Xpeng plays it smart in going beyond electrification
Xpeng plays it smart in going beyond electrification
Xpeng's concept flying car is the star attraction at Ocean Terminal in Tsim Sha Tsui. Photo: Reuters
At the Ocean Terminal in Tsim Sha Tsui, well-dressed social media influencers swarmed a lineup of sleek electric vehicles from Chinese automaker Xpeng, among the buzziest brands in the world's premier EV market.
Xpeng had come to the cruise-ship terminal ahead of this week's Shanghai auto show to unveil its upscale X9 minivan priced from 359,800 yuan with automated-driving features, a drop-down screen to entertain rear-seat passengers – and even a built-in refrigerator.
The biggest crowds surrounded Xpeng's concept flying car, which sat alongside a six-wheeled van designed to carry it.
Xpeng chief executive He Xiaopeng and president Brian Gu bristled with ambition, predicting the company would emerge as one of few survivors from China's hypercompetitive EV industry by expanding globally and building in-house artificial-intelligence capabilities. Like Tesla, it aims to develop robotaxis and humanoid robots.
Unlike Tesla, Xpeng has yet to turn a profit, despite fast-growing sales since its first car debuted in 2018 and an investment from Volkswagen.
The same is true of scores of other China EV makers, even as the sector leads a technological revolution that is upending the automotive industry globally.
Only a handful make money, most notably BYD , China's biggest EV-and-hybrid producer and Tesla's leading rival.
The burning question facing China's EV industry as it gathers in Shanghai is how and when it can convert explosive sales of ground-breaking vehicles into sustainable profits. The intense competition driving the sector's innovation has also made China a market with precious few winners, foreign or domestic.
Gu takes a clear-eyed view of the challenge.
"In the past two decades, we can see that only a few companies are performing well," he said. "I'm very concerned about Chinese automakers … I think in the end, only 10 will survive."
Xpeng is among the Chinese EV startups best positioned to thrive as the industry moves from the "electrification" era to "smartification" – competing on self-driving and other AI-driven technology, said Bo Yu, a China-market expert at research firm Jato Dynamics.
"They're not profitable because they've invested in a lot of new things, but their profitability is improving," she said of Xpeng.
"They've started in-house development of AI and self-driving, and the flying car isn't just a show – they really believe in it."
Jato Dynamics data show that 169 domestic and foreign auto brands are fighting it out in China, but only 14 have a market share higher than 2 percent. Last year, 86 brands produced a total of 327 EV models, not including hybrids.
The competition has depressed prices to levels unfathomable outside China. As Tesla and other automakers struggle to produce EVs to sell for less than US$30,000 in the United States, BYD's entry-level Seagull electric hatchback – the star of the 2023 Shanghai auto show – is priced below US$10,000.
Xpeng founder He said his company would have to balance chasing technological breakthroughs with cost control – and "globalisation" to seek profits outside China.
Xpeng entered 30 new markets in 2024 and aims to enter another 30 countries this year. It aims to eventually sell half its vehicles outside China, where it will have more "pricing power," the CEO said.
Gu said Xpeng's "core regions" for expansion will be Europe, Southeast Asia, Middle East and Latin America. Conspicuously absent from that list is the United States, where President Donald Trump is escalating a long-running trade war with Beijing that has effectively banned Chinese cars and components.
Such protectionism could backfire on US automakers, said Cameron Johnson, a Shanghai-based supply-chain consultant with Tidalwave Solutions.
"Chinese firms have the best automotive connected technology in the world, and foreign firms need it to be competitive around the world, especially as Chinese brands go global," he said.
Gu said the industry revolution requires automakers to become tech companies themselves rather than relying on suppliers. Xpeng announced last week that it would soon equip its vehicles with its own AI chips.
"You have to possess capabilities in AI, in software, in technology and in manufacturing,' Gu said. 'The players that can possess this full-stack capability will have a greater chance of survival.'
Xpeng focuses on the higher-end segment and has seen accelerating sales, which last year totalled about 190,000 vehicles. The automaker said it remained committed to its goal of turning a profit this year. (Reuters)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
US-China trade showdown: where do the talks stand after Day 1?
Top officials from China and the United States are expected to start a second day of negotiations in London on Tuesday morning local time, as the two sides strive to de-escalate a stand-off over trade and technology that has sent shock waves across the global economy. No official statements were released after the first round of talks on Monday, which finished without a deal being agreed. But both sides have sent signals regarding their expectations. US Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told CNBC that 'immediately after the handshake, any export controls from the US will be eased, and the rare earths will be released in volume, and then we can go back to negotiating smaller matters'. According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, citing people familiar with the matter, US President Donald Trump authorised the American delegation to negotiate away recent restrictions on the sale of advanced technologies and other products to China ahead of the London talks. The recent US export controls cover jet engines and related parts, though these were never publicly announced by Washington; design software Chinese companies need to make advanced microchips; and ethane, a component of natural gas that is used to manufacture plastics, the report said. China
Asia Times
an hour ago
- Asia Times
US-China: what's really at stake in London
A high-stakes showdown is unfolding this week in London—far from the manufacturing plants of Shenzhen or the trading floors of Wall Street, yet central to the global economic order. Senior US and Chinese officials will hold a second day of talks today (Tuesday) aimed at de-escalating the most consequential economic rivalry of our time. After Monday's first day of talks, US President Donald Trump said, 'We are doing well with China. China's not easy…I'm only getting good reports.' China is negotiating for looser US tech controls while the US wants China to ease limits on rare earth mineral exports. But for investors watching from Singapore to Silicon Valley, these meetings aren't just about tariffs. They're about who writes the rules of the 21st-century global economy. Both sides are seeking to revive the Geneva framework established last month—an agreement that temporarily eased a volatile tariff standoff by rolling back US import duties on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, and slashing Chinese tariffs from 125% to 10%. The compromise was a ceasefire, not a peace treaty. Since then, fiery accusations of non-compliance have resumed. Washington says Beijing is dragging its feet on critical mineral exports. Beijing accuses the US of doubling down on tech restrictions, particularly on semiconductors and AI. The talks in London are significant because the stakes have never been higher. China and the US are no longer just competing powers—they are operating two fundamentally divergent systems, each trying to shape the global economic architecture in its own image. This is a full-spectrum competition that spans data flows, digital currencies, energy policy, national security, and ideology. Investors ignore this at their peril. To understand the gravity of this week's negotiations, you have to look beyond the tariff tables and see the wider trajectory. Under Trump, the US is doubling down on strategic protectionism. The re-imposition of sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April was not an isolated action—it was the next phase in a broader effort to reshape American economic exposure. China, under President Xi Jinping, is responding in kind by accelerating self-reliance campaigns, boosting its military-industrial complex and tightening control over capital flows and foreign technology. The two economic giants are hurtling toward a split system of parallel supply chains, competing standards, rival digital currencies and mutually exclusive rules for artificial intelligence. The old model—interdependence through globalization—is unraveling in real time. From a market perspective, this fracturing introduces volatility but also extraordinary opportunity. Strategic sectors are being rapidly repriced. Defense tech, AI, cybersecurity, semiconductor manufacturing and rare earths have all emerged as proxies in this economic power contest. Recent capital flows tell the story: US and European investors are ramping up exposure to domestic chip production, while China is injecting vast state funding into its own tech champions and weaponizing industrial policy. Just last week, China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced a new 500 billion yuan (US$69 billion) investment initiative focused on dual-use technologies—those with both civilian and military applications. Simultaneously, the US Commerce Department expanded its export restrictions to cover quantum computing components and AI training data sets. The message from both sides is unmistakable: dominance in tomorrow's tech is national security today. The London talks, then, a theater where the future is being negotiated—or not. With US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer facing off against China's Vice Premier He Lifeng, these are the most senior discussions since the Geneva reset. Both capitals know what's at stake, and neither wants to look like it's blinking. Investors are caught in a strange double bind: exposed to the risks of fragmentation, but positioned to benefit from the rush to secure the commanding heights of the future economy. That's why the London talks are being watched as closely in corporate boardrooms as in diplomatic circles. If the talks succeed in holding the Geneva line, it could stabilize sentiment and breathe life into cross-border dealmaking that's been paralyzed by policy uncertainty. If they fail—and signs point to fundamental misalignments in trust and expectation—then the decoupling will accelerate. Supply chains shift faster, capital reallocates at scale and inflation risks in key inputs like semiconductors and rare earths will spike again. Investors will need to think in terms of dual portfolios: one optimized for the Western bloc, the other for the Chinese sphere of influence. However, there is another, deeper implication that should not be overlooked. The current rivalry is not just about GDP or tech leadership; it's about two economic visions vying for legitimacy. One is anchored in democratic capitalism, now reasserting control over trade and industrial policy after decades of liberalization. The other is a centralized, state-driven model that promises order, speed and resilience. This isn't the Cold War redux, it's something newer, more fluid—and potentially longer-lasting. That's why framing these talks purely as tariff negotiations misses the point. This is about system design and every conversation about chips, data or critical minerals is, in reality, a conversation about who gets to define economic power in the coming decades. Some investors have already begun adjusting to this reality. Sovereign wealth funds are shifting long-term allocations away from passive indices and toward strategic sectors. Venture capital is increasingly split along ideological lines. Private equity is retreating from cross-border deals in politically sensitive industries. The smart capital knows this is the macro megatrend. What London offers this week is a readout not just of policy positions but of political will. Are the world's two largest economies capable of coexisting with guardrails, or are we headed toward a fully bipolar economic order? Markets have always priced in risk. But this is something more fundamental. This is about pricing in rival worldviews. And the London talks are where the next chapter begins.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong medical device maker to build China plant as US, EU raise trade barriers
Vincent Medical Holdings, a Hong Kong-based medical device maker, has doubled down on manufacturing in China by investing in automation and digitalisation, instead of moving operations abroad amid rising trade barriers in the US and Europe. The maker of disposable radiology products and respiratory devices is building a factory in Kaiping in the western part of the Greater Bay Area, CEO Raymond Choi Cheung-tai said in an interview. Trial operations could start before the end of the year, he added. 'We are transforming into a new business model that will give us the flexibility to set up operations in multiple markets to get around the trade barriers,' said Choi, an industrial engineer by training. 'Our new factory will be nearly fully automated, except for some equipment that requires maintenance by technicians.' The firm has a plant in Dongguan in the southern province of Guangdong, which produces 70 million imaging and respiratory consumables and 100,000 hospital electronic respiratory devices annually. The first phase of the new facility was expected to cost HK$200 million (US$25.5 million), it said. Dongguan is one of the nine cities in the province, which together with Hong Kong and Macau, make up the Greater Bay Area - Beijing's vision for a manufacturing and technology powerhouse to drive the nation's economy. Choi joined Vincent Medical in 2020. He is the son of founder and chairman Choi Man-sing, who controls about 60 per cent of the firm. Sales of disposable imaging products grew 38 per cent to HK$393 million last year, or 49 per cent of the group's revenue. The US and Europe contributed almost 40 per cent each to its sales.
