.
But at a military base in North Carolina, Trump was painting a much darker picture.
"What you're witnessing in California is a full-blown assault on peace, on public order and national sovereignty," he told troops at Fort Bragg.
"This anarchy will not stand. We will not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy."
California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat who has clashed with the president before, said Trump's shock militarization of the city was the behavior of "a tyrant, not a president."
"Sending trained warfighters onto the streets is unprecedented and threatens the very core of our democracy," he said.
In a live-streamed address, Newsom called Trump a "president who wants to be bound by no law or constitution, perpetuating a unified assault on American tradition.
"California may be first, but it clearly will not end here."
In a filing to the US District Court in Northern California, Newsom asked for an injunction preventing the use of troops for policing.
'Incredibly rare'
Trump's use of the military is an "incredibly rare" move for a US president, Rachel VanLandingham, a professor at Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles and a former US Air Force lieutenant colonel, told AFP.
US law largely prevents the use of the military as a policing force — absent the declaration of an insurrection, which Trump again mused about on Tuesday.
Trump "is trying to use emergency declarations to justify bringing in first the National Guard and then mobilising Marines," said law professor Frank Bowman of the University of Missouri.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US weekly jobless claims steady at higher levels
US weekly jobless claims steady at higher levels

Zawya

time16 minutes ago

  • Zawya

US weekly jobless claims steady at higher levels

The number of Americans filing new applications for unemployment benefits was unchanged at higher levels last week as labor market conditions continued to steadily ease. Initial claims for state unemployment benefits held steady at a seasonally adjusted 248,000 for the week ended June 7, the Labor Department said on Thursday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 240,000 claims for the latest week. Claims could remain elevated, with the school year ending this month as some states allow non-teaching staff to collect benefits during the long summer holidays. Though there have been no widespread layoffs as employers hoard workers amid economic uncertainty spawned by President Donald's aggressive tariffs, the labor market is steadily losing steam. An immigration crackdown by the White House is also slowing employment gains. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 139,000 jobs in May, down from 193,000 a year ago. A lagging measure of employment, the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), has suggested a much slower pace of job growth between April 2024 and December 2024 than reported in the survey of establishments from which the nonfarm payrolls data is compiled. Economists said this partly reflected reduced labor supply because of immigration restrictions imposed by former President Joe Biden's administration in mid-2024. The QCEW data is derived from reports by employers to the state unemployment insurance programs. Economists said the QCEW data raised the possibility that payrolls could be revised substantially down from April 2024 through May 2025. Much would, however, depend on the QCEW data for the first quarter. "All things considered, we think the 2025 benchmark revision is most likely to revise down job gains from April 2024-March 2025 by 800,000-1.125 million, with the range for August's preliminary benchmark announcement about 200,000 higher," said Jonathan Millar, a senior economist at Barclays. "This would trim monthly payroll gains over the benchmark period by about 65,000-95,000 per month relative to the current estimate of approximately 150,000 per month." The claims report showed the number of people receiving benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, increased 54,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.956 million during the week ending May 31. Recently laid off workers are struggling to find work, though the median duration of unemployment dropped to 9.5 weeks in May after surging to 10.4 weeks in April. (Reporting by Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)

US-China deal offers relief, not resolution, for global investors
US-China deal offers relief, not resolution, for global investors

Arabian Post

time2 hours ago

  • Arabian Post

US-China deal offers relief, not resolution, for global investors

The newly announced trade agreement between the United States and China offers temporary relief from economic tensions, but it does not resolve the deep strategic rift between the world's two largest economies. For investors, I believe, this is a short-term fix within a long-term rivalry, and portfolios must be positioned accordingly. President Donald Trump's statement that a deal is 'done' follows two days of talks in London. The agreement grants the US access to China's rare earth supplies—crucial for technologies such as electric vehicles, AI hardware, and clean energy infrastructure—and allows Chinese students to resume academic programs in American universities. ADVERTISEMENT These are valuable tactical steps, but they don't alter the fundamental dynamics of the relationship. Despite the optics, this is not a breakthrough. It is a limited détente that restores parts of the status quo that existed before tensions escalated in April. Core barriers remain in place, tariffs are still elevated, and export restrictions have not been meaningfully eased. Washington continues to block the transfer of advanced chips and semiconductor manufacturing equipment to Chinese firms. Beijing, in turn, retains its controls on critical mineral exports and has gained no concessions on auto trade or technology access. What's emerged is a narrow deal that skirts the real issues: national security-driven economic policy, supply chain sovereignty, and long-term technological supremacy. Neither country has deviated from its strategic course. The US is forging ahead with reshoring initiatives, stricter investment screening, and targeted industrial subsidies. China is accelerating domestic substitution, bolstering financial insulation, and pushing regional integration through its Belt and Road initiative and the expansion of the digital yuan. ADVERTISEMENT Two distinct economic systems are taking shape. One revolves around the US and its allies, the other around China and its partners. This deal doesn't halt that divergence—it simply slows the pace of public confrontation. Investors must be alert to what this means in practice. First, resist the temptation to interpret diplomatic progress as economic resolution. While this agreement may ease some bilateral friction, it leaves the overarching trajectory of decoupling untouched. Investors should not assume that sectors sensitive to geopolitical risk—especially technology, semiconductors, and energy—are any less exposed than they were a month ago. Second, increase geographical diversification. Relying heavily on one region or trade bloc is increasingly risky in a world where policy decisions are being driven by strategic alignment as much as by economic rationale. Exposure to multiple markets, not just across developed and emerging economies, but across different regulatory and geopolitical frameworks, is now a necessity, not a luxury. Third, seek companies that are actively building multi-country supply chains. Firms expanding into Southeast Asia, Mexico, and Eastern Europe are preparing for the next phase of trade fragmentation. Investors should prioritise businesses demonstrating adaptability and resilience over those optimised purely for cost efficiency. Fourth, identify sectors set to benefit from government-supported self-reliance efforts. These include domestic manufacturing, clean energy, cybersecurity, and digital infrastructure. Both the US and China are deploying substantial public capital into these areas, and investment opportunities will follow. Fifth, be cautious around industries reliant on predictable global rules. The WTO framework that governed decades of expansion in global trade is being steadily eroded. Where once investors could count on relatively open and rules-based flows of goods and services, they must now contend with shifting export controls, sanctions, and sudden regulatory interventions. Sixth, monitor the development of parallel financial systems. The coming divide may be less about products and more about money itself. Competing digital currencies, payment infrastructure, and capital controls are likely to feature more prominently. This financial bifurcation could have serious implications for cross-border investment flows, corporate funding, and monetary policy transmission. Investors should also be prepared for policy reversals. One of the defining characteristics of this era is that agreements are made with one hand and suspended with the other. Executive discretion in trade, tech, and security matters has expanded. Deals can be signed, then shelved, with minimal warning. Stability is no longer the default setting. This doesn't mean abandoning international investment. On the contrary, it means rethinking how to do it. The old model of betting on ever-deepening global integration is gone. What comes next is a world of selective engagement; one where investors must evaluate not only business models and earnings forecasts, but also geopolitical alignment and supply chain security. We're living through a reordering of the global economy. This agreement, modest as it is, fits into a broader pattern: occasional truces, punctuated by strategic divergence. Investors who adapt their approach now—diversifying intelligently, backing resilient enterprises, and anticipating future decoupling—will be in a stronger position to weather the volatility and capitalise on emerging opportunities. The US-China rivalry is not a story of one-off negotiations. It is a structural transformation with far-reaching consequences. This deal changes the tone, not the substance. For long-term investors, the challenge is to move beyond short-term noise and position for the future we are actually heading towards: one of competing economic blocs, disrupted trade flows, and heightened sensitivity to national interest. Nigel Green is deVere CEO and Founder Also published on Medium. Notice an issue? Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don't hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.

Wall Street futures slip as Middle East tensions rise; Boeing falls
Wall Street futures slip as Middle East tensions rise; Boeing falls

Zawya

time2 hours ago

  • Zawya

Wall Street futures slip as Middle East tensions rise; Boeing falls

U.S. stock index futures slipped on Thursday as signs of rising tensions in the Middle East weighed on risk sentiment and investors sought more clarity on Washington's recent trade deals with China. Shares of planemaker Boeing lost 7% premarket after an Air India aircraft with more than 200 people crashed in India's western city of Ahmedabad, and aviation tracking site Flightradar24 said the plane was a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday U.S. personnel were being moved out of the Middle East as it could be a "dangerous place", adding that the United States would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. This comes at a volatile time for the region and just days ahead of a planned sixth round of nuclear talks between Iran and the United States. A senior Iranian official said earlier on Wednesday Tehran will strike U.S. bases in the region if nuclear negotiations fail and conflict arises. China on Thursday affirmed a trade deal with the U.S., strengthening a delicate truce in the trade war that has roiled global markets for much of the year. "Now that a consensus has been reached, both sides should abide by it," Lin Jian, a foreign ministry spokesperson for China, said at a regular news conference. Traders also looked to gain more details on the trade framework discussed by officials from the U.S. and China at a two-day talk in London earlier this week. At 05:37 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 228 points, or 0.53%, S&P 500 E-minis were down 19.75 points, or 0.34%, and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were down 56.25 points, or 0.26% Tesla shares lost 1.1% and Nvidia lost about 0.7%. Among other movers, Oracle shares rose 7.6% after the cloud service provider raised its annual revenue growth forecast citing increased demand from companies deploying artificial intelligence. After a tame inflation report on Wednesday that provided investors with some reprieve, focus will now be on the May Producer Price Index data, which is due at 8:30 a.m. ET, along with initial jobless claims data. "May could be too soon to see the impact of tariffs, but softer demand may also be limiting pass through. We pencil in larger tariff effects starting later in the summer," said Citigroup strategists in a client note. With investor bets increasing on Trump reaching favorable trade agreements with several trading partners in the coming weeks, the benchmark S&P 500 index is trading 2% below its record high touched in February. The tech-heavy Nasdaq is about 2.7% from record levels hit in December. (Reporting by Kanchana Chakravarty in Bengaluru; Editing by Devika Syamnath)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store