First look at Volvo's 'groundbreaking' new SUV
The new Volvo EX60 will make its world debut in January 2026. It has been confirmed that the Swedish brand is planning to kick off the new year by unveiling its answer to the Audi Q6 e-tron, Porsche Macan Electric and the highly anticipated, next-generation BMW iX3.
Volvo has also shared the first official teaser image of the all-electric alternative to its faithful XC60 SUV, which reveals the new rear light signature for the EX60. Unlike seemingly every other EV being launched at the moment, there's no full-width light bar as far as we can see, but there are separate segmented tail-lights embedded in the rear windscreen as you'll find on the Volvo EX90, EX30 and ES90. Advertisement - Article continues below
The main tail-light unit is located lower down, behind the car's pronounced and surprisingly angular rear haunches, and features slim lights elements with tiny Volvo script at the side. We can also see much bigger Volvo lettering across the tailgate and smooth surfacing, similar to that on the brand's other electric cars.
The EX60's overall proportions should be similar to the current XC60, and our exclusive image gives you a better idea of what the new model will look like. We expect to see the front end use eight-bit-style Thor's-hammer LED headlights, plus flush door handles, a blanked-off grille and aerodynamic alloy wheels. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
Volvo hasn't confirmed whether the advanced LiDAR driver-assistance tech on the flagship EX90 will filter down to 'lesser' models, such as the forthcoming EX60. Chief Product and Strategy Officer, Erik Severinson did, however, tell us that the brand is experimenting with 'different kinds of [safety] sensors going forward'.
As well as being the first model to feature Volvo's new 'multi-adaptive safety belt' technology, the EX60 will also be the first built on the company's next-generation SPA3 platform. It's being described as 'groundbreaking' and 'designed for longer range, efficiency and intelligent core computing'.
Supposedly all these developments will make the EX60 'a car that evolves with you'. What exactly does that mean? All we know right now is that 'SPA3 is designed to learn and adapt over time with new features and capabilities, helping redefine what it means to engineer, own, and experience a car'. Advertisement - Article continues below
The SPA3 platform will also allow Volvo to develop and build cars of all sizes using the same technology. Being a scalable architecture, it also means the Swedes can create increased synergies and share key components across all cars built on this platform, which reduces complexity and can help bring down the cost of production.
Another advance that will set the EX60 apart from other electric Volvos will be its 'structural' battery pack. This technology has already been adopted by the likes of Tesla and BYD, and in effect it bonds the battery pack with the floor of the car. The result, Severinson told Auto Express, is 'improved energy density' and, given the extra structural rigidity, 'great driveability'.
The EX90 uses a huge 107kWh (usable) battery pack that offers a range of 374 miles on a single charge. Given the EX60's smaller size, we expect to see a slightly more compact, lighter battery fitted. The increased energy density of its structural battery pack could see range figures for the lighter car approaching the 400-mile mark, however. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
The incorporation of this new kind of technology is thanks, in part, to the EX60's megacasted rear underfloor. Unlike most cars, which have rear undercarriages constructed using a multitude of different parts, the EX60 will get a single unit that is cast out of aluminium.
We visited the factory in Gothenburg, Sweden, which will assemble the EX60's floor. Basically following the same manufacturing processes used to build 1:64-scale model cars but greatly enlarged, megacasting is a relatively new concept in the automotive sphere. Tesla is one other mainstream manufacturer currently adopting the method, along with several Chinese brands such as Nio, Zeekr and XPeng.
Volvo says the new rear floor weighs '15-20 per cent less' than a traditional stamped equivalent and that it offers 'just as good, if not better, safety and durability'.
There are other incidental benefits from the process, too, including an increased boot capacity and faster production times. A megacasted floor takes 120 seconds to build, compared with a full hour for a multi-piece stamped floor.
Plus, while Volvo's production process currently uses 20 per cent recycled aluminium, the goal is to increase this figure and fully recycle the megacasted floor at the end of the car's life.
Can't wait for the Volvo EX60's arrival? Take a look at our latest Volvo XC60 deals ...
Find a car with the experts BYD and Octopus Energy team up for 'all-inclusive' EV deal
BYD and Octopus Energy team up for 'all-inclusive' EV deal
Octopus' 'Power Pack Bundle' includes a leased BYD, a wallbox charger and charging all for less than £300 per month New Skoda Epiq baby SUV could be a Tardis on wheels
New Skoda Epiq baby SUV could be a Tardis on wheels
The new Skoda Epic will sit below the Elroq and Enyaq in the brand's ever-expanding SUV range and is set to offer plenty of space despite its compact … Car Deal of the Day: Fully loaded Vauxhall Mokka can be yours for just £175 per month
Car Deal of the Day: Fully loaded Vauxhall Mokka can be yours for just £175 per month
Our Deal of the Day for 21 June is this top-of-the-range version of Vauxhall's recently updated, style-focused small SUV
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
NATO boss praises ‘Dear Donald' for pushing alliance to boost defense spending: ‘You made this change possible'
Eight years after Donald Trump used his first appearance at a NATO leaders summit to castigate members of the alliance for 'not paying what they should be paying' for their own defense needs, the 32-member bloc is pledging to more than double their military budgeting commitments — and the American president is getting credit. Speaking at the outset of the group's annual confab at The Hague, Secretary General Mark Rutte said the alliance was poised to take 'historic, transformational decisions to make our people safer, through a stronger, fairer and more lethal NATO ' by implementing a 'concrete plan' for each member of the alliance to spend a full five percent of gross domestic product on defense, through a combination of 'core defense' and 'defense and security-related investments.' Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister who was selected as NATO's chief civil servant and diplomat last year, said the move was 'required' to make the alliance 'fairer' by ensuring that each member 'contributes their fair share for security' as he echoed a complaint voiced by Trump during his first summit in 2017, when the American leader groused that members' failure to meet a two percent defense spending threshold was 'not fair to the people and taxpayers of the United States.' 'For too long, one ally, the United States carried too much of the burden of that commitment, and that changes today,' Rutte added. The NATO leader then began praising Trump in a section of his remarks that evoked the statements of adulation that are heard at the American leader's cabinet meetings, addressing him first as 'President Trump,' then as 'dear Donald' before saying it was Trump who 'made this change possible.' 'Your leadership on this has already produced $1 trillion in extra spending from European allies since 2016 and the decisions today will produce trillions more for our common defense to make us stronger and fairer by equalizing spending between America and America's allies,' he said. He added that NATO members would also agree to 'further increase defense production' with what he described as 'a huge expansion of our defense industrial base on both sides of the Atlantic,' calling the development 'good for our security' as well as 'good for our economies and good for our jobs.' Rutte's remarks echoed a text message he'd sent to Trump the day before — which the president had captured in a screen grab he then posted to social media — in which he congratulated Trump for 'decisive action' in ordering airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend and hailed him as 'flying into another big success in The Hague' on account of the agreement for NATO members to up their defense spending to five percent of GDP. 'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done. Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' he said. When the 32 heads of state and government representing each of the allies met on Wednesday, they agreed to ratify the five percent threshold, writing in a joint declaration that each nation would commit to that minimum expenditure 'annually on core defense requirements as well as defense-and security-related spending by 2035 to ensure our individual and collective obligations.' Of that amount, 3.5 percent of each country's GDP will go to 'resource core defense requirements' with the remaining 1.5 percent allocated for 'critical infrastructure' protection as well as 'civil preparedness and resilience' and strengthening countries' defense industrial bases. Each country will be required to submit annual plans to show 'a credible, incremental path' to reaching the five percent spending threshold, the declaration said. In what appeared to be another carrot aimed at garnering the president's support, the NATO leaders also stated a commitment to 'eliminate defense trade barriers' and 'promote defense industrial cooperation' by leveraging transatlantic partnerships, as well as as an agreement to reaffirm 'enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine ' including 'direct contributions towards Ukraine's defense and its defense industry' that can be counted towards the five percent of GDP require for defense spending. The NATO leaders' agreement to step up their defense spending comes after years of pressure from Trump, including both implicit and explicit threats to the alliance's mutual defense provisions, raising fears that the American leader would either pull the United States out of the alliance entirely or simply refuse to come to another nation's aid in the event of an attack. Former officials who served in Trump's first administration have said that he expressed a desire to exit the United States from the North Atlantic Treaty, which he has long described as something akin to a mafia protection racket or a country club in which member states pay 'dues' in exchange for American military protection. During last year's presidential campaign, Trump went so far as to say that he'd 'encourage' Russia to 'do whatever the hell they want' to a NATO ally if that country were 'delinquent' on defense spending, prompting Rutte's predecessor, Jens Stoltenberg, to state that a suggestion that "allies will not defend each other undermines all of our security." His remarks on the campaign trail were part of a pattern set during his first appearance at a NATO summit in 2017, when he claimed 'many' allies owed 'massive amounts of money from past years and not paying in those past years,' which he continued as recently as Tuesday, when he refused to state whether he would commit the United States to continued support of the mutual defense provision in the NATO treaty that saw America's allies come to her aid after the September 11, 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington. Asked if he was still committed to Article Five of the North Atlantic Treaty, which states that an attack against one member is considered an attack against all of the organization's 32 member nations while en route to The Netherlands aboard Air Force One, Trump declined to say, telling reporters: 'It depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five. You know that, right?' The president added that he was nonetheless 'committed to being ... friends' with the other members of the alliance because he had 'become friends with many of those leaders' and was 'committed to helping them.' When pressed to explain his comments and given another chance to voice support for mutual defense, he told reporters he was 'committed to saving lives' and 'committed to live and safety' while promising to give his 'exact definition' of Article Five once he arrived in The Hague rather than doing so 'on the back of an airplane.' And as he sat next to Rutte during a brief media availability Wednesday morning, Trump appeared to have found more favorable feelings towards Article Five when he was asked once more about his support for the mutual aid provision. 'We're with them all the way,' he said. Asked to clarify his stance during a later bilateral meeting alongside Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof, Trump replied: 'I stand with it.' 'That's why I'm here. If I didn't stand with it, I wouldn't be here,' he said.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
EU revamps regulations for expanding space market
BRUSSELS, June 25 (Reuters) - The European Commission on Wednesday put forward the EU Space Act, a long-awaited overhaul of regulations affecting its fast-growing space industry. The legislation aims to create a single market for firms offering space services in the bloc while boosting efforts to be more competitive with the United States and other commercial space powers. It also includes measures to tackle the growing problem of congestion in space, where thousands of satellites are in orbit and 128 million pieces of debris are circulating. The European Commission said the legislation would also address threats from cyberattacks and electronic interference, and promote environmentally sustainable use of space resources. It would require satellites to be safely disposed of at the end of their operational life, mandate risk assessments and cybersecurity measures for space operators, and establish rules for measuring environmental impacts. "The 21st century will be the century of space and the century of the new frontier - new frontier: space," said EU space and defence commissioner Andrius Kubilius. "We are at the start of a space revolution. Very soon, space will become massive." The rules will apply to EU and national space assets and to non-EU operators who offer services in Europe. The proposal must be approved into law by the European Parliament and the EU Council.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Living standards ‘not likely to improve for at least five years'
UK households face a "bleak" living standards outlook for the remainder of the 2020s, with a leading think tank warning that many could end the decade no better off than they began it. The Resolution Foundation has painted a stark picture, suggesting the current "bust, boom and bleak outlook" could see the 2020s become "the first decade of the modern era to witness no improvement in disposable incomes across Britain." The grim forecast suggests that the tough start to the decade, marked by economic volatility, risks leaving typical households in a stagnant financial position. In its "central scenario," the think tank projects that the typical annual real income of non-pensioners is set to grow "only slightly" over the five years after 2024-25, amounting to just 1 per cent overall, or a cash increase of around £300 in total. The immediate future appears particularly challenging. The Living Standards Outlook 2025 report, funded by Nationwide Building Society, states: "Our outlook for 2025-26 specifically remains poor with income flat (0 per cent growth)." This stagnation is attributed to a combination of factors, including frozen tax thresholds and rising council tax, which are "cancelling out real pre-tax earnings growth for many, even before accounting for water, rent and mortgage rises." The report continued: 'Taking into account the cost-of-living crisis, the typical income in 2029-30 would remain essentially unchanged (0 per cent growth) compared to 2019-20. 'This would clearly make the 2020s the worst decade out of the past six for living standards growth.' The outlook for the lower-income half of the non-pensioner population is worse in the years ahead, according to the projection. The foundation said the average real incomes of this group could be 1 per cent (£200) lower in 2029-30 than in 2024-25. Within the weak outlook overall, some parts of the population are expected to fare better, the report said. The typical pensioner income is projected to rise by 5 per cent between 2024-25 and 2029-30, with a £1,500 increase. Housing tenure also plays a key role in determining the outlook, according to the research, with mortgage holders set to see income falls as they come off fixed-rate deals, while outright homeowners are expected to see a boost to their living standards. The projection for weak income growth over the second half of the decade follows a 'rollercoaster' first half, in which living standards were rocked by Covid-19 and the cost-of-living crisis, according to the foundation, which is focused on improving living standards for households on low to middle incomes. It said there was a 'mini living standards boom' as incomes grew by 4 per cent (£1,300) in 2024-25. The foundation also said that the economic outlook could improve, with policies potentially offering a 'helping hand' to lift living standards for poorer households. Adam Corlett, principal economist at the Resolution Foundation said: 'The living standards story of the decade so far has been bust and boom, with Covid-19 and a cost-of-living crisis followed by a much-needed recovery last year. But the rest of the decade looks bleak, with typical household incomes set to grow by just 1 per cent over the next five years. 'There are winners and losers within this weak outlook, with pensioner incomes set to grow by a healthy 5 per cent over the rest of the decade, while the poorest half of the population are set to see their incomes fall. 'But a stronger economy and the right policy interventions can brighten this outlook. Maintaining strong wage growth and returning to pre-pandemic employment levels would make middle-income Britain far better off, while ending the two-child limit can lift living standards for poorer families.'
