logo
Britain's ‘trendiest' beach town is set for biggest transformation in a DECADE as fresh plans unveiled

Britain's ‘trendiest' beach town is set for biggest transformation in a DECADE as fresh plans unveiled

The Sun3 days ago

NEW plans have been revealed for a seaside development project - months after the council blocked proposals.
The seaside town was named Time Out's top place to visit in the UK in 2025, as stats suggest it is one of the world's most 'up and coming' beach destinations.
3
3
3
Folkestone harbour and seafront could undergo a significant transformation if development plans are approved.
While Sir Roger De Haan's Folkestone Harbour and Seafront Development Company has already made significant changes to the area - they are still awaiting approval for the eastern section of the seafront.
The company previously submitted development plans in January which were narrowly refused.
Councillors voted 5-4 to reject the application, expressing concerns about the design, heritage impacts and housing affordability.
Public response was less favourable, with 96% of comments on the council's planning portal objecting to the proposals.
After making revisions to the plans that address the councillors' concerns, FHSDC is hoping the new proposal will be approved at a planning committee meeting on June 17.
One of the most drastic changes between the proposals is a 50 per cent increase in public parking provisions.
The increase correlates to 323 proposed public spaces, up from 215 in the original proposal - as well as a car club that should reduce pressure on residential parking.
They have also made alterations for the proposed plan to build 410 homes and 54 commercial units.
This will include 53 affordable homes, intended for shared ownership in order to meet affordability needs - as the original proposal faced backlash for failing to address local social issues.
The up-and-coming English seaside town with cheap booze and huge beaches
The new proposal includes more three-bedroom homes, as well as moving one of the proposed buildings away from the harbour station to "better respect" its historic setting.
84 beachfront properties have already been built, with prices ranging from £430,000 to £2.1 million.
FHSDC released a statement clarifying the restrictions they faced under the council's Local Plan.
The statement from FHSDC reads: 'The original permission dictated, for example, the maximum and minimum height of the buildings, and a maximum and minimum number of homes we can build, and these cannot be changed through a Reserved Matters Application.
'Any revised plans must remain within these, and other, parameters.'
Local residents had previously expressed concern about the project's design, as well as the lack of affordable housing.
One particularly outspoken resident, Georgina Baker, campaigned against the development as she believed it was "not the right development for the harbour" and that the "community deserves more."
However, FHSDC consultants believe the development would do more good for the area, with an emphasis on social benefit.
The proposal includes a new Section 106 agreement to contribute £5.19 million to local services including children's play areas, GPs, schools, social care, libraries and youth services.
This is in addition to the amount promised in the original proposal, bringing the total contribution to £8.72 million.
It is estimated that the development could generate 760 long-term jobs, boost the local economy by £21 million each year, and generate £148 million during construction.
With the luxury accommodation expected to attract wealthy residents, it is estimated to bring £9.4 million in annual spending, with almost £1 million in further tax revenue.
FHSDC told Kent Online that they hoped to correct the misinformation about the historic buildings on the development site.
A spokesperson said: "Ten years ago, the original outline planning permission provided for the demolition of the station, Customs House and Signal Box.
"At the time, these buildings were dangerous and inaccessible to the public.
"Sir Roger De Haan decided to restore and retain the station rather than demolish it and to prioritise its place in the development."
In addition to the residential properties, the development would create 7,489 square metres of commercial space used for leisure facilities, restaurants, bars and retail outlets.
The upcoming planning meeting will decide the fate of the remaining section of the project.
It comes as other areas of Folkestone are undergoing their own redevelopment.
A £20 million revamp is set to turn the bus station into a central park - complete with a plaza area, fountains and surrounding gardens.
The town's Lower Leas funicular is also undergoing a £6.6 million restoration - with the hopes it will be reopened by early 2026 after it closed nearly 10 years ago.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tottenham sue Ineos over termination of sponsorship deal
Tottenham sue Ineos over termination of sponsorship deal

The Independent

time9 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Tottenham sue Ineos over termination of sponsorship deal

Tottenham Hotspur have filed High Court proceedings against Manchester United co-owner Jim Ratcliffe 's company Ineos over a terminated sponsorship agreement. Court records show Spurs filed a commercial claim at the High Court against Ineos Automotive on Thursday, though no documents are available. Chemicals firm Ineos agreed a five-year deal with Spurs in 2022 - before Ratcliffe bought a stake in United - for Ineos Grenadier to become the London team's official 4x4 vehicle partner. Ineos said in a statement: "Ineos Automotive has been a partner of Tottenham Hotspur since 2022, expanding on a partnership agreement that Ineos Group had in place with the club since 2020. "We have a contractual right to terminate our partnership contract and in December 2024 exercised that right." Spurs declined to comment. In March it was announced Ineos had reached a settlement with New Zealand Rugby in relation to a sponsorship deal. The previous month, NZR had said it had launched legal proceedings against Ineos after alleging that the first instalment of 2025 sponsorship money due under a six-year agreement struck in 2021 had not been paid. Significant changes have been made at Manchester United since Ratcliffe bought a minority stake in December 2023, including the loss of hundreds of staff and increased ticket prices at Old Trafford.

The 100-year saga of one man's attempt to pay off the national debt
The 100-year saga of one man's attempt to pay off the national debt

Telegraph

time35 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The 100-year saga of one man's attempt to pay off the national debt

Gaspard Farrer may be just a footnote in history, but he will be remembered fondly by Rachel Reeves. A £585m fortune held by the wealthy banker, who died aged 85 almost 100 years ago, has finally been donated to the public purse after a seven-year legal battle. Mr Farrer, a former partner at the now-defunct Barings Bank, is thought to have left £500,000 in 1927 as a gift to the nation in response to the UK's huge national debt after the First World War. But rules stipulated that the so-called National Fund, established in 1927, could only be made available when it was enough to pay off the national debt in full. It means that for years, the fortune has been locked away from successive governments. However, a 2022 High Court ruling ordered the funds to be released – a decision upheld after the fund's trustees lodged an appeal. They were finally paid to the Debt Management Office (DMO) in the financial year ending in April, according to a Freedom of Information request seen by The Telegraph. The DMO offers a little-known scheme that allows taxpayers to voluntarily contribute to paying off the national debt. Last year, donations reached a record £585,112,933 – almost entirely due to the payment of the 1927 National Fund. It was one of 16 donations – three of which were left in wills and 13 were one-off payments. In the nine years prior, just £175,000 per year on average has been donated to the scheme. The legal wrangling for Mr Farrer's money began under Theresa May's government which successfully used a niche legal argument to prise open the savings pot. The bid to tap into the pot used cy-près jurisdiction – meaning 'as near as possible' – which is applied primarily to charitable trusts whose original purpose became impossible to fulfil. The funds were being looked after by Zedra Fiduciary Services who acted as the defendant in the case. The Telegraph contacted representatives for Zedra for comment. The cash is now on the Exchequer's balance sheet, but will make just a 0.02pc dent in Britain's £2.7 trillion national debt, which has grown to the same size as the entire economy. The funds were originally set aside as a £500,000 investment in assets, including gilts, by a donor who remained anonymous for decades. After the government of the day lodged its legal bid to obtain the money in 2018, Mr Farrer's identity was at last revealed. The fund quietly grew in value for years until its transfer to the Treasury was revealed in a request made to the DMO by accountancy firm RSM. The documents confirmed it had received Mr Farrer's fortune. Chris Etherington, partner at RSM, said: 'It is generosity of a level that the Chancellor could not have expected. It could provide some inspiration as to how additional revenues could be generated for the Exchequer.' 'No prospect of the fund ever paying off national debt' When Mr Farrer's donation was first made, Sir Winston Churchill said the money was 'inspired by clear-sighted patriotism and makes a practical contribution towards the ultimate – though yet distant – extinction of the public debt.' But doubts have grown over the years that the money would ever actually fulfil its original purpose. John Glenn, a former culture minister, said in response to a parliamentary question in 2018 that 'there is no realistic prospect of the fund ever amounting to a sum sufficient to pay off the whole of the national debt'. Mr Farrer's donation was held in the form of a charitable trust and was on paper one of the most well-endowed of its kind in the country. John Picton, a reader in law at the University of Manchester, said using the fund to pay off national debt would be a 'missed opportunity' to donate to more worthy causes. He added: 'It's a missed opportunity because the fund could have been kept in charity. I think it's unimaginative, personally.' Mr Picton suggested the money could go towards a charitable fund for the Armed Forces, or to support the work of the country's museums and art galleries. He said: 'In Gaspard Farrer's time, the national debt was associated with war debt and paying it off had a patriotic motivation and that's long lost.' 'But now the national debt, rather than having patriotic sentiments attached to it, is just a large number we all live with and grows throughout time. It's unthinkable now that people would want to voluntarily pay to reduce it.' Mr Farrer's only other surviving legacy is his 11,438 square foot mansion in Kent. He commissioned the legendary architect Sir Edwin Lutyens to design the property, which was built in 1911. The eight bedroom house was recently placed on the market for £3.5m.

Did late-season slide hinder Forest's recruitment?
Did late-season slide hinder Forest's recruitment?

BBC News

time38 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Did late-season slide hinder Forest's recruitment?

When I look at Nottingham Forest and the market that they were in at the beginning of this past season compared with the market they are potentially in now, I still think it would be the same whether they had qualified for the Champions League, Europa League or Conference they got into Europe's top-tier competition, I don't think they would have been able to attract anyone more high you could say it has hindered them as they may have to sell more high-profile players to fund signings, but from the perspective of players in the market, I don't think it is massively I think about player attraction, I feel, for example, if Newcastle ended up in the Europa League instead of the Champions League, they would have probably been able to draw a higher-profile player than Forest could have done if they had got in the Champions with Chelsea, if they didn't get that Champions League place, they still would have been able to draw a higher-profile player than Forest just because of the club and how much time has been spent in those European spots in recent the attraction would have been there of Champions League football, but I don't believe the market would be any different to what they would have looked at had they finished first to Williams was speaking to BBC Sport's Nicola Pearson

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store