Elon Musk has left DOGE. Was he successful in his mission?
Tech billionaire Elon Musk officially announced Wednesday that his time as a top adviser in the Trump administration has come to an end.
His departure from the Department of Government Efficiency marks the end of a bumpy chapter that included thousands of layoffs of federal employees, the shuttering of various agencies and a firestorm of challenges both in the courts and at his companies.
Musk took a leading role in the administration with promises to reduce wasteful government spending and end the 'tyranny of bureaucracy.' As he leaves his post to return focus to his business ventures, was he successful with his goals for DOGE?
Musk has been leading the department since President Donald Trump's inauguration day in January as a 'special government employee.'
A special government employee is someone within the executive branch or federal government who is appointed to serve for a period not exceeding 130 days during a period of 365 consecutive days, meaning Musk's tenure at DOGE would come to an end around this time.
Musk shared earlier this month during a Tesla earnings call that his time allocation to DOGE would 'drop significantly' as shares have fallen this year at Tesla and he shifts focus to his rocket company SpaceX.
At first, it was unknown when Musk would take a step back from his position with DOGE, but he announced Wednesday on X, the social platform he owns, that his scheduled time as a special government employee was coming to an end.
'I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending,' Musk wrote. 'The @DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government.'
Musk, the world's richest person, rose to political fame over the last year after spending at least $250 million on Trump's 2024 campaign. His influence grew after being appointed to lead DOGE and he was viewed as a key player in Republican Party politics.
However, his efforts to influence the Wisconsin Supreme Court race in April did not pan out. Musk spent at least $3 million of his own money to elect the conservative candidate, gave out $1 million checks through his America PAC and spent more through various groups, but the state elected the liberal candidate in the race, dealing a political blow to Musk.
In May, Musk said he would be spending a 'lot less' on political campaigns in the future than he did before, saying he thinks he's 'done enough.' He also criticized the Trump-backed 'big, beautiful bill.'
One of Musk's leading goals was to reduce federal spending. Musk and DOGE acted at lightning speed to enact changes across agencies and departments, leaving Congress scrambling to keep up and workers wondering if they would be cut next.
While Musk celebrated DOGE's cuts to the federal budget, critics said the savings came at a price — and watchdogs question the numbers, reasoning and logistics behind DOGE's reporting.
Musk first promised to cut spending by $2 trillion, which he later reduced to $1 trillion and then down to about $150 billion, The Associated Press reported.
As of May 26, DOGE shared it saved an estimated $175 billion through a combination of asset sales, contract and lease cancellations, fraud and improper payment deletion, programmatic changes, workforce reductions and more.
DOGE said it has saved the average taxpayer $1,086 through the cuts, its website said. However, DOGE has not said where the remaining spending cuts would come from, and a BBC analysis in April found just $61.5 billion of the total savings were itemized so far.
Despite Musk and Trump insisting the administration would cut back on Biden-era spending, a CBS News report found the government spent over $200 billion more in Trump's first 100 days compared to 2024 spending.
According to a New York Times analysis of layoffs, nearly 60,000 federal workers have been laid off. About 76,000 took DOGE's buyout offer and nearly 150,000 more are expected to be impacted by reduction plans for the federal workforce.
Some of the largest cuts come from DOGE's dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development, Voice of America, AmeriCorps, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Department of Education, the analysis found.
DOGE said on its website that it terminated nearly 500 real estate leases, totaling $216 million in savings. Nearly 50 Social Security Administration offices are expected to close within the year, even as the agency looks to require in-person identity checks in field offices for new and existing beneficiaries, with some exceptions. The changes will require people to make more trips to understaffed field offices, a new study found.
While Musk and DOGE have faced fierce pushback from Democrats in Congress and protesters across the country for the cuts, several of the department's actions have held up in court.
According to a New York Times roundup of legal dockets, there are more than two dozen open cases against Musk and DOGE's actions, over various issues including shuttering the U.S. Institute of Peace, the department gaining access to Americans' data and the American Privacy Act, mass layoffs and more.
The legal battles have already begun to play out in the courts.
Thousands of people fired by DOGE earlier this year were reinstated in February after a court order, but later decisions from the Supreme Court and an appeals court blocked the lower court ruling that would have reinstated the workers.
Some of Musk's critics are pointing to the legal battles as a reason for him leaving the administration, noting how the cases are setbacks to DOGE's efforts.
Musk's departure from the administration was largely uneventful after he shared the news online later Wednesday.
Sources familiar with the matter confirmed to Reuters that Musk's 'off-boarding' process began Wednesday evening and the tech CEO did not have a formal conversation with Trump before his announcement. Musk's departure was decided at 'a senior staff level,' Reuters reported.
Musk and Trump are expected to hold a press conference together on Friday.
The Trump administration and GOP allies insist that Musk's effort to downsize the government was effective.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed Musk's departure during Thursday's press briefing, saying the administration thanks him for his service and 'getting DOGE off of the ground.'
The department's efforts to cut 'waste, fraud and abuse will continue,' Leavitt said.
Utah Sen. Mike Lee shared several posts online praising Musk's time in the administration. Lee thanked Musk for his service and said he was 'confident' that Musk's critics will live to see him 'proven right.'
'Thank you for everything you have done, and will continue to do, for our country, Elon,' Lee said in a separate post. 'This is just the beginning.'
Musk's critics also weighed in on his step back from the administration.
Former White House ethics czar Norm Eisen dismissed the idea that Musk was retreating from DOGE because his 130-day timeline as a special government employee was up. Eisen argued that the legal battles facing Musk and DOGE were the real reason he is leaving his post.
'Give me a break, Musk is not leaving because his scheduled time is up,' Eisen shared Wednesday on BlueSky. 'The litigation held him accountable, & for that & other reasons he became politically unpopular & a liability.'
Attorney and fierce Trump critic George Conway agreed with Eisen, noting that the 130-day limit 'just happened to be the one law' Musk complied with. Conway said Musk clashed with the courts and public opinion of him dropped, saying 'good riddance.'
After posting his farewell message on Wednesday, Musk spent Thursday posting on X about his other business ventures, including Tesla, SpaceX and X's AI tool grok.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
20 minutes ago
The election of a Trump ally in Poland could alter EU and Ukraine policies
WARSAW, Poland -- Poland has elected Karol Nawrocki, a conservative historian and staunch nationalist, as its next president in a closely watched vote that signals a resurgence of right-wing populism in the heart of Europe. Nawrocki, who is set to take office on Aug. 6, is expected to shape the country's domestic and foreign policy in ways that could strain ties with Brussels while aligning the Central European nation of nearly 38 million people more closely with the administration of President Donald Trump in the United States. Here are some key takeaways: Nawrocki's victory underscores the enduring appeal of nationalist rhetoric among about half of the country along the eastern flank of NATO and the European Union, and its deep social divisions. The 42-year-old historian who had no previous political experience built his campaign on patriotic themes, traditional Catholic values, and a vow to defend Poland's sovereignty against the EU and larger European nations like Germany. His win also reflects the appeal of right-wing nationalism across Europe, where concerns about migration, national sovereignty, and cultural identity have led to surging support for parties on the right — even the far right in recent times. Far-right candidates did very well in Poland's first round of voting two weeks earlier, underlining the appeal of the nationalist and conservative views. Nawrocki picked up many of those votes. As his supporters celebrate his win, those who voted for the defeated liberal candidate, Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, worry that it will hasten the erosion of liberal democratic norms. Nawrocki's presidency presents a direct challenge to Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who returned to power in late 2023 pledging to mend relations with the EU and restore judicial independence which Brussels said was eroded by Law and Justice, the party that backed Nawrocki. But Tusk's coalition — a fragile alliance of centrists, leftists, and agrarian conservatives — has struggled to push through key promises including a civil union law for same-sex couples and a less restrictive abortion law. Nawrocki, who opposes such measures, will have the power to veto legislation, complicating Tusk's agenda and potentially triggering political gridlock. Nawrocki's election could signal a stronger relationship between Poland and the Trump administration. Poland and the U.S. are close allies, and there are 10,000 U.S. troops stationed in Poland, but Tusk and his partners in the past have been critical of Trump. Nawrocki, however, has a worldview closely aligned with Trump and his Make America Great Again ethos. Trump welcomed Nawrocki to the White House a month ago and his administration made clear in other ways that he was its preferred candidate. While Nawrocki has voiced support for Ukraine's defense against Russian aggression, he does not back Ukrainian membership in NATO and has questioned the long-term costs of aid — particularly support for refugees. His rhetoric has at times echoed that of Trump, for instance by accusing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of what he said was insufficient gratitude for Poland's assistance. With growing public fatigue over helping Ukrainian refugees, Nawrocki's approach could shift Poland's posture from strong ally to conditional partner if the war drags on much longer. The election result is a setback for the EU, which had welcomed Tusk's return in 2023 as a signal of renewed pro-European engagement. Nawrocki and the Law and Justice party have criticized what nationalists view as EU overreach into Poland's national affairs, especially regarding judicial reforms and migration policy. While the president does not control day-to-day diplomacy, Nawrocki's symbolic and veto powers could frustrate Brussels' efforts to bring Poland back into alignment with bloc standards, particularly on rule-of-law issues. Though an EU member, Poland has its own currency, the zloty, which weakened slightly on Monday morning, reflecting investor concerns over potential policy instability and renewed tensions with EU institutions. Billions of euros in EU funding has been linked to judicial reforms which Tusk's government will now be unlikely to enact without presidential cooperation.
Business Insider
21 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk said DOGE 'became the whipping boy' for all government problems
Elon Musk said the White House DOGE office was treated unfairly by its critics and became a "whipping boy for everything." Musk was speaking to CBS in an interview that aired on Sunday when he was asked about the backlash he faced over his work at the cost-cutting outfit. "It was a bit unfair because, like, DOGE became the whipping boy for everything," Musk said. "So, if there was some cut, real or imagined, everyone would blame DOGE. I've had people think that, like, somehow DOGE is gonna stop them from getting their Social Security check, which is completely untrue," he continued. The Trump administration said in March that it "will not cut Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid benefits." This clarification came after Musk called Social Security " the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time" in an episode of "The Joe Rogan Experience," which aired in February. Musk told CBS he is a "proponent of smaller government, not bigger government." President Donald Trump announced in November that Musk would co-lead DOGE with Vivek Ramaswamy. Musk became the sole leader of DOGE after Ramaswamy left the cost-cutting outfit in January. Musk served as DOGE's leader from January to May. He announced his departure from DOGE on Wednesday, concluding his 130-day stint as a special government employee. During his tenure, DOGE tried to slash government spending by shutting down foreign aid programs and laying off thousands of federal workers. The cuts sparked boycotts and protests against Tesla, Musk's EV company. The blowback Musk faced alarmed investors as well, who repeatedly told him to focus on Tesla. Last month, Musk told investors in a Tesla earnings call that he would be scaling down his involvement with DOGE to spend more time on Tesla. Musk, however, told CBS that he will still be working on DOGE, albeit on a part-time basis. "DOGE is going to continue, just as a way of life, and I will have some participation in that. But as I've said publicly, my focus has to be on the companies at this point," Musk said.
New York Times
34 minutes ago
- New York Times
Ukraine and Russia to Meet for Second Round of Talks as Attacks Escalate
A day after exchanging some of the most intense air attacks of the war, Russia and Ukraine were set to meet in Istanbul on Monday for peace talks, discussions that will be complicated by their entrenched positions and the situation on the battlefield. Russia and Ukraine are expected to formally exchange their respective conditions for a deal in the second round of negotiations since the two sides resumed direct dialogue two weeks ago. Expectations are low. Moscow and Kyiv are talking under pressure from President Trump, who has alternatively cajoled and chided both countries' leaders. But Russia and Ukraine have been holding firm, with neither expected to present conditions in the discussion that are acceptable to the other side. As negotiations sputter, the attacks on the battlefield have intensified. The Russian army appears to be launching a new offensive, advancing at the fastest pace since last fall and opening a new front in the northern Sumy region. It has also bombarded Ukrainian cities with some of the biggest drone and missile attacks of the years, including a barrage of 500 drones and decoys on Sunday. Ukraine, for its part, has adapted and evolved in the face of a much larger military with deeper resources. Ukrainian drones, in an ambitious, coordinated attack, struck air bases deep inside Russia this weekend. In recent days, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine dampened expectations for the discussions, confirming only on Sunday afternoon that a Ukrainian delegation would travel to Istanbul. 'Nevertheless, we will try to achieve at least some progress on the path to peace,' he said a few hours later. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
